logo
Isle of Man Airport find was '1940s phosphorus device', police say

Isle of Man Airport find was '1940s phosphorus device', police say

BBC News5 hours ago

Suspicious items found near Isle of Man Airport last week are suspected to be a "type of phosphorus device left undiscovered for many decades", police said.The buried items, estimated to go back to the 1940s, were found on Derbyhaven Road, on the perimeter of the airfield, by drainage work contractors on Friday.A specialist team from the UK attended the next day and the chemical device was safely disposed of in a "controlled manner", the force added.Residents were evacuated and the road was closed as there were initial concerns the items posed a threat to the public but flights were not affected.
The contractors were working on behalf of the Department of Infrastructure.Two of the contractors who had close exposure to the items attended Noble's Hospital for check-ups "as a precaution", and were subsequently discharged the same day.The Fire and Rescue Service, Ambulance Service, the Isle of Man Constabulary, Emergency Planning, Health and Safety officers, airport executives and Civil Defence attended the incident. "Further investigations" with the contractors, the Department of Infrastructure and Health and Safety officers would now take place, police said.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Give public a say on prison sentences, says Reform UK
Give public a say on prison sentences, says Reform UK

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Give public a say on prison sentences, says Reform UK

The deputy leader of Reform UK has proposed a new law that would allow members of the public a say when they think criminal sentences are either too harsh or too Richard Tice said he wanted a system where if 500 members of the public said they disagreed with a sentence in a petition to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), it would have to decide whether to refer the decision to a said it would add a further safeguard on sentences and that would give the public more confidence in the justice system.A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said they were not actively considering Tice's proposals. Tice told MPs that "even noble, experienced, wise judges can get things wrong", but that "maybe the public would have ever more confidence in a vibrant democracy, in our justice system, if it was like a system of treble check safeguard of the sentences, without being able to impinge on the original judgement that was following a case."He said it would give people more confidence in the "fairness and the comparative appropriateness of sentences within our system".An MoJ spokesperson declined to formally comment but said that under existing laws, a defendant can refer their conviction to the Court of Appeal if they believe their sentence to be unduly harsh or can refer a case they believe to be unduly lenient to the attorney general, the spokesperson proposed the bill in the wake of the case of Lucy Connolly, and referenced her in his speech in the House of to Connolly's case, he said someone sending a post on social media could be given a sentence "that might be significantly more than the sentence given to a shoplifter, a robber, a mugger, a drug dealer".Connolly was jailed for 31 months in October after admitting inciting racial hatred. She posted on on X calling for "mass deportation now", adding "set fire to all the... hotels [housing asylum seekers]... for all I care".Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times, before she deleted it three and a half hours May, she lost an appeal against her sentence. Tice has previously said Connolly should be freed and that her imprisonment was an example of "two tier justice".The CCRC, the body Tice proposes would assess any sentences a public petition has flagged, has faced criticism after a series of independent, arms-length body looks into potential miscarriages of justice in England, Wales and Northern Vera Baird KC, the new interim chair of the CCRC, told the BBC earlier this month the commission was "incapable of learning from their mistakes" and she wanted to "root out" the culture causing predecessor quit in January after an independent report concluded the CCRC had mishandled the case of Andrew Malkinson and had failed to complete basic work that could have cast doubt on his was wrongly imprisoned for rape in 2004. He was freed in 2023 when a judge declared his conviction unsafe when new DNA evidence on the victim's clothing was found to match another will debate the use of prison as a penalty for non-violent offences arising from social media posts after a Parliamentary petition created by ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe passed the 100,000 signatures threshold.

Tice calls for justice watchdog to act when petitioners say sentences too harsh
Tice calls for justice watchdog to act when petitioners say sentences too harsh

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tice calls for justice watchdog to act when petitioners say sentences too harsh

The miscarriage of justice watchdog should get new powers to review sentences, where petitioners fear they are too harsh or too soft, Richard Tice has said. The Reform UK deputy leader successfully introduced his Criminal Cases Review (Public Petition) Bill to the Commons on Wednesday, which he named 'Lucy's Bill', after the jailed social media user Lucy Connolly. Mr Tice suggested that where at least 500 people sign a petition asking for a sentence to be made tougher or more lenient, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) should look at judges' decision-making. The CCRC, which is already set up to review alleged miscarriages of justices, could then use its existing powers to refer cases to the appeal courts. 'Confidence in our judicial system and the sentences that are handed out is absolutely vital,' Mr Tice told MPs. 'I believe that the public, they want to trust our system but justice works when it is natural and fair and decent and the public believe that sentences are appropriate. 'If we lose that, then potentially we lose everything.' Mr Tice warned that 'even noble, experienced, wise judges can get things wrong' and added the draft legislation he had proposed was 'known outside this House as Lucy's Bill'. The Reform UK deputy leader has previously claimed Connolly was 'actually being treated as a political prisoner for political purposes', after he visited her at HMP Peterborough on Tuesday. Connolly is partway through her 31-month sentence for inciting racial hatred, after she posted on X following the Southport murders last year: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' A bid to alter her sentence was dismissed at the Court of Appeal last month. Mr Tice urged MPs to join him in a 'journey of imagination to a distant, respected democracy, where there is an elected leader of this democracy, where there is an independent judiciary, respected, where there is a respected legal system and, where there historically has been confidence amongst the people of this democracy for this judicial and legal system'. He continued: 'But then imagine that a bad event occurs and the elected leader of that distant democracy effectively instructs the judiciary to impose the harshest of possible sentences on potential transgressors, the consequence of which is that – imagine, someone in a fit of anger puts out an offensive, inappropriate, bad tweet for a few hours, calms down, apologises, and withdraws that online information and tweet. 'But is then, because of that tweet, is then charged and sentenced in a very serious way – potentially a sentence of some 31 months that might be significantly more than the sentence given to a shoplifter, a robber, a mugger, a drug dealer and the like. 'And the thing about the confidence in a legal system is the comparativeness of sentences.' Mr Tice said the convict in his story – a reference to Connolly – was 'allegedly the recipient of some violent maltreatment in prison', and added when he finished: 'This is the United Kingdom, and in the last few months, this has occurred.' He said: 'Maybe the public would have evermore confidence in a vibrant democracy, in our justice system, if it was like a system of a treble-check, safeguard of the sentences, so that without being able to impinge on the original judgment that is following a case. 'But that actually, let's say that 500 members of the public, if they signed a petition to ask the CCRC to reconsider the sentence, and if they felt within eight weeks that that sentence may be too lenient or too harsh, that they could then refer it through an appropriate court. 'I think that would give an extra level of trust and confidence in the fairness and the comparative appropriateness of sentences within our system.' Mr Tice's Bill will be listed for its second reading debate on July 11.

Sword attacker guilty of killing schoolboy and injuring five people in rampage
Sword attacker guilty of killing schoolboy and injuring five people in rampage

The Independent

time41 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Sword attacker guilty of killing schoolboy and injuring five people in rampage

A sword attacker has been found guilty of virtually decapitating a schoolboy and injuring five more people during a rampage he compared to The Hunger Games. Marcus Arduini Monzo, 37, had gone into a cannabis-induced psychosis when he killed 14-year-old Daniel Anjorin with a samurai sword, the Old Bailey heard. Witnesses described the former Amazon delivery driver screaming 'in delight' and smiling after mortally wounding Daniel, who had been walking to school in his PE kit. Prosecutor Tom Little KC told jurors it was 'miraculous' that more people weren't killed as Monzo slashed and chopped at whoever he came across over 20 minutes. Monzo had killed and skinned his pet cat Wizard before he ran amok in Hainault, north-east London, on April 30 last year. As well as killing Daniel, Monzo, who had a blue belt in Brazilian jiu jitsu, also attacked a pedestrian, two police officers and a couple in their own home before he was arrested by police. Afterwards, Monzo likened events to the Hollywood film The Hunger Games and claimed to have an alternative persona of a 'professional assassin'. Giving evidence at his trial, he said he had no memory of what happened and claimed his mental state had diminished his responsibility for the crimes. However, the prosecution argued that psychosis brought on by self-induced intoxication was no defence for murder. Even though Monzo admitted he had drunk a hallucinogenic tea called ayahuasca, no trace of DMT – the class A drug in the brew – was detected in his system. The court also heard how Monzo had made 'stabbing motions' re-enacting the violence when he chatted about 'killing films' with a member of staff at Broadmoor secure psychiatric hospital. An Old Bailey jury found Monzo guilty of Daniel's murder, three charges of attempted murder, aggravated burglary and possession of a bladed article relating to a kitchen knife. He was cleared of one count of attempted murder in relation to the victim Henry De Los Rios Polania but found guilty of the lesser offence of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. Monzo, who showed no emotion as the verdicts were read out, previously admitted having the samurai sword used to kill Daniel and a katana sword found in his van. Daniel's parents had sat in court throughout the trial when harrowing CCTV and police body worn video had been played. The court had heard how Monzo launched the series of attacks by driving his grey Ford Transit van into Donato Iwule, who was 'catapulted' into a nearby garden before the vehicle smashed into a concrete pillar and fence. He went on to hit Mr Iwule in the neck with his sword before running away, the court was told. He then virtually decapitated Daniel, who was wearing headphones on his way to school, jurors heard. Witness Maria Olmos said Monzo dropped to his knees and held his hands up after mortally wounding the schoolboy. She said: 'At the time of doing so he let out an extremely loud scream. It wasn't a scream of pain, it was a scream of delight – my interpretation was he was celebrating.' Pc Yasmin Mechem-Whitfield was hit three times with the 60cm long blade with 'extreme force' as she chased Monzo through alleyways and residential properties. Next he entered a property and attacked a couple who were sleeping in an upstairs bedroom with their young daughter nearby. Monzo demanded to know if they 'believe in God' before he left the property. Inspector Moloy Campbell tried to detain Monzo in a car park and received a slash wound to his hand. The defendant then climbed on to the roof of a garage before he was finally apprehended. Following his arrest, Monzo claimed his personality had switched and that 'something happened, like a game happening'. In his evidence, Monzo described being bullied growing up in Brazil before his family moved to Britain in 2013. He practised mixed martial arts (MMA) until an injury in 2016 led him to explore yoga and the 'magical, miraculous and supernatural' aspects of spirituality, he said. He began to follow a guru on YouTube, spent a year at a retreat in India and took ayahuasca – a hallucinogenic brew traditionally used in South America. Monzo will be sentenced on Friday at the Old Bailey.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store