One in five Irish people would not take a traditional vaccine, survey suggests
A further one in four said they would not take an mRNA vaccine, with this sentiment higher among parents of dependent children.
The Worldwide Independent Network of MR (WIN), an association of independent market research and polling firms, has released a survey of over 33,000 people across 38 countries, including Ireland.
It found that one-third of people globally either reject or are unsure about traditional vaccines despite decades of public health successes.
These include the eradication of smallpox through vaccination while a combination of the HPV vaccine and screening is hoped to eliminate cervical cancer.
Polling firm Red C Research surveyed 1,000 adults in Ireland as part of the global project.
The study found that a majority of people in Ireland still trust vaccines to a higher degree than the global average, with 73% saying they would accept a traditional vaccine compared to 68% globally.
Some 67% of Irish adults surveyed said they would be open to taking an mRNA vaccine, compared to 60% both in Europe and globally.
But a quarter of Irish adults surveyed said they would not be likely to take an mRNA vaccine and a fifth said they would not take a traditional vaccine.
Around 6% are uncertain about traditional vaccines.
A significant number of people said they would take a traditional vaccine (40%) over an mRNA jab (25%).
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology came to the forefront with the production of Covid-19 vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna.
The messenger RNA approach starts with a snippet of genetic code-carrying instructions for making proteins. By picking the right virus protein to target, the body turns into a mini-vaccine factory.
Acceptance of mRNA vaccines is higher in Ireland among men (72%), Dubliners (73%), those with a third-level education (71%) and those in higher socio-economic grades (75%).
The parents of dependent children, and those in the associated 35-54 age bracket, are the least accepting of mRNA vaccines, at 57%.
The global survey also found that Irish adults are more comfortable with innovative medicines than the European average.
For medicines that directly interact with cell components to protect against disease, 55% of Irish people were comfortable compared to the European average of 46%, and for personalised medicine based on genetic traits, 55% said they were comfortable compared to the European average of 50%.
'These findings are largely positive and show the strong levels immunisation acceptance in the population of Ireland, driven perhaps by our highly educated population and being a global leader i pharmaceuticals,' said John Rogers, associate director at Red C Research.
'As with other countries, a challenge for medical professionals and health boards is to address the concerns many have with approved vaccines, in addition to tried and tested medical innovations.
'Given the high levels of conspiracy theories and misinformation relating to vaccines, particularly involving those that cause negative effects in children, it's concerning to see the vaccine acceptance and trust of innovative medicines is lower amongst Irish parents.'
Professor Heidi J Larson, founder and director of the Vaccine Confidence Project, said: 'In general, publics tend to hesitate when new vaccines are introduced, especially those made in new ways (ie the Covid-19 vaccine was the first vaccine ever to use an mRNA approach).
'The perceptions of mRNA and future RNA-related vaccines and medicines should be monitored over time as people become more familiar with this new approach to making vaccines and medicines, but at the same time, risk seeing more misinformation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Kennedy's new vaccine adviser was expert witness against Merck vaccine
June 12 (Reuters) - One of the new vaccine advisers picked by U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has earned thousands of dollars as an expert witness in litigation against Merck's (MRK.N), opens new tab Gardasil vaccine, court records show. Martin Kulldorff, a biostatistician and epidemiologist who publicly criticized COVID-era lockdowns, is one of eight new members named by Kennedy on Wednesday to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a highly influential panel that recommends which shots should be administered to the American public. Kennedy fired the entire previous 17-member committee of expert vaccine advisers this week, claiming they were "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest" from financial ties to drugmakers. Kulldorff recently served as an expert witness for plaintiffs who accused Merck of concealing the risks of Gardasil, which is intended to prevent cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). In March, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled in favor of Merck in one of those cases that included about 200 lawsuits. At a deposition in October, Kulldorff testified that the plaintiffs paid him $400 an hour and he had already billed for about $33,000 in legal work on the case through late September. He said he also received a $4,000 retainer in the North Carolina case, according to court documents. Kulldorff is also listed as an expert witness in a similar case pending against Merck in Los Angeles state court, records show. Under ACIP's rules, committee members cannot serve as a "paid litigation consultant or expert witness in litigation involving a vaccine manufacturer' during their tenure on the panel. Prior work as an expert witness against drugmakers may require a waiver from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and recusal from votes involving Merck and HPV vaccines. The agency has said in its rules it "will generally consider issuance of waivers in specific situations." Kulldorff did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Merck declined to comment. A spokesman for Kennedy's Health and Human Services Department said on Wednesday that "all newly appointed ACIP members were thoroughly vetted." HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Kulldorff.
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Blocked ears could be 'red flag' symptom of deadly cancer
A doctor has shared the major 'red flags' to watch out for as they could be a sign of cancer A doctor has listed the potential 'red flag' symptoms that could be signs of cancer, including blocked ears. The doctor says there a multiple things to look out for, but many of them often go ignored. Head and neck cancers affect the mouth, throat and nose, with cases becoming more common. Almost 13,000 people in this country are diagnosed with head and neck cancers every year, according to Cancer Research UK, with incidence rates increasing by a third since the 1990s. Some put this down to the rising rates of human papillomavirus (HPV), an infection which can trigger the disease that often shows no symptoms. Leading oncologist Dr Jiri Kubes has shared some of the most common signs in a bid to raise awareness. The doctor, who works at the Proton Therapy Center in Prague, said: "Earlier diagnosis is absolutely crucial. The sooner we can identify head and neck cancer, the better the outcome. "It is considered one of the fastest growing types of cancer in the world but there is still a worrying lack of awareness around head and neck tumours." Red flag symptoms to watch out for Persistently blocked ears - Dr Kubes said: "This is a similar feeling to the one you might get after diving into a swimming pool. Stubborn earache also could be a sign there's cancer around that area." Swelling in the neck - Resistance when touching a part of the neck could also be an indicator. Sore gums and ulcers - The expert said: "Don't just shrug off an ulcer - get it checked out by your GP as it could be a cancerous lesion. Pain in your teeth and white or red patches in the mouth are also tell-tale symptoms." Sore throat - "If it lasts for more than two weeks, or if you experience any voice changes or hoarseness, this should ring alarm bells,' said Dr Kubes.
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Guernsey cervical screening invites to change
Invitations for cervical screening will be sent out every five years instead of every three for women aged 25 to 49 in Guernsey if they have a negative Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is in line with NHS England, which is also introducing the change from 1 HPV infection can cause changes to cells in the cervix, and leads to almost all of the main types of cervical Public Health said it wanted to eliminate cervical cancer on the island by 2030, a decade ahead of NHS England's national target. Currently cervical screenings are offered to all women and people with a cervix aged 25 to the moment people are automatically invited every three years if aged 25 to 49 and every five years if aged 50 to 65. 'Preventable and curable' A recent study showed that screening every five years is as safe as doing it every three years, as the same number of cancers are found and fewer screening tests are needed."Cervical cancer is preventable and curable, and we now have the tools to make the disease a thing of the past," said Di Mathews, strategic screening lead."The reason we have decided to follow England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland with this change is because the new test used in cervical screening picks up problems earlier than the older screening test that was previously used by the programme. "Women and people with a cervix who test negative for HPV are very low risk and those who have a recent history of HPV will be invited more frequently."
