logo
My brother was disabled. Defunding disability programs will cost lives.

My brother was disabled. Defunding disability programs will cost lives.

Yahoo13-05-2025

I grew up sitting across the dinner table from my developmentally disabled brother Jack. Left to the advice of specialists, Jack would have been sent to an institution for the 'benefit' of him and of my family. But my parents did not heed that advice, instead focusing on making sure Jack was included in community life.
Jack was the neighborhood paper boy, earning a wage well before most kids his age. The neighborhood kids included him in their baseball games, and he won medals for baseball in Special Olympics. Jack did not date, but he sure would have liked to had he been given education on healthy, safe relationships.
He was most happy when he worked in the kitchen at a hotel along with his fellow crewmates and their employment coach. He was so proud to get a paycheck ― one that reflected a real wage, not the few dollars he got each week back when he was at a sheltered workshop.
For most of his life, Jack was labeled with intellectual disabilities by the systems that were set up to serve him. It wasn't until he was in his 50's that we learned that he was also autistic. Jack never learned to tie his shoes, read, live on his own or appropriately use the telephone. He would have been considered 'severe.'
Letters: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is wrong about autism destroying families. Each has value.
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F Kennedy Jr.'s recently comments asserting that autistic people (later clarifying he meant 'severe autism') cannot hold jobs, date, toilet independently, or even play baseball. In his words 'autism destroys families.' Secretary Kennedy, from a proud sibling, you are wrong!
What may have gone unnoticed in the press over Kennedy's comments is a leaked version of a proposed budget for the federal Department of Health and Human Services which would eliminate direct funding for many programs for people with disabilities, including those in Wisconsin run by my organization, Disability Rights Wisconsin, and our partner organizations in this work, the Wisconsin Board for People with Developmental Disabilities and the Waisman Center.
Congress created these programs in every state and territory to advocate for the health, safety, and well-being of people with developmental disabilities, and to ensure people with disabilities in every state would be given the opportunity to live full lives in the community.
Disability Rights Wisconsin specifically exists and is funded to defend the rights of residents with disabilities who want to live and work in their communities or need protection from abuse and neglect. Whether the leaked budget as it is written becomes reality or not, it sends a disquieting signal regarding the administration's priorities.
It is not hyperbolic to say that the cost of cuts like these would be paid in lives. Without our three organizations, the most vulnerable in our state will be silenced. And yes, fewer autistic people may be able to hold a job, pay taxes, date, or play baseball.
Opinion: I'm the father of son with Down syndrome. Using the 'R' word is never acceptable.
Who do we want to be as a country: one that believes Americans with disabilities are less than and should be hidden away, as my brother would have been; or one that recognizes individuals like Jack and the 26% of Americans who have a disability deserve to live in our communities, free from abuse and neglect? Secretary Kennedy, I await your answer.
Jill Jacklitz is executive director of Disability Rights Wisconsin. Jack was an avid sports fan. Jack and Jill grew up in Cleveland, Ohio.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Kennedy's remark that 'autism destroys families' flat wrong | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration rescinds emergency abortion guidance
Trump administration rescinds emergency abortion guidance

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration rescinds emergency abortion guidance

The Trump administration has rescinded guidance telling health care workers who provide abortions to save their patients' lives that they are protected under federal law. The Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced Tuesday that it is rescinding guidance issued during the Biden administration, reinforcing to hospitals that under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), they must provide emergency abortions to pregnant patients if they are needed to save their lives. 'Legally, it means nothing,' Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Union's (ACLU) Reproductive Freedom Project, told The Hill. 'The obligation to provide emergency care comes from a federal statute … and as much as they might like to, President Trump and Secretary Kennedy can not erase 40 years of law with this press release.' CMS said in a statement that the agency will continue to enforce EMTALA, which protects all emergency room patients seeking treatment, including 'identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.' 'CMS will work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions,' the statement adds. The guidance change comes about two months after the Trump administration dropped a high-profile case over the right to an emergency abortion in Idaho, which health care policy experts said signaled an 'imminent reversal' of EMTALA guidance issued by the Biden administration. EMTALA was passed in 1986 to protect Americans from 'patient dumping,' a practice at hospitals and other clinics where patients are transferred to other facilities without their consent due to their inability to pay. The Biden administration in 2022 issued guidance on abortion specifically, following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade. A cascade of state laws quickly banned abortion, but the guidance allowed for emergency procedures and protected physicians in those cases. The move does not change the law, but it does make it more confusing for doctors to know what care they can legally provide regarding pregnancy terminations, especially if they practice in states with abortion bans, according to Kolbi-Molinas. Reproductive rights groups and health care providers are bashing the move, arguing that it will profoundly hurt the health of pregnant people in the United States. 'By rescinding this guidance, the Trump administration has sent a clear signal that it is siding not with the majority, but with its anti-abortion allies — and that will come at the expense of women's lives,' Kolbi-Molinas said. 'The ACLU will use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives.' Jamila Perritt, president and CEO of the group Physicians for Reproductive Health, said that she is 'deeply troubled' by the Trump administration's decision to change the guidance, arguing that it is abandoning its responsibility to people who need emergency medical care. 'This action sends a clear message: the lives and health of pregnant people are not worth protecting,' she said in a statement. 'Complying with this law can mean the difference between life and death for pregnant people, forcing providers like me to choose between caring for someone in their time of need and turning my back on them to comply with cruel and dangerous laws.' Meanwhile, some anti-abortion groups lauded CMS's move, calling it a 'victory.' 'Led by Dr. Oz, the Trump administration has delivered another win for life and truth — stopping Biden's attack on emergency care for both pregnant moms and their unborn children,' wrote Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. 'We call on more states to follow the Trump administration's lead and pass Med Ed laws to protect women from abortion lobby misinformation.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

CDC official overseeing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations resigns
CDC official overseeing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations resigns

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

CDC official overseeing COVID-19 vaccine recommendations resigns

What to know about changes in CDC guidance for COVID-19 vaccine A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention official said Tuesday she was resigning from her role overseeing updates to the agency's COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, following an order by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to force an update to the agency's guidance. "My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role," Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos wrote in an email to some members of the agency's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Panagiotakopoulos had served as one of the leads of the work group on COVID-19 vaccines within the ACIP. She sent an email to members of the work group early Tuesday morning to say she was resigning, multiple people who received the email confirmed to CBS News. Reuters first reported news of her resignation. Panagiotakopoulos and a CDC spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The process to update the CDC's influential vaccine recommendations is closely watched by experts because they are tied to federal policies and programs, including liability protections, vaccines for uninsured children and requirements for insurance coverage. The committee had been set to vote on updated recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines at a meeting later this month, before Kennedy usurped the process to impose his own changes to the guidance. Earlier this year, members of the work group had signaled they were already leaning toward narrowing the guidance to soften the recommendation for children with no underlying conditions to get vaccinated, in line with how Kennedy's order was ultimately implemented. But Kennedy's directive also broke with the committee by ordering the agency to exclude pregnant women from its COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. Pregnant women had been one of the groups that experts had worried were at higher risk of severe COVID-19 and warranted continued recommendations to get vaccinated. "More of us should be resigning in protest," one federal health official told CBS News, in response to the news of Panagiotakopoulos leaving her role.

Trump Admin Sends 'Ominous Signal' On Emergency Abortion Care Guidelines
Trump Admin Sends 'Ominous Signal' On Emergency Abortion Care Guidelines

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Admin Sends 'Ominous Signal' On Emergency Abortion Care Guidelines

President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday rescinded a Biden-era guideline around emergency abortion care. The move has no direct legal impacts on care, but it sends a clear message on where the Trump administration stands on abortion access. Abortion advocates also tell HuffPost that the guideline repeal will create more confusion for physicians on the ground, and lead to more delays and denials of care. The Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rescinded the 2022 guidance around the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, also known as EMTALA. EMTALA requires hospitals that participate in Medicare — the majority of hospitals in the country — to offer abortion care if it's necessary to stabilize the health of a pregnant patient while they're experiencing a medical emergency. The guidance was published by the Biden administration after the Supreme Court repealed federal abortion protections as a reminder to physicians that EMTALA, a federal law, supersedes any state abortion ban. 'As frontline health care providers, the federal EMTALA statute protects your clinical judgment and the action that you take to provide stabilizing medical treatment to your pregnant patients, regardless of the restrictions in the state where you practice,' then-HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra wrote. Trump's CMS stated that the previous guidance and accompanying letter 'do not reflect the policy of this Administration.' 'The obligation to provide emergency abortion care comes from EMTALA itself, a federal statute written by Congress,' Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, told HuffPost. 'The Trump administration does not have the power to simply erase that with the stroke of a pen.' 'But it absolutely sends an ominous signal about what this administration is going to attempt to do after promising not to interfere with emergency abortions,' she said. The announcement came the same day anti-abortion group Catholic Medical Association announced it was dismissing its case, Catholic Medical Association v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and challenging the guidance. Although the guidance simply underlined current federal law, rescinding it will throw physicians into legal chaos. 'The Trump administration doesn't want you to know it, but they just quietly erased guidance that informed hospitals of their obligation to provide lifesaving care for pregnant women facing health care emergencies, like severe hemorrhage or sepsis – circumstances where the only option to save a woman's life may be emergency abortion care,' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said in a Tuesday statement. 'Once again, the Trump administration is sending a clear message that they do not care about women's lives, and they don't care how many pregnant women they force into health care crises so long as they can continue to advance their extreme anti-abortion agenda.' There have been many reports of pregnant women across the country — in Texas, Florida, Oklahoma and elsewhere— who were denied emergency abortion care because they weren't close enough to death. The decision to revoke these guidelines will create further confusion for emergency care providers who are simply trying to do their jobs. The Supreme Court rejected an attack on emergency abortion care in Idaho last summer, but pro-choice groups cautioned against calling it a win. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that the decision was 'not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho' but instead 'it is delay.' 'Complying with this law can mean the difference between life and death for pregnant people, forcing providers like me to choose between caring for someone in their time of need and turning my back on them to comply with cruel and dangerous laws,' Dr. Jamila Perritt, OB-GYN, abortion provider and president of Physicians for Reproductive Health, said in a statement. 'As a doctor, I have a moral and ethical obligation to provide emergency care to those in need, including EMTALA's mandate to provide abortion care when it is necessary and stabilizing treatment,' Perritt added. 'This action does not change that.' Biden Administration Clarifies Protections For Doctors Making Emergency Abortion Decisions Conservative SCOTUS Justices Somehow Ignore Pregnant Patients In Heated Abortion Arguments Supreme Court Allows Emergency Abortion Care In Idaho For Now Opinion: I'm An Emergency Physician. Here's How Dangerous This Supreme Court Abortion Ruling Could Be.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store