logo
Swinney defends Wishaw NICU downgrade after by-election row

Swinney defends Wishaw NICU downgrade after by-election row

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said the proposed changes to neonatal care showed the health service was 'simply not safe in John Swinney's hands'.
He cited local opposition, including an online petition that has attracted more than 25,000 signatures.
READ MORE
Under the plans, the Wishaw unit will be downgraded to a level two facility, meaning babies born before 27 weeks will have to be transferred to one of three specialist centres in Aberdeen, Edinburgh or Glasgow.
The Scottish Government insists the move is based on expert clinical advice and will improve outcomes for the most premature and vulnerable babies.
Campaigners, however, warn it risks separating families and placing unnecessary stress on mothers.
Mr Sarwar highlighted the case of Tammy Johnston, who was unable to hold her premature son Kai for four weeks after birth.
'Under these plans, she could be forced to travel to Aberdeen or even further,' he warned.
He also cited Amanda Todd, who he said had been told she may need to give birth in Dublin due to bed shortages. 'Is it not the case that the NHS is simply not safe in John Swinney's hands?' he asked.
Mr Swinney rejected the claims, saying the proposals were about saving lives, not saving money.
'There is nothing in the proposal about Wishaw General Hospital that is about saving money,' he said. 'It is about maximising the chances of saving babies' lives. That is what the proposal is about — informed by expert opinion.'
He pushed back against suggestions that frontline voices were being ignored, insisting the Government was acting on the best available medical evidence.
Meanwhile, Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay warned that Scotland was in the grip of an 'out of control' organised crime wave.
He referenced Operation Portaledge — the ongoing police investigation into a violent gangland feud that has seen shootings, firebombings and assaults across central Scotland. Police have so far arrested 41 people in connection with the incidents.
'These parasites grow rich by preying on society's most vulnerable,' Mr Findlay said. 'These cowards cause terror and death with guns, knives and fire bombs. They go after journalists, politicians, businessmen, police and prison officers. Organised crime is out of control and communities are living in fear.'
Mr Findlay, who worked as a journalist who covered gangland crime before entering Holyrood, was the victim of an acid attack in 2015 when William Burns threw sulphuric acid into his face.
He asked the First Minister: 'Does John Swinney accept that the Scottish Parliament has failed to tackle organised crime in Scotland?'
Mr Swinney denied the claim. 'Organised crime is intolerable — it is unacceptable,' he said.
'It requires the forensic attention of our police and criminal justice authorities to tackle it, and that is being undertaken within Scotland on a relentless basis by Police Scotland and by the criminal justice authorities.
'I would expect the authorities to pursue that level of scrutiny and activity, and that is what is happening.
Mr Findlay also raised concerns about sentencing guidelines for young offenders. Current guidance encourages judges to consider rehabilitation rather than prison for those under 25 — a policy he described as open to abuse.
READ MORE
He quoted Detective Superintendent Andy Patrick, who warned last year that gangs were exploiting the rules by coercing young people into committing serious crimes in the belief they would avoid jail.
Mr Swinney responded: 'Not for the first time, I cannot allow Mr Findlay's remarks to stand. It is misleading to say to members of the public that there are no consequences for criminal activity under the age of 25 — there are very serious consequences, which involve imprisonment.'
However, there some was consensus at the end, with the First Minister signalling a willingness to review the Proceeds of Crime Act. The legislation is aimed at recovering assets from drug dealers and other criminals.
Mr Findlay told MSPs "top-level crime bosses" were "making millions of pounds from killing vulnerable Scots with their drugs."
He added: "We were told that the Mr Bigs would be bankrupted by the proceeds of crime law that was passed at the start of devolution, but the law has failed.
"Criminals and their white-collar enablers no longer fear the proceeds of crime legislation, and, 18 months ago, the SNP rejected my call to review why that is not working."
He highlighted the case of one dealer believed to have made £126 million through crime. However, the Crown Office was only able to recover only £118,000.
"The proceeds of crime legislation needs an urgent and radical overhaul. We must turn the tables on the drug gangs so that they live in fear," Mr Findlay said, calling on the First Minister to "toughen the legislation to make it fit to tackle organised crime in 2025 and beyond."
Mr Swinney said he was "open to ensuring that we have in place the correct legislative framework to deal with criminality in our country."
"I am perfectly willing to consider that, because I do not want anybody to benefit from criminal activity in our society, and I want people to be punished accordingly," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scotland's Labour weren't the only winners in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election
Scotland's Labour weren't the only winners in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election

Sky News

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Scotland's Labour weren't the only winners in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election

In the centre of Hamilton, stands the now derelict Bairds department store - a reminder of the past and a sign of the political present. Outside, people speak of a time when the high street was busy and the area buzzing. As in other areas of the country, the blame for this sense of decline is placed at the door of the established parties. "The SNP have done nothing for Hamilton… we need someone to do something and I'm not sure Labour will do it", said one woman stopping for a chat outside Belles Tearoom. Apathy once again prevails. But just over seven thousand people came up with a solution unusual for Scottish politics on Thursday. Nigel Farage. This by-election signals the arrival of Reform as an electoral force north of the border. From a standing start and with little in the way of campaigning infrastructure, the party finished just three percentage points behind the SNP. As he's become accustomed to in England, Nigel Farage ate up Tory votes here. But that does not account for the party's surge. "We took votes off all the parties… there's a huge surge of young people from the SNP, particularly young men, coming to us," said Thomas Kerr, a local Reform councillor and campaigner. For the party, this is explained by independence becoming less of a determinant of electoral support - and domestic issues like the cost of living and the NHS taking priority instead. It's just one factor that's causing traditional political axioms to be scrambled, chief among them - the assumption that Scots will never vote for Nigel Farage. His party can now be confident of picking up their first MSPs in next May's parliamentary elections. So for the established parties, this may all mean a strategic rethink. What is the politically expedient position on immigration in Scotland now? What of the socially liberal identity issues previously championed by the SNP? But there's a more fundamental tension, too. 2:57 Both the SNP and Labour ran campaigns casting this by-election as a two-horse race between them and Reform. The result clearly shows a three-way splintering. That could get messy in the world of coalitions that often comes from the proportionate voting system in Holyrood. For now though, Labour will take the win and try to use it to turn round their flagging ratings. This is no definite inflection point, though. Labour sources say the sophistication of their digital campaign in this race played a big role, with others pointing to the pull of a popular local candidate. But it's also worth remembering that before the SNP surge of 2015, this section of West Central Scotland would have been regarded as a Labour stronghold. It was painted red again last year, with convincing wins in the general election. So on paper, this could have been a tidying-up exercise for Labour. It speaks volumes about the party's wider standing that the win was so unexpected. SNP leader John Swinney may have a point when he says the close result shows his party making progress after the pummelling they took here just 11 months ago. There aren't any runner-up prizes in politics, though. Six hundred votes have denied the SNP a much-needed political shot in the arm and taught them they cannot just cruise to victory on the back of disdain for Sir Keir Starmer. Back in Hamilton, and Bairds is not the only monument of the past here. For the SNP, the town stands as an emblem of the electoral successes of yesteryear. A shock victory by Winnie Ewing in a 1967 by-election signalled the party's entry on to the political stage and triggered a rethink among their establishment rivals. It's an irony likely not lost on many in Scottish politics that Reform has used this slice of the central belt to do exactly the same thing.

Scottish Labour secures by-election win over SNP and Reform
Scottish Labour secures by-election win over SNP and Reform

Channel 4

timean hour ago

  • Channel 4

Scottish Labour secures by-election win over SNP and Reform

Labour's been celebrating after winning a surprise victory over the SNP in a fiercely contested by-election. The result in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse will come as a relief for their Scottish leader, Anas Sarwar, who's hoping to become First Minister in the Scottish Parliament elections next year. It was also the first big test for Reform UK in Scotland, after their recent success in English local elections. They came a close third – a rise they've described as 'truly remarkable.'

Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook
Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Hamilton by-election: How Labour 'defied the odds' and Reform ripped up the rulebook

Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Anas Sarwar was buzzing. The triumphant Scottish Labour leader told journalists his party had defied the bookies, the pollsters and the pundits by winning the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, and it was now 'game on'. He had a point. Almost everyone thought the SNP would keep hold of the seat, albeit with a much reduced majority. In the end, Labour's candidate, Davy Russell, beat his Nationalist rival by 602 votes. It was a narrow victory, but a win is a win. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Friday, as Labour held a victory rally in Hamilton, one party spinner purchased a "humble pie" - technically, an apple flan - from the Bayne's bakery next to their campaign HQ and used it to tease journalists who had written off Labour's chances. A Reform UK election billboard poster in Larkhall | PA Alas, it wasn't long before Professor Sir John Curtice, the polling guru, rained on their parade with some cold, hard numbers. The result, he said, was actually 'way below' what Labour needs if it wants to win next year's Holyrood election. "I think the honest truth is that neither Labour nor the SNP can be really particularly happy with this result,' he told The Scotsman. Professor Sir John Curtice has an important message about how to restore the public's trust in politics and democracy (Picture: Leon Neal) | Getty Images Instead, the most important development in terms of its wider implications lies elsewhere. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Hamilton by-election was a tight three-horse race between Labour, the SNP and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. The latter came in third, but still secured a remarkable 26 per cent of the vote, outperforming its national polling. In light of this, Sir John said, the possibility that Reform might come second next year, ahead of Labour, 'is not an outcome that we can presume is out of the bounds of possibility'. Like it or not, Reform is now a force to be reckoned with in Scottish politics, and all without having a separate leadership team in place north of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The spectre of Mr Farage dominated the by-election campaign, and his visit to the constituency on Monday received huge amounts of coverage. His rivals also spent a great deal of time talking about him. The First Minister repeatedly portrayed the by-election as a two-horse race between the SNP and Reform - an analysis that turned out to be somewhat flawed, to put it mildly. "Reform's performance, 26 per cent, is more than you would expect in Hamilton, if the result there were simply reflecting what the opinion polls have been telling us,' Sir John said. "Now there are [a few] possibilities. One is that the Reform campaign in the constituency might have been particularly effective. I certainly think that Mr [Ross] Lambie was a relatively strong candidate. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "And it may well be that Labour and the SNP made the cardinal, classic mistake of giving lots of lovely publicity to your opponent's election campaign. "Or it may be that the polls are indeed underestimating Reform somewhat. We did see Reform doing better than expected in the English local elections, and then the polls caught up with what the local elections were saying." The polling expert added: "For those of us who weren't consumed by the day to day events in Hamilton, we were going 'hang on, the only thing that anybody is hearing about this by-election campaign is what Nigel Farage is saying, as advertised by Anas Sarwar and John Swinney'." Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse was prime territory for Labour, and exactly the sort of seat it should be winning. Nevertheless, a narrative developed during the campaign the party was in trouble, and there was speculation it could even come third. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That did not happen, and Mr Sarwar is quite right to celebrate a hard-earned victory. Anas Sarwar, leader of the Scottish Labour party, celebrates with deputy leader Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson Mark Diffley, the pollster, said it was a 'big win' for Labour. However, he said it was 'not right' to say the party had hugely outperformed its polling. 'National polling puts Labour at 20 per cent, down two points from 2021 Holyrood election,' he wrote on social media. 'In this by-election, Labour's vote share fell by two points from the Hamilton result in 2021.' Labour bosses credited their victory to activists rolling up their sleeves and hitting the doors. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "For a long time, people looked at the SNP and thought they had the strongest communications strategy, the strongest digital outlook and they had the strongest field operation,' Mr Sarwar said. 'I genuinely believe we beat them in all three of those areas. We ran the most significant and best ground operation in any constituency in the history of the Scottish Labour party in this by-election." Meanwhile, John Swinney, the First Minister and SNP leader, told journalists he would 'consider the implications' of the result. 'There's nothing quite like being on the doorsteps for several weeks to hear what people are thinking and feeling, and you hear it very directly,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Asked about a potential Cabinet reshuffle, he said: 'Obviously I've got to consider all the issues about the ministerial team. [Energy Secretary] Màiri McAllan will be concluding her maternity leave soon, so these issues will be considered.' While his rival celebrated in Hamilton, Mr Swinney took questions at the SNP's HQ near the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh. It was, understandably, a muted affair. But spare a thought for the Scottish Tories, who secured just 6 per cent of the vote. The party will meet for its annual conference in Edinburgh next weekend, where leader Russell Findlay will have the unenviable task of trying to build some momentum.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store