logo
Bill proposing death penalty for first child rape offense moves to House floor

Bill proposing death penalty for first child rape offense moves to House floor

Yahoo18-04-2025

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – On Thursday, the House Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight Committee passed Senate Bill 599, authored by Rep. Tim Turner (R-Kinta) seeking to add thedeath penalty as a possible punishment for any person convicted of a first offense of forcible anal or oral sodomy, rape, or rape by instrumentation of a child under the age of 14.
'Children who are victimized should never have to worry again that the person who harmed them will escape justice,' Turner said. 'The cowards who commit these heinous acts against our youth deserve the maximum punishment allowed – death.'
Bill proposes criminal charges for violating service animal rules
Turner says, the bill is a sentence modification measure for child rapists. In addition to the death penalty, the bill would allow the punishment of life without parole on the first conviction.
The bill moves to the House floor for consideration.
*This story is developing
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The ‘big, beautiful' bill creates a $5 billion tax shelter for private school donors
The ‘big, beautiful' bill creates a $5 billion tax shelter for private school donors

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

The ‘big, beautiful' bill creates a $5 billion tax shelter for private school donors

The budget reconciliation bill passed by the House last month, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act, ' contains an unconventional provision establishing an unprecedented tax shelter designed to shift resources from public schools to wealthy people and private schools. The provision allocates $5 billion a year in federal tax credits for donors to organizations that provide private and religious school vouchers. While the bill cuts benefits for other charitable donations, it triples the tax benefit for private school voucher donations. This unique dollar-for-dollar rebate is something no other charity has ever gotten from the federal government. Other donors may be taken aback to learn that policymakers have singled out private schools for a reward three times larger than what can be received for gifts to pediatric cancer research, flood clean-up or assisting veterans exposed to chemicals. More alarming still, this provision creates a profitable tax shelter for wealthy people who agree to help funnel public funds into private schools. This is because rich donors will avoid the capital gains tax entirely if they make a gift of stock. Savvy tax advisors will instruct stockholders to avoid selling and to instead donate those holdings, getting a one-for-one return from the federal government — while avoiding hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars in capital gains taxes. This is the quintessential definition of a tax shelter, encouraging affluent people with no interest in school vouchers to direct contributions this way, not out of conviction but for profit. Usually, when policymakers do this, it is an inadvertent by-product of hasty legislative decisions, not an intentional giveaway. This, too, is a norm being broken with this bill. The provision expands vouchers nationwide, even in states — such as Kentucky, Nebraska and Colorado — where voters recently rejected vouchers at the ballot box. American voters have actually said no to vouchers in every state where they've been put on the ballot, which may be why voucher proponents are sneaking a big expansion into a must-pass federal bill. Vouchers, in addition to being unpopular, expensive. My organization, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, estimates that this provision alone would as drafted reduce federal tax revenue by $23.2 billion over the next 10 years, or by $67 billion if it is extended beyond its four-year expiration date, as Republicans would likely attempt to do. Because state income taxes largely piggyback on federal law, this provision would reduce state revenue by between $459 million and $1.1 billion over the decade, depending on extension. Of the 10-year state and federal tax cuts from this provision, between $2.2 billion and $5.3 billion would be in the form of capital gains tax avoidance, depending on extension. Had this provision been in effect in 2021, for example, Elon Musk could have cut his capital gains tax bill by $690 million. In all, while cutting tax benefits for charities across the board, the reconciliation bill creates an unprecedented giveaway that would enrich the wealthiest Americans, particularly those whose income comes from stock. It would weaken public budgets and public schools, siphoning money to private schools that are allowed to reject many students. Combined with other enormous cuts to public programs and tax cuts for the rich, this is an untenable combination. Amy Hanauer is executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions
Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions

The "Big, Beautiful Bill" may face major changes when the Senate begins debate next week. Look for Senate Republicans to pare down state and local tax deductions—known as SALT—which are important to House Republicans from California and New York. Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda Almost no Senate Republicans care about SALT. Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., says he'd oppose the bill if the Senate strips SALT. Fiscal hawks want further Medicaid changes to achieve additional savings, but Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Jim Justice, represent states with high percentages of their constituents on Medicaid. House Republicans Push For Spending Cancellations As Elon Musk And Conservatives Demand Deeper Budget Cuts Read On The Fox News App Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., wants to alter the no-tax-on-tips provision, arguing it's unfair to workers outside tipped industries. The Senate may also cut House provisions on AI and federal judges, as these policy issues don't comply with special Senate budget article source: Trump's spending bill heads to Senate where Republicans plan strategic adjustments to key provisions

GOP leadership unleashes fury on Dem governor ahead of blockbuster congressional hearing
GOP leadership unleashes fury on Dem governor ahead of blockbuster congressional hearing

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

GOP leadership unleashes fury on Dem governor ahead of blockbuster congressional hearing

FIRST ON FOX: House Republican leadership slammed Democratic Gov. Tim Walz ahead of a blockbuster congressional hearing addressing sanctuary city policy this week. GOP Whip and Minnesota Rep. Tom Emmer wished Walz "good luck" before the former vice presidential candidate is set to testify alongside Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul at a House Oversight Committee hearing on Thursday. "From hurling outrageous insults against ICE agents to offering a multitude of taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal aliens in Minnesota, Tim Walz's immigration agenda can be summed up easily: pro-illegal alien, anti-Minnesotan," GOP Whip Emmer told Fox News Digital. "If Tim Walz thinks he will be able to defend his abysmal record before Congress, then he's even more of a buffoon than I thought. I only have one thing to say to Timmy as he heads to Washington this week: GOOD LUCK." Handful Of House Democrats Join Republicans In Sanctuary City Crackdown Emmer paired his comments to Fox News Digital with a new video slamming Walz's various immigration policies titled "Protecting Illegals, Not Minnesotans: That's the Walz Way." Read On The Fox News App The three "sanctuary governors" will face a barrage of questions from members of the committee this week, as anti-ICE riots raged in Los Angeles over the weekend and the Trump administration continues to ramp up deportations across the country. Though the term "sanctuary city" is not legally defined, illegal immigrants will flock to the mainly Democrat-led regions to reduce the likelihood of deportation. Sanctuary cities often refuse Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) requests for information, like arrests or releases, and typically deny ICE detainer requests to hold jailed illegal migrants beyond their release date. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz House Oversight Chairman James Comer, R-Kentucky, said in a media advisory for the upcoming hearing that "The governors of these states must explain why they are prioritizing the protection of criminal illegal aliens over the safety of U.S. citizens." "Sanctuary policies only provide sanctuaries for criminal illegal aliens." Comer explained. "Former President Biden created the worst border crisis in U.S. history and allowed criminal illegal aliens to flood our communities." "The Trump Administration is taking decisive action to deport criminal illegal aliens from our nation but reckless sanctuary states like Illinois, Minnesota, and New York are actively seeking to obstruct federal immigration enforcement." 'Sick Puppy' Tim Walz Should Never Have Been On Dems' 2024 Ticket, Trump Says The hearing is scheduled for Thursday, June 12 at 10 a.m. ET. Fox News Digital reached out to Walz but did not receive a article source: GOP leadership unleashes fury on Dem governor ahead of blockbuster congressional hearing

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store