Orbis Responds to Public Statements by Tsuruha on Proposed Tsuruha-Welcia Merger and Subsequent Tender Offer by AEON
LONDON, May 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Orbis Investments ("Orbis"), which held 9.7% of Tsuruha Holdings Inc. ("Tsuruha") as of 28 February 2025 on behalf of its clients, notes the recent public statements by Tsuruha regarding its proposed merger with Welcia Holdings Co., Ltd. ("Welcia"), a company controlled by AEON Co., Ltd. ("AEON"), and the subsequent partial tender offer by AEON to take control of Tsuruha.
Tsuruha Should Receive a Control Premium from Welcia
In a press release dated 14 May 2025, Tsuruha stated that the share exchange ratio "…is considered favourable for [Tsuruha] shareholders when compared to the average premium levels observed in recent cases of full ownership acquisitions through share exchanges with similar characteristics."
This statement is, in Orbis' view, deeply misguided. Orbis fundamentally disagrees with the assertion that Tsuruha should pay a control premium for Welcia. Although the proposed merger is structured with Tsuruha as the surviving entity, it is an essential component of a series of transactions which would allow AEON to take control of Tsuruha. As such, shareholders in Tsuruha should receive—not pay—a control premium.
Both ISS and Glass Lewis have noted that AEON is taking control of Tsuruha without paying such a premium to Tsuruha shareholders. Both recognise that it is AEON-controlled Welcia—not Tsuruha—that should be paying a premium in this transaction. The fact that Tsuruha is instead paying one makes the share exchange ratio inappropriate and highly unfavourable to its shareholders.
Protections for Management, not Minority Shareholders
On 15 May 2025, Tsuruha published responses to shareholder FAQs regarding the proposed business integration. The company noted that:
The final agreement with AEON includes provisions to impose certain restrictions on AEON's exercise of control or influence, thereby ensuring the independence of Tsuruha management and protecting the interests of its minority shareholders.
AEON has agreed not to transfer or dispose of Tsuruha shares without prior consent and will not acquire more shares without Tsuruha's approval.
AEON may appoint only one non-executive director to Tsuruha's board.
It plans to appoint a new independent outside director who meets Tokyo Stock Exchange independence standards.
Orbis believes that these provisions would serve primarily to entrench the position of Tsuruha's incumbent board and management. While the agreement with AEON provides certain safeguards for Tsuruha management, it offers no meaningful protection for minority shareholders, who will lose their ability to influence the company's direction or to hold leadership to account under AEON's effective control.
Orbis is also concerned that minority shareholders would face significant governance risks as minorities in a listed AEON subsidiary—including the potential for AEON to take the merged entity private on highly unfavourable terms for minorities.
A Flawed Process, Unfavourable Terms, and Unanswered Questions
Orbis supports industry consolidation—which can realise substantial merger benefits—when it is pursued through a fair and transparent process and on equitable terms. However, Orbis strongly objects to both the terms and structure of these transactions, and notes fundamental flaws in the process that led to Tsuruha's decision to enter a Capital and Business Alliance with AEON and Welcia in February 2024. Orbis believes that both the proposed merger and the subsequent tender offer severely undervalue Tsuruha.
Orbis calls on Tsuruha to answer two key outstanding questions:
Why should AEON be allowed to take a controlling position in Tsuruha via a partial tender offer at a nearly 27% discount to the price it paid to acquire a non-controlling stake from Oasis Asset Management in March 2024?
Did the Tsuruha board form an independent special committee to conduct a market check, soliciting alternative bids before its February 2024 decision—and if so, will it now provide transparency on that process and its findings?
Orbis Urges Investors to Vote AGAINST the Proposed Merger at the 26 May AGM
Orbis calls on all shareholders who care about the fairness and integrity of capital markets to vote AGAINST the proposed merger at the upcoming 26 May 2025 Annual General Meeting. The merger requires a two-thirds majority, and is the only opportunity for Tsuruha shareholders to vote on one of the series of transactions that would hand control of Tsuruha to AEON at a steep discount to fair value.
The information contained in this press release is intended solely to share Orbis' views as a long-term shareholder in Tsuruha Holdings Inc. It does not constitute any solicitation to exercise shareholders' voting rights (either independently or jointly with Orbis) or to delegate such rights to Orbis, and Orbis is not seeking any shareholders' agreement regarding voting. Orbis is not soliciting or accepting any proxies, and encourages all shareholders to make their own voting decisions based on publicly available information and their own judgement. This press release reflects Orbis' opinions exclusively. Nothing in this press release constitutes investment advice.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250515631004/en/
Contacts
Investor Contact:Henry AllenOrbis Investments+1 44-20-7042-2000henry.allen@orbis.com Media Contact:Steve SchaeferHewes Communications+1 212-207-9456steve@hewescomm.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hawley bill would raise minimum wage to $15
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) wants to double the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, with legislation filed Tuesday to increase the rate adopted nearly two decades ago. 'For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline,' Hawley said in a statement to The Hill. 'One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hard-working Americans every day.' The increase would take effect next year, when Hawley's home state hikes its rate to the same level. Most states, like Missouri, have set minimum hourly wage levels above the $7.25 federal rate, and nearly a dozen of them will have minimum rates at or above $15 an hour after increases take effect this year. Five states — Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Tennessee — have never set their own rates, and three — Georgia, Oklahoma and Wyoming — have state minimums below $7.25 per hour. Those eight states all default to the federal rate. The Hawley legislation, cosponsored by Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), also would set automatic increases to match inflation over time to prevent future standstills like the nation has faced since the last federal hike in 2009. Minimum wage hikes have historically faced pushback from some business advocacy groups. 'This proposal would more than double the minimum wage and slash over 800,000 jobs,' Rebekah Paxton, research director at the Employment Policies Institute, said in a statement on Hawley's latest push. 'An overwhelming majority of economists agree that drastic minimum wage hikes cut employment, limit opportunities for workers and shutter businesses.' 'Hawley's proposal would take similar failed policies like California's and export them nationwide,' she added. It's unclear whether the GOP-controlled Senate and House will take up the bipartisan legislation or what the timeline could look like as lawmakers try to hash out President Trump's priority legislation. The White House declined to comment on Hawley's proposed minimum wage increase. A spokesperson told The Hill in an email that they would not 'get ahead of the President on pending legislation.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent rejected the idea of increasing the minimum wage earlier this year. But Trump acknowledged in a 'Meet the Press' interview a month before the start of his second presidency that the current minimum wage is 'very low' but said he didn't want to raise it to a level that would ultimately force businesses to shutter. 'There is a level at which you could do it, absolutely,' the then-president elect told host Kristen Welker. 'I would consider it.' Trump added that the debate is 'very complicated' because the cost of living varies among states. 'It would be nice to have just a minimum wage for the whole country, but it wouldn't work because you have places where it's very inexpensive to live,' he said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pakistan hikes defense budget 20% following conflict with India, but overall spending is cut
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan Tuesday hiked defense spending by 20% following last month's deadly conflict with India. The government of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif announced the increase as part of the budget for the fiscal year 2025-26, in which overall spending will be cut by 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion). Pakistan and India were pushed to the brink of war earlier this year after a gun massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir, marking the biggest breakdown in relations between them since 2019. Weeks of tension followed, culminating in missile and drone strikes that resulted in dozens of fatalities on both sides of the border. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb said the government was allocating 2.55 trillion rupees ($9 billion) for defense compared with 2.12 trillion rupees in the previous budget. India in February increased its defense spending by 9.5%. Sharif told the Cabinet: 'All economic indicators are satisfactory. After defeating India in a conventional war, now we have to go beyond it in the economic field as well.' Opposition members of the National Assembly verbally abused Aurangzeb, chanting slogans, throwing scrunched-up copies of the budget at him, whistling, and banging their desks as he gave his address. The coming year's defense allocation is considerably more than the government's expenditure on higher education, agricultural development, and mitigating climate-related risks, to which Pakistan is especially prone. The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
MAGA country voters sound alarm over ‘ridiculous' national debt amid debate over Trump-backed bill
Voters in red areas of the country are ringing alarm bells over the country's national debt just as President Donald Trump wants Congress to pass a bill experts say will add trillions to it over the next few years. Fox News Digital spoke to voters in Trump voting districts throughout the United States to gauge how they feel about the U.S. national debt. Most of them said that it was a significant cause for concern, and some even called out the president they support for adding to it. "We need to address the national debt, and I thought that Trump was doing that when he brought in [Elon] Musk. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Trump supporter. But I think his spending's gotten a little bit out of control," Art, in Lapeer, Michigan, told Fox. Trump Pushes 'Big, Beautiful Bill' As Solution To Four Years Of Biden Failures: 'Largest Tax Cut, Ever' The national debt currently sits at $36.2 trillion and counting, according to Fox Business' National Debt Tracker. A new spending bill – dubbed the "big, beautiful bill" by Trump – has reinvigorated concern over how much higher the debt, with its implications for economic growth and future spending, can get. The sweeping tax cuts and spending package, passed by the GOP-controlled House in May, addresses many of the president's legislative priorities on cutting taxes, boosting border security, American energy, defense, and rolling back some of former President Joe Biden's environmental regulations and tax credits. Read On The Fox News App However, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt, prompting criticism from even Trump allies like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla. Former Department of Government Efficiency head Elon Musk even publicly feuded with the president over the bill last week, in a spat that played out on social media. Elon Musk Warns Excessive Spending Will Plunge Us 'Into Debt Slavery' Ahead of the upcoming Senate vote on passing the bill, Fox News Digital asked voters in Republican voting precincts about the national debt, and many responded they had serious reservations. A woman in Staten Island, New York, who asked to remain anonymous, told Fox, "It's too big. And we're leaving it for the future, for our children, and we're leaving all that debt on them to pay for. I don't think that's right." "We can't keep spending ourselves into the ground and leaving that burden for our children and grandchildren," Franceen in Boca Raton, Florida, declared. Chris from Cypress, Texas said, "I mean, I'm inheriting it, my kids are inheriting it, and we've got to cut it off, or we're going to default." Front Royal, Virginia, resident Frank told Fox that the debt has been a "longstanding problem." "It's probably going to be there even after I'm gone, but yeah, of course, any country has a problem with their debt. Of course, it's a problem," he said. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Joe in Lapeer said, "Yes, I think it is an issue. So, at this time, I think it's going to level out over time. It can't keep going the way it was going, put it that way. You know, that's my opinion." A man from Staten Island, who asked to remain anonymous, acknowledged the problem but expressed hope that Trump will try to right the ship. "I think it's always a problem," he said. "I think the other party was just – made everything upside down and now Trump's trying to fix it. So, it's going to take a few years, but I think we're on the right track." "It is a huge problem," Chad in Cypress, Texas, declared. "You know, we've got to the point right now – I think we're $34, $36 trillion in debt. And it's like running up a credit card, you know, sooner or later the bill has to be paid and there's no reason for America to be in debt." However, another gentleman from Staten Island, who also asked to remain anonymous, told Fox he wasn't too concerned. "I have no idea what the debt is. I could care less what the national debt is, as long as Trump makes this country a little better. National debt has been in existence for hundreds of years, right?" he article source: MAGA country voters sound alarm over 'ridiculous' national debt amid debate over Trump-backed bill
