logo
Explained: Is a genocide unfolding in Gaza?

Explained: Is a genocide unfolding in Gaza?

First Posta day ago

Israel's offensive in the Gaza Strip, triggered by the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack, has killed over 50,500 people, mostly civilians. While Israel maintains it has acted in 'self defence', rights groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Benjamin Netanyahu-led country's actions as a 'genocide'. What is a genocide, and who can declare one? read more
Palestinians gather to receive food cooked by a charity kitchen, amid a hunger crisis, as the Israel-Gaza conflict continues, in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, December 4, 2024. File image/Reuters
Rights groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Gaza war as 'genocide' and calling for a ceasefire but Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, vehemently rejects the explosive term.
Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023.
But Israel's devastating war on Gaza – largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 – has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from 'Schindler's List' star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians.
What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies?
What is 'genocide'?
The word genocide – derived from the Greek word 'genos', for race or tribe, and 'cide', from the Latin for 'to kill' – was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin.
Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust.
It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945.
However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity.
Jewish children were kept alive in Germany's Auschwitz for use in medical experiments. Image courtesy:
It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention.
That text defines genocide as any of five 'acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group'.
These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Regardless of the definition, the qualification of 'genocide' has been hugely sensitive over the decades.
What is happening in Gaza?
Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,510 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory.
The United Nations said on May 30 that the territory's entire population of more than two million people was at risk of famine, even if Israel said earlier that month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2.
Palestinian people with empty bowls wait for food at a donation point in Rafah. The widespread hunger and malnutrition in Gaza is catastrophic, UN has said. (Photo: NPR)
Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive.
The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023.
The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Of the 251 hostages seized, 57 remain in Gaza, including 34 the Israeli military says, are dead.
Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza?
In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Israel denies the accusation.
In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to 'prevent' acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including urgently to facilitate humanitarian aid to prevent famine.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While no court has so far ruled that the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts – including several who are Israeli – have used the term to describe it.
Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a 'live-streamed genocide' in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for 'acts of genocide'.
Palestinians mourn their relatives who were killed in Israeli airstrikes on a medical center in Jabalia, northern Gaza Strip, on Thursday, May 15, 2025. AP
A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was 'consistent with the characteristics of genocide'.
And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out 'genocidal acts' in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities.
Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that 'Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions'.
Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman, in January, co-wrote an article in which they said: 'Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a 'political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes'.
But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, as has Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
What does Israel say?
Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and 'self defence', an argument echoed by its staunch ally, the United States.
Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as 'blatant lies' and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being 'an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body'.
He has said UN experts should instead focus on 'crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust', referring to October 7.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza – including starvation as a method of warfare.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. File image/ Reuters
It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation of his death.
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh but dropped those applications because they had been killed in Israeli attacks.
Who decides and when?
Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert based in the Netherlands, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be 'designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave' but a court would have to decide if it was genocide.
'It bears the hallmarks of it, but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was,' he said.
In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for an international tribunal to conclude genocide had happened.
It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet,' Bouwknegt explained.
'You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened.'
Has there been an intent?
French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said, 'there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed' in Gaza.
But he agreed intent was more difficult to prove.
Israeli military patrols near the Al Shifa Hospital compound in Gaza City during ground operation against Hamas in the northern Gaza Strip on November 22, 2023. File Photo/ Reuters
That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for 'incitement to genocide in Gaza'.
'If incitement is established, that establishes intent,' he told AFP.
His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting 'human animals' in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging 'total extermination' in the Palestinian territory.
It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of 'an entire nation out there that is responsible' for the October 7 attack.
Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But, she warned: 'International law cannot stop a war.'
'The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later,' she said.
What now?
The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs 'to take such action… for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide'.
But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how.
Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel.
The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government.
But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel.
With inputs from AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Census delay no accident, delimitation not a coincidence', says Stalin
'Census delay no accident, delimitation not a coincidence', says Stalin

Business Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

'Census delay no accident, delimitation not a coincidence', says Stalin

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) president MK Stalin on Friday accused the BJP-led central government of deliberately delaying the national Census and orchestrating the delimitation process with a hidden agenda. Calling the Census delay 'no accident' and the delimitation exercise 'no coincidence,' he said, 'The danger I warned of is at our doorstep.' In a post on social media, he alleged: 'There is a sinister design in how the BJP-led Union Government is implementing the national Census and the subsequent delimitation. Developed states, especially in the non-Hindi speaking South, which followed population control norms, will now be punished.' He argued that states which disregarded population control for years would be rewarded with additional seats in Parliament. This, he said, distorts the federal structure and unfairly benefits neglect over progress. Stalin noted that he had already 'warned about this design' and cited senior Congress leader P Chidambaram's detailed explanation of 'how this sleight of hand is unfolding.' He said it was time to remain vigilant and prepare strategies to defend the South's representation. 'The 2027 Census will form the basis for the next delimitation, replacing the 1971 data. This gives the Union BJP government the means to restructure parliamentary representation to its advantage, at the cost of the southern states,' he alleged. While the Ministry of Home Affairs has stated that the concerns of affected states will be considered, Stalin described such assurances as vague. He insisted that the situation calls for a clear commitment in Parliament and the introduction of a Constitutional amendment. He added: 'Just look at what happened after Article 370 was abrogated. The Union government spoke of restoring statehood to Jammu and Kashmir. Elections were held. Assurances were given in the Supreme Court. Yet, Jammu and Kashmir remains a Union Territory. This is the track record of BJP we are dealing with.' Stalin warned that if delimitation is carried out using the 2027 Census, the democratic influence of the southern states would be severely diminished. He also criticised the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), saying, 'Betrayers like the AIADMK choose to kneel before the BJP for their political survival,' but that the people of Tamil Nadu, under the DMK's leadership, would not allow the state to suffer for its developmental success.

‘I Missed My Son's Birth': Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil, Detained Over Gaza Protest, Shares Ordeal
‘I Missed My Son's Birth': Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil, Detained Over Gaza Protest, Shares Ordeal

News18

time20 minutes ago

  • News18

‘I Missed My Son's Birth': Columbia Student Mahmoud Khalil, Detained Over Gaza Protest, Shares Ordeal

A Columbia University graduate facing deportation over his participation in pro-Palestinian campus protests detailed the personal and professional toll of his continued detention. In a court statement 30-year-old Mahmoud Khalil, a legal US resident originally from Syria, said he suffered 'irreparable harm" during months in federal immigration custody in Louisiana. Mahmoud Khalil said, 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep."

'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release
'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release

NDTV

time23 minutes ago

  • NDTV

'Irreparable Harm' To Career, Family: Detained Columbia Graduate Pleads For Release

Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate facing deportation due to his pro-Palestinian activism, details the emotional toll of his detention, missing his child's birth and losing job opportunities. A judge questions the constitutionality of his deportation. New York: A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the "irreparable harm" caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the "most immediate and visceral harms" he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. "Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. "When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." He also cited potentially "career-ending" harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. "As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States," he wrote. "Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?" Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin responded that Khalil should simply self-deport, taking advantage of the administration's offer of $1,000 and a free flight to those in the country illegally that use its CBP Home app. Khalil obtained a green card, but the Trump administration says it is revoking it. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil - that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy - could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store