logo
Senate panel passes bills on Bible studies and a school of ‘intellectual freedom'

Senate panel passes bills on Bible studies and a school of ‘intellectual freedom'

Yahoo05-03-2025

Bills passed out of the Iowa Senate Education Committee Tuesday would set guidelines for academic programs and change how child abuse in schools is investigated. (Photo via Getty Images)
The Iowa Senate Education Committee passed a number of bills aimed at both primary and higher education during its Tuesday meeting, only a couple of days out from the first funnel deadline of the session.
A few bills focused on child abuse in schools will move ahead with unanimous support from lawmakers, while perspectives clashed on proposed education programs on intellectual diversity and the study of the Christian Bible.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Senate File 127 would require the University of Iowa to establish a 'school of intellectual freedom' in its College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, which would focus on 'the historical ideas, traditions and texts that have shaped the American constitutional order and society,' according to the bill, as well as free speech, civil discourse and intellectual diversity.
Sen. Herman Quirmbach, D-Ames, had a number of issues with the legislation, including its potential to restrict intellectual freedom rather than promote it and the fact that it is an unfunded mandate that would have universities incur large annual costs.
Its companion bill passed out of the House Higher Education Committee in February, with a fiscal note added March 4 detailing costs of forming and maintaining the school. Staffing costs, including a dean, five tenure-eligible faculty members and two administrative staff members, are expected to amount to about $1.45 million annually, according to the analysis from nonpartisan legislative staff, with an additional $50,000 needed each year for programming expenses.
Quirmbach pointed out that the legislation states appropriated or donated funds cannot be used for indirect costs, like cleaning services and other expenses, which could drive that annual $1.5 million up even more.
'I think that we're seeing here a proposal for a school of intellectual freedom, which, in its authorization here, defeats intellectual freedom …,' Quirmbach said. 'It seems to be unnecessary because of these already existing statutory guarantees of intellectual freedom, it's an unfunded mandate, the personnel reviews for tenure are not consistent with standard practice. And aside from that, it's a great idea — not.'
The bill was moved onto the debate calendar with an 11-5 vote.
Senate File 138 would establish guidelines for school districts to offer an elective course on the Bible for grades 9-12, with approval from a district's school board required for such a course to be established. According to the bill, these courses 'shall not endorse, favor, promote, or disfavor, or be hostile toward, any particular religion, faith, or nonreligious perspective.'
Sen. Sandy Salmon, R-Janesville, said when introducing the bill that all religious views of participating students must be respected in class.
Echoing comments she made during the bill's subcommittee meeting, Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott, D-West Des Moines, said schools are already allowed to have elective courses on different religions and making this bill a law would be unnecessary and unconstitutional, as it promotes the teaching of one religion over another.
Though he said he supports the teaching of the Bible as it has had an enormous impact on history and culture, Quirmbach said other religions like Islam and Hinduism have also made significant influences on American life.
When he asked whether Salmon would be amenable to adding amendments to give guidelines on the teaching of the Quran and Hindu texts, she replied that schools already have the ability to offer classes on these subjects, but other religious texts haven't had the 'deep impact on our society, on our nation, that the Bible has had.'
'So to have a bill here that promotes reading of the Bible, which I support, but where there would be resistance to providing similar recognition to Islam, to Hinduism, to all of the other great world religions, all of which add to the knowledge and wisdom of humanity, that then is going to be a violation of the First Amendment,' Quirmbach said.
The bill passed 11-5 in the committee.
Senate Study Bill 1075 would change data reporting requirements for Iowa community colleges to have them report information directly to the Iowa Department of Education rather than the state community colleges bureau. It would also have colleges provide individual-level data to the department, and the Department of Education would need to include information on 'program level educational and employment outcomes' in its annual Condition of Community Colleges report, according to the legislation.
The legislation would also direct the Iowa Department of Administrative Services to work with the Department of Education and form an annual compensation schedule and set employee benefits for all employees of the Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired and Iowa School for the Deaf.
Sen. Jeff Taylor, R-Sioux Center, introduced an amendment to exempt non-credit and continuing education instructors from code defining how community college teachers are subject to teacher contract continuation, termination, and discharge laws. These policies are also not applicable to adjunct instructors, he said.
Both the amendment and bill passed unanimously and without discussion.
Senate File 237 would have the Iowa Department of Education form a working group focused on the impacts of school-provided technology, including computers, class slideshow presentations and online learning management systems, on students' cognitive function and academic performances. The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services will work with the Department of Education for this working group, according to the bill.
If passed, the group would submit a report to the General Assembly by Dec. 31 on their findings and recommendations for best practices in mitigating negative effects of school provided technology on 'social and behavioral development, attention span, mental concentration and learning ability of students,' according to the bill.
Sen. Cindy Winckler, D-Davenport, voiced her support for the bill, saying parents could potentially learn from the work group as well as educators and bring some new practices into the home.
'I think that we are only touching the tip of the iceberg as we talk about our schools and the use of technology,' Winckler said. 'Certainly, there is a lot of technology used outside of school, but we really don't have control of that.'
An amendment brought forward by Taylor would require that the working group include parents of school-aged children, mental health professionals and educators. It, as well as the full bill, passed unanimously.
Taylor said he introduced this legislation in part in response to a bill proposed by Gov. Kim Reynolds that would set a statewide cellphone policy in schools.
'Student-used laptops and online learning platforms and PowerPoint presentations in the classroom, those can be wonderful in many ways, and there's lots of benefits and advantages to using those, but there are also some drawbacks to that as well, and I think it would be useful to know what those are,' Taylor said.
Salmon said Senate File 221 would move the responsibility of investigating alleged child abuse cases at school from the school where it occurred to the Department of Health and Human Services. When a report of child abuse is brought forward, the school would need to notify the department and place the employee who allegedly committed the abuse on administrative leave.
If found to have committed child abuse, the employee would have their license revoked by the Iowa Board of Educational Examiners and be fired by the school.
Lawmakers expressed concerns that the Department of Health and Human Services does not have the capacity to handle alleged child abuse cases for school districts across the state. Sen. Mike Zimmer, D-DeWitt, said he would like to see an amendment where a level one investigator is brought in from another school district to handle the case in order to remove the appearance of a conflict of interest while avoiding putting undue burden on the department. He said level two investigators, or those from an outside agency hired by the school, could also be utilized.
Salmon said Iowa would be following a number of other states by enacting this policy, and it would also serve to provide more transparency and objectivity to the investigation.
Winckler said during discussion of another bill relating to child abuse in schools that the two pieces of legislation contradict one another, and both cannot be passed.
Senate File 366 would require all Iowa schools to immediately place employees on administrative leave if they are involved in a Iowa Board of Educational Examiners case involving the abuse of a child with probable cause, or if they were 'involved in any criminal or civil action in which a court found that the employee was negligent' while employed by the school, according to the bill.
'It is important that administrative leaves occur. It is important that abuse is taken seriously and actions are taken immediately,' Winckler said. 'But it seems like we have two different ideas in regard to how things would progress, and we just need to work those out before they come to the floor. We can't pass both of them.'
With unanimous votes, both bills will move to the Senate floor for debate.
Called 'Erin's Law' by Taylor, Senate File 172 would require the head of the Iowa Department of Education to develop guidelines on how schools can teach students in kindergarten through sixth grade about child sexual abuse with the goal of prevention and increasing awareness. Schools would be required to offer instruction based on these guidelines, according to the legislation.
Students would be educated on how to identify safe-versus-unsafe touches and secrets, Taylor said, and how to escape an abuser and report what occurred. Iowa is one of 12 states that have not passed a version of Erin's Law, Taylor said, and he hopes that the state will stop lagging behind in providing students with necessary and important education that could keep them safe.
Trone Garriott said it is 'incredibly important' to help students understand sexual abuse and teach them how to ask for help, as child sexual abuse is a prevalent problem that is often done by people they know. There is a lot of misinformation out there about child sexual abuse and its perpetrators, something she said the Legislature contributes to, with 'the idea that it's some certain group or some certain population that's doing this.'
'Knowledge is power, and knowledge protects our children, and so having accurate information, correct terms for body parts, understanding of what's appropriate and healthy and what is not safe, is incredibly powerful for these young people,' Trone Garriott said.
An amendment introduced by Taylor and passed by the committee would include an opt-out option for parents who don't wish for their child to participate in these lessons. The bill will move to Senate debate after a unanimous vote from the committee.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House breaks ground on Trump projects to pave over Rose Garden grass, add flagpoles to lawns

time20 minutes ago

White House breaks ground on Trump projects to pave over Rose Garden grass, add flagpoles to lawns

WASHINGTON -- The White House broke ground Monday on construction projects ordered by President Donald Trump to pave over the grass in the Rose Garden and install flagpoles on the north and south lawns. The projects are part of a series of personal touches that Trump, a real estate developer turned politician, has added or is adding to the Executive Mansion and its grounds since he opened his second term in January. The projects also include new artwork of himself on walls and gold-toned flourishes in the Oval Office. He also wants to add a ballroom. Reporters on Monday noticed that work had begun in the Rose Garden, just off the Oval Office on the south grounds, when they were taken out to the South Lawn to wait for Trump to return on the Marine One helicopter from an overnight at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland. Photos showed that a limestone border that first lady Melania Trump had added during a Rose Garden renovation project in her husband's first term had been removed in some places and the grass had been dug up in others spots. Employees of the National Park Service, which maintains the White House grounds, started the work on Monday, according to a White House official. The project is set to be completed in about two months, or the first half of August, said the official, who was not authorized to comment publicly on intended changes to the Executive Mansion and spoke on the condition of anonymity. After stepping off the helicopter, Trump walked over to a bulldozer that was on the South Lawn to start digging a foundation for one of two flagpoles he promised in April. One flagpole will be added to the South Lawn, and the second will be installed on the North Lawn, he said. Trump said he was installing two 'beautiful' flagpoles 'paid for by Trump' on the grounds because 'they've needed flagpoles for 200 years.' The American and POW/MIA flags fly on the roof of the White House every day. The Republican president said months ago that he would pave over the Rose Garden because the grass there is always wet and an inconvenience for women in high heels. It was unclear if he planned to pay for this project. Last week, Trump posted on his social media site about the ballroom he promised, 'compliments of a man known as Donald J. Trump.' He wrote on Friday that he had inspected the site for the ballroom, saying it will be a 'wonderful addition' and is an example of the ''fun' projects I do while thinking about the World Economy, the United States, China, Russia, and lots of other Countries, places, and events.'

White House breaks ground on Trump projects to pave over Rose Garden grass, add flagpoles to lawns
White House breaks ground on Trump projects to pave over Rose Garden grass, add flagpoles to lawns

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

White House breaks ground on Trump projects to pave over Rose Garden grass, add flagpoles to lawns

WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House broke ground Monday on construction projects ordered by President Donald Trump to pave over the grass in the Rose Garden and install flagpoles on the north and south lawns. The projects are part of a series of personal touches that Trump, a real estate developer turned politician, has added or is adding to the Executive Mansion and its grounds since he opened his second term in January. The projects also include new artwork of himself on walls and gold-toned flourishes in the Oval Office. He also wants to add a ballroom. Reporters on Monday noticed that work had begun in the Rose Garden, just off the Oval Office on the south grounds, when they were taken out to the South Lawn to wait for Trump to return on the Marine One helicopter from an overnight at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland. Photos showed that a limestone border that first lady Melania Trump had added during a Rose Garden renovation project in her husband's first term had been removed in some places and the grass had been dug up in others spots. Employees of the National Park Service, which maintains the White House grounds, started the work on Monday, according to a White House official. The project is set to be completed in about two months, or the first half of August, said the official, who was not authorized to comment publicly on intended changes to the Executive Mansion and spoke on the condition of anonymity. After stepping off the helicopter, Trump walked over to a bulldozer that was on the South Lawn to start digging a foundation for one of two flagpoles he promised in April. One flagpole will be added to the South Lawn, and the second will be installed on the North Lawn, he said. Trump said he was installing two 'beautiful' flagpoles 'paid for by Trump' on the grounds because 'they've needed flagpoles for 200 years.' The American and POW/MIA flags fly on the roof of the White House every day. The Republican president said months ago that he would pave over the Rose Garden because the grass there is always wet and an inconvenience for women in high heels. It was unclear if he planned to pay for this project. Last week, Trump posted on his social media site about the ballroom he promised, 'compliments of a man known as Donald J. Trump.' He wrote on Friday that he had inspected the site for the ballroom, saying it will be a 'wonderful addition' and is an example of the ''fun' projects I do while thinking about the World Economy, the United States, China, Russia, and lots of other Countries, places, and events.' ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

The Scholar Who Predicted America's Breakdown Says It's Just Beginning
The Scholar Who Predicted America's Breakdown Says It's Just Beginning

Newsweek

time25 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

The Scholar Who Predicted America's Breakdown Says It's Just Beginning

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Fifteen years ago, smack in the middle of Barack Obama's first term, amid the rapid rise of social media and a slow recovery from the Great Recession, a professor at the University of Connecticut issued a stark warning: the United States was heading into a decade of growing political instability. It sounded somewhat contrarian at the time. The global economy was clawing back from the depths of the financial crisis, and the American political order still seemed anchored in post-Cold War optimism — though cracks were beginning to emerge, as evidenced by the Tea Party uprising. But Peter Turchin, an ecologist-turned-historian, had the data. "Quantitative historical analysis reveals that complex human societies are affected by recurrent—and predictable—waves of political instability," Turchin wrote in the journal Nature in 2010, forecasting a spike in unrest around 2020, driven by economic inequality, "elite overproduction" and rising public debt. A protestor holds up a Mexican flag as burning cars line the street on June 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Tensions in the city remain high after the Trump administration called in the National... A protestor holds up a Mexican flag as burning cars line the street on June 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. Tensions in the city remain high after the Trump administration called in the National Guard against the wishes of city leaders following two days of clashes with police during a series of immigration raids. More Photo byNow, with the nation consumed by polarization in the early months of a second Donald Trump presidency, institutional mistrust at all-time highs, and deepening political conflict, Turchin's prediction appears to have landed with uncanny accuracy. In the wake of escalating protests and the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles under President Trump's immigration crackdown, Turchin spoke with Newsweek about the latest escalation of political turbulence in the United States—and the deeper structural forces he believes have been driving the country toward systemic crisis for more than a decade. Predicting Chaos In his 2010 analysis published by Nature, Turchin identified several warning signs in the domestic electorate: stagnating wages, a growing wealth gap, a surplus of educated elites without corresponding elite jobs, and an accelerating fiscal deficit. All of these phenomena, he argued, had reached a turning point in the 1970s. "These seemingly disparate social indicators are actually related to each other dynamically," he wrote at the time. "Nearly every one of those indicators has intensified," Turchin said in an interview with Newsweek, citing real wage stagnation, the effects of artificial intelligence on the professional class and increasingly unmanageable public finances. Turchin's prediction was based on a framework known as Structural-Demographic Theory (SDT), which models how historical forces—economic inequality, elite competition and state capacity—interact to drive cycles of political instability. These cycles have recurred across empires and republics, from ancient Rome to the Ottoman Empire. Turchin's forecast is based on a framework known as Structural-Demographic Theory (SDT), which models how historical forces—economic inequality, elite competition, and state capacity—interact to drive cycles of political instability. Turchin's forecast is based on a framework known as Structural-Demographic Theory (SDT), which models how historical forces—economic inequality, elite competition, and state capacity—interact to drive cycles of political instability. Courtesy Peter Turchin "Structural-Demographic Theory enables us to analyze historical dynamics and apply that understanding to current trajectories," Turchin said. "It's not prophecy. It's modeling feedback loops that repeat with alarming regularity." He argues that violence in the U.S. tends to repeat about every 50 years— pointing to spasms of unrest around 1870, 1920, 1970 and 2020. He links these periods to how generations tend to forget what came before. "After two generations, memories of upheaval fade, elites begin to reorganize systems in their favor, and the stress returns," he said. One of the clearest historical parallels to now, he notes, is the 1970s. That decade saw radical movements emerge from university campuses and middle-class enclaves not just in the U.S., but across the West. The far-left Weather Underground movement, which started as a campus organization at the University of Michigan, bombed government buildings and banks; the Red Army Faction in West Germany and Italy's Red Brigades carried out kidnappings and assassinations. These weren't movements of the dispossessed, but of the downwardly mobile—overeducated and politically alienated. "There's a real risk of that dynamic resurfacing," Turchin said. A 'Knowledge Class' Critics have sometimes questioned the deterministic tone of Turchin's models. But he emphasizes that he does not predict exact events—only the risk factors and phases of systemic stress. While many political analysts and historians point to Donald Trump's 2016 election as the inflection point for the modern era of American political turmoil, Turchin had charted the warning signs years earlier — when Trump was known, above all, as the host of a popular NBC reality show. President Donald Trump takes part in a signing ceremony after his inauguration on January 20, 2025 in the President's Room at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. President Donald Trump takes part in a signing ceremony after his inauguration on January 20, 2025 in the President's Room at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC. Melina Mara-Pool/Getty Images "As you know, in 2010, based on historical patterns and quantitative indicators, I predicted a period of political instability in the United States beginning in the 2020s," Turchin said to Newsweek. "The structural drivers behind this prediction were threefold: popular immiseration, elite overproduction, and a weakening state capacity." According to his model, Trump's rise was not the cause of America's political crisis but a symptom—emerging from a society already strained by widening inequality and elite saturation. In Turchin's view, such figures often arise when a growing class of counter-elites—ambitious, credentialed individuals locked out of power—begin to challenge the status quo. "Intraelite competition has increased even more, driven now mostly by the shrinking supply of positions for them," he said. In 2025, he pointed to the impact of AI in the legal profession and recent government downsizing, such as the DOGE eliminating thousands of positions at USAID, as accelerants in this trend. This theory was echoed by Wayne State University sociologist Jukka Savolainen, who argued in a recent op-ed in The Wall Street Journal that the U.S. is risking the creation of a radicalized "knowledge class"—overeducated, underemployed, and institutionally excluded. "When societies generate more elite aspirants than there are roles to fill, competition for status intensifies," Savolainen wrote. "Ambitious but frustrated people grow disillusioned and radicalized. Rather than integrate into institutions, they seek to undermine them." Peter Turchin forecasted a spike in unrest around 2020, driven by economic inequality, elite overproduction, and rising public debt. Peter Turchin forecasted a spike in unrest around 2020, driven by economic inequality, elite overproduction, and rising public debt. Courtesy of Peter Turchin Savolainen warned that Trump-era policies—such as the dismantling of D.E.I. and academic research programs and cuts to public institutions—have the potential to accelerate the pattern, echoing the unrest of the 1970s. "President Trump's policies could intensify this dynamic," he noted. "Many are trained in critique, moral reasoning, and systems thinking—the very profile of earlier generations of radicals." Structural Drivers Turchin, who is now an emeritus professor at UConn, believes the American system entered what he calls a "revolutionary situation"—a historical phase in which the destabilizing conditions can no longer be absorbed by institutional buffers. Reflecting on the last few years in a recent post on his Cliodynamica newsletter, he wrote that "history accelerated" after 2020. He and colleague Andrey Korotayev had tracked rising incidents of anti-government demonstrations and violent riots across Western democracies in the lead-up to that year. Their findings predicted a reversal of prior declines in unrest. "And then history accelerated," he wrote. "America was slammed by the pandemic, George Floyd, and a long summer of discontent." A police officer points a hand cannon at protesters who have been detained pending arrest on South Washington Street in Minneapolis, May 31, 2020, as protests continued following the death of George Floyd. A police officer points a hand cannon at protesters who have been detained pending arrest on South Washington Street in Minneapolis, May 31, 2020, as protests continued following the death of George Floyd. AP Photo/John Minchillo, File While many saw Trump's 2020 election loss and the January 6 Capitol riot that followed as its own turning point in that hectic period, Turchin warned that these events did not mark an end to the turbulence. "Many commentators hastily concluded that things would now go back to normal. I disagreed," he wrote. "The structural drivers for instability—the wealth pump, popular immiseration, and elite overproduction/conflict—were still running hot," Turchin continued. "America was in a 'revolutionary situation,' which could be resolved by either developing into a full-blown revolution, or by being defused by skillful actions of the governing elites. Well, now we know which way it went." These stressors, he argues, are not isolated. They are systemwide pressures building for years, playing out in feedback loops. "Unfortunately," he told Newsweek, "all these trends are only gaining power."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store