Why Pakistan fights India
India and Pakistan have agreed to a temporary ceasefire, but tensions between the two nuclear-armed nations are still running high. There are factions in both governments that think a war might be a good thing for them politically.
The old saying goes that most nations have an army, whereas Pakistan is a place where the army has a nation. So will nationalistic rhetoric from Pakistan's military lead an inevitable escalation into all-out war?
This is the second episode in a two-part series where we take a look at both sides: India and Pakistan. Why they want to fight, and what they have to lose.
Follow If You're Listening on the ABC Listen app.
Check out our series on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDTPrMoGHssAfgMMS3L5LpLNFMNp1U_Nq
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Hamas agrees to hostage releases, pushes for 'amendments' to US ceasefire proposal
Hamas responds to US-brokered ceasefire proposal with a push for amendments but the US slams their demands as "unacceptable".
News.com.au
9 hours ago
- News.com.au
Inside $31m mansion abandoned on skyscraper after owner flees
The fate of an abandoned $31 million mansion perched on a 120 metre-tall skyscraper hangs in balance after its tycoon owner fled to the UK. Details of what's inside the unbelievable White House replica have been revealed for the first time, but it remains unclear whether the sprawling home will have any residents. Businessman and former Indian politician Vijay Mallya, 69, who lives in the UK, commissioned the Sky Mansion on the 34th and 35th Kingfisher Towers in Bengaluru, India in 2010. But the tycoon could never live in his dream home after he fled the country in 2016 after defrauding at least 17 banks of nearly $2.1 billion. Now, sources familiar with the case say the future of the mansion remains uncertain as lenders and agencies probing the fraud are still trying to recover cash from Mallya. Sprawled over an unbelievable 3716 square metres on two levels, the unique mansion sticks out like a sore thumb on the gargantuan tower. For its ultra-rich future owner — if it finds one — there's a helipad, infinity pool and an open deck that offers a 360-degree viewing platform of the city. Despite the penthouse being part of the skyscraper, it's a private villa with two of its own elevators. The Kingfisher Towers were built on 1.8 hectares of land where the father-in-law of former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Narayan Murthy, reportedly bought an apartment last year. The mansion was one of the first residential penthouses in India built at such a height. Prestige Group chairman Irfan Razack previously said constructing the gargantuan mansion was a challenge as it was mounted on cantilever — a structure only supported at one end. 'It's a complex structure,' he told local media. 'It was a challenge to construct the mansion on a huge cantilever at that height.' It's unknown when the build was completed, but the exterior of the mansion appears to be fully finished. But it's not clear if the White House replica is finished on the inside. Interior firm Morph Design and Co, an arm of Prestige Group which was hired to work on the interiors of the mansion, revealed to The Sun the 'interiors of the mansion were not done'. While the house is reportedly taken care of by the developers and regularly cleaned, the penthouse lies unoccupied due to legal tangles. Prestige Constructions didn't respond to a request from The Sun on its fate. Before the penthouse was finished, Mr Mallya fled the country after facing legal action over money laundering and alleged fraud charges. He had taken a loan from a syndicate of banks for the operations of his defunct Kingfisher Airlines, but he failed to make the payment. Mr Mallya is also the former co-owner of the Force India Formula One Team that went into administration. The tycoon left India in 2016 and later declared himself bankrupt in the UK. Indian banks have since been seeking to recover the outstanding loan amount through various legal means including the sale of his assets. Several of his properties have been seized by the Enforcement Directorate, otherwise known as the financial crimes police. The mansion is likely part of the recovery procedure. SS Naganand, the counsel who appeared for one of the banks, told The Sun, 'The tower was part of the entire recovery proceeding and all the assets belonging to him are part of the process, certainly that mansion. 'The building was constructed long before the litigation started. 'Prestige Group put up the structure and kept a portion of it, the rest of which came to [his] company and Mallya had built something for him on the top and belonged to him personally. 'From my understanding there were proceedings relating to that both in Indian courts and the UK courts.' Mr Mallya's former lawyer EC Agrawala said that the fate of the property can only be decided by the Indian government. 'The mansion was under construction,' he said. 'The last three to four years, I have not followed it. It was seized by the Enforcement Directorate but not fully confiscated. 'It is still lying unoccupied and unsold as the government is yet to decide its fate.'
News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
Liberal frontbencher James Paterson says Coalition should not have opposed Labor's ‘meagre' tax cuts before election
Senior opposition frontbencher James Paterson has conceded the Coalition's immediate objection to Labor's $5-a-week tax cuts contributed to the opposition's blistering election result, stating that party 'unity' was put before 'robustly interrogating policy ideas'. The $5-a-week tax cuts which come into effect from July 2026 were introduced by Jim Chalmers in the March federal budget. While the 'meagre' measures were criticised for being untargeted, they were passed through parliament just before Anthony Albanese called the election and are set to come into effect from July 2026. Speaking to Sky on Sunday, Senator Paterson conceded that the opposition should not have opposed the policy as it allowed Labor to claim that taxes would be higher under a Coalition. 'I don't think we should have opposed the government's tax cuts, as meagre and miserly as they were. In the core of the liberal party's DNA is lower taxes, and we should never oppose a tax cut,' he said. 'We should never allow the Labor Party as audacious a claim as it was to go to an election, to claim to be the party of lower taxes. The Liberal Party must always own the space of lower taxes, and under Ted O'Brien's role as Shadow Treasurer and me as shadow finance minister, that will be the case.' Although Senator Paterson declined to say whether he had personally advocated for further tax relief, stating he didn't want to go into 'private conversations' had by the leadership group, he said he personally believed lower taxes are a core Liberal value. Reflecting on the Coalition's thumping defeat that reduced its representation in the lower to house by 15 seats to 43, Senator Paterson also said that 'with the benefit of hindsight,' he believed the Coalition 'prized unity over robustly interrogating policy ideas'. 'I should have spoken up more. I should have pushed back more. I should have contested ideas more. I think all my colleagues in the parliamentary party have had that conclusion,' he said. 'Unity and discipline in politics is a critical feature of a successful political party, and we will need that in this parliamentary term, but it should never come at the expense of taking, of really contesting those ideas, of really robustly considering them, making sure that they are fit for public consumption, making sure that they contribute to the public, believing that we are ready to govern.' Party pollster Freshwater also failed to identify the Liberal's poor performance in key seats like Banks, Hughes, Menzies, Sturt and Deakin which were all lost to Labor, Senator Paterson added. He said that had the party been aware of the potential swings against the incumbent MPs, then opposition leader Peter Dutton would have spent more time campaigning in those vulnerable electorates. 'We particularly would have spent our resources differently, we wouldn't have had such an aggressive map going after safer Labor seats in the outer suburbs … had we known that we needed to be spending more to defend those seats of our own,' he said. 'You have to rely on polling for that kind of intelligence, and so that is a real problem, and I feel terribly sorry for my colleagues who are victims of that.' As it stands the Coalition holds 43 of the 150 seats in the Lower House. The Liberals are likely to gain the blue-ribbon Sydney seat of Bradfield. The initial count revealed that Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian had won the seat by a whisper-thin eight votes, however the slim margin triggered an automatic recount, with teal independent Nicolette Boele yet to concede the vote.
