Karen Read murder trial: Second trial not the end of Read's legal troubles
Karen Read's second murder trial is now underway. But this trial is not it for Read's legal troubles.
Read, 45, is accused of killing her boyfriend, Braintree native and Boston police officer John O'Keefe outside a Canton home in January 2022. Read's first trial in O'Keefe's death ended in a mistrial in July.
O'Keefe's family in August filed a civil lawsuit in Plymouth Superior Court against Read and two bars in Canton that she and O'Keefe visited before his death.
John O'Keefe's brother, Paul O'Keefe, and his estate filed a civil lawsuit in Plymouth Superior Court in August against John O'Keefe's girlfriend, Karen Read, and Canton bars C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall.
The suit is seeking at least $50,000 in damages including "reasonably expected society, companionship, comfort, guidance, counsel, net income, services, assistance, protection, care, and advice to next of kin."
The lawsuit states Read's conduct was "extreme and outrageous, beyond the bounds of decency and was utterly intolerable" and that she "outrageously created a false narrative."
Read's counsel filed motioned to stay the civil case until the criminal case is resolved, arguing that parallel civil and criminal proceedings could undermine Read's Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination.
Judge William White Jr. in November ordered the halt of Read's scheduled deposition in the civil case and any other discovery directly related to her. Other discovery proceedings were allowed to continue without pause, according to the ruling.
Read was charged with second-degree murder after O'Keefe's body was found in the driveway outside the Canton home of a fellow Boston police officer Jan. 29, 2022, during a snowstorm. Prosecutors say Read was drunk and angry when she purposely hit him after a night of drinking at C.F. McCarthy's and the Waterfall.
But defense attorneys for Read say she was framed for O'Keefe's death.
Read is also charged with manslaughter while driving drunk and leaving the scene of personal injury and death.
This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: What is the status of Karen Read's civil case? O'Keefe family sues
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Severity of damage to Karen Read's taillight comes into question during testimony of Dighton officer
Fireworks on the stand during the retrial of Karen Read after a Dighton Police officer testified Read's taillight wasn't damaged that bad before it was seized by Massachusetts State Police troopers. Dighton Police Sergeant Nicholas Barros said Read's taillight had damage, but not to the extent of what pictures presented in court showed. 'That was the black Lexus,' he said. 'That was not the taillight the day I was there.' Barros described seeing a hole about the size of a dollar bill before State Troopers seized the Lexus from Read's parents Dighton home. 'Did you see anybody from the State Police in any way tamper with that vehicle?' Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan asked on cross. 'I did not,' Barros replied. Barros appeared confident with his memory until Brennan began peppering him with questions. 'Would be fair to say, based on all the additional information you've read and seen, had some effect on your memory?' Brennan questioned. 'I guess,' Barros said. 'His testimony hasn't changed,' Karen Read said outside court. 'He was subpoenaed by the prosecution and said it was damaged and not completely broken a year ago and then he said that again today.' More fireworks during the testimony of the defense's dog bite expert Dr. Marie Russel, when Read's lawyer Robert Alessi demanded a mistrial over the prosecutor's questioning. Alessi argued that Brennan brought up the absence of dog DNA on O'Keefe's clothing when it wasn't in evidence. Brennan pushed back. 'It might be hurtful for the defendant's theories, for the creation they portrayed, for this jury yesterday,' he said. 'But it is not improper.' Judge Beverly Cannone sided with Brennan and rejected the mistrial request. Russell was asked about statements Read has made about a possible collision with O'Keefe. Russell said people suffer something called 'acute grief reaction,' where they blame themselves when bad things happen. Outside of court, Read was asked if she will take the stand. She said she has mixed feelings and did not give a 'yes' or 'no' response. A plow driver is expected to testify on Wednesday. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
5 hours ago
Judge denies Karen Read another mistrial in killing of boyfriend
Judge Beverly Cannone denied Karen Read a mistrial in her second murder trial in the killing of her cop boyfriend John O'Keefe on Tuesday. Attorneys for Karen Read asked the judge to declare a mistrial with prejudice in her second murder trial after prosecutors questioned a defense witness over whether she was aware no dog DNA was found on O'Keefe's sweater from the night of the murder, in an attempt to discredit the defense's theory. Dog bite expert and forensic pathologist Dr. Marie Russell testified that markings on O'Keefe's arm were caused by dog bites and scratches, supporting the defense's claim that O'Keefe was attacked by a dog and beaten by other parties before being thrown out into the snow the night of the murder. Prosecutors -- for the first time in this trial -- admitted O'Keefe's sweater into evidence and cited a forensics report that said there was no evidence of dog DNA. Prosecutors have alleged Read hit O'Keefe with her car outside the home of fellow police officer Brian Albert -- causing the marks on his arm -- then left him there to die during a major blizzard. Read is accused of killing O'Keefe in 2022. Read is charged with second degree murder, manslaughter while operating a motor vehicle under the influence and leaving a scene of personal injury and death. She has denied the allegations and maintained her innocence. Read's first murder trial ended in a mistrial after the jury was unable to reach a verdict. At least four jurors who served on her first trial last year confirmed she was found not guilty of murder and leaving the scene. The prosecution rested last week and the defense began presenting its case. On Tuesday, prosecutors introduced evidence -- O'Keefe's sweatshirt from the night of the murder -- to the defense's expert witness, asking her if she was aware that holes in the arm of the sweatshirt had been swabbed for traces of dog DNA. The evidence had not been previously presented to this jury. Before she could answer, the defense objected. After a short sidebar between attorneys and the judge, the jury was removed from the courtroom. After the jury and the witness on the stand -- Russell -- left the courtroom, Read's defense team requested the judge declare a mistrial with prejudice. "Attorney Brennan -- just with regard to Dr. Russell -- in open court, in front of the jury, used the concept of DNA in this case. He has introduced it and brought it in for the very first time in front of the jury. He has done so intentionally," defense Attorney Robert Alessi said Tuesday. "Based upon that intentional mention, the defense moves strongly, vigorously for a mistrial with prejudice," Alessi said. Lawyers for Read argued that during this trial, prosecutors did not call a witness who, in her first trial, testified about the testing of DNA evidence. "For whatever reason, the prosecution has chosen not to bring that witness in who would testify, perhaps to DNA. As a result of that strategic decision that the prosecution made, there's been no mention," Alessi said. The defense said that it has purposefully not mentioned DNA in the trial so far and it is not permissible for prosecutors to present it now. "The prosecution has put in the jury's mind that topic. That is irremediable. That cannot be reversed," Alessi said. "The prosecution has to suffer the consequences of its own intentional actions of bringing up that topic," Alessi said. "The only remedy is a mistrial with prejudice." Prosecutors claimed they had always planned on bringing an expert to discuss DNA on rebuttal and argued that asking the defense's witness about the presence of dog DNA is permissible and essential. "The defense is on notice that there is no dog DNA in the sweater of John O'Keefe," prosecutor Hank Brennan said in court Tuesday. Alessi argued that there was no swabbing of the wounds in O'Keefe's right arm for DNA. He also argued that there is a series of concerns about the chain of custody of O'Keefe's sweater. O'Keefe's sweater was "left on the floor of the ambulance, left on the floor of the hospital, carried around by Mr. Proctor for weeks maybe even months, not submitted for testing for months," Alessi said. "There are huge issues that prevent a fair determination about whether there was even proper determination of whether there was DNA or not," Alessi said. Prosecutors argued that the defense had brought up DNA evidence in previous hearings in the case, making it permissible for them to ask a witness about DNA. After a short recess, the judge allowed prosecutors to continue questioning the witness about the presence of DNA evidence in the sweater. Russell testified that there are many reasons why there was no evidence of dog DNA in testing, but said the report stating there is no evidence of dog DNA does not change her determination that a dog caused the marks on O'Keefe's arm.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial recap: Hotel security guard says Combs paid $100,000 for video of Cassie Ventura assault; heckler is removed from the courtroom
The trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs continued Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, with two more witnesses — including a hotel security guard who was paid $100,000 by Combs for a copy of the surveillance video showing him beating Cassie Ventura — testifying in the sex trafficking case. Their testimony was briefly delayed by an outburst from a spectator, who was removed by court marshals. Federal prosecutors say that for decades, Combs abused, threatened and coerced women to participate in marathon sexual encounters called "freak offs" and used his business empire, along with guns, kidnapping and arson, to conceal his crimes. The 55-year-old hip-hop mogul is facing five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, he could face life in prison. Here are some key takeaways from Tuesday's testimony culled from various reporters and news organizations in the courtroom, including CNN, NBC News and the Washington Post. Before Tuesday's testimony got underway, a woman who began screaming obscenities was removed from the courtroom at the request of Judge Arun Subramanian. The woman could be heard yelling at Combs, 'These motherf***ers are laughing at you!' "Escort her out right now!" Subramanian shouted from the bench. Combs, seated in his chair at the defense table, glanced at the woman as she was taken away by court marshals. Speaking to reporters outside, the woman said she was a Combs supporter and was upset about how people attending the trial in person had been mocking him. "Everyone is laughing at Diddy!" said the woman, who did not identify herself. "It's not right what they're doing to him!" Big picture: This was the first major outburst of the trial, which is now in its fourth week. Eddy Garcia, a former security guard at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, where Combs was caught on surveillance video assaulting Cassie Ventura in March 2016, took the stand first. He testified under an immunity order after asserting his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself. Garcia told the court that he was initially approached by Combs's former chief of staff Kristina Khorram about the footage, which showed Combs kicking and dragging Ventura in an elevator bank. The video was shown to the jury earlier in the trial. He said he told Khorram that she would need a subpoena to see the video. Combs then called from his personal cellphone saying the video 'could ruin' him if it got out and that he would 'take care' of Garcia if he could secure the only copy. Garcia said he spoke to his boss and they agreed to sell it for $50,000. Big picture: The video is a key piece of evidence in the prosecution's case as it seeks to prove that Ventura was forced by Combs to have sex with male escorts as part of 'freak offs' held at various hotels. At a private meeting at a Los Angeles high-rise building a few days later, Garcia said he and Combs got on a FaceTime call with Ventura, who at Combs's direction said she also wanted the video to go away. Garcia testified that Combs made him sign documents, including a nondisclosure agreement. Garcia then handed Combs a USB drive with the footage. 'Eddy, my angel, I knew you could help,' Combs told Garcia, according to the former security guard. Combs left the room and returned with $100,000 in a brown paper bag, ran the cash through a money counter and handed it to him while warning him not to make any big purchases, Garcia recalled. According to Garcia, Combs told him to give the extra cash to the other security guards on duty that day. Garcia testified that he gave $50,000 of the money to his supervisor who approved the deal with Combs, $20,000 to another guard involved in the incident and kept $30,000 for himself. Big picture: The defense team does not dispute the $100,000 payout. But they say it was made to avoid any negative press — and not to obstruct any potential criminal investigation. Derek Ferguson, the former chief financial officer of Combs's Bad Boy Entertainment, took the stand next. Ferguson told the court that he sometimes reported directly to Combs as CFO of Bad Boy from 1998 to 2012, overseeing budgets and salaries and at times responsible for the music mogul's personal finances. Financial records from December 2011 submitted as evidence by prosecutors while Ferguson was on the stand showed three $20,000 transfers, including: An outgoing transfer of $20,000 from Combs to Cassie Ventura on Dec. 14 An incoming transfer of $20,000 to Combs from Broderick Ventura, Cassie Ventura's father, on Dec. 23 An outgoing transfer of $20,000 from Combs to Broderick Ventura on Dec. 27 Big picture: Earlier in the trial, Regina Ventura, Cassie Ventura's mother, testified that Combs had threatened to release explicit videos of her daughter after he learned she was dating rapper Kid Cudi. Regina Ventura testified that Combs wanted $20,000 to 'recoup' his investment in Cassie. She said she was scared for her daughter's safety and that the family took out a home equity loan to pay Combs via a wire transfer. Regina Ventura told the court that the money was returned several days later with no explanation. Prosecutor Maurene Comey said the government intends to call three more witnesses on Wednesday, including Bryana Bongolan, who previously accused Combs of sexual battery and dangling her over a balcony; and 'Jane,' another one of Combs's accusers who is using a pseudonym during the trial. 'Mia,' a former assistant and the first accuser to testify against Combs under a pseudonym, concluded three days of testimony on Monday. Comey said that direct examination of Jane will take at least two days, followed by cross-examination that is expected to be of similar length. Big picture: Earlier Tuesday, prosecutors asked Judge Subramanian to order a news organization that revealed the identity of Mia in a social media post to remove it. Subramanian said he would consider it if the government submitted a formal request.
