12 new MK Party and PA members sworn in as MPs
CAPE TOWN - Twelve new Parliamentarians will be in the National Assembly on Wednesday afternoon, after being sworn in by the Speaker.
Nine of those members of Parliament (MPs) will be filling vacant seats of the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, while another three from the Patriotic Alliance (PA) will be replacing members who have been redeployed by the party.
Speaker Thoko Didiza has appealed to them to always respect the decorum of the house, and to always remember that they ultimately serve the people of South Africa.
Among the nine new MK Party members only Khanyisile Litchfield-Tshabalala, a former South African Navy rear-admiral, has served as an MP before, representing the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) between 2014 and 2015.
Despite earlier announcements by the party, its former secretary general, Floyd Shivambu, has not made a return to Parliament.
The MK Party last welcomed new MPs to the fold in August 2024, after axing more than a dozen members following a fallout over membership and the list process.
It has had to wait out the post-election period before making changes to its candidate lists.
Didiza appealed to the new MPs to exercise their duties with diligence.
'Because we do come from different parties, we will differ about how we see things on the issues that are being debated, but what is important is to do that in the manner that still respects one another.'
The official opposition will now have all its 58 seats filled for the first time since the swearing-in of new members following the elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SABC Bill withdrawal crisis and South Africa's public broadcasting future
The six months of silence since Communications Minister Solly Malatsi withdrew the SABC Bill is unacceptable. The Speaker must urgently gazette that withdrawal, in line with the rules of the National Assembly. Silence is killing the SABC. For years, the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has weathered waves of political noise, controversy, and intense public scrutiny — the kind of attention that once threatened its survival. But today, it is not the noise, but the silence that endangers its future. On 10 November 2024, the Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi withdrew the SABC Bill in terms of Rule 334 of the National Assembly Rules, following sustained pressure from civil society organisations, including the SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition (SOS), and various broadcasters. In line with Rule 277(3), the Speaker of the National Assembly was required to formally gazette this withdrawal. Six months later, this has yet to happen. Instead, the process has evolved into political infighting. On 21 December 2024, the Parliamentary committee on communications and digital technologies issued a statement rejecting outright Minister Malatsi's decision, describing the withdrawal as both unilateral and unconstitutional. Deputy communications minister (also former minister), Mondli Gungubele vented on X, opposing the withdrawal, while civil society organisations, including SOS, supported the withdrawal of the flawed SABC Bill. On 8 February 2025, News24 reported that Deputy President Paul Mashatile had convened a meeting with the Speaker and Minister Malatsi to understand the reasons behind the withdrawal. However, by 2 March, TimesLIVE reported that the deputy president, in his role as leader of Government Business, was on the receiving end of a backlash from ANC ministers after he presented and supported Malatsi's rationale for withdrawing the Bill. To date, the Speaker has not gazetted this withdrawal, the Cabinet and the parliamentary committee have gone quiet, and the public has been left in the dark. This silence goes beyond mere procedural oversight – it is symptomatic of a severe lack of political will to protect and reform the public broadcaster. The SABC Bill In October 2023, former Minister Gungubele introduced the SABC Bill in Parliament. The Bill seeks to repeal the outdated Broadcasting Act 4 of 1999 and should ideally pave the way for the SABC to address its persistent financial woes, at which it dismally fails. Civil society organisations, including SOS, raised myriad concerns about the Bill's implications on media freedom and sustainability, warning it would erode the SABC's editorial independence, entrench political interference and delay much-needed financial reform. The SOS Coalition, in a joint submission with Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) and the South African National Editors Forum (SANEF), highlighted the following concerning flaws: Policy vacuum: The Bill is being introduced in the absence of pre-requisite policy, the Audio and Audio-Visual Media Services, and online content safety; Policy U-turn: It proposes the establishment of a commercial board when it is clearly stated in the first iteration of the Audio and Audio-Visual policy that 'the idea of the commercial division cross-subsidising the public division has been a failure from inception'; Retrogressive: The Bill proposes that the group chief executive officer, a business-oriented executive who lacks journalistic experience, be the editor-in-chief, while overlooking the head of news, who has the appropriate journalistic background and is involved in daily editorial matters; No funding model: The Bill promises that the minister will develop a funding model framework, but only in three years, and not a funding model, while the SABC's financial challenges worsen; and Ministerial powers: The minister is granted powers that are contrary to prominent court judgments that specifically require protection of the independence of the public broadcaster from ministerial interference. One case in particular is the SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition and Others v South African Broadcasting Corporation SOC Limited and Others; SOS Support Public Broadcasting Coalition and Others v South African Broadcasting Corporation SOC Limited and Others (81056/14) [2017] ZA. In the Bill, the minister has powers to interfere with processes at the SABC and appoint board members of the commercial board, the interim board, and extend the board's term after the end of the second term by six months or until a new board is appointed. These concerns justify the withdrawal by Minister Malatsi, who agrees that the Bill is 'totally flawed'. The withdrawal of the Bill was within Minister Malatsi's purview, and he followed due process. The Cabinet has no formal role in this process and its subsequent involvement has caused further delays. Following the meeting between the deputy president, the Speaker, and the minister, and in particular the endorsement of Minister Malatsi's withdrawal by the deputy president, it remains unclear why Cabinet has not yet directed the Speaker to gazette the Bill. The sooner the withdrawal is formally gazetted, the sooner the department can begin the necessary consultations and revisions to address the flaws in the Bill. The continued silence is unacceptable. The Speaker must urgently gazette the Bill's withdrawal, in line with the rules of the National Assembly. Similarly, Cabinet and political parties must demonstrate the political will to support meaningful reform of the SABC rather than delay this reform through political infighting. The public broadcaster is a cornerstone of our democracy and provides millions of South Africans with critical information to make informed decisions about their lives – it needs to be safeguarded and supported to fulfil its public mandate. DM
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Did SA bend BEE rules for Elon Musk's Starlink? Ramaphosa says no
President Cyril Ramaphosa denied relaxing BBBEE to benefit South African-born tech billionaire Elon Musk after his visit to the US. Image: Presidency President Cyril Ramaphosa has again poured cold water on claims that South Africa proposed relaxing its black empowerment rules solely for Elon Musk's Starlink, despite the move coming days after his meeting with US President Donald Trump last month. 'Our visit to the United States did not focus on issues of Black Economic Empowerment,' Ramaphosa told Parliament on Wednesday afternoon. 'It focused on resetting the relationship with the United States and ensuring that we continue open conversations with our major trading partners.' He was responding to a question from Nicholaas Hendricks Pienaar of the Democratic Alliance (DA) in Limpopo. Pienaar asked whether the Government of National Unity (GNU) should revise Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) policies to attract more international investment and stimulate economic growth and job creation. Ramaphosa reiterated the government's commitment to economic transformation. 'Our commitment to black economic empowerment, as expressed through various policy documents and statements, remains steadfast,' he said. 'Through the Statement of Intent signed by various parties in the GNU, we are committed to translating the values of our Constitution into reality - particularly social justice, redress, and equity.' Last month, IOL News reported that, just days after a high-level meeting at the White House, attended by South African billionaire Johann Rupert and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the South African government appeared to be easing regulations to facilitate the entry of Starlink, Musk's satellite internet service. The alleged shift in policy has sparked debate over the influence of global business elites on national legislation and whether diplomatic lobbying is steering South Africa's tech and telecommunications framework. Rupert, citing rising crime and economic stagnation, called for Starlink's launch to be fast-tracked. 'We need Starlink in South Africa,' he said. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa pointed to the Constitution's Equality Clause as a foundation for transformation policies like BBBEE. 'There are a number of measures that the Equality Clause calls on us to embark on - legislative measures to protect or advance persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination,' he said. He emphasised that the BEE Act remains a central lever for inclusive, sustainable growth. 'We must dispense with the false notion that we must choose between transformation and growth,' Ramaphosa said. 'Black economic empowerment is not only compatible with investment and growth - it is essential to achieving broad-based prosperity.' Ramaphosa added that BEE should not be seen as a project for a select few. 'It must be a national project. Everyone, including those who benefited under apartheid, must be involved,' he said. 'Failing to do so risks economic stagnation.' In a follow-up question, Pienaar asked Ramaphosa if he would support foreign investments like Starlink without requiring a 30% ownership stake for local partners. However, Ramaphosa responded by pointing to the country's equity-equivalent model, which allows foreign companies that cannot meet direct ownership requirements to instead contribute to transformation initiatives. 'For offshore-based companies with global ownership structures, we've come up with an innovative, equity-equivalent solution,' Ramaphosa said. 'They embark on initiatives that support transformation and get involved in economic development without handing over equity. And many have embraced this approach.' He added that while South Africa is not unique in requiring local ownership, it may be the only country offering a flexible equity-equivalent system - which many multinational companies have welcomed. 'We are not averse to coming up with good solutions, so long as there is commitment to transformation,' Ramaphosa said. 'That, to us, is not negotiable.' He reiterated the historical rationale for transformation policies. 'Our economy was structured for the benefit of a white minority,' he said. 'They passed laws to exclude others, even from menial jobs. We are turning the tables. We want all South Africans to benefit, not just a few.' [email protected] IOL Politics
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
RAF hits Scopa speedbump as rare inquiry signals a reboot
Months of missed audits, vanishing executives and R340bn in liabilities have finally triggered action — Parliament is launching only its fourth full public accounts inquiry since 1994, into the Road Accident Fund. The Road Accident Fund (RAF) will now find itself the subject of a rare full committee inquiry by Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) after months of failed document submissions and non-compliance by its board and executives. But beyond the scandal lies a deeper governance signal. 'This decision follows months of repeated attempts by the committee to obtain truthful, complete information from the RAF Board and executive management to little avail,' reads the 24 June statement. The release also cites reckless financial management, governance failures and whistle-blower reports of supply chain irregularities. While the list of issues reads like a litany, the very act of invoking Scopa's highest oversight mechanism can be interpreted as a positive shift in parliamentary accountability.'Scopa is doing the work it's meant to do,' said Dr Ivor Chipkin, governance expert and executive director of the New South Institute. 'It's checking whether public money has been properly used, whether processes were followed… That is good governance.' Inquiry 'long overdue' Only three other full committee inquiries have been launched since 1994, into Eskom, the SABC and Prasa. That the RAF has now joined that list shows how seriously Parliament views its failings. 'This inquiry is long overdue,' Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) CEO Wayne Duvenage told Daily Maverick. 'The situation at the RAF has deteriorated to the point of becoming a national concern.' The RAF's structural dysfunction has been in plain sight for years. The Auditor-General's Annual Report for the 2022/2023 financial year, issued the fund a disclaimer audit opinion – the most severe rating, issued when auditors are unable to find sufficient evidence to support financial statements. It flagged liabilities amounting to R340-billion. The RAF's funding is not typical of an SOE, accumulating through a levy on every litre of petrol and diesel sold in the country. Its failures, then, directly affect every South African, whether you drive, pay for fuel or seek compensation after a crash. All the wheels are falling off The Auditor-General has repeatedly flagged irregular expenditure, procurement failures and poor internal controls. None of the material concerns have been addressed. A revolving door of political heads hasn't helped. 'We've had seven, eight Ministers of Transport over the past 10 years,' Duvenage noted. 'Not one of them really got stuck in to fix what is really broken.'Then came a leaked draft Special Investigating Unit (SIU) report – first reported by the Sunday Times – implicating suspended CEO Collins Letsoalo in procurement irregularities, including an R81-million lease signed against internal legal advice. Duvenage raised the point that conflict with executives in SOEs also causes longer-term challenges, with the personnel lost during conflicts often causing severe, long-term capability losses within the entity. 'We've lost a lot of institutional knowledge, a lot of really experienced, skilled people who understood RAF and its systems.' Letsoalo was suspended on 3 June 2025 after allegedly failing to attend a Scopa hearing in breach of a statutory summons. He is now challenging that suspension in court. What the RAF inquiry means for you You fund the RAF: A portion of every litre of fuel you buy goes directly to the Road Accident Fund. Its failures are costing you money. Massive debt: The RAF has liabilities of R340-billion — its financial mismanagement has been flagged by the Auditor-General for years. Justice delayed for victims: If you or a family member are in a road accident and need to claim, you could wait years for a payout due to the fund's chaotic state. Thousands of claims, many for young people, are stuck in the system. This is only the fourth full inquiry of its kind since 1994. Experts believe it signals a positive shift towards greater government accountability, which could lead to a more functional RAF in the long term. Fiscal problems with real-world consequences Challenges are not inconsequential –the RAF has amassed hundreds of millions of rands in default court judgments due to missed appearances and last-minute settlements. 'In the past five years, 43.5% of personal claims submitted to the RAF were from individuals aged 15-35, totalling [sic] 70,743 claims,' said the fund in a press release issued on Wednesday, 25 June. 'An additional 15,227 claims came from those under 15' – a clear indicator of the physical harm, often borne by the young, who the RAF as an entity exists to support. The National Treasury warned of a collapse in 2021. The Auditor-General has since continued to report noncompliance and weak financial discipline, and this has a direct impact on those who need to claim from the RAF. 'You only realise the damage when you have to claim, and you wait, and you wait. Nothing happens for years,' said Duvenage. Scopa action is a seismic shift The inquiry grants Scopa broad powers to summon witnesses under oath, compel document production and issue subpoenas. These are not symbolic levers – they are constitutional mechanisms designed for exactly this kind of failure. Chipkin argues that Scopa's actions also reflect a broader political shift: 'One of the reasons why this is happening is precisely because we don't have a dominant party. We don't have one party in control any more. So there's an opening here, and what's filling that vacuum is oversight committees and others beginning to act. That's a really good sign.' 'Scopa, if you're on the wrong side of those committees, you're playing with fire. They're not just talk shops. When a parliamentary committee does the job properly, they've got real authority behind them,' said Chipkin. Expected witnesses are likely to include current and former RAF board members and executives, the Auditor-General's office, National Treasury, SIU officials and whistle-blowers. For Duvenage, any hope of reform begins with restoring the institution's personnel and systems to competency. 'RAF needs systems people with industry understanding. Bring back the actuaries, the claims experts and the people who know the job,' he said. For the thousands of claimants stuck in limbo, as well as anyone who is affected by the cost of fuel – which is to say everyone – the inquiry, depending on its actions and findings, is not merely for show, but perhaps for institutional restoration and claims delivered. DM
