Dining across the divide: ‘I was expecting her to shout me down'
Occupation Litigation solicitor
Voting record Usually votes Conservative
Amuse bouche Was shortlisted for a Legal Hero award, the only solicitor from outside the London area that year
Occupation Associate professor
Voting record Holds an Irish and a US passport, and votes wherever she can. Did not vote for 'that man', voted for Kamala. Votes Labour or Green, depending on who needs the help
Amuse bouche Was a keen figure skater in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, as a teenager – but found out after three years that if you want to be the best, you have to start when you're four, not 11
Katie She was warm and welcoming from the start, very mellow. She'd chosen the restaurant, and recommended the paneer tikka, which was delicious.
Parvien She was very sweet. I was expecting someone really feisty.
Katie We both had mock mojitos.
Parvien I had peshwari lamb with raw green chillies; it blew my head off.
Katie I believe in freedom of movement for everyone. I'm an immigrant myself – I believe everyone should have access to that, all the time. Migration to the UK should be made less punitive. We need to remove existing barriers to incoming migrants. A phrase we both arrived at was 'universal freedom of movement'. She said it was utopian, and it is a utopian idea, but it's something I believe in.
Parvien There have to be the resources, conditions in place. I'm quite swayed by what the public think as well. We need to look at how immigration is benefiting society as a whole, and whether we have the infrastructure. In places like Dubai you can work there, but you don't immediately get full rights. Just because you're there, doesn't mean you can then stay there after the role is redundant.
Katie I think she could see where I was coming from when I said, 'If I get to move around, everyone should get to do it.' I didn't want to armwrestle her. I wouldn't say she's very swayable, but we had such a great conversation. It was quite warm. She had concrete experience of working with people who have migrated, and the difficulties they experience.
Parvien We need to have a good look at why we have a skills shortage, rather than just getting migrants to plug it. We import doctors, yet our own universities are blocking students from doing medicine. When you import doctors, how do you verify their qualifications? In my profession, I've come across people with fake degrees. There's a disparity there – I can understand people are going to get a bit annoyed about that.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
Katie I was curious to hear her take on the idea of the UK leaving the European convention on human rights. My question to her was: what equips the UK, acting alone, to be a better protector of human rights? She gave an example of a ruling where Europe basically overturned the disenfranchisement of all prisoners – the point she made was that the resources used to argue that change of policy could have been used to fight poverty instead.
Parvien I thought that was rubbish. If you've broken the law, how can you demand your rights under the law? The number of cases I deal with where I have a legal aid opponent on the other side, and there's no merit in what they're bringing: what is the cost to the taxpayer of this exercise?
Katie I object to generative AI, in part because I teach. My students use ChatGPT for their assessments. The sentences are too smooth, it's very weird. That's not the problem, the problem is what it does to students. They don't produce arguments based on their own reading and thinking.
Parvien Katie's view was that big tech was going to get rid of her job – I think I agreed with her; it probably would. I'm not worried about my job. If it gets rid of my job, I'll just do something else. I'll probably be the person programming the AI judges.
Katie We left on gorgeous terms. We spoke for three hours – she had all this knowledge – and she drove me home.
Parvien I was expecting someone shouting me down. She did not do that. We kept giggling.
Additional reporting: Kitty Drake
Parvien and Katie ate at The Tipu Sultan in Oadby, near Leicester
Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Children's Commissioner attacks Musk for letting children view porn on X
Sir Keir Starmer's Children's Commissioner has attacked Elon Musk for allowing children to watch porn on X. Dame Rachel de Souza has called on the billionaire owner of the social media site to 'act like a father' after it was revealed that children are most likely to view pornographic content on X. Speaking in an interview series by anti-porn charity the Naked Truth Project, Dame Rachel attacked the world's richest man, encouraging him to 'think about children'. 'Look, frankly, Elon Musk, who owns X, is a father. Be [and] act like a father. Think about children,' she told the Naked Truth Project's Ian Henderson. 'Children need our protection. I want Apple, I want X, I want all the social media companies where children see these things to take it seriously. They are global companies and they should do better,' Dame Rachel said. The commissioner's 2023 study into young people and pornography revealed that 41 per cent of young people have encountered pornography on Twitter, surpassing dedicated pornography sites (37 per cent), Instagram (33 per cent) and Snapchat (32 per cent). X introduced age verification measures in 2024 but these can easily be bypassed and fail to offer real protection. The commissioner's office is carrying out work to update her study and reflect children's experiences today, to be published later in 2025. 'We want young people to be able to enjoy the internet, enjoy apps, never have to be bored again on a Sunday afternoon or not find something in a good, sensible way,' she said. 'Instead I'm still hearing heinous stories about what children are seeing on there and I find the tech companies absolutely morally culpable. They are not doing what they should.' The Government's online safety act, which followed this newspaper's campaign for a duty of care on firms to protect children, was introduced in October 2023. It requires porn companies to bar under-18s from their sites and tech giants to put in place tough age checks to prevent children accessing such content. But Dame Rachel said that she is not satisfied with social media companies' compliance with the legislation. 'The Online Safety Bill is clear. They should be protecting children,' she said. 'They know how old the children are on their sites. They've got the technology. 'They should have proper, strict age verification. 'They should be answering children's complaints. They should be taking down harmful material. 'And when I ask them why they're not, they often mumble something about resources or say 'we're doing better'. It's just not good enough. These are our children. This is the law in this country and I want to see a robust approach from government.' The Children's Commissioner is also working on the rise of deepfake and ' nudifying' apps, pointing to research that one in four girls has been shown a deepfake image of themselves, a friend or a teacher. She said that 25 per cent of girls that they had spoken to had either seen themself, a friend or a teacher on nudifying apps. 'It spreads like wildfire with the young,' she said. 'Girls are telling me they're as afraid of these apps as they are of walking home on a dark night because they are terrified of seeing themselves shown naked and passed round. 'It's illegal to make pornographic images of children. Boys who are making these images are committing an illegal act. But the apps that enable this aren't illegal yet – and they should be.'
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
LA grandmother self-deports over Trump fears
A grandmother has chosen to self-deport over fears she'd be kicked out of the United States and sent to Mexico by Donald Trump . The 51-year-old woman, identified only as Regina, has lived in South Los Angeles since 1989 but boarded a one-way flight to Mexico City on June 7 and left her life behind. Her daughter, Julie Ear, said her mother had become frightened over the Trump Administration's continued efforts to crack down on illegal immigration and deportations. 'After decades of hard work in the US, she made the difficult decision to return home, not because she wanted to, but because it was the only option left,' Ear wrote on a GoFundMe for her mother's new life. Regina had been working to gain citizenship, and meanwhile had raised her family and worked as a garment worker in the city's Fashion District. As Regina boarded her flight, her family drove to Tijuana, Mexico, to say goodbye, as she leaves behind three children and three grandchildren. 'She was afraid they would come to her house,' Ear told KTLA 5 . 'She was afraid to drive, to be pulled over and taken in.' 'The worst part was saying goodbye to her kids and grandchildren. That was the hardest part for her.' She said that her mother decided not to take advantage of Trump's Project Homecoming, which offers financial aid including government funded flights and an 'incentive' of $1,000 to those who self deport. 'It honestly feels like a trap,' Ear said. '[Especially] once we give up that control to somebody else, to the government that is obviously not on our side.' Ear videoed her mother's journey and posted it on social media, where it went viral. The compilation of videos shows her family getting up at 5am with her mom in the back of the car. Regina and her family were videoed journeying into Tijuana and spending time in the airport together before her flight. 'She made this decision months ago and even though it breaks my heart, I'd rather see her leave than live here in fear,' Ear wrote on Instagram. 'She is the most Americanized person I know and a total diva! She has spent most of her life in the US, so this is going to be a huge adjustment for her.' Regina was seen tearfully hugging her family members in heartbreaking moments throughout the video as they said goodbye. 'I just hugged her so close to me,' Ear told KTLA 5. 'I kissed her. I kept telling her, "Don't worry, Mom. I'm going to see you very soon".' After landing in Mexico, Regina was able to see her mother for the first time in 22 years. A father-of-four self-deported to Mexico with his American wife and four US born children due to the same fears harbored by Regina and her family. Cenobio Feliciano-Galeana crossed into the United States illegally when he was 18, and since then has built his life in America. But despite his children and his wife, he was unable to obtain citizenship or a green card. Now, following the ruthless crackdown on illegal immigrants and the looming threat of ICE agents, Cenobio made the decision to self-deport. At the end of the year, Ashlee, Cenobio's wife, plans to move with her four children to a country they have never known, just to keep the family together. Since they began their relationship, Ashlee says she and her family have been trying to get Cenobio through the process to gain legal status in the U.S., with no luck. Several lawyers and thousands of dollars later, she says not even being married to a U.S. citizen helps Cenobio's cause. 'If I had a penny for every time somebody has said that, I'd have the money to pay for those lawyers,' she said. She says the lawyers initially told them they had a fifty-fifty chance of getting Cenobio lawful permanent residence or citizenship. After the Trump administration was sworn in, she says she was told they had no chance. Their options were to stay and risk it—or have Cenobio self-deport and try again in 10 years. 'We have a six-year-old down to a nine-month-old baby. Ten years without a father? That is huge,' Ashlee said. For her, moving with him is the only option. Staying behind in the U.S. was out of the question. 'Wait for one day them to come into my home and take my husband away like a criminal and have my kids have to see that. And I decided that was not a choice I was willing to live with,' she said. Ashlee says Cenobio never committed a crime. His name doesn't bring anything up in the Utah court system. His only offense was being caught at the border twice and crossing illegally. That itself is a crime—one that Ashlee acknowledges but doesn't believe should be a life sentence. 'He was born on the wrong side of a line. He came here because he was starving. You know, what would you do if he truly went days without eating, starving? Where would your desperation lead you?' she said. The Trump Administration has heavily pushed for any illegal immigrants in the United States to self-deport, instead of being detained by ICE officials. United States Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem gave a stern warning to any undocumented immigrants in an advertisement pushing the deportations and arrests of illegal immigrants. 'Leave now. If you don't, we will find you and deport you,' Noem said. 'You will never return.' Self-deportation typically allows an individual to reenter the United States without the bans that follow from an official deportation. According to ICE, a bar on reentry for a specific period of time can be imposed once proceedings before a Department of Justice immigration judge take place. 'ICE may agree to seek dismissal of removal proceedings if you prove you left the US on your own - and that way, you may be able to avoid getting a final order of removal [and the negative consequences that come with it],' the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement website said. The reentry ban can range from five to twenty years depending on the severity of the crime. Individuals who were removed after a short unlawful stay in the US can face a ban of five years, while repeat offenders who have been removed multiple times can face around a twenty year ban. Anyone who was involved in 'serious criminal activity' or those who reentered the US illegally following deportation can face a permanent ban.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Mapped: UK, US and French military base locations across the Middle East
Iran has threatened to target UK, French and US military bases across the Middle East if the help block the Iranian missile and drone retaliation for Israel's attack. Both countries have exchanged extensive aerial attacks after Israel launched a surprise missile assault on some of Tehran's nuclear facilities, uranium experts and high-ranking officials on Friday (13 June). Dozens of civilians have been killed in the crossfire. Sir Keir Starmer has announced additional British fighter jets are being deployed to the Middle East as a 'contingency support' in the region. Chancellor Rachel Reeves today insisted Britain is not at war despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East, but said the UK could play a military role defending Israel from ongoing Iranian attacks. US president Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned Iran that an attack on its military interests in the region would be met with the 'full strength and might of the US Armed Forces'. Below, The Independent looks at where the British, French and the Americans have a presence across the Middle East. Britain's military bases The UK has three permanent military sites in the Middle East, as well as an RAF base in Cyprus in the Mediterranean. The UK opened a permanent military centre at the Al Minhad Air Base in the United Arab Emirates last March. Named after a World War II pilot, William Donnelly, the centre is a relatively small military facility equipped with a headquarters, a welfare center and accommodation. It also operates a permanent military presence in Bahrain and Oman, both of which are used by the British Navy. Its main operating base in the region is RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, home to a number of fighter jets. It also has access to the US-run Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The American presence in the Middle East is considerably larger. It operates a broad network of sites across at least 19 locations in the wider region, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. Eight are permanent, including in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. US forces have been attacked on several occasions by Iran-backed forces since the outbreak of the latest war in Gaza and the subsequent conflicts with other state and non-state actors in the wider region. In January 2024, three American soldiers were killed and dozens more injured after a one-way attack drone hit the military base Tower 22 in Jordan, near the Syrian border. US officials blamed the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, for the attack. French military bases in the Middle East The French presence in the Middle East is primarily based at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE, where it has a permanent outfit stationed there. French troops in the UAE number about 650, according to the French Armed Forces Ministry. It has also periodically operated from Jordan, combating militia forces in Syria and Iraq.
