Los Angeles ICE raids fuel controversy over masked agents
Violent clashes erupted in Los Angeles after masked US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers rounded up alleged offenders. (AP pic)
WASHINGTON : Images of federal immigration agents wearing masks and balaclavas as they conduct raids in Los Angeles and other US cities have ignited a politically charged debate over whether they are protecting their identities or engaging in intimidation tactics.
Violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Los Angeles during the weekend were triggered by masked US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers rounding up alleged immigration offenders.
Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups say masks are an attempt by ICE agents to escape accountability for their actions and are aimed at frightening immigrants as they carry out Republican President Donald Trump's directive to crack down on illegal immigration.
Republicans and ICE officials assert the face coverings are necessary to protect agents and their families from being targeted by 'doxxing,' in which their home addresses and personal information are posted online.
'People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves,' Todd Lyons, the acting ICE chief, said last week.
There are no federal rules or laws forbidding mask-wearing by law enforcement personnel, although historically they have been used to protect the identities of agents during undercover operations, said Jerry Robinette, a former ICE special agent in charge.
Armed masked ICE agents have also been seen arresting people in cities besides Los Angeles, often in plain clothes that sometimes lack clear identifying markings.
One of the most notable arrests by ICE officials came in March when Turkish student Rumeysa Ozturk was confronted by several masked, plain-clothed agents on a street in a Boston suburb. Her arrest and terrified reaction were captured in a video that went viral.
Ozturk, arrested after co-writing an opinion piece criticising her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza, was released from ICE detention in May after a judge's order.
Masked ICE agents have been filmed arresting workers at a restaurant in San Diego and a gardener at a house in Massachusetts. ICE officers were prominently seen wearing masks during arrests at courthouses across the U.S. last month.
Increased mask use in Trump's second term
Scott Shuchart, a top ICE policy official under former Democratic President Joe Biden, said it appeared ICE officers had increased the use of face coverings and tactical gear since Trump took office.
Shuchart said an officer concealing their identity goes against typical American law enforcement practices.
'In general, law enforcement personnel need to have name patches, badge numbers, or other indicia that the public can see and use to file complaints and ensure accountability and oversight,' Shuchart said.
Three former US officials dealing with immigration enforcement, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they did not recall ICE officers routinely using face masks while Biden was in office from 2021-2025.
Mask-wearing by law enforcement agents is more common in countries such as Mexico and Russia with high levels of organised crime or political unrest, or during counter-terrorism operations in countries including France.
Boston's Democratic Mayor Michelle Wu was criticised by the Trump administration last week when she compared masked ICE agents to the 'secret police' and a neo-Nazi group.
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the department of homeland security, the parent agency of ICE, called Wu's rhetoric dangerous.
'Make no mistake, this type of rhetoric is contributing to the surge in assaults of ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE,' McLaughlin said.
Doxxing
Trump's border czar Tom Homan, speaking to Reuters in May, defended ICE officers using face coverings.
'They've been doxxed repeatedly,' Homan said. 'I should know because I've been doxxed a thousand times myself.'
Homan cited an April protest outside his home in upstate New York after ICE arrested a mother and her three children on a dairy farm.
The debate over ICE masks has also erupted on Capitol Hill.
Last week the Democrats' house of representatives leader, Hakeem Jeffries, denounced the practice, saying ICE agents were trying to conceal their identities from the American people.
Jeffries and others believe unidentifiable law enforcement officials are difficult to hold accountable when misconduct is alleged. He vowed that the masked ICE agents would be identified 'no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes.'
His comments were decried by his Republican counterpart, House speaker Mike Johnson.
'They need to back off of ICE and respect our agents and stop protesting against them,' Johnson told Fox News.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
35 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Sources: White House orders review of SpaceX's US$22b in federal contracts after Trump-Musk clash
WASHINGTON, June 14 — The White House earlier this month directed the Defence Department and Nasa to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinise Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new US missile defence system. Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately US$22 billion (RM93 billion) in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. 'We'll take a look at everything,' the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' In a separate statement, a spokesperson at Nasa said the agency 'will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defence Department responded to requests for comment. The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is 'for political ammunition,' one of the people said. Whether the US government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest. 'There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts,' said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. 'Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security.' Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the US government in much of its aerospace and defence work — launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the 'Golden Dome' missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president — such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender — his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly US$5 billion contract with Nasa, is the only US vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a US intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with US defence and intelligence services. — Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US Marines deployed to LA in rare move as more protests expected
The Trump administration has authorised the deployment of a total of 700 Marines to provide protection in Los Angeles. (AP pic) LOS ANGELES : US Marines were deployed to Los Angeles on Friday, the military said, in a rare domestic use of its forces after days of protests over immigration raids and as nationwide demonstrations were expected on Saturday, in the biggest backlash since President Donald Trump returned to power. About 200 Marines will protect a federal building in Los Angeles, Army major general Scott Sherman said on Friday. The administration has authorised a total of 700 Marines to be deployed in the city. Neither the Marines nor National Guard troops in the city have temporarily detained anyone, he added. 'I would like to emphasise that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' he said during a briefing. It is uncommon for active-duty troops to be used domestically during civil disturbances. The last time the military was used for direct police action was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked then President George HW Bush to invoke the Insurrection Act to help respond to Los Angeles riots over the acquittal of police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King. A court decided on Thursday that Trump can keep his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles for now. The 9th US Circuit court of appeals' decision temporarily paused a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation, although it does not mean the court will ultimately side with him. 'We saved LA. Thank you for the Decision!!!' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. The Trump administration 'far overreached its authority,' the California attorney general's office said, adding that it remained confident in its case ahead of making arguments to court on Tuesday. In the city's downtown, construction workers were out early on Friday adding plywood to storefronts, with many already boarded-up. Little Tokyo, hardest hit by the protests, remains largely covered in anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement graffiti spray-painted by demonstrators during the previous nights' marches, though few buildings had damage beyond that. 'This is all terrible for business,' said the proprietor of one restaurant, whose windows were being boarded up and would only speak on condition of anonymity. 'My business is great when things are calm, but neither the protesters nor the police are letting that happen.' Soldiers on the streets Cities across the US were bracing for demonstrations on Saturday, when those also opposed to a weekend military parade in Washington are expected to take to the streets. 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services,' the group No Kings, which is organising the day of action, wrote on its website. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats, including California governor Gavin Newsom, have said the use of military force was unnecessary and an example of Trump's authoritarianism. In Los Angeles, troops have stood guard at a federal detention centre downtown where many of the protests have taken place in a show of solidarity for immigrants detained inside. The Guard had accompanied ICE agents on operations to detain immigrants. City officials in Los Angeles and state officials in California have opposed the ramp-up of federal immigration enforcement since it began last Friday. 'Peace begins with ICE leaving Los Angeles,' Mayor Karen Bass, who has imposed a nighttime curfew over one square mile (2.5 square km) of downtown Los Angeles, said on Thursday. Protests have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence, and restricted to a few city blocks. The Los Angeles Police Department said 33 people were arrested downtown overnight for failing to disperse as protests continued in the city for a seventh day, and 13 arrests were made for violating the curfew. Demonstrations have also taken place in other cities this week, including New York and Chicago, and there have been some disturbances. Four detainees escaped from a privately operated immigration detention center in Newark, New Jersey, on Thursday amid reported unrest inside the facility, a Department of Homeland Security official said on Friday. 'DHS has become aware of 4 detainees at the privately held Delaney Hall Detention Facility escaping,' the official said in a statement. Video posted to social media by the New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, an advocacy group, showed protesters outside the facility attempting to block law enforcement vehicles from entering. Delaney Hall drew national attention last month when the mayor of Newark and a Democratic congresswoman were arrested while trying to enter. Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Pay to dine with Trump
THE sale of face-to-face access to US President Donald Trump through a cryptocurrency bearing his name has done more than line his pockets. Trump announced last month that top buyers of a meme coin known as $TRUMP would be invited to a private dinner with him at one of his golf resorts. The highest spenders would even score a VIP reception and a tour of the White House. The promotion ignited a frenzy in the crypto world and sparked bipartisan condemnation, all while leaving the sitting president unusually vulnerable to outside influence – including from foreign investors with policy agendas. Since the announcement, crypto speculators around the world have scrambled to scoop up $TRUMP, a novelty token tied to Trump's political brand. Some buyers have said outright that they purchased the coin with hopes of swaying US policy. The result? A surge in the coin's value –at least on paper – that's added billions to a stash controlled by Trump, his family and business allies. The sale of face-to-face access to President Donald Trump using the Trump family's own cryptocurrency has done more than benefit him financially, though it has certainly done that. -- 5.9 x 4.4 -- cat=a According to the crypto analytics firm Chainalysis, they've already made more than US$1.3mil in transaction fees as the coin is traded. Some traders jumped in early, flipping coins for big profits as others raced to buy into 'the most exclusive invitation in the world', as the promotion billed it. But the backlash has been swift. The spectacle helped derail a key piece of cryptocurrency legislation in Congress, with industry leaders and lawmakers – including some Republicans – uneasy about the optics. 'It does give me pause because it complicates our work here,' said Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis. 'The optics are challenging.' The Times found that trading volumes for $TRUMP spiked the day before the contest was publicly announced. That raises the possibility that information leaked, giving some traders a chance to make early bets. Former US securities officials say Trump may be skating close to violations of federal law – not that he's likely to face consequences. His administration has dramatically scaled back crypto enforcement at both the SEC and the Justice Department. 'This absolutely would have triggered an initial investigation,' said John Reed Stark, a former SEC cybercrimes chief. 'Or at least it certainly would have under norms from prior Republican and Democratic eras.' The White House has brushed off the criticism. A senior official described the dinner as 'a private event' taking place during Trump's personal time, while White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president is 'abiding by all conflict-of-interest laws'. Trump began promoting $TRUMP on Jan 17, just days before his inauguration. Like many meme coins, its value is heavily driven by social buzz. The coin's price spiked, then dropped, before Trump repeatedly intervened to keep it afloat – culminating in the dinner contest. A website tied to the promotion outlined the rewards: the top 220 buyers get a spot at the gala dinner, the top 25 gain VIP access to Trump and a White House tour, and the top four receive a Trump-branded timepiece dubbed 'the most beautiful watch ever made'. The leaderboard-style contest, which plays out in real-time on the website, gamifies the auction. Investors can track how much more they need to spend to make the cut before the contest ends. But according to Chainalysis, most buyers are losing money – even as the Trump family profits. Blockchain records suggest many participants are based outside the United States. Buyers flocked to overseas crypto exchanges like Binance and Bybit, which bar US users. With help from data firm Nansen, The Times identified top account holders in Singapore and Australia. One of them, Sydney-based crypto entrepreneur Kain Warwick, confirmed he was aiming to meet Trump in person. Another trader, identified only as 'Sun', is reportedly linked to HTX – an overseas exchange where controversial crypto mogul Justin Sun serves as adviser. Sun was previously sued for fraud by the SEC but has also invested heavily in Trump's crypto ventures. The promotion gives foreign buyers a direct route to Trump, something normally restricted under US campaign finance law, which bars foreign nationals from donating to political candidates. But nothing stops them from buying meme coins. In Mexico, logistics CEO Javier Selgas initially said he would purchase US$20mil worth of $TRUMP in hopes of getting Trump to lower tariffs. After a backlash, the company backed away from those plans. In Singapore, crypto firm MemeCore surged up the leaderboard with a stash valued at US$19.3mil. Its chief business officer, Cherry Hsu, said they hope to share their 'vision and mission' with Trump at the dinner. 'It's a very, very good opportunity,' Hsu said. Some traders are playing the market, not the dinner game. One investor, using the alias 'ABC', spent US$160,000 on the coin the day before the dinner was publicly announced, then sold the entire holding just eight days later, making US$407,000 in profit. Because the contest rewards average holdings over time, ABC may still score an invite despite holding zero $TRUMP now. All of this frenzied trading has proven lucrative for Trump and his family. Every time a $TRUMP coin is sold, the family and its partners earn a slice of the transaction. Since the coin launched, they've raked in US$320mil in fees, Chainalysis found. And that's just the beginning. Trump also controls 800 million $TRUMP coins through a tied business entity. Since news of the dinner contest began circulating in April, the value of that stash has ballooned by US$4.1bil – though that's theoretical, for now. If the family tried to sell all at once, the price would likely collapse. — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
