‘Not in line with rationalisation': Interim stay on transfer of one govt school teacher by HC
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted an interim stay on the transfer order of a govt primary school teacher. The court directed the authorities to decide on the teacher's representation within seven days.
This comes at a time when protests against the state govt's rationalisation policy are ongoing and several teachers have also moved HC against rationalisation orders, There will be a separate hearing for the other petitions.
The petition was filed against the transfer order dated 2 June 2025, which moved the petitioner from Government Abhyas Primary School, Mahasamund, to Government Primary School, Fooljhar, in Bagbahara block.
The petitioner's counsel argued that the transfer order was not in line with the rationalisation transfer policy and should therefore be set aside. The counsel also stated that the petitioner filed a representation with the competent authority, which was not yet considered.
The court was urged to direct the authority to decide the representation within a specific timeframe.
State counsel informed the court that the petitioner's representation would be considered and decided in accordance with the law within seven days.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Unglaublich: Der Rechner zeigt sofort den Wert Ihres Hauses an [schauen Sie sich das an]
Hauswert
Undo
After hearing both sides, Justice Arvind Kumar Verma directed the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation by 10 June 2025, if it was not already decided.
Until then, the transfer order of 2 June 2025 will remain in abeyance. The writ petition was disposed of with this observation and direction to the authorities.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Eid wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Detained Columbia graduate claims 'irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release
Detained Columbia graduate claims 'irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release NEW YORK: A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the "irreparable harm" caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the "most immediate and visceral harms" he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. "Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," the 30-year-old legal US resident wrote. "When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." He also cited potentially "career-ending" harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy adviser. Even his mother's visa to come to the US to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. "As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States," he wrote. "Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?" Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin responded that Khalil should simply self-deport, taking advantage of the administration's offer of $1,000 and a free flight to those in the country illegally that use its CBP Home app. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Khalil obtained a green card, but the Trump administration says it is revoking it. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his US citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil - that his beliefs may pose a threat to US foreign policy - could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Musk vs Trump: Is Musk taking a step closer to mending broken relationship with Trump? Here is a full list of tweets deleted by Tesla CEO after feud
US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk Is Musk taking a step closer to ending the feud with Trump because Tesla CEO's latest move seems to be hinting in that direction? James Fishback, principal architect of the "DOGE checks" initiative, who had called out Musk for his tweets against Donald Trump , hailed Tesla CEO after he deleted all the posts against the US President. He pointed out Musk's deleted posts and said that now to take another step and apologies to President Trump. "Elon has deleted his slanderous tweets about the President of the United States. Good first step. Next up: full-throated apology to Trump and his family," he said. It all started with Fishback, replying to Musk's tweet over think about making another party" American party. "Elon, Keep tweeting about your 'new political party' and Japanese fertility rates all you want. You owe President Trump a full-throated apology, and every hour you delay, it'll make an eventual apology less sincere. You can substantively disagree with the President on policy, but you should not have baselessly and personally attacked him. " Fishback said. Responding to Fishback, Musk posted several tweets but after a short brief, those tweets were deleted from the account. His response to some tweets are still existing but the riginal tweets has been deleted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Not only those but all his previous tweets, targeting the president, has been deleted including the Epstein files. It seems that Musk may be seeing different ways to mends and go back from their broken ties. The political rift became public earlier this week when Musk slammed one of Trump's most touted legislative efforts, referred to by the president as his 'big, beautiful bill', calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The remark surprised Republican leaders and got a rare serious reaction from President Trump. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said from the Oval Office. He didn't stop there. Taking direct aim at Musk's businesses, the president said: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Musk, in return, accused Trump of 'ingratitude' and escalated the standoff by reposting claims, without evidence, suggesting Trump's name appeared in government documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Bangladesh: Hasina's Awami League, BNP condemn Yunus's Eid address as he picks April 2026 to hold polls
Former PMs of Bangladesh Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia's parties Awami League and BNP, respectively, slammed the country's Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus's Eid address in which he announced that the country will hold polls in April 2026. read more Two of the most prominent parties of Bangladesh have rejected the country's Interim Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus's decision to hold elections in April 2026 , demanding that the polls be conducted by the end of 2025. After completing 10 months in power, Yunus used his Eid address to announce that the country would go to the polls in April next year. It is pertinent to note that this will be the first national election in Bangladesh after a violent protest in the country toppled former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's government. Shortly after Yunus's address to the nation, both ex-PM Khaleda Zia's Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Hasina's Awami League issued respective statements condemning Yunus's 10-month-long leadership. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Following a meeting of BNP's national standing committee, chaired by acting chairman Tarique Rahman, the party said that Yunus is trying to delay elections. 'The chief adviser's Eid address went beyond the traditional festive message and ventured into political issues unrelated to the Interim Government's stated three-point mandate," the party said in a statement following the meeting. BNP slams the timing of it all Zia's party criticised Yunus's discussion of topics like ports and economic corridors, calling it inappropriate and politically biased. BNP insisted that the tone and language of the chief adviser's speech felt like Yunus was crossing the boundaries of political decorum. BNP outrightly rejected the April election proposal, citing concerns over the timing, particularly the overlap with the holy month of Ramadan, school examinations, and adverse summer weather conditions. The party went on to question why the elections could not be held in December 2025 , a date also supported by the country's Army, insisting that Yunus had provided no specific justification for the delay. Referring to the sacrifices of citizens during the July–August 2024 uprising, the BNP warned that any further delay in polls would only deepen public frustration and anger. Awami League calls Yunus 'fascist' Meanwhile, ousted Bangladeshi premier Sheikh Hasina's Awami League also criticised Yunus's address to the nation, where he announced that Bangladesh's general elections will be held in April 2026. 'We want an election that honours the sacrifices of the martyrs. One with the highest number of voters, candidates, and parties participating. Let this be remembered as the freest and fairest election the nation has seen," Yunus said in his address. The Awami League slammed Yunus, saying the chief adviser was trying to cover up his failures by blaming the previous Awami League government and 'creating a false narrative of crisis.' It is pertinent to note that Hasina's party is already banned from contesting in polls , a move condemned by the party. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Awami League said that Yunus's government lacks democratic legitimacy and serves foreign interests rather than the people of Bangladesh. The party warned that many in the interim government hold foreign passports and will leave the country, but their actions could cause irreversible damage to the nation. Overall, the statements from both the Awami League and the BNP reflected that two of the biggest parties in the country are displeased with Yunus. With inputs from agencies.
