World turning away from awareness of global aid crises, official says
The world is turning away from awareness of global humanitarian crises, a senior Swiss development official told The National in an exclusive interview. Patricia Danzi, director general of the Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation, said a feeling of helplessness, polarised conflicts and the all-pervading nature of social media could be among the reasons for this. In a sit-down interview in Abu Dhabi on Wednesday, Ms Danzi said in the 1980s everyone across the world knew of the situation in Africa but today the picture was much more complex. 'The world is turning away,' she said. 'You had concerts 30 years ago when there was a famine in Ethiopia: the actors were mobilising, the whole world was mobilised. Every child in school knew that there was a problem there,' said Ms Danzi, referring to the Live Aid concerts that brought attention to the famine in Africa. 'I think this currently is not happening.' Ms Danzi said it is hard to pinpoint exactly why this has happened but looked at social media as a key driver, noting how many do not wish to discuss conflict zones due to the polarised nature of the discourse. 'Maybe because they feel helpless,' she said. 'I can't change it, so the best thing is not to expose myself to it.' Ms Danzi said many countries were also focused on defence budgets, rather than preventing war and finding consensus in the UN was 'very difficult'. Ms Danzi is an aid and development veteran, having worked for the International Committee of the Red Cross for several decades before being appointed as director general of the Swiss agency in 2020. The agency, with a budget of about $12 billion from 2025 to 2028, is responsible for overall co-ordination of the country's international development activities as well as humanitarian aid and works across the world from Africa to Asia. Ms Danzi was in the UAE on the final leg of a regional tour to hold talks with aid officials. She noted the country's 'growing role' in global aid efforts and said it was important to talk to all agencies in the region to bolster development efforts in a changing world. She also attended the Dubai International Humanitarian Aid and Development conference where Switzerland was the guest of honour. The three-day event ends on Thursday and, this year, seeks to tackle the challenges of humanitarian aid in a polarised world. More than 16,000 participants from 154 countries came for last year's edition. The event is timely with conflicts raging around the world from Ukraine to Gaza with vulnerable citizens suffering the most. Ms Danzi said her agency had to close their office in Gaza but had a presence in Ramallah and the situation there was 'very difficult'. It is Ukraine that is the biggest focus for the Swiss agency. 'The need is very high to keep a country at war still on the level they can still manage basic services,' she said. 'In the eastern part, mainly humanitarian aid is still a big part of what is needed.' She said the country was very clear about what was needed – particularly to keep a focus on development aid as well as emergency relief – and this long-term planning was crucial but often the first thing to be cut from aid budgets. 'If you see a disaster just down the road or on TV, it's, 'OK, I'm giving this … to save lives' because humanitarian aid is to save lives and who doesn't want to do this,' Ms Danzi said. 'However, it's more long term. How can you improve governance? How can you improve or actually empower local actors? How can you empower local governments? This takes time.' Born in Switzerland, Ms Danzi is the daughter of a teacher and a Nigerian diplomat. She spent time teaching in South Africa after Nelson Mandela was elected and represented Switzerland at the 1996 summer Olympics, participating in the heptathlon. She also speaks seven languages. 'I think sport gives you the focus,' she said, of her time as an elite athlete. 'You cannot always win. Sometimes you have a problem, but you can still keep trying.' Ms Danzi has spent her career dedicated to helping those most vulnerable and her family's history has also influenced her. Her grandfather died in the Nigerian war in the late 1960s that is also known as the Biafra conflict. 'When I told them [my Nigerian family] I'm going to work in the Red Cross, they said: 'Why do you want to go to war?' You don't know what that means. So I told them, 'so tell me what it means',' she said. 'The stories that came up were quite impressive. That definitely had an influence on me.' Despite the often grim global picture, Ms Danzi remains hopeful about what can be achieved. She said international rules and human rights law had been created and the world needed to keep its focus on this compass.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
Three more Palestinians killed by Israeli army gunfire near aid centre in southern Gaza
Three more Palestinians were killed early on Monday by Israeli army gunfire near an aid distribution centre in southern Gaza, medical sources told The National, a day after dozens were shot dead in the same area. Another 35 were wounded as Israeli troops opened fire on civilians near the US-backed aid distribution point west of Rafah, the sources said. Official Palestinian news agency Wafa also reported the deaths, saying Israeli troops 'fired directly at civilians'. The violence comes a day after Gaza's Health Ministry and witnesses reported that dozens were killed by Israeli fire at an aid site in the same area run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a group backed by the US and Israel that started operating after Israel recently relaxed a blockade on the enclave. The UN and other international aid organisations have refused to work with the foundation, saying its operations are an affront to international humanitarian principles. The Israeli army has offered competing explanations of Sunday's violence. It first said it was unaware of casualties, then said it did not fire at civilians 'near or within' the food bank and that 'reports to this effect are false'. But an Israeli military official separately said troops had fired warning shots to 'prevent several suspects from approaching' the site. The GHF said aid had been distributed 'without incident' on Sunday and reports of fatalities were false. Israel has faced mounting international criticism over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where the UN has warned the entire population faces famine. Gaza's farmland has been destroyed, with barely any land remaining arable. Israel imposed an aid blockade on the besieged strip in March and only relaxed it in recent days. Aid is now trickling in but the UN has reported looting of its lorries and warehouses. Israel says the new system of food distribution by the GHF is a way of bypassing Hamas, which it accuses of pilfering aid. But other aid groups say it forces civilians to navigate dangerous areas to obtain food at the centres. Philippe Lazzarini, the head of Palestinian relief agency UNRWA, said aid distribution 'has become a death trap'. He described the new distribution centres as a 'humiliating system' forcing hungry Gazans to walk for miles to areas ravaged by Israeli bombardment.
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Nations urged to make UN summit a 'turning point' for oceans
2 June 2025 09:41 PARIS (AFP) Nations will be under pressure to deliver more than just rhetoric at a UN oceans summit in France next week, including much-needed funds to better protect the world's overexploited and polluted third UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) seeks to build global unity and raise money for marine conservation even as nations disagree over deep-sea mining, plastic trash, and Sunday, hosts France are expecting about 70 heads of state and government to arrive in Nice for a pre-conference opening ceremony, including Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da are "in a state of emergency" and the June 9 to 13 meeting "will not be just another routine gathering", said UN under-secretary-general Li Junhua."There's still time to change our course if we act collectively," he countries are expected to send ministers or lower-level delegates to the summit, which does not carry the weight of a climate COP or UN treaty negotiation or make legally binding United States under President Donald Trump is unlikely to send a delegation at has promised the summit will do for ocean conservation what the Paris Agreement did for global climate present are expected to adopt a "Nice Declaration:" a statement of support for greater ocean protection, coupled with voluntary additional commitments by individual leaders are expected to turn out in force and demand, in particular, concrete financial commitments from governments."The message is clear: voluntary pledges are not enough", Ralph Regenvanu, environment minister for Vanuatu, told summit will also host business leaders, international donors, and ocean activists, while a science convention beforehand is expected to draw 2,000 ocean experts. Temperature Check France has set a high bar for securing by Nice the 60 ratifications needed to enact a landmark treaty to protect marine habitats outside national jurisdiction. So far, only 28 countries and the European Union have done so. Olivier Poivre d'Arvor, France's oceans envoy, says that without the numbers, the conference "will be a failure." Bringing the high seas treaty into force is seen as crucial to meeting the globally agreed target of protecting 30 percent of oceans by 2030.
Gulf Today
16 hours ago
- Gulf Today
‘Fresh ideas' mooted to close gap in US-Iran N-deal talks
Donald Trump has said he warned Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu against attacking Iran because Washington and Tehran are close to reaching a deal on limiting that country's nuclear programme in exchange for lifting sanctions. He said this would be an unprecedented agreement as US as well as UN inspectors would be included on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) teams monitoring Iran's nuclear sites. His declared objective is to make certain Iran is not preparing to make nuclear bombs. Trump's statement suggests that that US is ready to accept Iran's "red line" — the right to enrich uranium — which Iran insists cannot be violated by any agreement. Iran demands domestic enrichment to 3.67 per cent for use in civilian power plants. The US previously flip-flopped on this issue. Washington demanded total shutdown of the nuclear programme, then agreed on low enrichment. The programme was launched in the 1950s when the US provided a nuclear reactor to Iran under the Atoms for Peace Programme long before the shah was toppled by anti-US clerics in 1979. To reassure the US and regional neighbours over its retention of a low level of enrichment, Tehran has suggested creating a consortium comprising the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia and Iran. Tehran would make partners shareholders in exchange for funding and give them access to its technologies and provide them a with stake in developing an independent capacity for nuclear power generation. The UAE has already established the first civil nuclear power plant in the Arab world with four operational reactors which should produce 25 per cent of Emirati electricity. The region's oil producing states have expressed eagerness to establish such facilities for a future when customers cut oil imports for environmental reasons or oil fields are no longer productive enough to generate large revenues. Since Omani-mediated indirect talks began this spring, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi threatened to pull out if the US called for Iran to shut down its enrichment programme. Araghchi said this would amount to a violation of the Non-Proliferation Treaty to which Iran is a signatory. Trump stated on May 25th that the latest round of negotiations was 'very, very good.' He said there could be an announcement, presumably of a breakthrough, in coming days. "We've had some real progress, serious progress." Since he has threatened military action if no deal is reached, he added, "I would love to see no bombs dropped and a lot of people dead." Trump is eager for a foreign policy success while Tehran is under heavy domestic pressure for a deal as sanctions have crippled the economy and impoverished Iranians. Following the fifth round of talks round in Rome on May 23rd, the US State Department declared, "The talks continue to be constructive — we made further progress, but there is still work to do" when the sides "meet again in the near future." Araghchi contended the issues were complicated and needed further discussions. He said mediator Omani Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi had suggested fresh ideas to close the gap between the sides. Busaidi posted on X, "We achieved some progress, although it was not conclusive" and expressed the wish that 'outstanding issues can be clarified in coming days that allows for meaningful progress toward a sustainable agreement." During his first term in office, Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 agreement limiting Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for lifting sanctions. After a year, Iran responded by breaching the 3.67 per cent enrichment limitation, produced a large stockpile of 20 and 60 per cent enriched uranium and cut inspections by the IAEA. Sixty per cent is near the 90 per cent for weaponization. Iran has dismissed Western allegations that it intends to make nuclear arms and could produce enough highly enriched uranium for several devices from the existing stocks of 60 per cent pure. Experts have said Iran could take up to 18 months to make bombs once the decision to do so was taken. While no date has been declared for a sixth round of talks, the experts from the sides are said to be holding discussions behind the scenes. To show willingness to compromise, Iran has proposed sending its stocks of highly enriched uranium to a third country, presumably Russia. Moscow had been assigned this role under the original agreement reached during the Obama administration. Al Monitor cited the International Crisis Group's Iran Project Director Ali Vaez who said negotiators are moving toward a framework agreement that would postpone the enrichment issue until a more permanent deal is reached. 'When they realized that the gaps are too wide to bridge, they decided to go for a framework agreement in order to prevent the process from collapsing. What is very likely in the next few weeks is a statement of principles — basically very broad strokes that would defer some of the most difficult issues." Unwise pressures could torpedo this tactic. Reuters reported that the US, UK, and Europe are preparing to urge the IAEA board at its meeting beginning on June 9th to declare Tehran in breach of its non-proliferation commitments, including the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) which Tehran ratified in 1970. This prohibits the development, testing and transfer of nuclear weapons. Since Iran has not violated the NPT, this would mark the first time this step has been taken in almost 20 years and could "enrage Tehran." Such action could add further add complications to negotiations for a deal the US and Iran are striving to reach or, even, scupper the negotiations altogether. As he is prone to taking unconsidered, wrongheaded moves, this proposed move has Trump's fingerprints all over it and he could end up shooting himself in the foot. It must be recalled that when Trump pulled out of the earlier deal and slapped down 1,500 sanctions, Europe, Russia and China could not deliver on promised benefits by circumventing the US grip on international banking and multinational business. This did not happen. Tehran responded by advancing and expanding nuclear research and development far beyond the basic level and escaped tight IAEA monitoring.
