NZ launches world first anonymous reporting platform to combat foreign bribery
Photo:
Pixabay/shafin_protic
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has today launched a national campaign targeting foreign bribery.
The SFO said the capaign aims to raise awareness and encourage reporting with the introduction of a new online platform for anonymous reporting of suspected foreign bribery.
Reports will be received by specifically trained staff through a fully encrypted platform.
All interactions between reporters and case handlers remain encrypted, with data being stored and safeguarded in European-based data centres.
One of the most effective ways to detect these fraud cases is by whistleblowers according to the government department.
Speaking at the launch event in Auckland, Police Minister Mark Mitchell, said the reporting tool will give them a better scope of where and how much money is being used in foreign bribery which authorities currently have a lack of data for.
"I think the beauty about this tool is that it will start to build out that picture for us as a country, so that we actually start to capture some of the data, we get a feeling for how big the problem might be," Mitchell said.
"This is a more sophisticated tool now to be able to use in terms of allowing people to come forward and share that information and give us that information around that.
Police Minister Mark Mitchell said the reporting tool will give them a better scope of where and how much money is being used in foreign bribery.
Photo:
RNZ / Calvin Samuel
"I think too that we can't look past the deterrent factor, that if you run a big campaign on this and people become more aware and there's an awareness then that can have a positive impact on behaviour as well."
The SFO said the online platform for anonymous reporting was the first of it's kind in the world in dealing with foreign bribery and was modelled from a similar system used by the Commerce Commission.
The government department said foreign bribery distorts global markets and can take many forms.
The SFO said examples of this include a New Zealand company paying a foreign official for market access, a bribe from an overseas company to a public official here, or kickbacks to a private sector employee by a foreign company.
SFO director Karen Chang said one of the most effective ways to detect these cases is by whistleblowers.
"Foreign bribery is notoriously difficult to detect, but if left unchecked, it undermines trust, transparency and fair competition. Our national advertising campaign and new reporting platform is a crucial step in making it easier and safer for people to come forward.
"We know that anonymous reporting can be difficult in New Zealand's close-knit communities and professional networks."
"We also recognise that foreign bribery is not widely understood as a crime type, that's why we are launching a national advertising campaign and investing in a platform that protects identities while allowing secure follow-up with our investigators.
"Our message is simple: if you see something, report it. If you're unsure, get in touch anyway. We all have an interest in ensuring that business is conducted ethically and, in a way that enhances New Zealand's reputation as an attractive place to invest," said the SFO director.
Karen Chang said the new campaign has taken onboard aspects from an OECD report last year which was critical about the lack of foreign bribery prosecutions and there not being a safe space for whistleblowers to report fraud.
"This does build upon the OECD report, stepping up the visibility and public awareness.
"But it also builds on the work that we've already been doing in this sphere and also in relation to our Pacific nations of the 15 languages.
"A number of them are Pacific languages, such as Tongan, Samoan, Fijian, Cook Islands Maori, and Hindi, and French as well, so we are alive to that and hoping that we can really raise the profile and recognition and bring those complaints in," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
29 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan
By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter Brendan Kearney speaks at the Marlborough District Council's Local Water Done Well hearing. Photo: LDR/Kira Carrington Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday. The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options ‒ a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts. The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council. The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure. But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference. Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation. Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief executive of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more. It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said. He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well. "[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers. "This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so." To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda. "A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance." Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow. "It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much. "On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations. "Something in between those two extremes needs to happen." Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable. "What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them. "This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door. "You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people." Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services. "How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said. Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised. Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989. "I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said. "I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us." The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table. The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September . LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
41 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Newtown death over weekend was dubstep musician Oliver Hayes
On Monday Police said they were undertaking a post-mortem. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The person who died at a property in Newtown in Wellington on Saturday night was 40-year-old dubstep musician Oliver Hayes. Police were called to the death on Mansfield Street at around 7.15pm. In a post on social media his sister Louise Hayes said her brother, who was also known as Olie Bassweight, had been found unexpectedly dead on Saturday. "There is a police investigation. It seems something terrible might have happened to him. We wait for answers." Louise said Olie had touched many with his music, philosophy, curiosity and passion. "His light was like no other. We are heartbroken and thrown into tumultuous grief and shock. I don't know what else to say." Police said their inquires into the circumstance surrounding Hayes's death were ongoing. "Police are appealing for anyone who knew Mr Hayes and who had recent contact with him, to please contact us immediately. "Police would also like to speak to anyone who may have seen Mr Hayes in the days prior to Saturday evening, in particular residents of the apartment complex who may have seen him moving about." Information could be reported using the reference file number 250607/5712. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
43 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Military panel drops two charges against soldier accused of filming during sex without consent
Corporal Manu Smith. Photo: Pool / Stuff / Kai Schwoerer Two of the charges against a soldier accused of taking sexual videos without consent have been dropped. Corporal Manu Smith was facing a Court Martial on three counts of making intimate visual recordings under the Armed Forces Discipline Act. In a Court Martial, a military panel make a decision on the accused's guilt or innocence. On Tuesday morning, Justice Tom Gilbert, who was presiding over the court, advised the military panel that he had granted the defence's request to drop two of the charges. The judge said the two charges were dismissed for legal reasons, because in light of the evidence, he ruled that a properly directed panel could not reasonably convict on those charges. That afternoon, the accused Corporal Manu Smith gave evidence for the defence. Defence lawyer Timothy Leighton asked Corporal Smith why he had taken out his phone and started recording during sex with the complainant, and if the woman had known he was filming. Corporal Smith said he saw it as a way of expressing their intimacy and that she had seen that he was filming on his phone, and did nothing to indicate she wanted him to stop filming. He said the pair's relationship had been sexual from the start, and they both shared intimate sexual images with each other. Corporal Smith said the pair had talked about boundaries. "Yes, I expected the same respect from her that she did with me, in terms of sharing content with a third party or anybody outside. "...It was a circle of trust, it should have been. I don't want images of me shared with her girlfriends, nor would she want me to share intimate images of her." He said the pair had discussed filming sexual encounters, while discussing their sexual likes and dislikes, and he believed she was open to it. Corporal Smith said he believed he did have consent to record the sexual encounter which is the subject of the complaint, and he said if she had asked him to stop he would have. The prosecution's captain John Whitcombe asked Corporal Smith about the nature of his relationship with the complainant and whether she had reason to assume it was a exclusive relationship. Corporal Smith said the nature of their relationship was not discussed, but he saw it as non-exclusive and he believed she did too. Captain John Whitcombe challenged Corporal Smith's assertion that the woman had consented to the sex being filmed, asking if there was ever an express discussion about him filming on the day in question. Corporal Smith said they had talked about it in a light-hearted jovial way. "There was no black and white, no written agreement," he told the court. The defence and prosecution will give their closing addresses on Tuesday afternoon. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
