Genocide Crimes Forced Algerians to Change Their Means of Struggle
In anticipation of the 80th anniversary of the May 8, 1945 Massacres Day, the French Colonial and Postcolonial History Association has devoted an extensive file to the genocide committed against Algerians by the colonial armed forces and settler gangs following the end of World War II, while they were demanding that France grant them the rights it had promised them before the war.
The Anti-Colonisation Foundation commissioned a group of historians involved in French colonial affairs in Algeria, such as Alain Ruscio and Aissa Kadri, as well as excerpts from the research of historian and freedom fighter (Mujahid) Mohamed Harbi.
According to the file, 'France, liberated from Nazi occupation, committed one of its worst collective colonial crimes in Algeria. While Nazi Germany celebrated its surrender, and under the pretext of rioting, its army and settler militias massacred thousands of Algerian civilians.'
The file stated that Algerians' attempts to express their hopes for a change in their status as colonised people, despite their declarations during World War II, were in vain. It relied on historian Alain Ruscio to dwell on the events that occurred in the northern Constantine region in May and June 1945 and their human cost.
For historian Alain Ruscio, the term commonly used to describe the events of May 8, 1945, in northern Constantine (eastern Algeria) seems highly inappropriate. Perhaps for some French people. But for Algerian society as a whole, it was a true 'shock.' The Sétif and Guelma massacres of 1945 were a colonial crime among many others, but their violence and the active participation of the European population left a lasting mark on the minds of people on the other side of the Mediterranean.
The massacre began on May 7th in Algeria, with the announcement of the Nazi surrender. The first incidents between Europeans and Muslims erupted in Setif (eastern Algeria). 'In the same city, the planned protests began on the morning of May 8. A group of 7,000 to 8,000 Muslims was more visible than the few hundred French. Flags of the Algerian People's Party were numerous, and banners bearing slogans such as 'For the Liberation of the People' and 'Long Live Free and Independent Algeria' were visible.
He added: 'Police Commissioner Valère phoned the prefect, André Achiary, to inform him that the intervention was risky. The answer was, 'Well, there will be a fight.' Valéry, assisted by Commissioner Lucien Olivieri, ordered the protesters to remove their flags and banners, but they refused. The shooting began, and it is still unknown who fired first. At 9:00 a.m., the young scout, Bouzid Saâl, fell.'
The number of Algerian victims varied. Some historians put the number at less than 45000, while others, according to an elected Muslim official, put it at 90,000. However, the figure ultimately settled at 45,000, compared to only 104 French, which qualified it as a genocide.
Historian Aissa Kadri concluded in his research that the events of May 8, 1945, shifted the Algerian people's struggle from one stage to another. He focused on France's loss of its Algerian supporters. He noted here that France rejected Ferhat Abbas's reformist, or rather integrationist, demands. This position evolved, eventually leading to the dissolution of the demands of the independence movement, represented by the Algerian People's Party (PPA), the primary nucleus of the liberation revolution, whose efforts led to independence.
These tragic events, on the one hand, and the French occupation authorities' treatment of their perpetrators by granting them unjustified immunity, prompted Algerian revolutionary activists to reevaluate their dealings with colonial France, which had promised them but ultimately betrayed them, even disavowing them and committing crimes of genocide against them.
Accordingly, the historian Mohamed Harbi was quoted as saying: 'The consequences of the earthquake are multiple (referring to the massacres of May 8, 1945). It now appears that the long-awaited settlement between the Algerian people and the European colony has become a mere wish.' Meanwhile, the falsehood of some of the French who nominally supported Algerian rights was exposed, referring here to the French Communist Party, which chose to side with the occupying army by demanding the execution of the leaders of the Algerian movement at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
16 hours ago
- El Chorouk
Algeria Represents the Future For Spanish Companies' Investment
The impact of the economic and trade crisis between Algeria and Spain over the past years has been very significant for companies in the region, Juan Riera, President of the Council of Chambers of Commerce of the Spanish Community of Valenciana, said. He emphasised that Algeria represents the future for many of the Spanish companies' investments, partnerships, local production, and exports to Africa, especially in light of the low production costs of energy and labour. In a statement to Echorouk on the sidelines of an Algerian-Spanish economic forum held Sunday at the Marriott Hotel in Algiers, Juan Riera explained that companies from the region have experienced a decline in their export turnover of approximately 70%. He explained that the impact of the crisis with Algeria has been particularly severe, especially since trade and economic relations between the region and Algeria have been halted by approximately 85 to 90%. Regarding the prospects for investment and partnership with Algeria in the coming period, following the resumption of economic and trade relations between the two countries, Juan Riera explained that the new rules of the game dictate a shift toward local investment here in Algeria, rather than solely focusing on exports. The head of the Chambers of Commerce of the Valenciana Community, which includes the provinces of Valencia, Castellón, and Alicante, confirmed that the Algerian government provides significant support and assistance to investors under a new legal framework, as well as concerning the financing that is available and necessary. Therefore, Juan Riera added, it is necessary to look for a good partner and the right product for export, but especially for local investment and production here in Algeria. In this regard, Juan Riera said, 'I believe that investment and partnerships in Algeria represent the future for many companies in Spain and the Comunidad Valenciana .' The speaker justified his position by stating that Algeria offers extremely attractive opportunities for local production and export to the countries of the South, namely sub-Saharan Africa, which represent markets with enormous potential, especially given the highly stimulating production conditions in Algeria, including the availability of energy (electricity, gas, and fuel) at very competitive prices and an inexpensive labor force. During his speech at the forum, Juan Riera emphasised that Spain is fully prepared to invest and launch partnerships in Algeria if it is provided with legal, economic, and financial protection. He noted that, in such a situation, Spanish companies will be able to launch local production and export projects, particularly to the south, given its strategic location. During the forum, organised by the Algerian-Spanish Club for Trade and Industry, Saliha Nasri, representing the Minister of Environment, gave a detailed presentation to Spanish investors on the prospects for tourism development in Algeria and the opportunities offered by this promising sector in Algeria, given the open workshops. The Spanish operators present also received detailed explanations of investment facilities and procedures, industrial property grants, and other measures presented by a representative from the Algerian Investment Promotion Agency. The forum will continue until Tuesday, June 17, and will include bilateral meetings between Algerian and Spanish business leaders. Field visits to Algerian company headquarters will also be conducted, and partnerships will be explored in a variety of sectors, including logistics, the automotive industry, pharmaceuticals, tourism, agriculture, and other fields.
El Chorouk
17 hours ago
- El Chorouk
French Authorities Raise Sansal Case Again To Brussels
After a remarkable silence that lasted for a few weeks, what is known as the committee supporting the Franco-Algerian writer, Boualem Sansal, decided to act again, by pressuring the institutions of the European Union, in order to resolve this issue, which has seen a striking decline in discussion within political and media circles in France. In a statement by Arnaud Benedetti, a member of the committee supporting the writer imprisoned in Algeria on charges of involvement in targeting the territorial integrity of the country, he said that the committee had filed a complaint with the European Union's 'Ombudsman' due to what he described as the 'inaction' of EU institutions in defending Boualem Sansal's case. After Arnaud Benedetti pointed out that the French National Assembly (the lower house of parliament) adopted a draft resolution on May 6 calling for the release of Boualem Sansal, with no significant results, he stated in an interview with the French parliamentary channel that the committee had not received 'any response' from the High Representative of the European Union since that date, which prompted the committee to 'contact the Ombudsman' to move the file. The Franco-Algerian writer, who is serving a five-year prison sentence, entered his seventh month in Koléa prison near the capital, while the Algiers Judicial Council is expected to begin reviewing his case again in an appeal session on the 24th of this month, following the public prosecutor's decision at the Dar El Beida court in the capital to appeal the five-year prison sentence. Based on the statement issued by a member of the committee supporting the Franco-Algerian writer, the committee aims to incite European Union institutions against Algeria, based on the partnership agreement signed between the two parties in 2002, which came into force in 2005, and which includes clauses on human rights. The committee, composed of French nationals, sought the help of European Union institutions after all attempts at blackmail led by French politicians and media figures, led by French President Emmanuel Macron, and many ministers in François Bayrou's government, such as Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau, and Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, and many political figures belonging to the traditional right and the far-right, failed. However, those repeated French campaigns and provocations only complicated the case of the writer accused of espionage and working for foreign entities, which prompted the Paris authorities to review their tone and lean towards de-escalation, by using phrases dominated by entreaty and appeals, realizing that those methods would only complicate the file further. Despite the change in the tone of the French authorities and their political and media arms towards Algeria, this does not mean that Paris has learned its lesson, as many observers believe that the former colonizer has not yet gotten rid of old practices, which are often characterized by political hypocrisy in secret, and de-escalation in public. It can be noted here the role that Paris may have played in classifying Algeria on the European Union's 'blacklist' of high-risk countries regarding money laundering and terrorist financing, which was recently issued by what is known as the 'Financial Action Task Force,' headquartered in the French capital and affiliated with the European Commission. Decisions issued by the European Union, particularly those concerning the Maghreb countries and Algeria, are usually entrusted to France due to its history in the region, which gives Paris a hand, one way or another, in this classification, and the Algerian authorities are well aware of this.
El Chorouk
2 days ago
- El Chorouk
A report on the 1968 Agreement on the French Parliament's Agenda
After a period of unannounced calm between Algeria and France, new developments suggest a return to high tensions between the two capitals, further indicating of the failure of all attempts at de-escalation. What's striking is that the French side, as usual, always initiates escalation, hoping to achieve gains through political pressure. This approach has proven ineffective over the past 11 months of escalating political and diplomatic crisis. What's even more interesting about this issue is that those fanning the flames of the crisis are not limited to the far right or individuals obsessed with Algeria, such as Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau. They also belong to the presidential camp, specifically the 'Renaissance' party, founded by French President Emmanuel Macron to reach the Élysée Palace. In this context, two MPs from the ruling party, Mathieu Lefèvre and Charles Rodwell, have prepared a report on 'Evaluating the Cost of the 1968 Agreement' on immigration between Algeria and France. The conclusions of this report will be presented to the French Parliament in early July, a development that could spark further controversy and heighten tensions between the two countries. The 1968 agreement is a sensitive issue that has been a source of tension between Algeria and Paris. The French far right and their new theorist, former ambassador to Algeria Xavier Driencourt, have used it as a Trojan horse to pressure successive Macron governments to abolish it. They argue that the agreement offers exclusive privileges to Algerian citizens in terms of residence, employment, education, and the pursuit of liberal activities. These descriptions no longer hold any credibility in light of the amendments introduced to it from the mid-1980s to the beginning of the third millennium. According to the French newspaper Le Parisien, MP Charles Rodville insists that the report's purpose is to shed light on what he considers 'financial abuses, particularly in the files of social assistance and health protection, which also affect the security of French citizens, as some deported Algerian citizens remain on French soil to this day.' He is referring here to the expenses his country incurs on migrants who have been issued deportation orders and whom Algeria has refused to receive due to France's failure to follow the usual diplomatic procedures and channels in such cases. The MP Mathieu Lefèvre argued that this report also aims to revive debate on this issue, which had been largely absent since French President Emmanuel Macron decided to close it last March. This came in response to repeated demands from his Interior Minister, Bruno Retailleau, regarding the issue. Retailleau asserted that the 1968 agreement remains the exclusive prerogative of the Élysée Palace (the French presidency) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, headed by Jean-Noël Barrot. The affiliation of the two MPs who prepared the report on the 1968 agreement with French President Emmanuel Macron's party is a strong indication that the targeting of Algeria and its vital interests in France is no longer limited to parties accustomed to such behaviour, such as the traditional right and the far right, but has spread across the French political class, except the left-wing movement under the New National Front (NFP), representing a dangerous development that threatens to deepen the escalating political and diplomatic crisis, which is approaching the end of its first year. Reviving the debate in the French parliament on the 1968 immigration agreement could lead to serious escalations targeting the Algerian community in France, which numbers in the millions. The presidential camp, represented by the 'Renaissance' party, will bear full responsibility, as previous tensions are usually attributed to the far right, known for its intense hostility toward Algeria and its community.
