A walkover and surprise moves: Highlights from Nomination Day
SINGAPORE - Candidates from 11 political parties filed their papers at nine nomination centres across the island on April 23, kicking off the campaign for Singapore's 15th General Election.
With the political chessboard in place , the nine-day campaign period kicked off once nomination papers were filed. Singaporeans will head to the polls on May 3, after Cooling Off Day on May 2.
Here are the key highlights from Nomination Day.
1. Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC walkover
The PAP team comprising Speaker of Parliament Seah Kian Peng, Minister of State for Home Affairs Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim, Ms Tin Pei Ling, and political newcomers Diana Pang and Goh Pei Ming, were returned to power after the GRC was uncontested by the opposition.
At the last polls, WP made a play for Marine Parade GRC but this year, in what was a last-minute Nomination Day surprise, the WP did not field a team to contest the newly formed Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC.
This is the first walkover in a general election since 2011, when Tanjong Pagar GRC went uncontested and the PAP won in a walkover.
2. Surprise moves by heavyweights
The ruling PAP made a surprise move by diverting Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong from Chua Chu Kang GRC to field him in Punggol GRC instead.
Mr Gan will lead the PAP team comprising Dr Janil Puthucheary, Ms Sun Xueling and Ms Yeo Wan Ling.
Meanwhile, Manpower Minister Tan See Leng moved from Marine Parade-Braddell Heights GRC to replace Mr Gan in Chua Chu Kang.
The split-second switch-up came at the last minute, after Dr Tan was seen at 9.30am at PAP's Mountbatten branch, where the Marine Parade-Braddell Heights team met earlier in the morning.
The WP also moved Mr Faisal Manap, 49, one of its incumbent Aljunied GRC MPs, to lead its team in Tampines GRC.
3. Punggol - the electoral contest to watch
Punggol GRC is shaping up to be the electoral contest to watch at this year's polls.
The WP chose to field one of its 'star catches', senior counsel Harpreet Singh Nehal, as part of its Punggol slate, along with its other new faces, Mr Jackson Au, Ms Siti Alia Abdul Rahim Mattar and Ms Alexis Dang.
The PAP, likely anticipating a tough fight, moved Mr Gan to Punggol GRC to bolster its chances.
Before Nomination Day, pundits tipped East Coast GRC to emerge as of the hottest election battlegrounds, predicting that the WP would field one of its big names in the constituency.
The WP team in East Coast will be led by former Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong, 60. The WP will face off against a PAP team led by Culture, Community and Youth Minister Edwin Tong, 55.
4. Political veterans retire
Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean and Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat will retire from politics.
Both men were seen at nomination centres in the morning, but were not fielded as candidates.
Mr Teo first entered politics when he was part of a PAP team that contested and won a by-election in Marine Parade GRC in 1992.
Meanwhile, Mr Heng made his political debut in the 2011 general election as part of the five-member PAP team contesting Tampines GRC.
5. Multi-cornered fights
Tampines GRC, Sembawang GRC and Ang Mo Kio GRC, as well as Radin Mas SMC and Potong Pasir SMC will have multi-cornered fights.
In Tampines GRC, the PAP team is facing off against the WP, National Solidarity Party (NSP) and People's Power Party (PPP) in a four-cornered fight.
Social and Family Development Minister Masagos Zulkifli, 62 will helm the Tampines GRC team that also comprises Senior Minister of State for Manpower and Sustainability and the Environment Koh Poh Koon, 53, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Transport and Sustainability and the Environment Baey Yam Keng, 54, and two new faces - former chief of army David Neo, 47, and Dr Charlene Chen, 43, an assistant professor of marketing at Nanyang Technological University.
The WP is fielding Mr Faisal Manap, Mr Jimmy Tan, 53, co-founder of industrial equipment supply firm Immanuel Engineering, Institute of Mental Health senior principal clinical psychologist Ong Lue Ping, 48, former diplomat Eileen Chong, 33, and Mr Michael Thng, 37, co-founder of technology start-up Showdrop.
The NSP is fielding party president Reno Fong, 56, party vice-president Mohd Ridzwan Mohammad, 63, assistant secretary-general Eugene Yeo, 49, financial planner Zee Phay, 32, and Mr Thamilselvan Karuppaya, 57, who is self-employed.
The PPP is fielding a slate comprising secretary-general Goh Meng Seng, 55, party chairman Derrick Sim, 44, landscaping executive Vere Nathan, 26, green tech firm founder Peter Soh, 65, and entrepreneur Arbaah Haroun, 50.
In Ang Mo Kio GRC, there will be a three-cornered fight between the PAP, Singapore United Party (SUP), and PPP.
The PAP team will be led by Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, 73. It will also comprise incumbent Ang Mo Kio GRC MPs Darryl David, 54, and Nadia Ahmad Samdin, 35, as well as newcomer Jasmin Lau, 42, and Mr Victor Lye, 63.
As for the SUP, its Ang Mo Kio slate comprises the party's secretary-general Andy Zhu, 42, Ms Noraini Yunus, 57, party chairman Ridhuan Chandran, 53, flight attendant Nigel Ng, 39, and Dr Vincent Ng, 52.
The PPP team in Ang Mo Kio comprises party treasurer William Lim, 47, retired civil servant Martinn Ho, 64, safety coordinator Thaddeus Thomas, 43, IT engineer Samuel Lee, 33, and former horticulturalist Heng Zheng Dao, 24.
Sembawang GRC will also see a three-way fight between the PAP, NSP and Singapore Democratic Party.
Health Minister Ong Ye Kung will lead the PAP team, which will be made up of incumbent MPs Vikram Nair and Mariam Jaafar, and two new faces - Mr Gabriel Lam, 42, who is chief operating officer of moving company Shalom International Movers, and Mr Ng Shi Xuan, 35, director of battery company Powermark Battery and Hardware.
The SDP team consists of hospital assistant director Bryan Lim, music publisher Surayah Akbar, research institute director James Gomez, entrepreneur Alfred Tan, and Mr Damanhuri Abas, an educational consultant.
The NSP team will be led by its secretary-general Spencer Ng and include Mr Raiyian Chia, a private-hire driver and swim coach, Republic Polytechnic lecturer Verina Ong, Republic Polytechnic associate lecturer Mr Lee Wei, and Mr Yadzeth Hairis, who was in NSP's 2015 and 2020 Sembawang teams.
In the Radin Mas single seat, incumbent PAP MP Melvin Yong will defend his seat against Mr Kumar Appavoo from the People's Alliance for Reform (PAR) and independent candidate Darryl Lo.
In the Potong Pasir single seat, the lawyer Alex Yeo takes over the baton from outgoing PAP MP Sitoh Yi Pin, and will face off against PAR secretary-general Lim Tean, and Singapore People's Party candidate Williamson Lee.
In GE2020, there were two multi-cornered fights in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC and Pioneer SMC.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far?
An art installation at the Padang. Vocal naysayers recently accused the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. PHOTO: ST FILE Hear Me Out: Has the swing against elitism gone too far? SINGAPORE – At a time when most people understand that the personal is political, individual views have become a battleground of virtue – equality, good; hierarchy, bad. Elitism? The worst possible kind of social evil. Yet, take a step back from this instinctive repulsion and there might be benefits to muddying the waters. Elitism, the belief that an elite group, however defined, should be entitled to the reins of power has been the norm throughout much of history. Whether it is the clergy, kings with their divine right, the Confucian scholar or today's fintech bros, there have been groups in each time period that societies tend to value and reward. It was only with increasing democratisation, and a growing disenfranchisement at the chasm between the top and the rest, that elitism has become a byword for undeserved privilege and gross injustice. This brief trip back in time is not to rehabilitate elitism, but to show that the current period against it – or at least one that pays lip service to not believing in an elite class – may be an aberrant one. In the West, this has been taken to extremes, manifesting in a debilitating disregard fo r e xperts and fatal results during the Covid-19 pandemic against the advice of doctors to vaccinate. In Singapore, it is the elite schools that are targeted, in the idealistic slogan that every school is a good school. Though, for perplexing reasons, this scepticism has not yet been extended to the natural reverence the majority of Singaporeans harbour for lawyers and doctors. Their expertise is assumed to be universally applicable – a mentality that has narrowed parents and students' conception of what success looks like. In any case, the ills of elitism have been thoroughly aired, including the type of entitled, discompassionate divas that it ends up producing. The very consensus of who deserves to be elite has also fractured. I wonder, though, if this enmity has led to some unexpected side effects. This is a train of thought sparked by recent reactions to the Government's SG Culture Pass initiative set out during the Budget statement in 2025. Self-sabotage Under the scheme, $100 would be given t o Si ngaporeans aged 18 and above for the consumption of the local arts, redeemable from September. One would expect rejoicing, but there was uproar from a group of vocal naysayers. They accused the credits of being the very thing it counteracted: elitism. Why? Because the money could be better spent on support for groceries. This, I thought, was a case of anti-elitism as self-sabotage. Central to this worldview was that the arts is an elitist activity patronised only by the rich and the hyper-educated aesthete, when one type of activity for the elite and one for the others is exactly the sort of segregation and self-limiting mentality that perpetuates divides. There was no sense that this $100 in credits was a way of making the perceived barrier more permeable. To put it in context, the Government also announced $800 in CDC vouchers. This was bread for all, and roses too. Yet another potentially problematic by-product is that the word 'elite' has since been tainted by association. No one dares lay claim to the word 'elite', or acknowledge that someone else may be elite in his or her field. The rare exemption is perhaps in sports, where athletes accept the cut-throat nature of their competition, and where non-athletes are so tangibly outside their league that there is no point in pretending otherwise. This is not in itself a problem – elite is after all just a word – though I find no easy replacement term that can immediately convey excellence to the same degree. But it incidentally comes at a time when there is a general reluctance to impose any kind of objective standard, supplemented by that compassionate but useless invention: the consolation prize. This applies to things: Is no one taste now better than another? As well as people, where so many takes on social media are considered equally valid, measured just by virality. It is the kind of ChatGPT mentality where how often something is repeated or the number of clicks on a website can influence results, with no regard to its truth value. The war against elitism may have come at the expense of standards and good sense. Reclaiming elite This impulse to drag discourse to the same level – usually downwards – has the right intentions, timely given that, for so long, highly selective elitist standards have been imposed as objective metrics. To right the ship so discourse is levelled upwards though, perhaps elite can be thought of as separate from elitism, rehabilitated without the corresponding concentration of resources and power. This should be expanded so that who is elite becomes not just about education but also because of other qualities – role models people can aspire to in different contexts. What constitutes an elite has always been reliant on man-made barometers, negotiated by the community. There should be no shame in aspiring to be elite. Anti-elitism should not mean an absence of the elite, but that all who put their heart and minds to it should have a fair shot at claiming its pedigree, or getting closer to it. It is a lifelong dusting off of mediocrity, and it begins with first recognising what is good. Hear Me Out is a new series where young journalists (over)share on topics ranging from navigating friendships to self-loathing, and the occasional intrusive thought. Check out the Headstart chatbot for answers to your questions on careers and work trends.
Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
S'pore embassy in Washington seeking US clarification on Harvard's visa ban
SINGAPORE - Singapore's embassy in Washington has been seeking clarification from the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security on President Donald Trump's directive prohibiting foreigners from entering the country to study at Harvard University. The embassy is hoping for clarity from US authorities in the next few days, including on whether there will be any delay in the processing of visas for Singaporeans hoping to study in the US, Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said on June 7. In a zoom call with Singapore media to wrap up his five-day visit to Washington, he noted that many current and prospective students looking to study in the United States had expressed their concern to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs over potential visa delays. Asked to elaborate on contingencies being planned should Singaporean students find themselves unable to proceeds with their plans to study in the US, he said the Government is trying to find solutions to deal with the worst case scenario where students are not able to physically study in Boston. 'We've got some ideas for how we can help them to, in a sense, deal with that eventuality without impairing their academic and professional progress,' said Dr Balakrishnan. 'For others who are not yet here, who have not yet secured visas, you may also need to have backup plans, but my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed.' Dr Balakrishnan noted that Singapore's ambassador to the US Lui Tuck Yew has also held a virtual town hall with students currently studying in Harvard. In the virtual town hall on May 30, Mr Lui told Singaporean students at Harvard that the Republic's autonomous universities can offer them placements if they wish to discontinue their studies in the US and return home. A Ministry of Education spokesperson said this message was shared with affected students so they could consider returning to Singapore as a possible option to continue their studies. There are six autonomous universities here: National University of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Management University, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore University of Technology and Design and Singapore Institute of Technology. University statistics show that there are currently 151 Singaporean students in Harvard. Among them are 12 Public Service Commission scholarship holders. Foreign students at Harvard were thrown into limbo after Mr Trump's administration announced on May 22 that it had revoked Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification with immediate effect. The nearly 6,800 international students in the Ivy League college were given an ultimatum to either transfer to another institution, or face deportation. A federal judge later blocked the move, with the Trump administration rolling back its stance on May 29 and giving Harvard 30 days to submit evidence contesting the administration's plan to revoke the school's right to enrol international students. International students make up more than a quarter of Harvard's student body, but Mr Trump said the university should cap its international intake at 15 per cent. Dr Balakrishnan said the situation confronting international students stems from domestic political issues within the US. But students, including from Singapore, can become affected as collateral damage, and there will be a period of uncertainty of at least a few days or weeks. 'Nevertheless, we will continue to pursue this with the American authorities, and I hope we'll be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States.' At a macro level, it remains in both Singapore and the US' interests to keep opportunities open for Singaporeans who want to study and work in the US to expand their domain experience and their networks, he added. 'So this is an issue that we will continue to pursue with the State Department.' Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Give more thought to lowering Singapore's voting age to 18
The writer says that when young Singaporeans feel marginalised in politics and disengage from political participation, Singapore will be poorer for it. PHOTO: ST FILE Over the past few years, there have been calls from some quarters to lower Singapore's voting age to 18. They cite Singapore as one of the few states in the world where the minimum voting age is 21, highlighting a mismatch with existing legislation. After all, 18-year-old Singaporeans can get married, do national service, be appointed as company directors and be polling and counting agents during elections. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
