Travel bans imposed on former PM, finance minister
Travel bans for ex-PSS top officials also extended
Former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo and former Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Choi Sang-mok have been banned from leaving the country for their alleged connection to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's botched martial law attempt in December 2024, according to the police on Tuesday.
The announcement by the Korean National Police Agency comes a day after the KNPA's National Office of Investigation conducted interrogations that lasted approximately 10 hours with Han, Choi and former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min regarding their involvement in the martial law debacle.
During interrogations, the former ministers were reportedly questioned about whether they made false statements about the process of receiving martial law-related documents on the night martial law was declared, based on police analysis of surveillance footage of the presidential office's Cabinet meeting room and hallway.
According to the Korean National Police Agency, a travel ban had already been imposed on Han and Choi around the middle of May. Lee's exit ban, which was already in place since December last year, was also extended.
The police also announced on Tuesday that it has extended the travel bans placed on Yoon's former chiefs of the Presidential Security Service, including former PSS chief Park Chong-jun, former PSS deputy chief Kim Seong-hoon and former head of the PSS' bodyguard division Lee Kwang-woo.
The decision comes after the police obtained secure phone server records on May 23, including calls and texts exchanged between Yoon and government ministers, military officials and PSS personnel.
The police announced three days later that it had detected signs that some call records of a secure phone held by Yoon had been remotely deleted. Though police officials were quoted in local media reports saying that the PSS is believed to be responsible for deleting the records, they are still in the process of narrowing down a suspect.
The police plans to move ahead with investigations by looking into when the three individuals first became aware of Yoon's plan to declare martial law, and whether they knew about the plan in advance before martial law was officially declared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Mammoth probes to look into Yoon's alleged treason, insurrection
Special teams size of a district attorney's office to be formed to investigate ex-president Multiple probe teams together comprising some 120 prosecutors are set to look into allegations surrounding former President Yoon Suk Yeol, including one that he committed treason by trying to impose martial law on Dec. 3, 2024. The Democratic Party of Korea on Thursday passed a series of bills seeking to open three separate special counsel investigations. One will investigate whether Yoon's short-lived martial law declaration would constitute insurrection, for which a criminal trial is already underway, as well as treason. The Democratic Party claims that Yoon plotted to provoke a military action from North Korea to justify declaring martial law with his hawkish policies such as resumption of anti-Pyongyang broadcasts near inter-Korean borders in June 2024. The Democratic Party is also pushing an as-yet unsubstatiated claim that Yoon sent unmanned aerial vehicles into Pyongyang in October 2024. Yoon allegedly attempting to instigate an armed conflict with North Korea in the run-up to his martial law decree was "treason," the Democratic Party claimed, on top of it being a "rebellion against the Constitution, which is to say, insurrection." Another special counsel investigation would revisit the death of a Marine in July 2023. Cpl. Chae Su-geun, 20, died when he was swept away in moving water during a search and rescue operation to locate flood victims in a rain-swollen river in Yecheon, North Gyeongsang Province. The Democratic Party claims that the Yoon presidential office tried to hinder a preliminary investigation into if there had been negligence and other wrongdoing at the top in Chae's death. Yoon's wife Kim Keon Hee is also set to face a special counsel investigation into allegations that she interfered in the People Power Party's nomination of candidates for a National Assembly seat. The Democratic Party voted without the People Power Party to pass the special counsel bills Thursday. The Democratic Party has the majority in the Assembly, holding 167 out of 300 seats.
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Controversy-ridden former presidential worker was Kim Keon Hee's photographer: report
YouTuber who filmed videos from inside the presidential office had taken staged photos for former first lady The woman who posted controversial YouTube videos about her daily life as a worker in the presidential office turned out to be an official who took photos for former first lady Kim Keon Hee, a local media outlet reported. According to the CBS Nocut News, the person was a former Class 9 civil servant surnamed Shin, who had joined ex-President's Yoon Suk Yeol's staff during his presidential campaign in 2022. Shin had purportedly just graduated from college and was entrusted with administrative duties at the presidential office, in particular taking photos of Yoon's wife. It was reported that Shin was responsible for the several staged photos of Kim that were subject of controversy. This included a photo of Yoon's wife holding a sick Cambodian boy in her arms, a photo of her appearing to give instructions to police officials that sparked criticism of her overstepping her role, and photos at the opening of the Suncheonman International Garden Expo 2023 that was focused on Kim and not the event itself. The CBS report said several former officials of the presidential office had made internal complaints over the photos, which were supposedly overruled by Kim. The report also said that Shin had received several warnings for tardiness and had frequently argued with her superiors, but was able to squash out the complaints against herself on the former first lady's authority. The videos recently posted by the former presidential office employee also sparked disputes here, for her filming the outer areas of the secure facility and showing it to the public. During the impeachment trials of now-expelled Yoon, the presidential office in January filed for criminal charges against local broadcasters for filming the official presidential residence from the outside. It claimed that such act was in violation of the Protection of Military Bases and Installations Act, specifically the Article 9 that bans filming in the area designated as a "Protection Zone." The same logic would prevent filming the outside areas of the presidential office. Neither the presidential office or the former employee has issued a comment on the controversy, although she made the disputed videos inaccessible to the public.
![[Lee Byung-jong] Danger of too much power?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F06%2F05%2Fnews-p.v1.20250605.37ad2cf553ae443ab411a1db98568db6_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Lee Byung-jong] Danger of too much power?
After six months of excruciating political uncertainty and public anxiety, South Korea has ushered in a new era with the election of President Lee Jae-myung on Wednesday. The initial response has been broadly positive: The stock market surged, and allies such as Japan and the US offered swift messages of support and continued cooperation. Lee's decisive victory — garnering over 17 million votes, the most for any Korean president — gives him a strong and clear mandate to pursue his policy agenda. However, the scale of Lee's victory could also be cause for concern. With his Democratic Party of Korea holding an overwhelming majority in the National Assembly, the Lee administration may be tempted to overextend its executive power. The judiciary, increasingly seen as vulnerable to public pressure, may not be able to serve as an effective check. Lee's firm control over his party, filled with his loyalists, further eliminates internal constraints, heightening fears of a concentration of power. The first signs of potential executive overreach appeared on day one of Lee's presidency, when the ruling party put forward a bill to expand the number of Supreme Court justices from 14 to as many as 30. This proposal, floated even before the election following the Court's ruling against Lee for election law violations, is officially framed as a response to the judiciary's heavy caseload. Yet critics argue it is a thinly veiled attempt to stack the Court with pro-government justices. Other controversial bills are likely to follow now that executive and legislative powers are united under one party. These include measures to strengthen protections for unionized workers and rice farmers, and to impose tighter regulations on major corporate shareholders. Such bills were repeatedly vetoed by former President Yoon Suk Yeol on the grounds that they would stifle economic growth. Another previously blocked bill, which would expand civil society influence in public broadcasting oversight, is also expected to be revived despite concerns about ideological bias, as civil society groups in Korea often lean liberal and support the Democratic Party's agenda. These initiatives are likely to be pushed through in the early days of Lee's presidency. Concerns about the concentration of power are compounded by the current disarray of the opposition People Power Party, following the impeachment of President Yoon. While the ruling party, along with its allies, commands a near two-thirds majority in the Assembly, the opposition is fractured — torn by internal debates over the legitimacy of Yoon's impeachment, especially his imposition of martial law in December. The party was sharply divided between pro and anti-impeachment factions. With the next parliamentary elections still three years away, the opposition's ability to check President Lee's administration appears weak at best. This concentration of power threatens the foundations of Korean democracy, still fragile in the aftermath of the failed marshal law declaration. Similar patterns of democratic erosion have emerged globally — in Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and other nations that maintain the form of democracy through elections while systematically weakening checks and balances, silencing dissent and undermining independent institutions such as the press and civil society. These so-called 'elected autocracies' or 'illiberal democracies' consolidate power under the guise of democratic legitimacy. Even the United States — long regarded as a beacon of democracy — has shown signs of democratic backsliding. The newly returned Trump administration has increasingly relied on executive orders to bypass Congress on contentious issues such as immigration and tariffs. Like the aforementioned regimes, US President Donald Trump has targeted the media, demonized critics and used federal agencies to investigate political opponents. His fights against higher educational institutions like Harvard University and moves to reduce or close federal government agencies are accused of executive overreach. Yet the US system retains important guardrails. Many of Trump's executive actions have been blocked by the judiciary, including the Supreme Court, despite its conservative majority. Midterm elections, seen as a confidence vote on the presidency, serve as a vital democratic check, and the federal structure ensures that state governments can limit federal overreach. South Korea also operates a system of local autonomy, with major cities like Seoul and Busan still under opposition control. However, local governments remain weak in practice, as the central government controls budgeting and other key decisions. Given the ruling party's big win in the presidential election, next year's local elections are unlikely to yield many opposition victories. Unlike the US, Korea lacks midterm elections, meaning the opposition may remain marginalized for the next three years. Concerns over excessive presidential power are not new in Korea. Whenever presidents have faced their downfall — whether by impeachment or scandals of power abuse — calls for constitutional reform have resurfaced. Proposals have included shifting to a cabinet system or introducing power-sharing arrangements with a prime minister or vice president. In this latest election, all major candidates pledged to reduce the power of the presidency to prevent another 'imperial presidency.' Whether President Lee will follow through on such promises remains to be seen.
