Colorado petrol bomb suspect charged with 16 counts of attempted murder
The suspect in the Colorado petrol bomb attack has been charged with 16 counts of attempted murder.
Mohamed Soliman is accused of throwing Molotov cocktails and using a makeshift flamethrower on a group of people at a rally in support of Israeli hostages - with the FBI describing the incident as a targeted "act of terrorism".
The 45-year-old, from El Paso County, Colorado, shouted "Free Palestine" during the attack, it is alleged.
A total of 12 victims were injured and taken to hospitals, authorities said. One of those was at one point said to be in a critical condition.
A federal criminal complaint (court filing) said Soliman confessed to the attack, told investigators that he had planned it for a year, said he "wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead", and that "he would do it again".
At a press conference on Monday evening, 20th judicial district attorney Michael Dougherty said "Boulder is a beautiful and special place, but we're not immune from mass violence or hate crimes" as he explained the charges against Soliman.
He said that the suspect faces 16 counts of attempted murder in the first-degree, with eight of those for attempted murder with intent and after deliberation, meaning he had time to consider his crimes.
The other eight counts relate to attempted murder with extreme indifference, meaning he acted without regard to others' lives.
Read more:
Soliman is also charged with eight counts of first-degree assault, two counts of use of an incendiary device, and 16 counts of attempted use of an incendiary device.
If convicted on all charges pursued by the state prosecutor, and if they run consecutively, Soliman faces a maximum sentence of 624 years in prison.
Mr Dougherty added that the US attorney's office "will be prosecuting the hate crime against the defendant," which relates to the federal crime of causing bodily injury because of actual or perceived race, colour, religion, or national origin.
Suspect appears in court
After the press conference, Soliman made his first appearance in court, appearing via web link from Boulder County Jail.
During the brief hearing, Judge Nancy Salomone asked the suspect if received the protection order issued by the court preventing him from contacting the victims, to which he said "yes".
She then said she will see legal representatives on Thursday for the filing of the charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - We're in an era of ideological violence, and it's only getting worse
A CEO gunned down on an early morning Manhattan street. A young couple shot dead outside an event in the nation's capital. Separated by a few hundred miles and a few months, these two events perfectly encapsulate the era of ideological violence we are living in. A crazed man attacking Jews with a makeshift flamethrower while yelling 'Free Palestine' in Colorado is just the latest example in a trend that feels ominously like it is picking up pace. For years, we have managed threats to executives, celebrities and high-net-worth individuals. The threats against these groups have increased exponentially. It mirrors the zeitgeist in the country, which feels like it is on a razor's edge. Threats and who could become a target are evolving quickly beyond people with high profiles. Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, who was murdered in December, had a security detail and knew that he worked in a sector of the economy that many feel is deeply unjust. But he surely had no sense that he would become the personification of those grievances, and that his killer would become a folk hero to those who harbor similar grievances. Last month, when Israeli embassy employees Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky were leaving an event focused on humanitarian approaches to foreign policy, they were also surely aware of the vitriol directed at Israel for the war in Gaza and at Jews in general as a result. But this young couple was to face a similar fate as Thompson — becoming the personification of a grievance by a deluded individual, catalyzed towards violence by a society that no longer provides guardrails to curtail it. Social media has brought some good things into our lives. It allows us to keep in touch with old friends, share details of our lives broadly with our networks and get beyond traditional gatekeepers of media to broaden perspectives and quickly find out what's going on in the world. But in many ways, it is a scourge of our time. Algorithms consumed with driving engagement have become outrage machines and lesser minds fall prey to their catastrophic cacophony. Monitoring threats on social media and in other dark corners of the web has become a big part of the corporate security business. We use the same AI that powers the algorithms used by social media companies to drive us mad with anger to gauge who is potentially serious about committing violence by evaluating negative sentiment. We combine analytically driven approaches to language and frequency of posting with tools like background investigations into someone who might pose a threat to our protectee or company. It works, and we frequently take actions that mitigate threats, but it is a game of whack-a-mole. While these types of threats and the realization of the violence that they can bring are chilling and grab the headlines, disgruntled former employees and marginalized individuals with mental illness who have fixated on a celebrity or executive are the more traditional threats that remain the focus of our work. But something is at work in America that is deeply disturbing and changing the threat landscape. Professional athletes have always been under an intense spotlight and have faced the wrath of disappointed fans. But Red Sox pitcher Liam Hendricks described a new reality last month as the latest player to come forward about the many death threats that he has received. Many of these threats have arisen out of the miasma of legalized gambling, with a fan enraged when a pitcher like Hendricks gives up a lead and the gambler's bet is blown. With money on the line and the easy anonymity of social media available, it isn't hard for these gamblers to make vicious threats. And with a wealth of personal identifiable information about any of our lives out there (one threat against Hendricks alluded to the sliding door in his home) it is frightening how real these dangers can be. Hendricks is a cancer survivor and some of these individuals have messaged him that they wish he succumbed to the disease. He is not an outlier — Jarren Duran, an outfielder also with the Boston Red Sox, has bravely discussed suicidal ideations and recently had a fan in Cleveland scream at him that he wished he killed himself. While the trend of ideological violence has complex roots, it is further empowered and manifested by President Trump, who seems to revel in malice and cruelty, especially against anyone he feels may be against him. The examples are manifold, but the gleeful and dishonest purging of many innocent immigrants who have done nothing wrong and have, in many cases, fled violence in their home countries is but one example. The current administration is also awash in conspiracy theorists who have amplified the darkest and most vile rumors online. In many ways, the president of the United States sets the tone for the country. Previous presidents have tried to calm anger and violence in the country — this administration fuels it. Other presidents have tried to unite the country — this one seeks to further divide it. The fault of this crisis of ideological violence doesn't reside with the president, but he is making it worse. Indeed, Trump nearly lost his life to the trend during two assassination attempts last year. We are in the business of forecasting threats and protecting our clients. Doing the work we do, monitoring social media and the dark web for percolating threats and evaluating the fault lines of foreign affairs for other drivers of risk, we are predicting a continued rise in ideological violence. Unfortunately, it is the average American citizen who is likely to bear the continued burden of the violence of this unfortunate era. Don Aviv CPP, PSP, PCI, is CEO of Interfor International. Jeremy Hurewitz is Head of Interfor Academy and the author of 'Sell Like a Spy.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-What might happen in Israel's parliamentary dissolution vote?
(Reuters) -Opposition party Yesh Atid has submitted a vote to dissolve the Israeli parliament, known as the Knesset, for June 11, amid rising tensions in the ruling right-wing coalition. Here are some key facts about the Knesset, the procedure for a dissolution vote, which would lead to an election, and possible scenarios. KNESSET COMPOSITION Total seats: 120 Simple majority needed to pass the vote: 61 Current government majority: 8 seats LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE The Yesh Atid motion faces four votes with an absolute majority of the Knesset required in the final stretch to become law, thereby bringing a premature end to the legislature and triggering an election, which must be held within five months of the motion passing. In practice, if the initial vote passes, the subsequent stages could occur all the same day or take months. OPPOSITION STRATEGY A bill to dissolve parliament will only be brought to a vote if Yesh Atid is confident of securing a majority. If not, it can withdraw the motion anytime before June 11, preventing a vote. ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS Ultra-Orthodox coalition parties could decide to leave the government to protest at its failure to put forward a law granting exemption from military service to ultra-Orthodox men. At the same time, they might refuse to vote for dissolution of parliament, allowing a minority government to continue. COALITION NUMBERS The coalition led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a majority of around 68 seats in parliament, though its size has fluctuated due to internal political shifts. The two coalition ultra-Orthodox parties, United Torah Judaism and Shas, hold 18 seats collectively. If they united with the opposition, they would have enough votes to dissolve parliament and trigger early elections a year ahead of schedule.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pressure mounts on Netanyahu as opposition moves to dissolve parliament
By Alexander Cornwell TEL AVIV (Reuters) -A member of Israel's right-wing coalition threatened to quit the cabinet on Wednesday and support an opposition motion to dissolve parliament tabled for next week, piling pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Latest opinion polls suggest that Netanyahu's coalition would lose power if an election was held today, with many voters unhappy over the continued war in Gaza prompted by the attack by Hamas militants on southern Israel in October 2023. United Torah Judaism, one of two ultra-Orthodox parties in the coalition, said it would withdraw from the government unless it secured last-minute concessions formalising an exemption for ultra-Orthodox men from military service. The opposition party Yesh Atid, led by former prime minister Yair Lapid, put forward a parliamentary vote for next week to topple the government, even as the Israeli army continues battling Hamas in the Gaza Strip. It would require the support of 61 out of the 120 members of the parliament to succeed. "This Knesset (parliament) is finished. It has nowhere to go," Lapid said. Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, has remained silent on the looming crisis. A spokesperson for United Torah Judaism leader Yitzhak Goldknopf told Reuters the party would vote in favour of dissolving parliament unless exemption legislation was passed. With a week until the vote, Netanyahu and his allies still have time to negotiate over an issue that has dogged the coalition for months. A source close to the government said, on condition of anonymity, that negotiations within the coalition were continuing. Netanyahu's coalition of secular right-wing and ultra-Orthodox parties holds an 8-seat majority in parliament. United Torah Judaism has 7 seats while its ally, Shas, the other ultra-Orthodox party, has 11. BETTING ON A BLUFF The coalition is sharply divided over whether young ultra-Orthodox men who are studying in religious seminaries should be exempt from mandatory military service. Failing to pass an exemption risks a walkout by ultra-Orthodox lawmakers, while approving it could trigger a protest exit by secular parties. Coalition member Ohad Tal of Bezalel Smotrich's Religious Zionism party criticized Goldknopf for threatening to trigger elections and called on the ultra-Orthodox lawmaker to resign. He urged others to negotiate a new arrangement but that a blanket exemption from military service could no longer stand. Former Knesset member Ofer Shelah said Netanyahu was likely betting the ultra-Orthodox lawmakers were bluffing, given the polls suggested they faced defeat in any early election. In March, ultra-Orthodox lawmakers threatened to bring down the government over the same issue, but time passed without any action. Resentment over the informal exemption given to religious seminary students is growing and lawmakers from the ruling coalition and opposition ranks say it is no longer tenable. Netanyahu won election in 2022 and does not have to return to the polls until 2026. Historically, few Israeli governments serve a full term. He has faced widespread criticism for failing to prevent the surprise October 2023 Hamas attack that killed roughly 1,200 people, and is facing growing calls from protesters and families of hostages still held in Gaza to end the war to secure their release. But some in his coalition say the war must continue until Hamas is eradicated. Political analysts say that the ultra-Orthodox lawmakers could simply quit the government to protest their failure to secure concessions, without toppling the ruling coalition.
