Increase in number of drinking water supply samples exceeding legal limits for pesticides
THERE HAS BEEN an increase in the number of drinking water supply samples that exceed legal limits for pesticides.
Uisce Éireann's public water supply monitoring programme found 66 exceedances in 2024 from more than 34,000 analyses, compared to 52 exceedances in 2023.
The pesticide levels detected in the monitoring programmes do not pose a risk to health, the body said.
These include herbicides such as MCPA, which is used to control dock and thistle, and in Ireland is commonly used to control rushes – meaning it's used close to water courses. As it's water soluble, it's more prone to leaching and run-off to nearby water bodies.
There have been recurring cases of samples coming back with high levels of pesticides in Hacketstown, Co Carlow, Greenmount, Co Louth and Foynes Shannon Estuary, Co Limerick.
Advertisement
These areas will be the subjects of targeted action now, the likes of which Uisce Éireann says was successful in reducing pesticides found in water in Belturbet, Co Cavan and Newport, Co. Mayo.
It added that while the overall compliance rate remains 'very high', all stakeholders should stay vigilant to protect drinking water quality.
These include Uisce Éireann itself, as well as other state bodies related to water, agriculture and health, such as the HSE and the Irish Farmers' Association.
Uisce Éireann and the National Pesticides and Drinking Water Action Group are urging farmers, greenkeepers, amenity users and domestic pesticide users to carefully evaluate the necessity of using pesticides.
'Pesticides should only be applied when essential and after considering alternative methods.'
As well as improving water quality, minimising pesticide use can allow native flowering plant species to grow, which in turn supports insects, including bees and other important pollinators.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
7 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Tipperary eatery ordered to close over food safety breaches
Shake Dog restaurant-café, located at Unit 23, Showgrounds Shopping Centre, Clonmel, Co Tipperary, was ordered to close on May 14, and the order was lifted on May 19. The order was served under the EU's Official Controls in Relation to Food Legislation regulations, 2020, the Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) reported on Tuesday this week. The closure order was served on Clonmel Diner Ltd by the Health Service Executive (HSE), and directed that all of the activities of the business, its establishments, holdings or other premises, be ceased. The HSE officer noted that the hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) based procedures which had been put in place were not effectively implemented in practice. 'To control the growth of food poisoning bacteria in cold food, the HACCP based procedures in place state: safe storage of food is to be chilled and stored between 0C to 5C. 'Some high risk chilled foods were being held at potentially unsafe temperatures (above the critical limit of <5C for cold display established in the Shake Dog HACCP plan), in the server area.' The HSE officer reported that evidence of non-compliance with legislation included 'garlic mayonnaise and salsa in middle of counter top unit opposite to grill: 13.6C. 'Cooked bacon at back of counter top unit adjacent to grill: 9.2C. Raw chicken breasts in milk at back of counter top unit adjacent to grill: 12.6C. Raw sausage at back of counter top unit adjacent to grill: 10C. 'These potentially unsafe holding temperatures had not been identified as part of part of your temperature monitoring procedures. 'Temperature monitoring records must accurately reflect actual food temperatures and corrective action (s) must be taken and recorded whenever temperature monitoring indicates that a critical control point (such as storage) is not under control.' ADVERTISEMENT Business operators are to maintain and provide evidence of an appropriate food safety culture by fulfilling certain requirements, such as the safe production and distribution of food, noted the inspector. 'There has been repeated non-compliance with regulatory requirements,' stated the HSE officer. 'An unsatisfactory level of compliance with food safety legislation was observed during previous inspection.' The legislation stipulates that all articles, fittings and equipment with which food comes into contact with are to be effectively cleaned and where necessary, disinfected. Evidence of non-compliance included that food contact equipment had evidence of food residue present. Additionally, the wash basin behind the counter in the milkshake drinks area was covered with plastic film as the hand basin was blocked. 'Stagnant water pooling within the wash basin,' was observed. 'There was no material for cleaning and or drying hands at the wash hand basin in the rear preparation area.' 'There was a small amount of liquid soap available which appeared to be watered down at the hand basin in the main food preparation area,' concluded the inspection report.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
From 20 cigarettes a day for 55 years to finally quitting: ‘I took it up, thinking I was the big man'
For 55 years, Mick Staunton smoked more than 20 cigarettes a day. His wife, Olivia, wasn't far behind him, having taken up smoking 46 years ago and smoking at least 10 a day ever since. However, proving that you are never too old to quit, the Roscommon couple have finally ditched the habit and are feeling much healthier as a result. 'I took it up, like every young fella, thinking I was the big man,' said the 74-year-old. 'Olivia (71) was similar, and with the two of us smoking, it became harder and harder to quit, even though we tried a few times.' The retired garda says that he and his wife, who used to work in the Civil Service, attempted to stop smoking on numerous occasions throughout their lives, but knew they needed support to stop for good. READ MORE 'Whenever I tried, I would only last a few months before going back on them [cigarettes] and Olivia was the same,' said the father of five. 'We tried to go cold turkey and were using sweets and chewing gum whenever we wanted a cigarette, but they were a poor substitute. So last year we contacted the [ HSE ] QUIT team and the support we got was the biggest thing to help us through.' More than 17 per cent of the Irish population are smokers, with 14 per cent smoking daily, and 4 per cent occasionally. With 20 per cent of the 25- to 34-year-old age bracket smoking, this demographic has the highest number of smokers. However, these figures have declined since the first Healthy Ireland Survey in 2015, when the figure was 32 per cent. This decrease could be down to more available supports, as, according to the HSE, smokers are four times more likely to quit successfully if they use a combination of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the form of sprays, mists, lozenges and patches, along with support from a 'stop smoking adviser'. Smoking is a leading cause of preventable death and significantly impacts physical and mental health, so giving up can lead to improved health, reduced disease risk, and better overall wellbeing, including increased life expectancy and reduced stress. 'Smoking is dangerous, and the odds facing people who smoke are stark - 1 in 2 will die of a smoking-related disease; on average, people who smoke will die 10 years earlier and are at increased risk of cancer, heart attack, stroke, lung disease and many other debilitating diseases,' said Dr Paul Kavanagh, HSE public health consultant and clinical adviser to the Tobacco Free Ireland Programme. [ Smoking ban has important lessons for Ireland's approach to climate issues Opens in new window ] However, Dr Kavanagh says it's not all bad news, as these odds can be changed when people stop smoking. 'We see changes in physiological measures like heart rate, blood pressure and exhaled carbon monoxide within days; breathing and exercise tolerance will improve within weeks; and over the coming months and years, the risk of smoking-related disease reduces dramatically.' Mick Staunton with his wife Olivia in their garden in Castlerea. Photograph: Arthur Ellis According to the HSE, other health benefits include increased life expectancy as smoking takes an average of 10 to 15 years off a person's life, reduced risk of life-threatening diseases, improved respiratory function, circulation and oxygen levels, and better skin, teeth and hair. Quitting smoking also helps with improved mood and reduces feelings of stress, anxiety and depression. Giving up also helps to improve fertility, reduces risk of pregnancy complications, offers protection for loved ones from second-hand smoke and creates financial savings as it can 'free up a significant amount of money'. Research from Healthy Ireland Statistics shows that 17 per cent of the population smokes cigarettes, while another 8 per cent uses e-cigarettes, either daily or occasionally. These figures have not changed since 2023, and Martina Blake, national lead for the HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, says NRTs can help more people to quit. 'These licensed medicines safely give you just enough nicotine to relieve cravings and withdrawal symptoms, while reducing your dependence on nicotine gradually,' she said. 'They help you to cope with cravings and withdrawal symptoms, but do not contain the poisonous and cancer-causing chemicals in tobacco smoke, such as tar and carbon monoxide.' [ Quitting smoking isn't easy, but these tricks could help Opens in new window ] Men remain more likely to smoke than women (20 per cent of men smoke as opposed to 15 per cent of women), and Mick Staunton says it's never too late to think about giving up. 'We both wish we did it years ago, as we're flying it now.'
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Employee suspensions lasting more than a decade ‘extraordinarily rare', say lawyers
The paid suspension of an employee lasting more than a decade is 'extraordinarily rare' but can indicate the seriousness of alleged wrongdoing, according to people working in employment law. The Irish Times reported on Monday that two Health Service Executive employees have been suspended with pay or have been on administrative leave for 11 years. Generally, in employment, suspensions are a precautionary measure during a workplace investigation into alleged misconduct. They can last for months if not years in some rare circumstances. However, one breaching two years is considered unusual, so how could a suspension last 11 years? Although employers are now encouraged to avoid suspensions where possible due to the potential reputational damage suffered by the off-work employee, they are sometimes necessary, particularly where safety concerns are at play, according to Alan Eustace, an assistant professor of private law at Trinity College Dublin. READ MORE Allegations at the more serious end of the scale may require a 'more robust procedure' that can result in lengthy suspensions, he said. Dr Eustace, who has a particular interest in employment law, said suspensions of employees subject to allegations of misconduct can often be necessary if their presence is deemed to be 'potentially dangerous'. 'In general, it's quite rare to find people on very lengthy suspensions, unless there's been an extremely serious allegation made against them, and the investigation into that case is extremely complicated,' he said. While all employees have a right to fair procedure, through thorough and fair investigations of alleged misconduct, this procedure can be made more complex in the public sector where collective agreements can see procedures vary between roles. [ Two HSE staff suspended with pay or on administrative leave for 11 years Opens in new window ] On the other hand, employees can take legal action to halt investigations. If the employer in question is found to be proceeding incorrectly or unfairly, they can be ordered to restart the investigation. Sick leave, potentially due to stress as a result of the investigation, can also result in the process being paused entirely until they are well enough to engage again, he said. While suspending an employee can be costly, it can end up 'cheaper than sacking them unfairly and being sued for that later on', Dr Eustace said. Due to its potential reputational damage to the employee in question, suspension, even with pay, has become 'much harder to do', according to Anne O'Connell, principal of employment law firm AOC Solicitors. Historically, there was little preventing employers from suspending employees during investigations in the past, once the employee was paid. However, in the last decade or so, more stringent steps have been required to do so. A botched or rushed investigation could result in costly legal proceedings down the line, she said, and an investigation must run its course before any disciplinary action, including dismissal. 'You can't just fire somebody before a full investigation is complete, they have a right to fair procedures,' she said, stressing that the outcome of investigations may not warrant dismissal and any allegations could be deemed unfounded. Unforeseen events, such as relevant court proceedings, can delay investigations, she said. Regardless, '11 years is very rare – extraordinarily rare', she said.
