Post-Tribune reporters win SPJ awards
Three Post-Tribune reporters brought home awards from the Indiana Society of Professional Journalists Pro Chapter banquet Friday night.
Staff writer Alexandra Kukulka earned two third-place awards — one in Election and Campaign coverage for 'Indiana Dems excited about Harris-Walz ticket' and one for Government and Politics coverage for 'Supreme Court ruling in Snyder Case could impact how officials interact with contractors, vendors.' Kukulka shared the latter honor with freelance reporter Michelle L. Quinn.
Freelance reporter Carole Carlson also brought home a third place award for Sports Reporting with her story, 'Chicago Sky's Dana Evans seeing heightened interest, sellout crowds.'
More than 1,100 entries were submitted from around the state, it was announced at the banquet — an all-time high.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump shouldn't import socialist price controls
Remember when Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump castigated 'Comrade Kamala' Harris, then the Democratic nominee, for supporting price controls? It wasn't that long ago — just last August. At a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, Trump told the crowd: 'In her speech yesterday, Kamala went full Communist … She wants to destroy our country. After causing catastrophic inflation, Comrade Kamala announced that she wants to institute socialist price controls.' Harris's price controls were largely aimed at food in grocery stores, though she also frequently touted the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act's backdoor price controls — under the guise of 'negotiations' — on a certain number of expensive drugs. Trump was right to criticize Harris for supporting price controls on food, as well as prescription drugs. And, given the election results, it seems the public agreed with him. Price controls are the progressive left's go-to solution for almost all economic problems. But price controls virtually always lead to unintended consequences: shortages of the price-controlled products or services; lower quality as manufacturers cut corners to meet government-imposed price points; less innovation, since companies don't know if they'll be allowed to recover their costs; and a black market where people pay more to get what they want or need. So it's puzzling to see Trump now proposing a version of drug price controls himself. It's not the first time, either. During his first term, Trump pushed for 'drug importation,' encouraging U.S. citizens to buy medicines from countries like Canada — even though the FDA has warned those drugs could be fake or substandard. The effort fizzled, and even Florida, which tried a state-level importation scheme, eventually abandoned its program. Trump's latest idea is called 'Most Favored Nation' pricing. Details are thin, but a recent executive order says, 'To the extent consistent with law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) shall facilitate direct-to-consumer purchasing programs for pharmaceutical manufacturers that sell their products to American patients at the most-favored-nation price.' That 'most-favored' country will almost certainly be one with government-run health care — that is, socialized medicine. These systems are known for price controls, which lead to shortages, long wait times, and limited access to cutting-edge treatments. The goal of Most Favored Nation is to lower prices on expensive drugs. Americans do pay more for brand-name drugs than patients elsewhere. But they also pay less for generics, which account for roughly 90 percent of all prescriptions. One reason for the disparity is the middlemen in our system, known as pharmacy benefit managers. Their job is to negotiate lower prices with drugmakers. But those savings often don't make it to patients. Instead, pharmacy benefit managers keep a big chunk for themselves — on average, $0.42 of every $1 spent on brand-name drugs in the commercial market, by one estimate. In many cases, those pharmacy benefit manager cuts are larger than the total price of the drug in Europe. It's clear our system could work better. 'Shark Tank' entrepreneur Mark Cuban launched the Cost Plus Drug Company in 2022 to bypass these middlemen. The Cost Plus website says, 'Our prices are the true cost to get each medication from the manufacturer to you. We cut out the pharmacy middlemen and negotiate directly with manufacturers to get the best possible price.' The company tacks on 15 percent for overhead and a $5 filling fee. While customers may not save much on some widely used generics, the discounted prices on more expensive brand name and generic drugs are significantly lower than what most people would experience at their local pharmacy. Cost Plus has hundreds of drugs for nearly 100 listed medical conditions, and it's looking to add new drugs all the time. It's only been in business a few years and is working to expand. We also shouldn't ignore the fact that Americans are subsidizing below-market prices abroad. The United States funds a disproportionate share of global pharmaceutical innovation, while other wealthy nations impose price caps and benefit from our investment. If Trump wants to stop other countries from taking advantage of us, he should take the approach he's using to get countries to pay more for defense. Cuban's Cost Plus experiment proves we don't need Most Favored Nation pricing. Let socialized systems keep their socialized prices, limited access and denial of care. Tweaking a line Trump likes to use and applying it to prescription drugs: We don't need a new law. We just don't need a middleman. Merrill Matthews is a public policy and political analyst and the co-author of 'On the Edge: America Faces the Entitlements Cliff.'
Fox News
44 minutes ago
- Fox News
Federal labor board demands Washington Post rehire reporter fired over social media attacks
The National Labor Relations Board is seeking reinstatement and back pay for former Washington Post reporter Felicia Sonmez, who was fired in 2022 after attacking colleagues and fiercely criticizing the paper on social media. Sonmez was terminated for insubordination after she continued condemning other Post reporters online despite multiple memos issued by then-executive editor Sally Buzbee calling for civility. The Washington-Baltimore News Guild filed an unfair labor practice charge over Sonmez's firing. The NLRB, Guild and Washington Post each filed briefs on Friday. "To put it bluntly, Respondent just got sick of Sonmez's Twitter activity criticizing the Post's and its policies, as well as its implementation—or lack thereof—of those policies. In response, Respondent decided to bypass its progressive discipline system and fire her because of those criticisms," NLRB prosecutors said. When asking for the complaint to be dismissed, the Post argued that allowing Sonmez to return to the company "would cause unmanageable and unacceptable disruption," and referred to the actions that resulted in her dismissal as a "seven-day tirade." "Because Sonmez lacks the 'journalistic integrity' necessary to work in the Post's newsroom, she should not be reinstated," the Post argued. The Guild believes the Post violated her rights under the National Labor Relations Act. The saga began in June 2022 when Sonmez went after then-colleague Dave Weigel for retweeting a joke: "Every girl is bi. You just have to figure out if it's polar or sexual." Sonmez was not amused and publicly criticized her colleague, also attacking her workplace by reacting, "Fantastic to work at a news outlet where retweets like this are allowed!" Sonmez then launched a days-long public tirade against the Post and many of her colleagues. Weigel was placed on a one-month unpaid suspension despite having removed the retweet and issuing an apology. He left the Post to join the start-up site Semafor later that year. However, Sonmez's tweetstorms berating co-workers continued, and she began receiving public pushback from Post colleagues, who Sonmez then attacked publicly. She repeatedly ripped the paper's social media policy throughout the ordeal. Sonmez even took aim at "White" reporters who expressed solidarity with the paper amid infighting. "I don't know who the colleagues anonymously disparaging me in media reports are. But I do know that the reporters who issued synchronized tweets this week downplaying the Post's workplace issues have a few things in common with each other," Sonmez wrote during a lengthy Twitter thread, saying they "are all White." Despite Buzbee urging staffers to treat each other respectfully, following a week of constant viral warfare between Post colleagues, Sonmez was terminated. The Washington Post unveiled an updated social media policy after the ordeal. NLRB prosecutors are seeking reinstatement and back pay for Sonmez, who now works for Blue Ridge Public Radio. Sonmez declined comment. "The decision is now up to the judge," Sonmez wrote on X. The Washington Post did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iraq's Cultural Heritage Can Be a Double-Edged Sword
Since the fall of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Iraq has sought to reshape its global image, shifting from a legacy of aggression—most notably the 1990 invasion of Kuwait—to one centered on cultural diplomacy. With a civilization spanning over 6,000 years, the country's post-Saddam leadership recognized the potential of soft power as a peaceful and effective means of rebuilding its international relationships and national identity. Successive Iraqi governments also realized that promoting cultural engagement faced less resistance than traditional diplomacy and was an effective starting point for mending long-standing geopolitical tensions, particularly with neighboring countries like Kuwait. As such, cultural diplomacy became a cornerstone of Iraq's post-Saddam foreign policy, helping to forge international cultural ties, attract financial partnerships and restore its devastated cultural heritage, particularly after the territorial defeat of the so-called Islamic State, or ISIS, in 2017. One pivotal early example occurred in 2004, when Iraq sent a cultural delegation of 40 literary and cultural figures to Kuwait at the invitation of Kuwaiti poet Abdulaziz Al-Babtain, marking the first significant contact between the two nations after decades of animosity. Through joint poetry readings and cultural dialogue, this group laid the foundation for renewed diplomatic and geopolitical discussions between the two countries, demonstrating how shared cultural values could foster understanding and cooperation. Iraq has also strategically leveraged its rich historical heritage as a platform for facilitating political engagement and global partnerships. This approach not only helped establish Iraq's soft power in the international community in the years since Saddam's fall but also enabled collaboration among Iraqi and international experts. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. A notable instance of this strategy of cultural diplomacy came in the aftermath of the destruction of Iraqi cultural sites by ISIS after it seized broad swathes of territory in 2014. Iraq used global outrage over the loss of these sites—a collective legacy for all humankind—to galvanize support in the years following the group's defeat. Its ability to transform a tragic loss into cultural solidarity and international engagement was highlighted in early 2024, when Italy donated a 3D-printed replica of the Assyrian 'Bull of Nimrud' statue, dating from the 9th century BCE and destroyed by ISIS in 2015, to the Basra Museum. For Italy and other partners, the partnership offered an opportunity to display solidarity with Iraq, but also with the norm of cultural heritage preservation. As Italy's then-culture minister, Gennaro Sangiuliano, said at the statue's dedication ceremony in Iraq, 'Italy is at the forefront of safeguarding cultural heritage. It will therefore continue to make every effort to advance international collaboration in the field of cultural heritage protection.' Engaging with international technical experts and accessing available global funding for heritage preservation is another goal of Iraq's active participation in cultural diplomacy as an instrument of soft power, as highlighted in its efforts to restore cultural heritage destroyed by ISIS in Mosul. That involved tapping into international assistance, with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, providing technical advice and fostering cooperation. One of the flagship projects to grow out of that effort was the restoration of the 840-year-old al-Nuri Mosque and its al-Hadba minaret, destroyed by ISIS in 2017. Begun in 2018 and completed in February, the restoration was funded by the United Arab Emirates, which allocated $50 million to the project, and supervised by UNESCO. The collaboration also marked a positive shift in Iraq-UAE relations, which had been slow to develop after the fall of Saddam due to political factors and the influence of pro-Iranian Shiite militias in Iraq. The restoration initiative served as a nonpolitical foundation for enhancing cooperation in broader political and security matters. The Mosul Museum's collaboration with the Louvre to restore its facility and collection, including antiquities such as the 9th-century BCE 'Lion of Nimrud' statue destroyed by ISIS in 2015, was a similar step in deepening cultural ties between Iraqi and international experts. Rebuilding destroyed heritage projects is a good place to start. As Iraqi President Abdul Latif Jamal Rashid put it, 'Iraqi heritage is inexhaustible wealth,' offering the country an opportunity to show the world a side of itself that contrasts sharply with the conventional global image of it over the past 20 years as being mired in security crises and overrun by militants. Cultural diplomacy and the restoration of Iraq's cultural heritage have also played a crucial role in fostering national unity and rebuilding national pride since the fall of Saddam and the defeat of ISIS. Iraqis take immense pride in their ancient cultural heritage, so the looting of the National Museum of Iraq in 2003 and the destruction of iconic sites like the 3,000-year-old city of Nimrud outside Mosul by ISIS in 2015 deeply wounded their collective sense of identity. Recognizing the importance of preserving this heritage, Rashid and other Iraqi leaders have worked to not only restore but also reclaim Iraq's historical legacy as a means of healing the nation. In 2023, as part of these efforts, Iraq saw the return of a significant Assyrian artifact from Italy and 6,000 artifacts loaned by the British Museum. By reclaiming these historical artifacts, the Iraqi government is seeking to bolster Iraqi's collective identity and create a healthy nationalist sentiment. Work is currently underway to recover more than 40,000 other artifacts that are still scattered around the world. The loss of these cultural artifacts and monuments has at times amplified social divisions, fostering alienation and distrust among Iraqis. However, efforts to restore monuments such as the Mosul Museum and Nimrud have served as catalysts for social unity, demonstrating the Iraqi people's resilience and the power of a shared cultural identity. A key example of this was the 'Return to Mosul' art exhibition in 2019, a joint effort between Al-Ghad Radio and the Mosul Artists' Committee, which brought together diverse communities to use art as a medium for storytelling and healing. The exhibition sought to bridge social gaps by narrating the history of Mosul's occupation by ISIS and envisioning a more tolerant future. Finally, the rebuilding of Iraq's cultural heritage is not just about restoring physical sites but also about creating jobs and strengthening cooperation within the country. The 'Revive the Spirit of Mosul' project—a collaboration between UNESCO, the UAE, the U.S., the European Union and other partners, of which the al-Nuri Mosque restoration was a part—exemplifies this approach. This initiative has created 6,000 new jobs and trained over 1,300 young people in traditional crafts like carpentry, stonemasonry and painting. By combining cultural restoration with economic empowerment, these efforts are fostering a sense of collective unity, contributing to the nation's recovery and rekindling national pride. However, Iraq still has a long way to go in using its cultural heritage to nurture national cohesion and identity. The existence of numerous tribal and cultural communities and opposing religious groups that have used confrontation and even conflict with each other in the construction of their collective identities has made this process difficult. Since 2003, Iraq's elites have also appropriated the country's rich cultural heritage in the service of various harmful agendas. These range from commercialization to the propagation of exclusionary political and sectarian narratives, the latter facilitated by Iraq's governance system, which divides political power along sectarian lines. This leaves each group in control of the archaeological sites in its region of the country, free to use the revenue and other resources derived from cultural heritage to serve their ethno-sectarian goals and agendas, rather than to enhance national identity and cultural cohesion. In this way, they seek to use Iraq's shared history and identities to create cultural divides rather than ambitious national agendas. One example is the reconstruction in Babil of the Shrine of the Prophet Ezekiel, known as Al-Kifl in Iraq, the biblical prophet of the exiled Judean community in Babylon in the 6th century BCE. Until 2010, the State Board of Antiquities and Heritage was the custodian of the complex, which consisted of a shrine, a synagogue, a mosque and adjacent Ottoman-era khans, or inns. However, ownership was subsequently transferred to the Shiite Endowment, based on the claim that Imam Ali—the first Shiite religious leader in the middle of the 6th century CE—camped and prayed at the site. In the decade since the endowment assumed control of the site, it has used a series of interventions to remove the synagogue and khans, expand the mosque and build new minarets, in an effort to advance its own sectarian interests and narratives, to the detriment of Iraqi national identity. Over the past 20 years, Iraq has used cultural diplomacy as a tool to advance its soft power and promote international engagements, as well as to enhance national cohesion and the creation of a common identity among the country's at times conflicting tribal and religious communities. In its efforts to reclaim its cultural heritage in the global arena and reconstruct ancient sites destroyed by ISIS, Iraq has been able to revive a spirit of collective cooperation and shared identity in the domestic arena. Meanwhile, technical cooperation with global partners has paved the way for a cultural coalition to reconstruct humanity's common heritage in Iraq, further illustrating and bolstering Iraqi soft power. However, Iraq still faces challenges and limitations in the domestic uses of its cultural heritage, which must be addressed by prioritizing national cooperation over sectarianism and ethnic differences. Mohammad Salami holds a doctorate in international relations. He is a research associate at the International Institute for Global Strategic Analysis (IIGSA). He can be followed on X/Twitter at @moh_salami. The post Iraq's Cultural Heritage Can Be a Double-Edged Sword appeared first on World Politics Review.
