Indonesia raises alert to highest level for Lewotobi Laki-laki volcano
JAKARTA: Indonesia raised the alert level of Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki to the highest after it erupted eight times over the weekend, its volcanology agency has said.
Lewotobi Laki-laki, located on Flores island in eastern Indonesia, spewed volcanic ash between 3km to 5.5km high on Sunday (May 18), Muhammad Wafid, the agency's head said in a statement late on Sunday.
"Our analysis showed that the activities of Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki are still high so we raised the status level starting on Sunday at 8pm," he said.
Images shared by the agency showed clouds of thick grey ash billowing from the crater. Rumbling noises with low to high intensity were heard from the nearest monitoring post during the eruption, Wafid added.
On Monday morning, the volcano erupted again, belching 1.2km high ash clouds.
The agency said a 6km radius from the crater must be cleared and warned the residents of the risk of cold lava flow from the crater once heavy rains take place.
There has not been any evacuation of residents or flight cancellations due to the eruptions so far, said Heronimus Lamawuran, a local government official.
In March, an eruption at Lewotobi Laki-laki forced some airlines to cancel and delay flights into Bali, including Australia's Jetstar and Qantas Airways.
erupted in November last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: Record profits for SIA and other airlines, but aviation's long-term outlook isn't that rosy
SINGAPORE: From three years of losses during the pandemic to three consecutive years of record profits, Singapore Airlines (SIA) has made international headlines for the profit-sharing bonuses given to its employees, most recently 7.45 months' worth. SIA Group declared excellent financial results, with S$2.78 billion (US$2.14 billion) net profit for the fiscal year ended March 2025, boosted by a one-off S$1.1 billion gain from the divestment of stake in India-based Vistara. Emirates, a rival that is comparable in reputation to SIA, reported a record profit of US$5.77 billion People may have come to think of healthy profits as routine in aviation. But that hasn't typically been the case across the sector, according to management consultancy McKinsey. In fact, the airline industry's recent results and especially those reported by leading airlines such as SIA and Emirates have proven many analysts, including me, wrong. Most had anticipated airlines to struggle post-COVID once everyone scratched their revenge travel itch. Among the factors was that video conferencing adopted during the pandemic would persist to the point of reducing business travel, a key contributor to full-service airlines' profitability. That clearly hasn't happened. Also unanticipated were the robustness of the global economy post-pandemic and consumers' willingness to continue paying top prices amid concerns about cost of living and inflation. All these contributed to the increased yields (or the earnings for every available seat per kilometre travelled) enjoyed by carriers such as SIA compared to the pre-pandemic years. Customers are unlikely to find much respite from high fares in the short term. Demand simply outstrips supply. The International Air Transport Association expects the number of passengers to reach a record high of 4.99 billion in 2025, up 4 per cent from 2024. Airlines have faced difficulties in bringing planes that were mothballed during the pandemic back on stream constraining the supply of seats. Boeing and Airbus, which together control a large proportion of the commercial airliners made, have also told customers to expect delayed deliveries for new aircraft. They reported backlogs at the end of 2024 of over 5,500 and 8,600 aircraft respectively, considering between 600 and 800 were typically delivered each year. In particular, Boeing has had quality problems over the last few years, with the American planemaker's 2024 marked by a string of high-profile mishaps, legal challenges and the lowest number of deliveries (348) since the pandemic. AVIATION'S LONG-TERM PROSPECTS AREN'T THAT ROSY But at the risk of being wrong again, I would venture to say that air fares cannot keep going up. The long-term prospects of airlines are weaker than their short-term prospects. On the demand side, there are three reasons. First, there is a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the global economy, chiefly attributable to the prospect of a global trade war. Many economies in Asia will be dented by the imposition of United States tariffs (especially if the paused 'reciprocal' tariffs and more sector-specific tariffs come to pass), affecting the purchasing power of consumers in these countries. Equally importantly, if regional (or even within-country in the case of the US) supply chains substitute global supply chains, the multinational presence (especially of US multinationals) in Asian countries may decline, in turn impacting business travel to and from these countries. Second, employment in the tech sector – which has been a good paymaster for many people, especially the younger demographic – might struggle because of the emergence of AI and related technologies. Several recent reports suggest that layoffs by many tech companies are substantial, though it remains unclear whether these layoffs are because of the adoption of AI. Third, the recent uncertainty about the visa policies of the US might reduce the travel demand to and from the US, which will likely impact global travel demand. On the supply side, there are two reasons. New airlines may enter, especially if the yields earned by incumbent players continue to be firm. Markets with strong growth in the airline traffic such as India are already witnessing the entry of several smaller players who are not taking larger rivals head-on but competing with them regardless. As existing players aggressively add seats, yields might come down over time even if demand stays high. We are already seeing signs of this: In 2024, the US-based airlines reported record sales but not record profits. BUSTS AFTER BOOMS As always, the airline industry is also affected by uncontrollable factors such as jet fuel prices, pandemics and wars, among other things. The industry has often witnessed busts after booms, so going by past patterns, a bust may not be that far away. So, what is my advice to travellers? Maybe, for discretionary travel, they can pick and choose among destinations that offer better value while waiting for fares to moderate. For airline executives, my advice is to remain flexible by not taking on too much expansion, especially if it involves debt financing, squeezing out cost savings and strengthening their balance sheets. In other words, be ready to take advantage of the opportunities but protect your downside as well, if the environment becomes adverse.
CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
China tourism: New type of freelance work catering to young travellers gaining popularity
A new type of freelance work is gaining popularity in China. It caters to young, busy professionals who struggle to find travel companions. CNA's Tan Yew Guan explains.
AsiaOne
15 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Expanding missile threats and airspace closures are straining airlines, World News
NEW DELHI — Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability, executives say, as carriers grapple with missiles and drones, airspace closures, location spoofing and the shoot-down of another passenger flight. Airlines are racking up costs and losing market share from cancelled flights and expensive re-routings, often at short notice. The aviation industry, which prides itself on its safety performance, is investing more in data and security planning. "Flight planning in this kind of environment is extremely difficult … The airline industry thrives on predictability, and the absence of this will always drive greater cost," said Guy Murray, who leads aviation security at European carrier TUI Airline. With increasing airspace closures around Russia and Ukraine, throughout the Middle East, between India and Pakistan and in parts of Africa, airlines are left with fewer route options. "Compared to five years ago, more than half of the countries being overflown on a typical Europe-Asia flight would now need to be carefully reviewed before each flight," said Mark Zee, founder of OpsGroup, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths — some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers. Russian airports, including in Moscow, are now regularly shut down for brief periods due to drone activity, while interference with navigation systems, known as GPS spoofing or jamming, is surging around political fault lines worldwide. When hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan last month, the neighbours blocked each other's aircraft from their respective airspace. "Airspace should not be used as a retaliatory tool, but it is," Nick Careen, International Air Transport Association (IATA) senior vice president for operations, safety and security, told reporters at the airline body's annual meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday. Isidre Porqueras, chief operating officer at Indian carrier IndiGo, said the recent diversions were undoing efforts to reduce emissions and increase airline efficiencies. Worst-case scenario Finances aside, civil aviation's worst-case scenario is a plane being hit, accidentally or intentionally, by weaponry. In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources. In October, a cargo plane was shot down in Sudan, killing five people. Six commercial aircraft have been shot down unintentionally, with three near-misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions. Governments need to share information more effectively to keep civil aviation secure as conflict zones proliferate, IATA Director General Willie Walsh said this week. Safety statistics used by the commercial aviation industry show a steady decline in accidents over the past two decades, but these do not include security-related incidents such as being hit by weaponry. IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination. Tough choices Each airline decides where to travel based on a patchwork of government notices, security advisers, and information-sharing between carriers and states, leading to divergent policies. The closure of Russian airspace to most Western carriers since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in 2022 put them at a cost disadvantage compared to airlines from places like China, India and the Middle East that continue to take shorter northern routes that need less fuel and fewer crew. Shifting risk calculations mean Singapore Airlines' flight SQ326 from Singapore to Amsterdam has used three different routes into Europe in just over a year, Flightradar24 tracking data shows. When reciprocal missile and drone attacks broke out between Iran and Israel in April 2024, it started crossing previously avoided Afghanistan instead of Iran. Last month, its route shifted again to avoid Pakistan's airspace as conflict escalated between India and Pakistan. Flight SQ326 now reaches Europe via the Persian Gulf and Iraq. Singapore Airlines did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Pilots and flight attendants are also worried about how the patchwork of shifting risk might impact their safety. "IATA says airlines should decide if it's safe to fly over conflict zones, not regulators. But history shows commercial pressures can cloud those decisions," said Paul Reuter, vice president of the European Cockpit Association, which represents pilots. Flight crew typically have the right to refuse a trip due to concerns about airspace, whether over weather or conflict zones, IATA security head Careen said. "Most airlines, in fact, I would say the vast majority of them, do not want crew on an aircraft if they don't feel comfortable flying," he said. [[nid:717677]]
