In Another Blow To Pakistan, India To Ask World Bank To Pause Kishanganga-Ratle Case
Last Updated:
India is reportedly preparing to officially ask the World Bank-appointed neutral expert, Michel Lino, to pause the ongoing adjudication proceedings in Kishanganga-Ratle Case.
In an escalation following the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India has effectively abandoned the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and taken sweeping steps that experts say could signal a new chapter in South Asia's geopolitical water diplomacy. From military readiness to diplomatic isolation, India appears to be cornering Pakistan on multiple fronts – and this time, the water tap is part of the strategy.
One of the most significant developments in this direction has been the abrupt diversion of the Chenab River, a lifeline for Pakistan's Punjab region. By closing the gates of the Baglihar Dam in Jammu and Kashmir, India has reportedly redirected the river's flow, drastically reducing water availability downstream.
The Chenab, among the three western rivers allocated to Pakistan under the IWT, contributes heavily to irrigation across vast agricultural tracts. Its diminished flow is now feared to trigger an acute water crisis, possibly even famine, in parts of Pakistan this summer.
This bold maneuver is not limited to water control alone. India has also moved to halt all engagement in the IWT dispute resolution process, particularly regarding the contentious Kishanganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects.
According to a report by The Economic Times, India is preparing to officially ask the World Bank-appointed neutral expert, Michel Lino, to pause the ongoing adjudication proceedings. The rationale India will present is rooted in 'changed circumstances" following the Pahalgam attack and the government's decision to place the entire treaty framework in abeyance.
'India is set to ask the World Bank-appointed neutral expert, mediating the Kishanganga-Ratle hydel project dispute since 2022-23 under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), to put the proceedings in abeyance," ET reported, citing high-level sources. The move is expected to be communicated soon in writing to the neutral expert, with a copy also sent to the World Bank, effectively freezing the three-party engagement.
The Kishanganga-Ratle dispute, one of the most technically and diplomatically complex under the IWT, was already deep into its neutral expert phase. As part of a structured work programme, Pakistan was scheduled to file its 'counter memorial" by August 7, 2025, following which a key meeting between the parties and the expert was slated for November. This session would have included presentations from both countries, expert questions, and preparation for a second site inspection in India, tentatively planned for December.
The process, which began in 2023, has already witnessed three rounds of high-level meetings in Vienna, exchange of extensive documentation, and a major site visit to the Kishanganga and Ratle project locations in June 2024. According to ET, the next phases would have included further submissions in early 2026 and a fifth meeting in July that year. All of this is now at risk of indefinite suspension.
India's posture appears to be aimed at delivering a comprehensive strategic response to the Pahalgam terror attack, one that simultaneously wields military readiness, legal disengagement, and environmental leverage.
While Pakistan has yet to issue an official response to this sweeping shift, the implications for regional stability and future water sharing are enormous. The IWT, brokered by the World Bank in 1960, has long been hailed as a model of resilient diplomacy. India's decision to back away from both the treaty and its dispute resolution process marks a historic, and potentially irreversible, break from that legacy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Stalin unveils World Bank-funded projects for women, blue economy
Chennai: Tamil Nadu will soon launch three major projects worth $409.79 million in partnership with World Bank, chief minister M K Stalin announced on Tuesday in Taramani. He was speaking after inaugurating the revamped Global Business Centre, which houses more than 1,500 employees and provides support services to 189 countries through more than 130 World Bank offices worldwide. Among the upcoming initiatives is Women Employment and Security (WE-SAFE) project, which aims to bring more women into the workforce, particularly in high-growth, non-agricultural sectors. "We have allocated 1,185 crore over the next five years for this scheme," Stalin said. Two other initiatives in the pipeline include a project focused on sustainable marine resource management and the second phase of the Tamil Nadu Rural Rejuvenation Project. Tracing TN's five-decade-long association with the World Bank, Stalin highlighted landmark projects - the Nutrition and Health Systems Projects, which helped make the state a national leader in maternal and child health. He also cited the success of the Vazhndhu Kaattuvom scheme, which benefited over 20 lakh rural families, created 1 lakh new enterprises, and generated 53,000 jobs for women. "The World Bank's support for Tamil Nadu goes beyond mere loans—it reflects a shared commitment to sustainable, equitable, and lasting progress. Together, we are building a future where no one is left behind," said Stalin. Other transformative projects include the urban development project, road sector project, the TNIAMWARM irrigation initiative, and the coastal disaster risk mitigation programme. He also noted the $190 million loan to support urban housing for the economically weaker sections. Calling for lower interest rates on development loans, Stalin urged the Bank to continue backing TN's vision of achieving a $1 trillion economy by 2030 through climate action, inclusive growth, and technological collaboration.
NDTV
3 hours ago
- NDTV
IMF Team Makes First Syria Visit Since 2009
An IMF team visited Syria for the first time since 2009 to take part in efforts to rebuild the economy after years of civil war and the fall of Bashar al-Assad, the lender said Tuesday. The International Monetary Fund's trip to Damascus took place from June 1 to June 5, and its team sought to discuss authorities' priorities and how to help achieve them. Syria's economy and the country are a wreck after 14 years of war under Assad, who was ousted in December. "Syria faces enormous challenges following years of conflict that caused immense human suffering and reduced its economy to a fraction of its former size," said Ron van Rooden, who led the visit. Around six million people have fled the country while another seven million have been displaced internally, he noted. "Output has plummeted, real incomes have fallen sharply, and poverty rates are high," he said, adding that state institutions have also been weakened with much infrastructure destroyed. "There is great urgency to address these challenges and achieve a sustainable economic recovery," van Rooden said in a statement at the end of the mission. Much of Syria's infrastructure has been destroyed by the war, which began with a bloody crackdown on pro-democracy protests. Longtime strongman Assad was ousted in a lightning offensive by Islamist-led rebels in December, and Syria's new government has sought to rebuild diplomatic ties, including with international financial institutions. Last month, the IMF said it had held useful discussions with Syria's economic team. The Fund's last comprehensive review of the health of the Syrian economy was done in 2009, before the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011. In April, Saudi Arabia and Qatar announced that they would settle Syria's debt to the World Bank totaling about $15 million. The World Bank suspended operations in Syria when the war began. The settlement of its arrears will allow it to resume accessing the bank's financial support and technical advice.
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Water For Peace Or Terrorism? India's Indus Treaty Suspension Sinks Pakistan Into Crisis, Diplomacy In Overdrive
New Delhi: In the rugged terrain of diplomacy and decades-old treaties, water – which is often considered the harbinger of life – has now turned into a powerful instrument of geopolitical assertion. What was once a rare symbol of bilateral cooperation between India and Pakistan, the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), now hangs in limbo, dangling between Islamabad's urgent pleas and New Delhi's steely silence. In April, India made a stunning move by suspending the treaty following the brutal Pahalgam terrorist attack, which killed 26 innocent lives in Jammu and Kashmir. For India, the message was enough is enough. Tolerance for cross-border terrorism has hit its limit, and business-as-usual is no longer acceptable, not even when it comes to sharing vital water resources. According to sources in New Delhi, Pakistan's Water Resources Secretary Syed Ali Murtaza has reached out multiple times to his Indian counterpart Debashree Mukherjee. His letters speak of urgency, diplomacy and an apparent willingness to address New Delhi's 'specific objections'. But India has not replied. Not once. India's official stance? 'No dialogue on water, unless terrorism ends—credibly and irreversibly.' The fallout from this hardline position has already begun to ripple across Pakistan. A recent report by Pakistan's own Indus River System Authority recorded a 13.3% drop in year-on-year water flow from the Indus River. This decline is jeopardising critical Kharif crop sowing in its Punjab province. Farmers are now at the mercy of delayed monsoon rains, with scorching heatwaves compounding the crisis. A Nation on the Brink What began as a tactical diplomatic suspension by India has morphed into a full-blown existential threat for Pakistan. Over 80% of its agriculture depends on the Indus system. The flow from rivers like Indus, Jhelum and Chenab, which Pakistan heavily relies on, has reduced drastically. Experts now warn of a dual crisis – agricultural collapse and potential floods, as India is no longer obligated to share critical flood data. Facing mounting pressure at home, Pakistan has unleashed a global diplomatic offensive. A nine-member delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari first landed in the United States and pitched Pakistan's side of the story before UN officials and senior American diplomats. 'Our message was Pakistan seeks peace,' said former Foreign Secretary Jalil Abbas Jilani. They were not only talking about water. They were talking about survival. Parliamentarian Khurram Dastgir warned US officials that the treaty's suspension 'endangers the livelihood of 240 million people'. Climate Minister Musadik Malik echoed those fears and flagged food security and environmental devastation as looming threats if the treaty is not revived. Pakistan also dispatched delegations to the United Kingdom, where lawmakers were told Islamabad remains 'committed to regional peace' and seeks to restore the IWT through 'composite dialogue'. India is Playing with Precision Back home, India remains unfazed by Pakistan's global outreach. Once unthinkable, the suspension of the IWT has triggered introspection within Indian strategic circles. Renowned geopolitical expert Brahma Chellaney called the treaty 'the world's most lopsided and inequitable water-sharing agreement'. He emphasised that Pakistan receives over 80.5% of the Indus system's waters, including almost 100% of the western rivers. Despite being the upstream state, India settled for only 19.5%. 'Pakistan repaid India's generosity not with gratitude, but with grenades and guns,' Chellaney wrote bluntly on X, citing a long list of terror attacks from the 2001 Parliament attack to the 2024 Pahalgam massacre. For him, the treaty is not only about water, it is about trust. And that trust, he says, is 'systematically dismantled'. Some Indian media reports incorrectly state that Pakistan gets 80% of the waters of the western rivers (the Indus system's three main rivers). As this chart from my book shows, Pakistan gets 80.52% of the total waters of the six-river Indus system — and almost 100% of the western… — Brahma Chellaney (@Chellaney) June 9, 2025 Former Indian High Commissioner to Pakistan, Satish Chandra, called the treaty a 'Brahmastra', warning that its full termination could cause 'extreme pain' and long-term disruption in Pakistan. What Happens Now? As Pakistan floods foreign capitals with diplomatic appeals and farmers grapple with parched fields, New Delhi remains unmoved. For India, any talks about Indus waters hinge solely on one condition: 'Concrete, irreversible action against terrorism.' Whether the global community can mediate or Pakistan can muster internal resolve to act on India's concerns remains to be seen. But for now, once a river of peace, the Indus is fast becoming a river of reckoning.
