logo
How Lab-Grown Meat Could Bring An End To Needless Animal Cruelty

How Lab-Grown Meat Could Bring An End To Needless Animal Cruelty

Scoop21-04-2025

Billions of animals are killed each year to feed an unsustainable demand for meat. Lab-grown meat—also known as cultured, cultivated, cell-based, or clean meat—can offer a kinder alternative while still meeting the growing global demand for meat.
Silicon Valley start-ups are racing to get lab-grown meat on the market. And with good reason. Bethan Grylls of Food Manufacture, a UK-based resource for food and drink processors, reports that GovGrant, a research and development tax relief consulting firm, 'anticipates that by 2040 cultured meat will make up 35 percent of global meat consumption, with conventional meat accounting for 40 percent and vegan meat alternatives the remaining 25 percent.'
Cultured meat emerged in the early 2000s and is a miracle of modern science. Fish filets, burgers, and bacon produced in this way taste just as consumers would expect them to, but millions of animals don't need to be bred, confined, or slaughtered to create these actual meat products.
How Is Lab-Grown Meat Made?
The term 'lab-grown meat' might sound off-putting. However, labs are only involved in supporting ongoing research and development. Once they begin to produce at scale, cultured meat companies will swap out laboratories for facilities resembling microbreweries—a far cry from the industrial farms that profit from the abuse and slaughter of sentient animals.
Instead of using slaughtered animals, lab-grown meat is made by carefully removing a few muscle cells from a living animal. The pain is typically relieved with local anesthesia. The animal experiences a momentary twinge of discomfort, not unlike the feeling of getting a routine blood test at the doctor's.
Then, a lab technician places the harvested cells in bioreactors before adding them to a bath of nutrients. The cells grow and multiply, producing actual muscle tissue, which scientists shape into edible 'scaffoldings.'
These scaffoldings can transform lab-grown cells into steaks, chicken nuggets, burger patties, and fish products. National University of Singapore scientists have even begun using sorghum grain to produce cultivated pork. These offerings could sway pork eaters who are wary of parasites and disease.
The final product is an actual cut of meat, ready to be marinated, breaded, grilled, baked, or fried—no animal slaughter required! Cells from a single cow can produce an astonishing 175 million quarter-pounder burgers.
Lab-Grown Meat Is More Humane and Sustainable
Lab-grown meat is created from the same animal cells as traditional meat. The key distinction lies in the process—lab-grown meat eliminates the need for breeding, raising, and slaughtering animals, offering a more humane and sustainable alternative to conventional farming practices.
One of the most compelling aspects of lab-grown meat is its potential to reduce animal suffering. By harvesting cells without killing the animal, this innovative approach addresses the ethical concerns of consumers who oppose factory farming and industrialized slaughterhouses.
As Brian Spears, founder of New Age Meats, explains, 'People want meat. They don't want slaughter.' This sentiment reflects a growing demand for products that align with the values of compassion and sustainability without requiring individuals to give up their dietary preferences.
In addition to its ethical appeal, lab-grown meat could serve as a practical solution for meeting the global demand for meat while addressing the environmental and health challenges associated with traditional meat production. Industrial farming is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and water pollution.
By bypassing the need for large-scale animal agriculture, lab-grown meat has the potential to significantly reduce the industry's environmental footprint. Furthermore, it can be produced under controlled conditions that minimize health risks, such as antibiotic resistance and contamination from pathogens like E. coli.
Lab-grown meat represents a revolutionary shift in how we think about food production. It merges scientific innovation with ethical and environmental consciousness, providing a tangible alternative to unsustainable practices. At the same time, it is not without challenges, such as high production costs and reliance on inevitable animal-derived by-products. Ongoing technological advancements and scaling promise to address these hurdles.
For many, enjoying real meat without traditional methods' moral and environmental consequences offers a hopeful glimpse into a future where food choices are both satisfying and responsible.
Cultured Meat Is Not Artificial
Lab-grown meat isn't artificial meat—it's real meat produced in a new, innovative way. One of the most exciting aspects of lab-grown meat is its ability to replicate the taste, texture, and appearance of conventionally produced meat. Scientists are continually refining techniques to ensure that lab-cultivated muscle tissue mimics the sensory qualities consumers expect from products like steak, chicken, and bacon. From marbled beef to flaky fish fillets, lab-grown meat offers a near-identical eating experience to traditional meat while eliminating the need for breeding, confining, and slaughtering animals. This innovation provides meat lovers with an option that aligns with their dietary preferences and ethical concerns.
Thanks to this breakthrough, consumers can enjoy the foods they already love without contributing to the cruelty and environmental damage inherent in factory farming. Lab-grown meat allows people to indulge in burgers, chicken wings, or pork chops with the peace of mind that no animal endured suffering to create their meal. As this technology scales and becomes more accessible, it can transform global food systems by providing a sustainable and humane way to meet the world's growing appetite for meat.
Healthier Alternative
Meat consumption has long been associated with health risks, mainly due to meat's high levels of cholesterol and saturated fat, which can contribute to conditions like heart disease and obesity. Traditional meat production provides little control over these factors, as the fat content of an animal's meat is determined by its diet and genetics.
However, lab-grown meat offers a unique opportunity to address these health concerns at their source. By cultivating meat in a controlled environment, food scientists can precisely regulate its nutritional composition, reducing harmful cholesterol and saturated fat levels while retaining the flavor and texture consumers expect.
This ability to engineer healthier cuts of meat could make lab-grown products a game-changer for public health. For example, lab-grown meat can be tailored to include healthier fats, such as omega-3 fatty acids, typically found in fish and known to support heart and brain health.
Additionally, lab-grown meat could mitigate the growing threat of antibiotic resistance. Since the animals are not kept in filthy factory farms or bred in painful, disease-prone ways to maximize meat production, there is far less need for antibiotic treatment. Plus, lab-grown meat is pretty resilient against bacteria like E. coli. Thus, lab-grown meat will offer new options to consumers looking for better proteins for their health, the planet, and animals. By offering a nutritionally improved and safer alternative, lab-grown meat can revolutionize how we think about meat consumption and its impact on our well-being.
Better for the Environment
Industrial animal farming significantly contributes to some of the planet's most pressing environmental issues. From climate change to deforestation and water pollution, the environmental toll of raising billions of animals for meat for a skyrocketing human population is staggering. According to the United Nations, animal agriculture accounts for 14.5 percent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions, a figure that rivals emissions from the entire transportation sector.
Industrial farming releases methane, a potent greenhouse gas, and drives deforestation to create grazing land and grow feed crops, further exacerbating the climate crisis. Lab-grown meat presents an innovative solution to these challenges by eliminating the need for large-scale animal agriculture.
One of lab-grown meat's most notable environmental benefits is its significantly lower resource footprint than that of conventional meat production. While some lab-grown meat producers currently rely on fossil fuels to power their operations, the process still uses far less land, water, and energy than raising animals on factory farms.
Cultivating meat from animal cells does not require clearing forests for pastures or growing massive quantities of feed crops. The production process not only conserves natural ecosystems but also reduces the water and fertilizer usage that often pollutes local water supplies. As production methods evolve, transitioning lab-grown meat facilities to renewable energy sources could make them even more sustainable. Studies show that producing lab-grown meat using renewable energy would have a significantly lower carbon footprint than even the most 'sustainably raised' traditional meat products.
The potential environmental benefits of lab-grown meat extend beyond reduced resource consumption. It bypasses traditional farming practices and avoids many adverse side effects associated with industrial agriculture, such as soil degradation, water contamination from animal waste, and habitat destruction.
By offering a cleaner and more sustainable way to produce meat, lab-grown meat has the potential to drastically reduce the environmental impact of meat consumption. As this technology continues to advance and scale up, it could play a critical role in mitigating climate change and preserving the planet's natural resources for future generations.
Lab-Grown Meat Is Not Vegan
Lab-grown meat is not technically vegan because it involves using cells taken from living animals. While these animals are not killed in the process, the act of harvesting cells places lab-grown meat outside the realm of purely plant-based or vegan products. However, the primary goal of lab-grown meat is not to replace vegan options but to provide a viable alternative for meat-eaters who are concerned about the ethical and environmental consequences of traditional factory farming. This innovation bridges the gap between ethical concerns and dietary preferences by offering a way to enjoy real meat without causing extensive harm to animals or the planet.
Lab-grown meat is specifically designed to appeal to consumers who might be hesitant to adopt plant-based alternatives but are nonetheless troubled by industrial agriculture practices. As Damian Carrington of the Guardian explains, 'The companies developing lab-grown meat believe this is the product most likely to wean committed meat-eaters off traditional sources.'
For many, the idea of consuming meat without contributing to animal suffering, confinement, and slaughter is a compelling proposition. Furthermore, lab-grown meat offers the potential for health benefits and a reduced environmental footprint, making it an increasingly attractive choice for ethically and environmentally conscious consumers.
While lab-grown meat still requires keeping animals in captivity, the scale of this practice is drastically smaller than that of traditional factory farming. Instead of raising thousands of animals in confined, inhumane conditions, cellular agriculture relies on small herds from which cells can be periodically harvested.
This significant reduction in the number of animals used can significantly diminish the suffering caused by meat production on a global scale. Additionally, because animals are not slaughtered, the process of harvesting cells avoids the emotional and physical trauma typically associated with traditional farming practices.
The widespread adoption of lab-grown meat could mark a turning point in how society approaches food production and animal welfare. By reducing the reliance on factory farms and minimizing the number of animals needed for meat production, lab-grown meat represents a more humane and sustainable future for food systems.
With continued technological advancements, increased public awareness, and support for ethical alternatives, the vision of lab-grown meat becoming a mainstream option could help shift global consumption patterns and pave the way for a more sustainable world.
Lab-Grown Meat Isn't Perfect
Lab-grown meat isn't perfect—yet. Some lab-grown meat is created using an animal by-product known as fetal bovine serum. Slaughterhouses obtain fetal bovine serum by collecting blood from the unborn calves of pregnant cows after they're killed.
San Francisco-based lab-grown meat producer Eat Just uses a 'very low level' serum in its chicken, the first lab-grown meat product to hit the market. In response to ethical concerns about using a slaughterhouse by-product in otherwise lab-grown meat, Eat Just is developing an animal-free alternative to fetal bovine serum.
Another controversy surrounding lab-grown meat is its price—some companies charge around $50 per serving, significantly more expensive than conventional meat. Hopefully, prices will drop as companies scale up operations, making it more accessible.
A 2024 study in Nature Food Journal projects that cultivated chicken will cost $6.20 per pound, given the proper production scale. This is competitive with the current cost of traditional organic chicken.
Lab-Grown Meat Availability
In 2020, the Singapore government approved the sale of lab-grown meats, giving consumers in Singapore the first chance to taste lab-grown chicken. But as of March 2025, lab-grown meat is not readily available to American consumers. Lab-grown meat companies are working to perfect their products, lower costs, and scale up.
More consumers worldwide should soon get their first taste of lab-grown meat. In 2023, the U.S. approved sales of lab-grown meat, though Florida and Alabama have banned the product from grocery store shelves. Tyson Foods, one of the world's ten largest meat processors, has invested millions in Future Meat Technologies, which indicates a demand for meat industry support. Until lab-grown meat hits the market, leaving animals off our plates is the kindest thing we can do.
Author Bio: Laurie Wills is the lead grassroots campaign coordinator for the Humane League UK, based in Cornwall, the United Kingdom.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer
A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer

Article – The Conversation While rocket launches are increasing dramatically every year, it is still possible to mitigate any harmful effects on the ozone layer. The international space industry is on a growth trajectory, but new research shows a rapid increase in rocket launches would damage the ozone layer. Several hundred rockets are launched globally each year by a mix of commercial companies and nation-state space programmes. These take place at around 20 sites, almost all in the northern hemisphere, with the most prolific launch rates currently from the United States, China, New Zealand and Russia. Our latest research explores the tipping point when launching more rockets will begin to cause problems. Our findings show that once rates reach 2,000 launches a year – about a ten-fold increase on last year – the current healing of the ozone layer slows down. We argue that with care, we can avoid this future. The economic benefits of industry growth can be realised, but it will take a collaborative effort. Rocket launches thin the ozone layer The ozone layer protects life on Earth from harmful solar ultraviolet (UV) rays. It is slowly healing from the effects of chlorofluorocarbons and other damaging chemicals emitted last century, thanks to global cooperative agreements under the Montreal Protocol. Gases and particulates emitted by rockets as they punch through the atmosphere are known to thin the ozone layer. So far, they don't cause appreciable ozone depletion, as relatively few launches take place each year. However, launches are steadily increasing. In 2019, there were 102 launches. By 2024, that increased to 258 worldwide. There are expected to be even more in 2025. At multiple sites worldwide, the launch industry projects impressive levels of future growth. For US-based launches, a three-fold increase in the number of rockets launched in 2023 is expected as soon as 2028. One driver of this growth is the effort to build out satellite constellations to tens of thousands of units, positioned low in Earth's orbit. These require many launches to create and are happening in several nations, run by a number of companies. Once in place, these constellations require ongoing launches to keep them supplied with active satellites. Potential delay in ozone recovery To figure out how future launches could affect the ozone layer, we first built a database of ozone-depleting chemicals emitted by rockets currently in use. We then fed this database into a model of Earth's atmosphere and climate, and simulated atmospheric composition under several scenarios of higher rates of rocket launches. We found that with around 2,000 launches worldwide each year, the ozone layer thins by up to 3%. Due to atmospheric transport of rocket-emitted chemicals, we saw the largest ozone losses over Antarctica, even though most launches are taking place in the northern hemisphere. Fortunately, the ozone losses are small. We wouldn't expect to see catastrophic damage to humans or ecosystems. However, the losses are significant given global efforts underway to heal the ozone layer. The global abundance of ozone is still around 2% lower than before the onset of losses caused by chlorofluorocarbons. Future ozone losses are not locked in Encouragingly, we found no significant ozone loss in a scenario of more modest rates of around 900 launches per year. However, this is for the types of rockets that are in use right now around the world. We focus on current launch vehicles because it is uncertain when the new and massive rockets currently in development will enter use. But these larger rockets often require far more fuel, which creates more emissions at each launch. Rocket propellant choices make a big difference to the atmosphere. We found fuels emitting chlorine-containing chemicals or black carbon particulates have the largest effects on the ozone layer. Reducing use of these fuels as launch rates increase is key to supporting an ongoing recovery of the ozone layer. Re-entering spacecraft and satellite debris can also cause damage. However, the global scientific community doesn't yet fully understand the chemistry around re-entry. Our work provides a realistic 'floor' for the lowest level of damage that will occur. But it is important to remember that these effects are not locked in. It is entirely possible to create a launch industry where we avoid harmful effects, but that would require reducing use of chlorine-containing fuels, minimising black carbon emissions by new rockets and monitoring emissions. It will take keen effort and enthusiasm from industry and regulators, working together with scientists. But this needs to start now, not after the damage is done. Disclosure statement Laura Revell is a member of the International Ozone Commission and the UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, which assesses the effects of ozone depletion on life on Earth. She is a Rutherford Discovery Fellow, funded by the Royal Society of NZ Te Apārangi. Michele Bannister is the NZ delegate for the International Astronomical Union, serves on the COSPAR-NZ national committee, is a voting member of Aerospace New Zealand, and has research collaborations with the IAU Centre for Protection of the Dark & Quiet Sky. She is a Rutherford Discovery Fellow, funded by the Royal Society of NZ Te Apārangi.

A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer
A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

A 10-fold Increase In Rocket Launches Would Start Harming The Ozone Layer

The international space industry is on a growth trajectory, but new research shows a rapid increase in rocket launches would damage the ozone layer. Several hundred rockets are launched globally each year by a mix of commercial companies and nation-state space programmes. These take place at around 20 sites, almost all in the northern hemisphere, with the most prolific launch rates currently from the United States, China, New Zealand and Russia. Our latest research explores the tipping point when launching more rockets will begin to cause problems. Our findings show that once rates reach 2,000 launches a year – about a ten-fold increase on last year – the current healing of the ozone layer slows down. We argue that with care, we can avoid this future. The economic benefits of industry growth can be realised, but it will take a collaborative effort. Rocket launches thin the ozone layer The ozone layer protects life on Earth from harmful solar ultraviolet (UV) rays. It is slowly healing from the effects of chlorofluorocarbons and other damaging chemicals emitted last century, thanks to global cooperative agreements under the Montreal Protocol. Gases and particulates emitted by rockets as they punch through the atmosphere are known to thin the ozone layer. So far, they don't cause appreciable ozone depletion, as relatively few launches take place each year. However, launches are steadily increasing. In 2019, there were 102 launches. By 2024, that increased to 258 worldwide. There are expected to be even more in 2025. At multiple sites worldwide, the launch industry projects impressive levels of future growth. For US-based launches, a three-fold increase in the number of rockets launched in 2023 is expected as soon as 2028. One driver of this growth is the effort to build out satellite constellations to tens of thousands of units, positioned low in Earth's orbit. These require many launches to create and are happening in several nations, run by a number of companies. Once in place, these constellations require ongoing launches to keep them supplied with active satellites. Potential delay in ozone recovery To figure out how future launches could affect the ozone layer, we first built a database of ozone-depleting chemicals emitted by rockets currently in use. We then fed this database into a model of Earth's atmosphere and climate, and simulated atmospheric composition under several scenarios of higher rates of rocket launches. We found that with around 2,000 launches worldwide each year, the ozone layer thins by up to 3%. Due to atmospheric transport of rocket-emitted chemicals, we saw the largest ozone losses over Antarctica, even though most launches are taking place in the northern hemisphere. Fortunately, the ozone losses are small. We wouldn't expect to see catastrophic damage to humans or ecosystems. However, the losses are significant given global efforts underway to heal the ozone layer. The global abundance of ozone is still around 2% lower than before the onset of losses caused by chlorofluorocarbons. Future ozone losses are not locked in Encouragingly, we found no significant ozone loss in a scenario of more modest rates of around 900 launches per year. However, this is for the types of rockets that are in use right now around the world. We focus on current launch vehicles because it is uncertain when the new and massive rockets currently in development will enter use. But these larger rockets often require far more fuel, which creates more emissions at each launch. Rocket propellant choices make a big difference to the atmosphere. We found fuels emitting chlorine-containing chemicals or black carbon particulates have the largest effects on the ozone layer. Reducing use of these fuels as launch rates increase is key to supporting an ongoing recovery of the ozone layer. Re-entering spacecraft and satellite debris can also cause damage. However, the global scientific community doesn't yet fully understand the chemistry around re-entry. Our work provides a realistic 'floor' for the lowest level of damage that will occur. But it is important to remember that these effects are not locked in. It is entirely possible to create a launch industry where we avoid harmful effects, but that would require reducing use of chlorine-containing fuels, minimising black carbon emissions by new rockets and monitoring emissions. It will take keen effort and enthusiasm from industry and regulators, working together with scientists. But this needs to start now, not after the damage is done. Disclosure statement Laura Revell is a member of the International Ozone Commission and the UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, which assesses the effects of ozone depletion on life on Earth. She is a Rutherford Discovery Fellow, funded by the Royal Society of NZ Te Apārangi. Michele Bannister is the NZ delegate for the International Astronomical Union, serves on the COSPAR-NZ national committee, is a voting member of Aerospace New Zealand, and has research collaborations with the IAU Centre for Protection of the Dark & Quiet Sky. She is a Rutherford Discovery Fellow, funded by the Royal Society of NZ Te Apārangi.

Osaka Expo 2025 showcases future foods with tech innovations
Osaka Expo 2025 showcases future foods with tech innovations

NZ Herald

timea day ago

  • NZ Herald

Osaka Expo 2025 showcases future foods with tech innovations

Inside the 'Evolving Frozen Foods' showcase at the Earth Mart pavilion, conceptualised by broadcasting writer Kundo Koyama, visitors will find a colourful assortment of green, yellow, and red 'regenerated rice'. Ingredients such as rice, vegetables, meat and eggs are frozen and then crushed into a powder. The powder is reshaped into rice grains for easy consumption. There are a variety of flavours made through the combination of ingredients. One of the flavours is called 'salad rice,' while another is named 'takana fried rice flavoured rice'. Another flavour is 'family rice,' inspired by oyakodon, which is a bowl of rice topped with chicken and eggs. Professor Hidemitsu Furukawa of Yamagata University developed regenerated rice in co-operation with Nichirei Foods Inc., a major frozen food company based in Tokyo. Although conventional methods for pulverising ingredients rely on heat or desiccation, the drawback has been the accompanying loss of moisture and aroma. However, the team successfully created powdered ingredients while preserving their original moisture and aroma by instantaneously freezing them using liquid nitrogen. They said that adjusting the blending ratio enables precise control over taste, aroma and nutritional value. 'This approach allows for the use of agricultural produce discarded after a harvest that doesn't reach the market, leading to a reduction in food loss and waste. It also supports farmers,' Furukawa said. Tomoko Kadoya, 64, from Kanazawa, looked at the regenerated rice and said, 'I'm surprised and thrilled that such food will be available in the near future. I am curious to try it and find out what it tastes like.' 3D printed meat The Osaka Healthcare Pavilion, presented by Osaka Prefecture and Osaka City, is enticing the public with the prospect of making meat at home by 2050. Visitors can view 3D printed cultured meat. In 2023, the University of Osaka and companies such as Kyoto-based Shimadzu Corp. created a joint venture called the Consortium for Future Innovation by Cultured Meat. The consortium aims to commercialise technology that cultivates muscle and fat cells harvested from wagyu beef and processes them to create meat with a 3D printer. Pavilion visitors can look at two pieces of cultured meat, each 9cm long and 15cm wide, at the booth. They were produced over about six months. Cultured meat pieces are displayed at the Expo. Photo / The Japan News The ratio of lean to fatty parts can be adjusted to create marbled meat, with one of the pieces having a checkerboard pattern made with the lean and fatty sections. According to Michiya Matsusaki, a professor at the University of Osaka and the consortium's representative, they are close to reproducing the flavour and texture of marbled meat. During the Expo's period, they plan to grill the cultured meat at an event, allowing visitors to smell its aroma. 'I can't even imagine what it tastes like,' said a primary school student from Toyonaka, Osaka Prefecture. 'I wonder if we'll be eating it regularly when I grow up,' the student added curiously. Rice flour soft serve cones Visitors are flocking to eat innovative dairy-free soft serve ice cream and cones which are made without egg or wheat. Nissei Co. developed the dessert. The firm, based in Ibaraki, Osaka Prefecture, is a manufacturer and distributor of soft serve-related products. Beans make up the cream of the soft serve and the cones are made from rice flour. Five flavours, including vanilla, matcha, and strawberry, are available for ¥700 ($8) each at the Osaka Healthcare Pavilion. Commercialisation, however, presents challenges such as costs, according to the company. 'Eating soft serve is often a joyful experience. We want to create a future where everyone can enjoy it,' said a project leader from the company, outlining the project's goal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store