Human Rights Commissioner Says The Cost Of Limiting Gender Rights Under Legislation will be people's lives
Press Release – Human Rights Commission
International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism & Transphobia (IDAHOBIT) on May 17 is a global day to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of LGBTQIA+people. This year's theme is The power of communities.
A sense of belonging and being part of a community are vital for each of us. Community is where we find support, understanding, and a sense of home.
International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, Intersexism & Transphobia (IDAHOBIT) on May 17 is a global day to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of LGBTQIA+people. This year's theme is 'The power of communities'.
'It is a reminder of the importance of connection and collective action when human rights are threatened. Rainbow people are part of every community and like everyone, often identify with more than one,' says Disability Rights Commissioner and Rainbow Rights spokesperson, Prudence Walker.
'Community support and advocacy can help create safe and accepting environments for everyone to live authentically, to be ourselves.'
However, recent developments in Aotearoa and overseas raise concerns about increasing discrimination against some groups.
'Attacks on the rights of trans, non-binary, and intersex people internationally are having ripple effects here in Aotearoa. I don't believe that is who we are as a country. We have data that shows the overwhelming majority of New Zealanders believe that trans people should be protected from discrimination,' says Walker.
'The laws of other countries are not our laws. Those are not our values.' Trans and non-binary people in Aotearoa already experience disproportionately high levels of psychological distress due to discrimination, barriers to healthcare and threats to their safety. Legislation that threatens to limit rights about gender identity can compound this further, and will likely impact cis women, intersex people and children too. There will be particular impacts for Māori, Pasifika and other Indigenous peoples who have always had diverse expressions of gender and sexuality. Te Tiriti o Waitangi affirms the right of tangata whenua to uphold tino rangatiratanga over their sexuality, gender, gender expressions, and sex characteristics.
Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner and Women's Rights spokesperson, Professor Gail Pacheco, says inclusion of trans women in the definition of 'woman' is not only protected under international human rights standards, but it's crucial for wellbeing.
'All people deserve to have a sense of belonging. The Commission acknowledges and celebrates the diversity of women in Aotearoa and the value and strength that diversity brings to our communities,' says Pacheco.
The date of May 17 marks the anniversary of the World Health Organization's decision in 1990 to declassify homosexuality as a mental illness. 'While we've come so far together since those dark days, even now many people still live in fear of existing as their authentic selves,' says Walker. 'We cannot go back to a time when discrimination against Rainbow people was normalised in legislation and in public attitudes. The cost is people's lives and it's unacceptable.'
'Trans, non-binary, and intersex people are taonga and have existed forever. They will continue to do so with the same rights as others, including to be free from discrimination, violence and abuse,' she adds. 'Communities can use their power to support everyone's sense of identity and belonging, and to speak out against harmful legislation. We owe it to ourselves and to future generations to create a society that values inclusivity, equality, human rights, and lives of dignity for all.'
Notes:
• The Commission published a guide to 'Trans Rights and Human Rights' last year to help transgender people access this information
• More data about trans and non-binary people's experiences can be found in the
Counting Ourselves Health Survey.
• The United Nations treaty body, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) has made it clear that 'women', as that term is used in CEDAW, includes trans women, and accordingly, all the rights and protections in CEDAW extend to trans women.
• While Te Kāhui Tika Tangata Human Rights Commission can't make findings or decide if the law has been breached, it can help by providing information and support and in some cases can offer a dispute resolution process for complaints.
If someone has experienced unlawful discrimination, they can make a complaint via our website or by contacting us on 0800 496 877 or infoline@tikatangata.org.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
4 days ago
- The Spinoff
What was Chris Bishop thinking? An earnest attempt to figure it out
It's an objectively crazy way to behave. But I kind of get it, writes Duncan Greive. This time last week, Chris Bishop was having an awesome day. A massive NZ music fan, heading to the big awards show – a great night ahead of him. I saw him there, standing alongside his colleague Paul Goldsmith, next to the bar during the intermission. Bishop looked like he was having an excellent time, though to be fair everyone did – the awards are huge and informal and a great night out. As we now know, the fun wouldn't last for Bishop. Within a couple of hours he'd muttered derisively during a performance by Stan Walker and had a confrontation with Don McGlashan, a singer and songwriter so universally beloved that both Newstalk ZB and RNZ, which agree on very little, describe him as a national treasure. By the following day, Bishop's comments had become the biggest news story to emerge from the awards in years, and Bishop no doubt deeply regrets not keeping his opinions to himself. In the week since, he has stood by his statements on the night but acknowledged, both to media and to the prime minister, that he 'should have kept my thoughts to myself'. Bishop confirmed to RNZ that he'd said something about 'performative acclaim' during Walker's performance and referred to it as 'a load of crap'. It was poor timing. It was also just plain wrong. Walker's performance was one of the highlights of the night, a soaring ballad (he is becoming New Zealand's Celine Dion – a huge compliment, to be clear) which really took flight when the room filled with supporters waving Toitū te Tiriti flags, prompting an outpouring from the room. This seems an open and shut case, and I'm not here to defend Bishop – that would be almost as foolish as his behaviour – but there are mitigating circumstances which feel material to the current public prosecution. 1. Toitū te Tiriti is a complex organisation Stuff political editor Luke Malpass once adroitly observed that the Green Party likely scoop up a non-trivial proportion of its votes from people who feel a general dread about the climate and environment, and feel marginally better by giving the party their vote, and don't look much deeper into the policy platform or what they most emphasise. There's a similar phenomenon at work with Toitū te Tiriti. It's both a phrase and an organisation, a sentiment and closely allied with a specific parliamentary party. The phrase is well-supported, with more than seven in 10 New Zealanders endorsing the idea of 'harmonious race relations through honouring te Tiriti', according to polling by the Human Rights Commission earlier this year. At a guess, Bishop is one of them, as among the most prominent and unambiguous members of the liberal wing of the National Party. However, Toitū te Tiriti is also an organisation, one which achieved an awe-inspiring level of support during the hīkoi mō te Tiriti earlier this year. The organisation created a vast, countrywide response to both the Treaty principles bill and what supporters perceive as a large number of policies which go against the spirit of te Tiriti. But while the support for that general idea is broad and will necessarily include voters for a number of parties, the organisation Toitū te Tiriti has deep ties to Te Pāti Māori, most notably through one of its key organisers, Eru Kapa-Kingi, a teaching fellow at the University of Auckland who stood unsuccessfully for parliament in the 2023 election on Te Pāti Māori's list. Supporting the phrase is one thing, supporting the organisation another, and knowing how to practically apply it across society and politics is, to put it mildly, complicated. This is likely what Chris Bishop was trying and failing to express in the moment. 2. Arts and culture has a near total lack of representation for right wing politics Labour's Willie Jackson is not wrong in his statement on the Chris Bishop affair. 'Look around the world, people have been doing that for years. Whether it's Bob Marley, Bono, whatever, it's been happening, it's not like something new. He should talk to his Shihad heroes, 'cause the lead singer there's got pretty good politics too.' The phrase 'good politics' is telling there, but likely to be something the vast bulk of the music awards crowd endorses. I am old enough to have been to music awards since Helen Clark was prime minister. She received cheers and appeared on stage, with (mostly) undivided affection from the crowd. Over the years the likes of Chlöe Swarbrick and Jacinda Ardern, before and after their elevation to party leadership, have been largely lauded while in attendance. One notable exception was Homebrew's Tom Scott, who condemned Ardern for not visiting Ihumātao during the occupation – essentially a criticism of a centre left prime minister from the left, asking for a more explicitly leftist position. Bishop is manifestly a very genuine fan of New Zealand music. He regularly goes to shows, buys t-shirts, advocates for it whenever he can. He attended multiple dates on the final Shihad tour. He is its most prominent and present champion within the National party, perhaps the biggest fan the party has ever had. He will also not be unaware of the general politics of not only musicians, but arts and culture makers and workers more broadly. But he shows up and attempts to present an acceptable face of a party and a broader worldview which is anathema to many fans and almost all makers in the rooms he frequents. Where culture and politics collide What likely boiled over in Bishop is the tension which is always present and rarely voiced in these discussions. Music, TV, film, arts and culture in New Zealand receives a significant amount of support from central and local government. It's not enough, and it's not a huge amount compared to some other countries. But it comes from all taxpayers and ratepayers, which naturally includes many people who hold differing political views. Who might believe in toitū te Tiriti (the sentiment), but not the particular ambitions and ties of Toitū te Tiriti (the advocacy organisation) as a microcosm of the broader goal. So Jackson is right, music has always been political. And Bishop was wrong: neither Walker's performance nor the emotional heft of the arrival of the Toitū te Tiriti flags and supporters in the room was 'a load of crap'. It was the undeniable emotional heart of the evening. But the Aotearoa Music Awards are publicly funded, and streamed on both TVNZ and RNZ. To have something so close to a party political moment within them would rankle those who don't share those politics. To put it another way, imagine Groundswell or Family First, neither of which are as party aligned as Toitū te Tiriti, showing up and the reception they would receive. It's part of an increasingly explicit and party political alignment of our cultural figures, particularly in these fractious times, where performers can feel contemptuous of the views of those who are elected to represent them. While arts funding does wax and wane according to different governments, the idea that it should exist has endured for decades. When it goes beyond statements to specific party-aligned organisations, the bipartisan support for such funding might become more contested. Not to mention its broad appeal, inside and outside of parliament.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Supermarkets Slammed For Bad Behaviour
Another day, another report that reveals how badly the duopoly supermarkets of Woolworths and Foodstuffs are treating their customers and suppliers to benefit themselves. 'Kiwi consumers deserve so much better than this. We are still paying some of the highest prices on the planet to put food on the table and we have known this for more than three years,' said Grocery Action Group chair Sue Chetwin. Today's report from the Commerce Commission slams the supermarket duopoly sector for the way it treats its suppliers by making unrealistic demands of them and asking them to wear costs the supermarkets should be covering. The Commission also says this is a significant issue for any potential competitors who face an insurmountable battle to get wholesale groceries at a reasonable price. 'The report reveals the supermarkets suppliers are being subsidised by around $5 billion in rebates, discounts and promotional payments. Competitors just cannot compete with that power inbalance. 'It doesn't work for consumers either because prices bounce around so much they no longer know what a fair price might be,' Chetwin said. 'The report shows once again that despite the Commission and the Government calling out this appalling behavour the incumbents continue to treat consumers and suppliers as if they own them,' Chetwin said. 'In many respects they do. Foodstuffs and Woolworths hold more than 80% of the market. This lack of competition means consumers have no to little choice about where they shop.' Grocery Action also notes the large suppliers are complicit in this play because the lack of competition also helps keep their prices high. GAG is concerned improvements to the supply and wholesale codes proposed by the Commission, including prohibiting retaliation against suppliers who assert their rights will not be enough. 'The Commission is asking the duopoly to 'voluntarily' change the wholesale code over the next 12 months – that's like politely asking the greedy to stop being greedy. It won't work. 'We have already seen the duopoly play by its own rules. The industry has been on notice since the Commission released its Supermarket Study in 2022, which said supermarkets were making excessive profits and that a lack of competition meant we were paying some of the highest prices in the world for food, but nothing has changed. 'Hopefully this latest report will assist the Grocery Minister Nicola Willis, to conclude that forced divestment of the supermarkets to allow more competition needs to happen now, not in some distant future. Consumers will thank her.' Grocery Action background The Grocery Action Group was formed to bring down the prices of groceries for all Kiwis. Our vision is to influence government, the regulators and other parties to deliver a competitive and consumer-focused grocery sector in New Zealand. Our board is made up of consumer, industry, supplier and Māori interest experts. For more info visit
Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
ComCom Moves To Disrupt Power Structures In Groceries
The Commerce Commission is today spotlighting two commercial behaviours it believes are reinforcing the powerful positions of the major supermarkets and big grocery suppliers, and what's needed to address them and improve competition. 'We know the current grocery market is not serving Kiwi consumers well. The status quo lets a few major players set the rules for the rest of the industry which is negatively impacting consumers, new and expanding competitors, and small suppliers,' Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden says. 'These major players are the three main supermarkets and large national and multi-national suppliers. Their significant market share allows them to influence the settings of the market. This limits the ability for competing retailers to enter and grow in the market and often results in smaller suppliers getting an unfair deal. 'The Commission has today released our draft report on our review of the Grocery Supply Code and Initial Views on our Inquiry into the Wholesale Market. These focus on two issues we believe need to be addressed to improve outcomes for consumers. Suppliers covering retailer costs 'We're proposing to simplify the Grocery Supply Code to reduce the range of payments supermarkets can charge their suppliers,' Mr van Heerden says. 'With combined purchases of over $15 billion and 82% of the New Zealand grocery market, the major supermarkets are the largest customers for most grocery suppliers. 'My concern is that the power imbalance between the major supermarkets and small suppliers creates a reluctance among suppliers to push back on supermarket demands or behaviour for fear of damaging relationships or losing access to supermarket shelves. 'This leads to smaller suppliers taking on costs and risks that are best managed by the retailer. 'The changes we're suggesting would prevent the supermarkets from charging suppliers for ordinary retailing activities such as stocking shelves and setting up displays. It would also require the supermarkets to keep records of certain activities charged to suppliers, including promotions. 'We believe that setting these rules in place will help mitigate the power imbalance and allow suppliers to be more confident market participants so they can innovate and invest in better products and more choice for consumers. Promotional payments in the wholesale market 'A significant issue new and expanding supermarket competitors face is securing access to cost-effective groceries from large suppliers. 'The prices the major supermarkets pay suppliers are subsidised by around $5 billion in rebates, discounts, and promotional payments. Competing retailers can't negotiate similar levels of support due to their weaker buying power. 'The majority of these payments go to supermarkets in exchange for products being 'on special'. 'Consumers lose out because prices jump around more. This can mean the average price is more expensive and it's harder for consumers to assess the value of products. 'The major supermarkets use high low pricing much more than supermarkets in other countries. Large suppliers and the major supermarkets need to reduce their reliance on promotions and specials so that prices can be lower and more stable. This would benefit consumers because pricing would be more straight-forward, and new competitors would put competitive pressure on existing supermarkets to deliver on price without the high-low price distraction. 'With less promotional funding we'd expect suppliers to factor that saving into the price they charge retailers, which retailers would then pass onto consumers in the form of more stable and lower everyday prices. 'The best option is for large suppliers and the major supermarkets to voluntarily change their behaviour. If they don't, we'll have to consider our other alternatives,' Mr van Heerden says. Background The Commission has responsibilities to monitor and regulate the grocery sector under the Grocery Industry Competition Act 2023 (GICA). Our work focuses on the following areas to improve competition and efficiency in the grocery sector: Creating pricing and promotional transparency for consumers Setting rules around supplier treatment Enabling wholesale access for new and expanding competitors Ongoing monitoring of the state of competition in the grocery sector and whether it is delivering benefits for New Zealanders over time Taking action to address non-compliance under GICA, the Fair Trading Act, and the Commerce Act where necessary Grocery Supply Code The Commission is seeking submissions on the draft Grocery Supply Code and will consider those before we issue our final report before the end of September 2025. The mandatory Grocery Supply Code was introduced under the Grocery Industry Competition Act to ensure negotiations between major supermarkets and their suppliers are fair and transparent. The Commission started a review of the Supply Code to make sure it was operating as intended and suppliers had confidence to innovate and invest in more choice for consumers. The Commission's draft is informed by submissions on the Request for Views published in August 2024, the results of the Grocery Supplier Survey, and information from the Commission's Anonymous Reporting Tool. The Commission is proposing the following changes to the code Restricting the range of situations where retailers can charge suppliers. Retailers would no longer be able to charge suppliers for stocking the shelves or for groceries that become unfit for sale while in the retailer's effective control. Requiring regulated grocery retailers to keep records about how they are complying with the Code when undertaking certain activities. These activities include negotiating promotions with suppliers and making deductions to payments without written consent. Adding a requirement that if a retailer has bought groceries at a promotional price for a sale period and then sells that product at a higher price after that sales period, they pay the difference to the supplier. Prohibiting retaliation against suppliers that exercise their rights under the Code. The review has also identified some priority areas to develop guidance to support fair conduct and other areas to consider over the longer term. Wholesale Supply Inquiry The Commission has released preliminary findings in relation to the current Wholesale Supply Inquiry. The wholesale access regime was introduced under the Grocery Industry Competition Act (GICA) to address a key barrier to entry and expansion in the retail grocery market in New Zealand. The Commission started an inquiry into the Wholesale Supply of groceries after the first Annual Grocery Report found the wholesale access regime was not working as intended and is unlikely to substantially improve competition or benefit New Zealand consumers in its current form. The Commission has recommended the following changes: The major supermarkets expand their wholesale product range and implement systems to pass promotional funding through to their wholesale customers so other retailers can access lower prices Suppliers reduce their reliance on promotional funding or allocate the funding across more retailers. At this time the Commission believes these changes are best achieved through voluntary action from large suppliers and major supermarkets as they are well placed to do so efficiently. If the Commission doesn't see meaningful progress in 12 months, it will decide if regulations should be changed. The Commission will consider submissions on the preliminary findings and will gather further information to make decisions on whether changes are needed. A final report on the wholesale supply inquiry will likely be completed in 2026.
