
17 Doctors Share Wildest Things Patients Survived
We recently asked medical professionals of the BuzzFeed Community to tell us the wildest things they've witnessed a patient survive, and they revealed unbelievable ER moments that genuinely made them think, "How are you alive?!" Here are the most shocking stories:
"We were the closest hospital, so they brought a civilian in (I'm a former Air Force medic). His safety gear failed, and he fell 128 feet from a communications tower. It had rained the night before, and he fell into a marshy puddle of high grass, flat on his back, with a concussion and whiplash. He had no broken bones, but the bruises that covered his body from head to heel were something to behold."
"We had a patient come in after mowing the lawn. The patient said something was kicked up by the lawn mower and hit him in the head. Didn't think much of it and finished cutting the grass. A few hours later, he still had a headache, so he came to the ER. We CAT-scanned his head, and there is an entire nail embedded in his brain."
"We once received a patient who was bitten by a rattlesnake, TWICE. He only managed to get to the emergency ward three hours after being bitten. Then, to make things worse, we only managed to get the correct antivenom flown in one hour after his arrival. He now works as an admin clerk at our hospital and is as healthy as ever."
"I had a patient who was already blind from diabetes, lost some toes, and part of a foot. I checked the blood sugar, and it was 45 (this is Canada, so your normal range is 4 to 7); I rechecked it: 45. This patient had no symptoms of hyperglycemia. He just took his insulin pen, cranked it, and self-injected (home care). I had to wait a bit to see what would happen, but eventually we left, and he ended up fine."
"Had a patient with an internal temp of 75 degrees Fahrenheit. He was drowsy, but fully alert and oriented. He was found on a river embankment in the middle of winter. He had been lying there overnight before a dog walker found him. We didn't believe the equipment when it told us 75 degrees, so we repeated with a rectal thermometer, a different rectal thermometer, and a rectal probe attached to the bedside and Medi-Therm system. They were all consistent, and after several hours of heating measures, we got their internal temp up to 90 degrees before they went to ICU."
"Another 'how the f*ck are you not dead' patient was a person who had a blood sugar of 1,800. They weren't in a coma. It was just a woman who walked in to complain about abdominal pain."
"The guy with the crossbow bolt lodged in his head. He was initially described as having an arrow in his head, which it definitely looked like on first glance. But the angle of entry into his head made no sense. It entered under his chin and exited from the top of his head. That's when one of the nurses surmised that he would have to be lying on the ground to have been hit with the arrow at this angle."
"I was an intern working in a Grand Rapids ER in 1978 when a man came in, complaining of a headache that developed halfway through a local marathon. I quickly identified the cause of his headache as a .22-calibre bullet lodged in the top of his skull. He finished the marathon in three hours and nine minutes."
"My mom was a critical care nurse and said the freakiest thing she ever went through was having a 15-minute conversation with a little old lady who had no pulse. As I recall, she said the little old lady passed mid-sentence. Just stopped."
"Aside from hospice patients who have hung on for a surprisingly long time, I have a few that stick out in my mind. There was a patient in third-degree heart block with a pulse of 30 at best. Sitting up and talking like nothing was wrong. I was a new nurse at the time, and that freaked me out. Basically, the electrical system in the heart was malfunctioning, and this person was flirting with a massive cardiac event."
"There was a lady with a hemoglobin of 4. It should be at least 12. She was whiter than the bed sheets. It was really unsettling to see a living human that color."
"I was a surgery resident on nights. Critical trauma page came in. I rushed down to the trauma bay in the ER, and a man in his 20s came in with a gunshot wound to the head. Specifically, the guy was running from the cops, and instead of going to jail, he put the gun in his mouth and pulled the trigger. The exit wound was perfectly in the middle of the top of his head."
"While I was a student, I did a clinical placement at a major trauma hospital where they kept a collection of X-rays you never usually see because the injury would typically kill the patient instantly. The most interesting one was a smashed pelvis from a jockey in a horse racing accident. That kind of injury would usually also result in rupture of femoral arteries, which means you bleed to death very quickly, but somehow, this guy survived and made it to the hospital and lived long enough to get X-rayed. I don't know if he recovered, though."
"Not me, but my mom was an ER nurse right after college. A family got in a car crash, and there weren't any serious injuries; they were just taken to the ER to be assessed. They had a baby, and my mom asked them about its health, etc. When asked what the baby was being fed, the mom said, 'Juice.' Just juice. She had heard that at 6 months, you can start feeding the baby juice. Not realizing it was juice, in addition to baby food or milk. This woman had been feeding her baby ONLY JUICE for months."
"Back in my surgical days, I was a resident on my trauma rotation. A really nice young guy comes in via EMS. He'd been working on a factory site doing work high up on a tower (think 80 to 100 feet, kind of deal). He was climbing his way down, about halfway, when he heard commotion overhead and someone shouting, 'Watch out!' He's on the ladder, so he can't do much but bow his head to cover it. Feels something strike the back of his neck. Manages to stay calm, reaches around, and realizes a large piece of metal is embedded in him. His medic training kicks in, he calmly climbs down the rest of the ladder, sits down, and asks someone to call an ambulance."
"I'm a sleep tech, and I had a middle-aged patient whose oxygen fell all the way down to the 40s and was having central apneas for over a minute… He spent more time not breathing while asleep. No wonder he complains he feels dead every single day. I couldn't believe it, so I tried a bunch of other oximeters and different hands/fingers, and they were all incredibly low while he was asleep."
And finally...
"A young woman, in her 30s, had a stroke. She clotted off the basilar artery, the big artery in the base of the brain that supplies all of the 'primitive' functions, like breathing and awareness. I found out about her a day after the event. This, by the book, is a hopeless case. She was literally already dead. But, because she was young, they prevailed upon me to do something. I poked a catheter (a long, skinny plastic tube) into her groin artery, then snaked it up to the blocked artery in the base of her brain. I infused a clot-busting drug into the artery for about 12 hours (tPA, tissue plasminogen activator). I rechecked, and the clot was gone. She woke up the next day. After a month, she walked out of the hospital."
WOW. Fellow doctors and other medical professionals, what's the wildest thing you've ever seen a patient survive? Tell us in the comments, or use this anonymous form below:

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cadets who met all Air Force Academy graduation standards denied commissions because they're transgender
They stood in formation at Falcon Stadium, diplomas in hand, having met every standard of physical endurance, academic excellence, and military discipline. But, on Thursday, when the time came for the U.S. Air Force Academy's class of 2025 in Colorado Springs, Colorado, to commission as second lieutenants, three cadets were quietly held back. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. They are the first out transgender cadets to graduate from the Academy. And under a newly reinstated Trump administration ban, they will not be allowed to serve. Related: Federal judge blocks Trump's transgender military ban One of them, Hunter Marquez, had spent years preparing to become a combat systems officer. He earned dual degrees in aeronautical engineering and applied mathematics. He passed the Air Force's fitness standards for men. And he did so as himself, having transitioned while enrolled at the Academy. 'I really want to stay in for as long as possible, fight this out,' Marquez told The Colorado Springs Gazette. But the rules changed. On May 6, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to begin enforcing Executive Order 14183, which bans transgender people from military service. The unsigned order—issued without full argument and over the dissent of the Court's three liberal justices—overturned a Washington state lower court's preliminary injunction and gave the Pentagon the green light to begin separations. Related: Supreme Court allows Trump administration to enforce transgender military ban Marquez, along with the two other graduates, was placed on administrative absence, barred from taking the oath, and warned he might need to repay the cost of his education if he refused to leave voluntarily, the paper reports. That education—funded by taxpayers—is valued in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. According to The Gazette, Marquez was later told by Air Force officials that if he is involuntarily separated, he won't be billed. But the message was clear: his government does not want him in uniform. And yet, there is no question he met the standard. 'We want warfighters. We want people with grit, that are resilient. They have done all that,' a U.S. Air Force Academy staff member told The Gazette, speaking anonymously for fear of retaliation. All three cadets passed physical fitness tests for both men and women. All three graduated with distinction. What disqualifies them is not their performance but their identity. Marquez is a plaintiff in Talbott v. United States, one of the central legal challenges to the policy. In a sworn statement, he wrote that the executive order describes people like him as 'undisciplined, selfish, and dishonest.' 'None of those are correct descriptions of my character or my abilities,' he wrote. 'I have achieved alongside my peers throughout my time at the Academy.' The policy is not theoretical. It is personal. It has required cadets like Marquez to trek across dorms to find gender-compliant restrooms and showers. It has forced them to race through final semesters in case they're expelled before graduating. And it has turned what should have been a joyful week of ceremonies into a lesson in resilience. Related: Meet the transgender Army lieutenant who is challenging Donald Trump's military ban Marquez, now 23, is applying to the University of Colorado Boulder to earn an advanced degree in aerospace engineering. He is still receiving medical benefits and cadet pay, but he knows that may be temporary. 'There's still a lot of anger and frustration and sadness,' he said. 'Just because I have worked so hard to be a second lieutenant in the Air Force, and at the very end that was taken from me.' Academy alumni have responded with solidarity. Nearly 1,000 graduates have signed an open letter defending transgender cadets and midshipmen. 'Being transgender is in no way incompatible with any of our Academies' cherished virtues and values,' the letter reads, according to
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
14 Times McDonald's Was Caught Up In Legal Issues
McDonald's is one of the biggest names in fast food. It operates over 38,000 locations across the world. It's a fixture in cities, suburbs, and rural communities alike, and it seems like there's no place that the Golden Arches have not touched. With a presence that large -- and over 80 years in operation -- it's no surprise that McDonald's has faced its fair share of legal battles. Indeed, the fast food giant has been the subject of many lawsuits from customers and has also filed several suits against other corporations since its founding. Some cases are well-known, including the "hot coffee incident," while others have emerged more recently due to ongoing concerns over price-gouging, deceptive marketing, and food safety. In an effort to shed light on some of McDonald's most notable and relevant legal battles over the years, we assembled the list of the lawsuits, court cases, and proceedings you need to know about. Read more: Every McDonald's Burger, Ranked Worst To Best Liebeck v. McDonald's is perhaps one of the most well-known legal cases involving the fast food behemoth. This incident set a precedent for how McDonald's would go about labeling its products and also highlighted the chain's track record for putting profits before customer safety -- which is arguably one of the worst mistakes McDonald's has ever made. In 1992, Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns after a McDonald's coffee spilled in her lap. The burns were extensive -- covering 16% of her body -- and took upwards of two years to heal. Liebeck tried to settle with the company for $20,000, which would cover her medical expenses, but McDonald's offered a mere $800. When Liebeck took McDonald's to court, it was revealed that the chain's coffee wasn't just hot -- it was 30 to 40 degrees hotter than coffees served at other restaurants. The legal team also noted that 700 individuals had experienced similar burns from McDonald's coffee, yet the chain required franchises to continue to serve the beverages at between 180 degrees and 190 degrees Fahrenheit. It was thought that the reason for this was that if McDonald's served its coffee as hot as possible, it would not need to give customers as many refills of it, thus saving the company money. The court eventually awarded Liebeck compensation for compensatory and punitive damages -- to the tune of $2.7 million, which was eventually reduced. Now, McDonald's coffee cups display a warning to customers noting that the contents are hot. It also prompted the chain to issue training to its employees on how to properly attach lids and serve beverages at a "drinkable" temperature. Children who grew up in the '70s and '80s may have fond memories of McDonald's television ads, complete with characters like the Hamburglar, Grimace, and Officer Big Mac. But, before there were these characters, which were as integral to McDonald's as its food, there was "H.R. Pufnstuf" -- a one-season show that appeared in 1969, a year prior to McDonald's character-filled ad campaign. "H.R. Pufnstuf" shared some commonalities with McDonaldland -- and it was easy to draw parallels between McDonald's Mayor McCheese and the large-headed dragon character in the show. The creators of "H.R. Pufnstuf" eventually ended up suing McDonald's for stealing the character and adapting it for its own ads. It was eventually revealed that the advertising company McDonald's used approached the creators of the show about a potential collaboration, but backed out at the last second -- only to allegedly lift the ideas for themselves. McDonald's was forced to pay $50,000 in damages, but both sides appealed the verdict, which eventually led to the courts yet again siding with "H.R. Pufnstuf" -- and ultimately increasing the damages to upwards of $1 million. The fast food giant also had to revise its character lineup for the ads to prevent further infringement. McDonald's seems to have capitalized on all things "Mc" -- from the Egg McMuffin to the McNugget. And, one 1988 ruling proved that McDonald's truly did have a foothold on all things "Mc." A federal district judge ruled that Quality Inns International Inc., a large hotel chain, would need to cease using "McSleep Inns," the name of its new chain of economy-level hotels. McDonald's issued warnings to the company prior to the ruling, though the hotel chain clapped back by filing a lawsuit, claiming that the name did not technically infringe on McDonald's trademark. McDonald's countersued under the premise that using "Mc" in the name of the hotel would cause consumers to falsely associate it with the fast food chain. The judge eventually sided with McDonald's, granting a permanent injunction against the use of the name and gave Quality Inns International a 30-day window to fall in line. The chain was eventually renamed "Sleep Inns." This is not the only instance of McDonald's taking legal action over its ownership of the "Mc" name. In 2019, following a complaint filed by an Irish fast food chain called Supermac's, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) ruled that McDonald's "had not proved genuine use of the 'Mc' prefix on some of the products it trademarked," according to a BBC article. However, McDonald's was given the right to ownership of "Mc" branding for several items, including some sandwiches and chicken nuggets. McDonald's wouldn't be the first company facing allegations of marketing towards children, but its actions did result in a legal firestorm in 2018, when a Canadian man sued the chain for allegedly violating a provincial law that prohibits marketing towards children under 13. Quebec is one of the few places in the world where such marketing is illegal, and the law only offers a few exceptions -- restaurants not being one of them. The father, who reportedly visited McDonald's every couple weeks with his three children, argued that the Happy Meal's toy tie-ins to pop culture, like film releases, and display of toys at a child's eye-level were evidence of the chain's alleged wrongdoing. This was not the first time that McDonald's had come under fire for similar issues. In 2010, a California mother, in partnership with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, alleged that the company's decision to pack its Happy Meals with toys is deceptive towards children. The suit argued that the use of these toys to market to children was not only unethical, but it also encouraged unhealthy eating. Much like the Canadian class action lawsuit, the California mother reported that her two children constantly requested visits to McDonald's in order to complete the set of toys hidden in the Happy Meal boxes. The California suit came after two counties in the state, Marin and San Francisco, passed laws that prohibited the inclusion of toys in children's meals that did not reach certain nutritional benchmarks. Although it may seem like McDonald's is constantly being sued by individuals, the company has taken its fair share of legal action against other entities. In 2024, McDonald's filed a federal lawsuit against the "Big Four," beef companies -- Cargill, JBS, Tyson Foods, and National Beef -- over allegations of price-fixing. McDonald's alleged that the beef producers -- which controlled about 80% of the U.S. beef market in 2018 -- had been intentionally reducing the amount of beef produced in order to charge more for it, like by closing several of their large processing facilities. The fast food giant argued that the deliberate actions to control the price of beef were in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The complaint also alleged that the "Big Four" colluded at conferences and trade shows and shared business information with each other that would increase their profits -- at the expense of companies like McDonald's. McDonald's is one of the largest purchasers of beef in the world, though the amount of money that the company sought in damages against the meat packers was not specified. Similar cases have been brought against the "Big Four" by other plaintiffs besides McDonald's, including Aldi, Sodexo, and Target. Eating at McDonald's became more difficult for halal eaters -- a dietary requirement that requires animals to be slaughtered in accordance with Islamic law and prohibits the consumption of pork -- in 2013. Two years prior, a customer sued the fast food chain, alleging that the chicken sandwich he had purchased had been falsely advertised as halal. The lawsuit detailed that although the Dearborn, Michigan franchise advertised and purchased halal McNuggets and chicken sandwiches, it started selling non-halal chicken once it had run out of halal-compliant meat -- on multiple occasions. As a result of the $700,000 settlement and lawsuit, the last two McDonald's franchises to serve halal options -- both located in Michigan -- removed halal products from their menus in 2013. While this was the first case brought against McDonald's concerning halal food, it was not the first one brought against McDonald's with labeling-related concerns. In 2002, McDonald's paid a $10 million settlement to Sikh, Hindu, and vegetarian groups after mislabeling its french fries as vegetarian when the fry oil actually contains added beef flavor. The confusion emerged after the chain announced it would be switching from frying with beef tallow to vegetable oil in the '90s. McDonald's was hit with a somewhat unique discrimination lawsuit in 2016 after plaintiff Scott Magee alleged that the chain violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Magee, who is blind, claimed he attempted to order food from a Louisiana McDonald's in 2015, but was ultimately denied service after the lobby had closed. This would mean he would have had to use the drive-thru, and, at the time, the chain prohibited pedestrians from ordering via the lane. The suit alleged that the company did not offer the accessibility needed to serve visually-impaired customers after its lobbies had closed. The federal judge ultimately sided with McDonald's, ruling that the disability itself was not the reason why Magee couldn't use the drive-thru, therefore McDonald's was not in violation of the ADA. Moreover, the judge believed that McDonald's corporate couldn't technically be held responsible, since the three franchises that Magee said were in violation of the ADA operated via corporate franchise agreements. These agreements allow the independent operators to decide how they want to handle late-night business, in compliance with federal laws. 2024 was arguably not a good year for food safety, as evidenced by the infamous McDonald's E. coli outbreak. The October 2024 outbreak was linked to McDonald's Quarter Pounders, specifically the onions added on top of them. By the end of the outbreak, 104 cases of E. coli contamination were reported, with one death and 34 hospitalizations across 14 states. McDonald's and other fast food chains pulled onions from stores following news of the outbreak, but it did not stop the legal firestorm that ensued. A resulting $5 million class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of two plaintiffs who fell ill after eating contaminated sandwiches. This lawsuit was the third of its kind filed following the E. coli outbreak; Two people in Nebraska and Colorado also filed lawsuits against McDonald's. The $5 million class action suit, more specifically, alleged that McDonald's engaged in "fraudulent, unfair, deceptive, misleading, and/or unlawful conduct stemming from its omissions surrounding the risk of E. coli contamination affecting the Products," as reported by NBC News. You would think that McDonald's would have learned its lesson about hot food by now. But the chain faced yet another legal run-in in 2019 when a 4-year-old girl suffered second-degree burns by "unreasonably and dangerously" hot chicken McNuggets inside of her Happy Meal, as reported by NBC6. The girl's family sued both the Florida franchise and McDonald's corporate for the incident and requested upwards of $15 million in damages. Both McDonald's and Upchurch Foods Inc., the franchisee, argued that they were not responsible. But, the jury found both parties failed to put ample warning on the packaging to indicate risk. That said, McDonald's was not found negligent in this case, but the jury awarded the family $800,000 in damages. The HACER scholarship program, launched by McDonald's in 1985, has given more than $33 million to Latinx and Hispanic students since its inception. However, it faced legal challenges in 2025 after the American Alliance for Equal Rights sued the company, alleging that the HACER scholarship violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (which "prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance"). The plaintiffs also argued that the program violates Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race and ethnicity when forming contracts. The "contract" implied is the privacy policy that applicants sign when they fill out the HACER scholarship application. In a statement issued by McDonald's in January 2025, the company said that it plans to "safeguard HACER" going forward. It also announced it would be dropping the criteria for one parent of the applicant to be of Hispanic or Latino origin and would instead require applicants to share their impact and contributions to the Latinx and Hispanic community in the application. Although it settled the lawsuit, McDonald's stated that it "[disagrees] with this claim" and plans to evolve its program going forward so it can continue to meet the needs of scholarship recipients. McDonald's broken ice cream machines have become a running joke, but customers may not have to wait much longer for their local franchise to get its machines up and running again. In October 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office gave the fast food chain the opportunity to work around digital locks on its ice cream machine, which previously meant that only the original manufacturer could fix them. The Taylor Company -- which has been supplying the machines to McDonald's franchises for over 70 years -- held a copyright on its machines under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which essentially prevents tampering or the circumventing of control access on copyrighted technologies, including those pesky McFlurry machines. The case also established an exemption to the act for retail-scale commercial food businesses going forward. However, there are still barriers to companies bypassing this technology. For one, it's illegal to sell digital lockpicks that would allow others to repair the machines independently. The COVID-19 pandemic changed a lot of the ways that food service outlets operate, and one decision at an Oakland McDonald's sparked new controversy for the fast food chain. Workers at one franchise filed a public nuisance lawsuit in spring 2020 after they were told by their managers to wear doggy diapers and coffee filters as masks. The chain also allegedly did not comply with social distancing requirements, and managers did not perform proper temperature checks on employees before they started work. A total of 25 workers and their family members contracted COVID-19, and the managers' actions led to a 33-day strike -- one of the longest in McDonald's history. As part of the settlement, the Oakland franchise was required to follow worker safety guidelines and establish a worker safety committee. McDonald's corporate was not a defendant in the case and, in a statement issued to SF Gate, said that the conduct that occurred at the Oakland franchise was not reflective of pandemic-era procedures required at other locations. No breakfast at McDonald's is complete without orange juice -- but you may not know you're paying extra for it. That's the claim in a class action lawsuit filed against the fast food giant in 2023 in California. The plaintiffs argued that McDonald's did not adequately disclose the orange juice up-charge on its breakfast menus. The lawsuit suggested that McDonald's uses deceptive advertising on its menu boards by suggesting the OJ is included, without any asterisk or notation to indicate the charge. The plaintiffs on the case claimed that they only found out about the charge after they had purchased their meal, and one plaintiff claimed she would not have ordered the beverage if she'd known about the additional charge. The lawsuit also allegeed that employees were not trained to inform patrons about the charge before they ordered their meal. Your morning cup of coffee is supposed to be the pick-me-up that helps you get through your day. But for one customer, it turned into nothing short of a nightmare. A woman who visited a Dothan, Alabama McDonald's in 2020 alleged that her caramel macchiato was tainted with chemicals that workers were using to clean the machine. She reported that her mouth went numb when she sipped the coffee, which she claims caused permanent scarring in her throat and may require corrective surgery. The woman said that she asked for help, but that the drive-thru employees slammed the window in her face and would not disclose what chemicals they had used to clean the machine -- nor did they call for emergency assistance. The woman sued McDonald's corporate, the Alabama branch of the chain, and the owner-operators of the Dothan franchise for a whopping $13 million total in damages. The case was eventually dismissed by a judge following mediation and a motion to dismiss from both sides. Read the original article on Chowhound.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Yes, George Clooney Has Seen The Pitt — Here's What the ER Vet Had to Say About Noah Wyle's New Medical Show
TV's erstwhile Dr. Ross speaks highly of Dr. Robby: During an appearance on Monday's Late Night With Seth Meyers, George Clooney sang ER co-star Noah Wyle's praises, marveling at his performance in the Max medical drama The Pitt. 'Have you guys seen that show?' Clooney asked Meyers' audience. 'It's so good, and I have to say: We've been really dear friends since [ER] — since we did the pilot of the show. He is just the most honorable, talented young man, [which] I get to say because I'm an old man, and I cannot be happier for his success on the show. The show is just a beautiful show, and he does just a great job with it.' More from TVLine The Pitt's Noah Wyle & Co. Talk Taking Robby to the Very Edge in Finale and 'Getting Mentally Healthy' in Season 2 The Pitt Season 2 Premise, Time Jump and Premiere Month Confirmed — Plus, Who Is (and Is Not) Returning Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale Trailer Offers First Glimpse at Maggie Smith Tribute - Watch Clooney's recognition followed an anecdote about his days as hotshot County General doc Doug Ross, and how often he struggled with some of the medical jargon. 'We used to do these things called oners,' he recalled. 'You've got to get 12 pages of dialogue out and nobody can screw up, or you have to start all over again. I'm at the very end of the oner, at Page 12, and I have one line — supraventricular tachyarrhythmia — and I'm telling you, I never got it! Literally! We did, like, 40 takes, and the rest of the cast is, like, 'Are you f–king kidding me?'' When Meyers pointed out that Wyle is once again faced with difficult doctor terminology, Clooney noted that Wyle 'never had trouble' on ER. 'He always could do it, and I hated him for that,' the Tony nominee deadpanned. Clooney and Wyle recently reunited with fellow ER castmates Anthony Edwards and Julianna Margulies at the April premiere of Clooney's Broadway show, Good Night, and Good Luck, which is up for five Tonys this weekend. CNN is set to broadcast the penultimate performance on Saturday, June 7. The Pitt, meanwhile, took home the Gotham Award for Breakthrough Drama Series on Monday. The streaming hit was previously renewed for Season 2, which is set to premiere in January 2026. The Pitt Season 2: Everything We Know View List Wyle recently visited TVLine's New York City studio and marked the 25th anniversary of an unforgettable ER episode — Season 6's 'Be Still My Heart,' which culminated in the gruesome stabbings of both Dr. Carter and med student Lucy Knight. You can watch that interview below: Best of TVLine 'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?) The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More