logo
8,000-pound sloths once roamed North America. Where'd they go?

8,000-pound sloths once roamed North America. Where'd they go?

Yahoo23-05-2025

Giant sloths used to roam all over North America. Over 10 times bigger than today's sloths, many lived on the ground instead of in the trees and their closest living relatives are actually armadillos and anteaters. The largest of these ancient animals were those in the genus Megatherium–roughly the size of a modern Asian bull elephant and weighed about 8,000 pounds.
But how did they grow so large–and why did they shrink down? A new analysis of over 400 fossils found that these sloths evolved three times and that climate changes and increased pressure by early humans wiped out the enormous mammals. The findings are detailed in a study published May 22 in the journal Science.
In the new study, the team analyzed ancient DNA samples and compared more than 400 fossils from 17 natural history museums to try and figure out how they grew so large.
'They looked like grizzly bears, but five times larger,' said Rachel Narducci, a study co-author and the collection manager of vertebrate paleontology at the Florida Museum of Natural History.
Ground sloths greatly varied in size. The fairly squat and chunky Shasta fed on cacti in the deserts of North America, while the mighty Megatherium could use a long tongue like a giraffe's to rip leaves off of tree tops. Those that developed an affinity for tree climbing much like today's bear-faced slowpokes lived entirely in the tree canopy. Tree-dwelling sloths weighed in at about 14 pounds, compared to 174 pounds for the ground sloths.
It's obvious that life in trees requires a weight limit. Branches break when there is too much weight on them and tree sloths have reportedly survived 100 foot falls. Since even a moderate drop can cause severe damage, it makes evolutionary sense for a body to be as small as possible.
What is less obvious to paleontologists is why ground sloths grew to such enormous sizes in the first place. The size may have been helpful for finding food or avoiding predators. Ground sloths appear to have had an affinity for cave dwelling and their size likely played a role in finding and making shelter. The more moderately sized Shasta ground sloth favored the smaller natural caves embedded into the cliffsides of the Grand Canyon. These little caves were also convenient places to poop. In 1936, paleontologists found a mound of fossilized sloth poop, bat guano, and packrat middens over 20 feet thick in a cave near Lake Mead.
The larger sloths were not just restricted to lives in pre-existing caves. Their claws were among the largest of any known mammal, and they could use them to carve their own caves from rock and earth. Several of the caves that they left behind are still adorned with claw marks along the interior walls.
The scientists combined the data on the shape of fossils with DNA from both living and extinct species to build out a sloth tree of life. It traced sloth lineage all the way back to their origin over 35 million years ago. They then added what decades of research has found about where sloths lived, their diets, and whether they were climbers or walkers.
Since sloth size was a major question, they measured museum fossils to estimate the sloth weight.
'We [the Florida Museum] have the largest collection of North American and Caribbean-island sloths in the world,' said Narducci, who took several measurements of 117 limb bones.
With all of this data in tow, the team imported it into an analysis software and got their answer. Habitat type has primarily influenced size differences among sloths–and climate change by extension.
'Including all of these factors and running them through evolutionary models with multiple different scenarios was a major undertaking that had not been done before,' Narducci said.
[ Related: Our bravest ancestors may have hunted giant sloths. ]
The sloth dynasty coincided with some life-altering changes in Earth's climate. About 20 million years ago, a large rift opened up between present day Washington state and Idaho, south through parts of Oregon and Nevada. Magma boiled out of this hole, leaving a nearly 600,000 cubic mile scab that is still visible in some places along the Columbia River. These rock pillars have a distinct hexagonal shape, which was caused by the way in which the magma hardened and cracked as it cooled.
This volcanic event lasted roughly 750,000 years and aligned with the Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum–a period of global warming. The warming was likely caused by all of the greenhouse gasses emitted by the volcanic eruption.
Sloths responded to this slow-burn chaos by getting smaller. This might be because the warmer temperatures brought increased precipitation, which allowed forests to expand–creating more habitat for the smaller sloths. Additionally, size reduction is a common way for animals to deal with heat stress and has been seen in the fossil record on several different occasions.
For about one million years after the volcanic activity calmed down, the world remained warm. Then, a longstanding pattern of cooling that continued in fits and starts up to the present. The sloths also changed with the temperatures.
The more temperatures dropped, the bigger they grew. They eventually branched out into the Andes mountains, open savannas, deserts, and the forests of North America. One called Thalassocnus lived in the arid strip of land between the Andes and the Pacific and it foraged for food in the ocean.
'They developed adaptations similar to those of manatees,' Narducci said. 'They had dense ribs to help with buoyancy and longer snouts for eating seagrass.'
Ground sloths met the challenges of these diverse environments by bulking up.
'This would've allowed them to conserve energy and water and travel more efficiently across habitats with limited resources,' Narducci said. 'And if you're in an open grassland, you need protection, and being bigger provides some of that. Some ground sloths also had little pebble-like osteoderms embedded in their skin,' Narducci said, in reference to the bony plating that sloths had in common with their armadillo relatives.
The larger bodies helped sloths contend with cooling climates. They reached their greatest stature during the Pleistocene ice ages, shortly before they largely disappeared about 15,000 years ago.
What really led to the giant sloths' demise is still debated, but hunting and pressure by early humans cannot be ruled out. The sloths were not fast or well-defended 15,000 years ago, and would have likely been an easy target for early humans. After all of the ground-dwelling relatives had gone extinct everywhere else, two species of tree sloth in the Caribbean held on until 4,500 years ago.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Humanist Who Designed a Deadly Weapon
The Humanist Who Designed a Deadly Weapon

New York Times

time11 hours ago

  • New York Times

The Humanist Who Designed a Deadly Weapon

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. Once, during an interview, I saw him in action as he described a run of knotty calculations he was doing in his head — the kind of math his peers usually worked out on paper or with computers. That gift was surely one reason that Enrico Fermi, a founder of the nuclear age who mentored him at the University of Chicago, called Richard L. Garwin 'the only true genius I have ever met.' It also played to a popular image of Dr. Garwin as slightly robotic, even computerlike, a thinking machine that happened to have legs. Dr. Garwin died last month at 97, leaving behind a legacy of contradictions. In 1951, at age 23, he designed the first hydrogen bomb, the world's deadliest weapon, a planet shaker that could end civilization. He then devoted his life to counteracting the terror. Over four decades of interviews, chats and social interactions, I learned that the man behind the stereotypes was full of surprises, which I wrote about in a recent article. He had a reputation for being cruel to those he saw as less talented. That may have been true in the prime of his professional life. But in person during his later years, Dr. Garwin came across as a gentle academic, a humanist whose life turned out to be rich in benevolent acts. Years ago, Gene Cittadino, a friend of mine who taught science history at New York University, asked me if Dr. Garwin might be willing to speak to his class. After the talk, Gene and several students took him to lunch and were regaled with stories about the presidents he advised. 'He was soft-spoken, sharp as a tack and funny,' Gene recalled. The whiz, he added, 'treated us with respect,' as if we were his colleagues. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Dehorning of S.African rhinos slashed poaching: study
Dehorning of S.African rhinos slashed poaching: study

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dehorning of S.African rhinos slashed poaching: study

The dehorning of rhinos resulted in a nearly 80-percent reduction in the poaching of the animals during a seven-year study in a major South African conservation area, researchers said Thursday. Sawing off the sought-after horns was also a fraction of the cost of other counter-poaching measures such as deploying rangers or tracking dogs, according to the study published in the journal Science. The study was carried out between 2017 and 2023 in 11 reserves around South Africa's famed Kruger National Park that protect the world's largest rhino population. During this period, some 1,985 rhinos were poached in the reserves in the Greater Kruger area despite $74 million spent mostly on reactive law enforcement measures that netted around 700 poachers, it said. By contrast, dehorning 2,284 rhinos cut poaching by 78 percent at just 1.2 percent of that budget, said the study published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. "Some poaching of dehorned rhinos continued because poachers targeted horn stumps and regrowth, signalling the need for regular dehorning alongside judicious use of law enforcement," the study said. South Africa is home to most of the world's rhinos, including the critically endangered black rhino, and is a hotspot for poaching driven by demand in Asia where the horns are used in traditional medicine. Rhino horn is highly sought after on the black market, where the price by weight rivals that of gold and cocaine. Alongside ivory, the horns are coveted as status symbols or used in traditional medicine for their supposed aphrodisiac properties. "Ongoing socioeconomic inequality incentivises a large pool of vulnerable and motivated people to join, or poach for, criminal syndicates even when the risks are high," the researchers said. Corruption also played a role with gangs receiving insider tips to evade detection and arrest, they said. - Impacts unclear - "Although detecting and arresting poachers is essential, strategies that focus on reducing opportunities for and rewards from poaching may be more effective," the study said. It added, however, that "the effects of dehorning on rhino biology are still unclear, with present research suggesting that dehorning may alter rhino space use but not survival and reproduction." The co-authors of the study are from South Africa's Nelson Mandela University and the University of Cape Town, and various conservation groups including the Wildlife Conservation Network and United Kingdom's Save the Rhino International. South Africa had more than 16,000 rhinos at the end of 2023, mostly white rhinos, according to government data. But at least 34 rhinos were killed each month, the environment minister said in May. In 2024 South African scientists injected radioactive material into live rhino horns to make them easier to detect at border posts in a pioneering project aimed at curbing poaching. The radioactive material would not impact the animal's health or the environment in any way but make it poisonous for human consumption, according to the University of the Witwatersrand's radiation and health physics unit which spearheaded the initiative. Black rhinos are listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as critically endangered. ho/br/rlp

Japan-based company is poised for its moon-landing attempt
Japan-based company is poised for its moon-landing attempt

CNN

timea day ago

  • CNN

Japan-based company is poised for its moon-landing attempt

Update: Date: Title: Ispace's CEO is "very confident" success is on the way Content: Takeshi Hakamada, who founded Ispace in 2010 and serves as the company's CEO, told CNN last month that he is far more optimistic about today's landing attempt than he was going into Ispace's first landing attempt in 2023. 'I'm very confident, more confident than (during) Mission 1,' Hakamada told CNN in May. Hakamada added that he's not a very emotional person, so cold feet and sleepless nights aren't necessarily part of his pre-landing routine. 'I'm not the person emotion so much. I don't feel any peace or joy sometimes — most of the times,' Hakamada, who says he was inspired to puruse an aerospace career by the 'Star Wars' movies, told CNN. 'The importance of this space business is keep going.' Update: Date: Title: Reslience is carrying science — and art Content: Tucked alongside a molecule-splitting science experiment and radiation monitor, Resilience is carrying a couple lighthearted pieces of commemorative art. One includes commemorative coin-sized plates designed by UNESCO and US-based Barrelhand that will 'transport and safeguard 275 distinct languages and cultural treasures on the lunar surface.' Another is from Swedish artist Mikael Genberg, who contributed a miniature red house dubbed the 'Moonhouse.' Genberg has been aiming to put a red house on the lunar surface for more than two decades. 'They wanted to send something to the moon, so there was a good coincidence,' Ispace chief financial officer Jumpei Nozaki told CNN in January, noting that Ispace's European branch in Luxembourg found out about the art piece and worked to put it on the Resilience lander. The pieces may join a slew of other novelties, art pieces and curiosities that have been part of past lunar missions. A Jeff Koons sculpture series called 'Moon Phases,' for example, flew on the Odysseus lunar lander from Houston-based Intuitive Machines last year, becoming the first 'authorized' work of art on the moon. The Moonhouse on board Resilience aims to be an 'expression of humanity's ability to achieve the seemingly unattainable through boundary-crossing thoughts and collaborations and maybe a symbol of humanity's eternal and collective striving; a perspective on existence and (an) eye towards Earth,' according to a web page about the art project. Update: Date: Title: Here's how (another) failed landing attempt could affect Ispace Content: Ispace's roots began in the Google Lunar XPrize, which in the 2010s challenged the private-sector to put robotic landers on the moon for a $20 million grand prize. The compeititon ended in 2018, however, with no winner. 'That was very good program for me to start things here,' Ispace CEO and founder Takeshi Hakamada told CNN in May. 'We survived the Lunar XPrize and and then that created credibility for the next fundraising (effort).' After the competition folded, Ispace kept going, bringing on new investors. And just before its first lunar landing attempt in 2023, the company went public, listing on Tokyo's stock exchange. When Ispace's first landing attempt failed in 2023, crashing to the moon due to a software issue, the company's stock price shed more than half its value. And Ispace could face some significant financial struggles if today's landing attempt is unsuccessful, Ispace chief financial officer Jumpei Nozaki told CNN in January. 'If we do not successfully land on the moon, maybe there are going to be some very strong headwinds against us. It will be reflected to our share price immediately,' Nozaki said. Still, Nozaki added, the company raised money last year around the world, including from one US investor, that should keep the company funded through a third lunar landing attempt. Update: Date: Title: Resilience is aiming to land farther north than other recent missions Content: We're in the midst of renewed space race, with both the public and private sector eager to send robots to further explore the lunar surface. The modern moon dash was largely kicked off by China, which safely landed its first Chang'e spacecraft in 2013 — roughly 40 years after any vehicle, crewed or uncrewed, had soft-landed on the lunar surface. Much of the lunar exploration focus has been on the south pole, as the region is expected to be home to vast stores of water ice that can be converted to drinking water or fuel for rockets. But the vehicles that have made soft landings so far have explored a variety of regions. Update: Date: Title: Soft landing on the moon is still really hard. Here's why Content: All lunar landing attempts — even missions such as this with no humans on board — bring with them an element of risk and awe. Success is far from guaranteed. Overall, more than half of all lunar landing attempts have ended in failure, tough odds for a feat humanity first pulled off nearly 60 years ago. While technology has advanced in the past five decades, the fundamental challenges of landing on the moon remain the same. Here's what Resilience has had to overcome — and what it has yet to face. Update: Date: Title: What went wrong during Ispace's last lunar landing attempt Content: Ispace's first lunar lander, referred to by its model name, Hakuto-R, made a dramatic crash landing on the moon in 2023. When the estimated landing time came and went, and mission controllers had spent about 10 minutes troubleshooting why the lander hadn't sent a signal, it was safe to assume the golf-cart-size vehicle had not made a gentle touchdown, Ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada, told CNN. A NASA satellite later photographed the crash site. Ispace then spent weeks poring over the data, trying to pinpoint what went wrong. 'Almost everything performed perfectly — propulsion system, communication system, and also structure,' Ispace chief financial officer Jumpei Nozaki told CNN in January about the first Hakuto-R mission. 'The issue was the software and the altitude measurement has some issue.' Essentially, Hakuto-R had miscalculated its altitude, and the vehicle ended up running out of fuel before touching down on the surface. This time around, executives are far more confident. A software patch is in place. And mission controllers are hoping to get confirmation of a smooth touchdown within a minute or so after the 3:17 p.m. ET expected landing time. Update: Date: Title: Here's what to expect during today's moon-landing attempt Content: Resilience, a spacecraft built by Tokyo-based Ispace that could redeem the company after a failed moon-landing attempt in 2023, is ready to make its final descent to the lunar surface. Ispace has broken down its mission in to series of 10 goals or anticipated 'successes.' Resilience has already notched through the first eight of those steps. All that's left is the landing sequence and the harrowing moment of touchdown. Here are the key moments to watch out for: • During the touchdown attempt, Ispace will confirm it has started the 'lunar landing sequence' — the final steps the Resilience lander will need to tick through in the moments before the vehicle leaves it circular orbit around the moon and begins its touchdown attempt. • There a several critical phases within the sequence. The vehicle will begin to change its orientation and start the braking process, aiming to slow down Resilience's speed. • Resilience's targeted touchdown time is 3:17 p.m. ET. The lander is aiming for a spot within Mare Frigoris — or the 'Sea of Cold' — which lies in the moon's far northern reaches. • If all goes according to plan, Ispace should confirm the vehicle is safely on the surface within a minute or so after touchdown, the company's CEO, Takeshi Hakamada, told CNN. • Ground controllers will then conduct a series of health checks to make sure the lander, its science instruments and all other components are functioning as intended. • The first image from the lander is expected within the first 12 hours after the spacecraft reaches the surface, perhaps sooner. (Take note: Every lunar landing mission has to deal with limited bandwidth to beam data back to Earth. Sometimes, visuals are not the highest priority.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store