Hair-raising video captures massive snake slithering near busy boat ramp: 'It's taking itself on quite the adventure'
Australia is well-known for its wild animals, but locals were stunned by the appearance of one particular snake on the loose near Sydney.
Local station 9 News Sydney shared a video showing a large red-tailed boa constrictor near a boat launch in the Sylvania area.
"These snakes are native to Brazil," the reporter shared. "So the assumption is this was someone's pet, it's gotten loose, and now it's taking itself on quite the adventure."
The news report added that the species isn't known to be aggressive and is actually considered "quite docile." But its constricting abilities can be dangerous, and people were warned to keep their distance and contact authorities if they spot the creature.
As the coverage from 9 News mentioned, the boa constrictor poses a threat to Australia's biosecurity. It is also illegal to own the animal as a pet in the country as a matter of protecting native species and local ecosystems, ABC News Australia explained.
The Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry has also described the economic significance of maintaining biosecurity — a term that generally refers to policies and procedures intended to safeguard humans, animals, food, agriculture, and the environment from potential biological dangers.
"Our biosecurity system protects agriculture, forestry and fisheries export industries worth $51 billion; a tourism sector worth $50 billion; environmental assets worth more than $5.7 trillion; and more than 1.6 million jobs," the DAFF explains. The department also notes that maintaining a healthy environment allows for better protection of the culture "of our wider community and First Nations people."
The red-tailed boa constrictor in this case posed the risk of becoming an invasive predator and throwing the local ecosystem out of balance. It also posed the risk of bringing illness, such as the fatal inclusion body disease, to native snake populations, according to ABC News Australia.
A few days after the snake was first spotted, ABC News Australia reported that it was successfully captured by Shire Snake Wranglers, a company licensed to handle snakes.
More broadly, Australia has the country's Biosecurity Act 2015 to help back efforts to protect both native and non-native species from potentially harmful situations.
Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species?
Definitely
Depends on the animal
No way
Just let people do it for free
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Meanwhile, last year, a joint initiative from DAFF and CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, launched the Catalysing Australia's Biodiversity project to invest $55 million over six years in continuing to innovate biosecurity measures. This came on top of the $1 billion already committed to the cause.
In addition to formal efforts to prevent animal trafficking and the spread of invasive species, awareness campaigns to educate the public about the many hazards of selling and buying animals outside the law may be helpful in supporting a culture shift away from owning exotic but illegal pets — including those with the potential to escape into local habitats.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
$7 Million Flowing to BC Communities for Watershed Security Projects
VANCOUVER, BC and Xʷməθkwəy̓əm (Musqueam), Skwxwú7mesh (Squamish), and Səlilwətaɬ (Tsleil-Waututh) Nations, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - The Watershed Security Fund (WSF or 'the Fund'), a partnership between the First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC), the First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) and the Real Estate Foundation of BC (REFBC), is thrilled to announce the recipients of the second round of funding under the WSF Grants Program. Just under $7 million is being distributed to 28 recipients across British Columbia. At a time when communities are working hard to respond to climate, economic and cultural pressures, this critical resourcing is a positive step forward. A granting budget of $3-5 million is generated annually from interest earned on the initial $100 million endowment from the Province. In 2024/25, the WSF was able to hold a second grants intake, supplemented by a $7 million contribution from the Real Estate Foundation of BC. This second wave of funding builds on the success of the program's inaugural intake of 26 projects in 2024, continuing to support initiatives that prioritize the health of waterways, center First Nations rights and knowledge, and foster enduring relationships grounded in reciprocity and respect. Watershed security is a shared responsibility, requiring everyone within the watershed to actively contribute to its care and preservation. In its second application intake, the program received 161 applications, totalling over $41 million in funding requests—demonstrating both the immense need for funds and the deep commitment of communities to care for water and the natural world. "These projects demonstrate a strong commitment to watersheds and building lasting partnerships within community. The large number of First Nation-led and First Nation-partnered applications highlight the importance of First Nations' Rights and Title when doing work on watersheds. Protecting watersheds is no one person's responsibility, we all have a mutual reliance on water that will continue to drive this work forward." — Lydia Hwitsum, Co-Commissioner, First Nations Water Caucus The 28 recipients of the second intake include First Nation and non-First Nations organizations and partners working in territories and communities across BC. Project examples include: McLeod Lake Indian Band, in partnership with Saulteau First Nations and West Moberly First Nations, are receiving $400,000 to protect and restore the Kinosew Sîpîy/Whutone Gah Saghé, Murray River Watershed by implementing the actions in the 2024 Watershed Health Assessment and upcoming 2025 Water Quality Objectives established through government policy. We wanted to address an important question through this project: "Can we drink the water, can we eat the fish, would I be honoured to make tea for our Elders with these waters?' The WSF grant allows our Nations and local communities to advance critical collaborative work and studies to protect and recover this heavily impacted watershed. We look forward to continuing to work with all levels of government on this important project."—Nathan Prince, Traditional Land Use Coordinator, McLeod Lake Indian Band Raincoast Conservation Foundation, in partnership with Scw'exmx Tribal Council and Citxw Nlaka'pamux Assembly, are receiving $107,500 to continue mapping and assessing cold water shelter areas in the Coldwater River to support salmon recovery and climate adaptation. Lake Babine Nation is receiving $50,000 to enhance climate resiliency across the Lake Babine watershed through the development of a paired-watershed study that assesses feasible restoration sites for sockeye-bearing streams using beaver dam analogs (BDAs)."By using beaver dam analogs to build resilient salmon habitats in the face of industrial logging and a changing climate, we ensure that Lake Babine Nation members can rely on salmon into the future." — Lake Babine Nation Fisheries Team Amid tariffs and economic instability, many of these projects provide good jobs and nature-based solutions rooted in collaboration and focused on long-term resiliency goals. B.C.'s watersheds are the lifeblood of this province, and I thank every one of the 28 recipients for doing their part to help ensure safe, clean water is available to communities throughout B.C. for generations. Every watershed is unique in its characteristics, needs of the ecosystem, and the people it supports, so I'm thankful that we will see so much of First Nations' expertise and local knowledge go into these projects. This second grant intake creates another amazing path forward in taking action for watershed security, and we hope it will inspire others to contribute to the Fund's growth to support this important work."—Hon. Randene Neill, B.C. Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship Our mutual reliance on water drives the need for collaboration to support enduring funding streams. Through shared leadership and strategic investments, the interim partners aspire to continue growing the Fund through crown governments, industry and philanthropic contributions to generate enduring and predictable funding. A third round of funding is anticipated for October 2025. For more information about the Watershed Security Fund and the list of Intake 2 Grant Recipients, please visit Media Contact: Alieska Robles, Communications Manager, Real Estate Foundation of BC alieska@ Madison Rattai, Habitat and Environmental Protections Manager, First Nations Fisheries Council of BC madison@ About the Watershed Security Fund On March 6, 2023, the Province of British Columbia and the B.C.-First Nations Water Table jointly announced an initial $100-million investment from the Province of BC to establish the creation of an independent Watershed Security Fund (WSF or 'the Fund'). Grants for watershed security projects are provided from the interest earned on the fund. The initial $100-million contribution will generate a $3-5 million annual baseline budget for grants and programs. Interim Governance and Working Towards a Permanent Entity Since the announcement of the initial $100-million endowment to the WSF, the First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC) – with the First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) acting as its secretariat – partnered with the Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia (REFBC) to provide interim Fund stewardship. Together, the interim partners are working to create a permanent entity to oversee, manage and grow the Fund over the long term. The Province of BC acts in an advisory role to the interim Fund. The First Nations Water Caucus (FNWC) is comprised of the First Nation delegates who participate in the joint B.C.-First Nations Water Table (Water Table). The Water Table addresses water and watershed security issues of concern between First Nations in B.C. and the Province through co-development and consensus. FNWC was first convened by FNFC in June 2022 and, since then, has worked with the Province at the Water Table to co-develop a draft Watershed Security Strategy for B.C. The First Nations Fisheries Council (FNFC) is a non-profit society that works to develop a cohesive and united voice among First Nations in B.C. FNFC, as the secretariat to FNWC, implements the goals and priorities of FNWC and carries out the substantive operational work. They are partnering with REFBC as interim stewards of the Fund and supporting the co-development process. The Real Estate Foundation of BC (REFBC) is a philanthropic organization working to advance sustainable, equitable, and socially-just land use across what is known as B.C. For many years, REFBC has been proud to work with First Nations, local governments, the Province and a broad network of partners to advance watershed security through its grants, research and convening, and as host of the Healthy Watersheds Initiative. SOURCE Watershed Security Fund View original content to download multimedia:
Hamilton Spectator
21 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Northern Lights College honours Indigenous students with graduation ceremony
FORT ST. JOHN, B.C. — For one convocation ceremony in Fort St. John, colonialism was replaced with pan-Indigenous culture. Caps and gowns were replaced with Métis sashes and commemorative feather carvings, as Northern Lights College (NLC) honoured its First Nations and Métis students with a graduation celebration and dinner at the Fort St. John Curling Club. It was a special moment for graduate Destiny Laprete. Laprete completed the Adult Dogwood, the B.C. certification for high school equivalency. A member of Enoch Cree Nation, Laprete was the valedictorian of her class at NLC's Dawson Creek campus. 'I got to participate in a lot of Indigenous cultural events throughout the year. I think [it] really made me get back in touch with myself and my family,' Laprete said. 'It was the first time that I've ever been in school and actually been honoured and given the chance to embrace who I am.' Honourees from as many as 13 First Nations were among the graduates, including some from Doig River First Nation (DRFN), the Métis Nation, the Enoch Cree Nation and the Tahltan First Nation. Michael Calvert, the director of Indigenous education at NLC, conceived the event and felt the celebration was a great success. 'When we talk about graduation, we always think about convocation,' said Calvert. 'It's very colonized, very formal. 'It's important for Indigenous people to be able to celebrate in a way that is about their culture, their identity and their lived experiences, and this is the opportunity for them to do that.' Calvert said a big part of the success in the event came from Karen Tom. Tom is the Indigenous project facilitator for NLC. Tom said watching the event unfold as it did 'brings pride back' to First Nations culture, adding it makes Indigenous students 'stand a little taller.' 'It's a great honour that we could come together and do this,' said Tom. 'You feel the strength of each other and just honour our ancestors by doing this.' An opening prayer from Doig River First Nation Elder Gerry Attachie and a performance from DRFN drummers began the evening. After dinner, additional performances included powwow dancing from School District 60 Indigenous education students, along with drummers from Kehewin Cree Nation and dancers from Driftpile Cree Nation of Northern Alberta. The night was topped off by a performance from Penny Goulet, a fiddler who played several numbers. Several graduates were also awarded scholarships through Peace Country Petroleum, a two-year commitment from the company for $25,000 towards Indigenous students. The NLC Indigenous graduation ceremony took place on Thursday, June 5th. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why some refuse to evacuate during wildfires — and how understanding those choices can improve disaster plans
As out-of-control wildfires threaten communities across central and Western Canada, thousands of people have been forced out of their homes across Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta — but even in the face of mandatory evacuation orders and potential danger, some people may not go willingly, or at all. It's a story that's played out in Pimicikamak Cree Nation in northern Manitoba, where Chief David Monias recently voiced frustration with residents who refused to leave, despite a May 28 mandatory evacuation order spurred by a fire near the community. Monias initially said he planned to use police to round those people up and force them out. But later in the week, he said authorities had been able to convince holdouts in Pimicikamak — including an elderly man who didn't believe he'd survive if he left the community, and a family with young kids who thought they'd have the option to drive out later, Monias said — to leave voluntarily. Some underestimated the size of the fire. Others feared leaving their community for a bigger city, where they would "basically be homeless" and worried about how they would be treated. And for some, Monias said, being forced out of their community may have reminded them of past traumas inflicted on First Nations people, like the Sixties Scoop and residential schools. "Everybody wants to stay home. And I understand that," Monias said. "It took a while for people to catch on [that] this is real, and that it could endanger their lives." As of late last week, more than 18,000 wildfire evacuees had registered with the Canadian Red Cross in Manitoba, while officials in Saskatchewan estimated 15,000 were forced from their homes in that province. While it may seem counterintuitive to stay in an active wildfire zone when evacuation has been ordered, experts say that kind of refusal isn't unheard of in disasters. "There are often rational thoughts behind the reasons why persons do not evacuate, and those decisions go beyond mere recklessness or decisions not to obey orders," said Jack Rozdilsky, a professor of disaster and emergency management at York University in Toronto. Experts say if authorities take the time to understand why people choose to potentially put themselves in harm's way instead of evacuating, it could also help improve future evacuation planning and policy. Why do some people refuse to evacuate? Sometimes, those reasons are strictly practical — for example, not having a car to get out of their homes, or facing roads to safety that are congested and don't seem safe themselves, said Tara McGee, a professor at the University of Alberta whose research has included wildfire evacuations. People may also be reluctant to leave pets uncared for, or leave their homes unprotected from fire — especially if they have firefighting experience — and the perceived risk of break-ins. For people from small, remote communities who have never left before, or those who have had traumatic experiences with previous evacuations, the prospect of leaving can also be stressful enough that they decide against it, McGee said. The cost of evacuation and barriers for people with disabilities, especially if in-home care is needed, can also make people hesitant to leave their homes for an uncertain immediate future, Rozdilsky said. And if people didn't get enough notice to pack adequately before evacuating, or don't get enough timely information about what's happening on the ground while they're away from home, they may go back even before it's safe, McGee said. But reasons for not evacuating can also have more to do with how serious people believe the risk is — and the disconnect between the danger seen by authorities — who understand how quickly wildfire can spread in dry, windy conditions — and residents who think the danger has been overblown and take a "wait-and-see" approach, believing others will protect them even in extreme circumstances. "They don't necessarily see the danger in front of them," Rozdilsky said. "Wildfires are unique and dynamic situations, and there have been circumstances right now in Manitoba where mandatory evacuation orders are issued for locales and jurisdictions where the fire is not necessarily approaching one's front yard." That can be especially true for people who have survived previous disasters without evacuating, and feel what Rozdilsky calls a "tragic overconfidence" they can do it again. More deep-seated issues can also play a role, like for people whose families have lived on the land they're on for generations and feel a responsibility to care for it, or those who have trust issues with authority — especially in cases where there have been past false alarms, said Jeffrey Pellegrino, a professor of emergency management and homeland security in the school of disaster science and emergency services at the University of Akron in Ohio. What can authorities do when people won't leave? Depending on the wording of a particular evacuation order, authorities may technically be allowed to force out or fine people who refuse to leave during an emergency, Rozdilsky said — but given the amount of work and the lack of resources typically present in those situations, experts say they'd hesitate to take such a drastic step. "We're always going to be in a bad position if we force people to do something," Pellegrino said. "We need their assistance, because in a disaster we have limited resources, and we ultimately put people at risk to go in and … move people by force." Instead, Rozdilsky said authorities may take a different approach, like going door-to-door to take one last crack at convincing the holdouts of the danger they face, before asking them to take steps like filling out a next-of-kin form, providing dental records or writing their social insurance number in permanent marker on their arm, to make identifying their body easier if they die. "Those are actions which illustrate the seriousness of the risk and serve a purpose — often to scare people who have refused to evacuate, to try to make the risk real," Rozdilsky said. "These are extreme examples, but at the same time, with the extent and magnitude of these out-of-control wildfires, authorities sometimes are forced to act, to do everything possible to convince people to remove themselves." And if people still want to stay back despite the risk to their safety, Rozdilsky said local leaders may ask them to at least take steps to help the firefighting effort, like clearing brush from areas around their home and setting up sprinklers. What can be done differently? While refusals to evacuate can create an immediate issue for local authorities, they can also create an opportunity to improve emergency response plans — if officials take time to understand the reasons behind residents' decisions. "To be able to work with people, you have to understand their context," the U.S.-based Pellegrino said, highlighting the example of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when some people didn't evacuate because their pets weren't allowed in evacuation centres. "Because of that incident so many years ago now … we understand that the value that people put into their pets really, you know, impacts their judgment. "Those pets often bring a point of solace and a point of comfort for people, and so to be able to have them in a safe space, provide food, whatever areas pets need — we're trying to make that happen so that we are sensitive to what people need and value, and ultimately build that trust in us so that we can keep everybody safe." During an emergency like a wildfire, clear and widespread communication that's tailored to give groups the support and information they need in a way that will resonate with them — whether it's people with limited English proficiency or those with disabilities — is key to getting people on board with evacuation, Pellegrino said. But even better is engaging those communities before an emergency like a wildfire strikes — whether that means doing disaster drills, encouraging families to have an evacuation plan in their back pocket that accounts for things like medications and pets, or reminding people to fireproof their homes as much as they can ahead of time, so they feel ready to leave when the time comes. WATCH | This man evacuated his family from the Pimicikamak wildfire: "Emergency managers need to prepare these types of things before, in terms of building relationships and having the resources to put out those messages quickly," Pellegrino said. "That's ultimately going to build trust and more community engagement." Find the latest wildfire information at these sources: Are you an evacuee who needs assistance? Contact Manitoba 211 by calling 211 from anywhere in Manitoba or email 211mb@
