Hair-raising video captures massive snake slithering near busy boat ramp: 'It's taking itself on quite the adventure'
Australia is well-known for its wild animals, but locals were stunned by the appearance of one particular snake on the loose near Sydney.
Local station 9 News Sydney shared a video showing a large red-tailed boa constrictor near a boat launch in the Sylvania area.
"These snakes are native to Brazil," the reporter shared. "So the assumption is this was someone's pet, it's gotten loose, and now it's taking itself on quite the adventure."
The news report added that the species isn't known to be aggressive and is actually considered "quite docile." But its constricting abilities can be dangerous, and people were warned to keep their distance and contact authorities if they spot the creature.
As the coverage from 9 News mentioned, the boa constrictor poses a threat to Australia's biosecurity. It is also illegal to own the animal as a pet in the country as a matter of protecting native species and local ecosystems, ABC News Australia explained.
The Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry has also described the economic significance of maintaining biosecurity — a term that generally refers to policies and procedures intended to safeguard humans, animals, food, agriculture, and the environment from potential biological dangers.
"Our biosecurity system protects agriculture, forestry and fisheries export industries worth $51 billion; a tourism sector worth $50 billion; environmental assets worth more than $5.7 trillion; and more than 1.6 million jobs," the DAFF explains. The department also notes that maintaining a healthy environment allows for better protection of the culture "of our wider community and First Nations people."
The red-tailed boa constrictor in this case posed the risk of becoming an invasive predator and throwing the local ecosystem out of balance. It also posed the risk of bringing illness, such as the fatal inclusion body disease, to native snake populations, according to ABC News Australia.
A few days after the snake was first spotted, ABC News Australia reported that it was successfully captured by Shire Snake Wranglers, a company licensed to handle snakes.
More broadly, Australia has the country's Biosecurity Act 2015 to help back efforts to protect both native and non-native species from potentially harmful situations.
Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species?
Definitely
Depends on the animal
No way
Just let people do it for free
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Meanwhile, last year, a joint initiative from DAFF and CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, launched the Catalysing Australia's Biodiversity project to invest $55 million over six years in continuing to innovate biosecurity measures. This came on top of the $1 billion already committed to the cause.
In addition to formal efforts to prevent animal trafficking and the spread of invasive species, awareness campaigns to educate the public about the many hazards of selling and buying animals outside the law may be helpful in supporting a culture shift away from owning exotic but illegal pets — including those with the potential to escape into local habitats.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why some refuse to evacuate during wildfires — and how understanding those choices can improve disaster plans
As out-of-control wildfires threaten communities across central and Western Canada, thousands of people have been forced out of their homes across Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta — but even in the face of mandatory evacuation orders and potential danger, some people may not go willingly, or at all. It's a story that's played out in Pimicikamak Cree Nation in northern Manitoba, where Chief David Monias recently voiced frustration with residents who refused to leave, despite a May 28 mandatory evacuation order spurred by a fire near the community. Monias initially said he planned to use police to round those people up and force them out. But later in the week, he said authorities had been able to convince holdouts in Pimicikamak — including an elderly man who didn't believe he'd survive if he left the community, and a family with young kids who thought they'd have the option to drive out later, Monias said — to leave voluntarily. Some underestimated the size of the fire. Others feared leaving their community for a bigger city, where they would "basically be homeless" and worried about how they would be treated. And for some, Monias said, being forced out of their community may have reminded them of past traumas inflicted on First Nations people, like the Sixties Scoop and residential schools. "Everybody wants to stay home. And I understand that," Monias said. "It took a while for people to catch on [that] this is real, and that it could endanger their lives." As of late last week, more than 18,000 wildfire evacuees had registered with the Canadian Red Cross in Manitoba, while officials in Saskatchewan estimated 15,000 were forced from their homes in that province. While it may seem counterintuitive to stay in an active wildfire zone when evacuation has been ordered, experts say that kind of refusal isn't unheard of in disasters. "There are often rational thoughts behind the reasons why persons do not evacuate, and those decisions go beyond mere recklessness or decisions not to obey orders," said Jack Rozdilsky, a professor of disaster and emergency management at York University in Toronto. Experts say if authorities take the time to understand why people choose to potentially put themselves in harm's way instead of evacuating, it could also help improve future evacuation planning and policy. Why do some people refuse to evacuate? Sometimes, those reasons are strictly practical — for example, not having a car to get out of their homes, or facing roads to safety that are congested and don't seem safe themselves, said Tara McGee, a professor at the University of Alberta whose research has included wildfire evacuations. People may also be reluctant to leave pets uncared for, or leave their homes unprotected from fire — especially if they have firefighting experience — and the perceived risk of break-ins. For people from small, remote communities who have never left before, or those who have had traumatic experiences with previous evacuations, the prospect of leaving can also be stressful enough that they decide against it, McGee said. The cost of evacuation and barriers for people with disabilities, especially if in-home care is needed, can also make people hesitant to leave their homes for an uncertain immediate future, Rozdilsky said. And if people didn't get enough notice to pack adequately before evacuating, or don't get enough timely information about what's happening on the ground while they're away from home, they may go back even before it's safe, McGee said. But reasons for not evacuating can also have more to do with how serious people believe the risk is — and the disconnect between the danger seen by authorities — who understand how quickly wildfire can spread in dry, windy conditions — and residents who think the danger has been overblown and take a "wait-and-see" approach, believing others will protect them even in extreme circumstances. "They don't necessarily see the danger in front of them," Rozdilsky said. "Wildfires are unique and dynamic situations, and there have been circumstances right now in Manitoba where mandatory evacuation orders are issued for locales and jurisdictions where the fire is not necessarily approaching one's front yard." That can be especially true for people who have survived previous disasters without evacuating, and feel what Rozdilsky calls a "tragic overconfidence" they can do it again. More deep-seated issues can also play a role, like for people whose families have lived on the land they're on for generations and feel a responsibility to care for it, or those who have trust issues with authority — especially in cases where there have been past false alarms, said Jeffrey Pellegrino, a professor of emergency management and homeland security in the school of disaster science and emergency services at the University of Akron in Ohio. What can authorities do when people won't leave? Depending on the wording of a particular evacuation order, authorities may technically be allowed to force out or fine people who refuse to leave during an emergency, Rozdilsky said — but given the amount of work and the lack of resources typically present in those situations, experts say they'd hesitate to take such a drastic step. "We're always going to be in a bad position if we force people to do something," Pellegrino said. "We need their assistance, because in a disaster we have limited resources, and we ultimately put people at risk to go in and … move people by force." Instead, Rozdilsky said authorities may take a different approach, like going door-to-door to take one last crack at convincing the holdouts of the danger they face, before asking them to take steps like filling out a next-of-kin form, providing dental records or writing their social insurance number in permanent marker on their arm, to make identifying their body easier if they die. "Those are actions which illustrate the seriousness of the risk and serve a purpose — often to scare people who have refused to evacuate, to try to make the risk real," Rozdilsky said. "These are extreme examples, but at the same time, with the extent and magnitude of these out-of-control wildfires, authorities sometimes are forced to act, to do everything possible to convince people to remove themselves." And if people still want to stay back despite the risk to their safety, Rozdilsky said local leaders may ask them to at least take steps to help the firefighting effort, like clearing brush from areas around their home and setting up sprinklers. What can be done differently? While refusals to evacuate can create an immediate issue for local authorities, they can also create an opportunity to improve emergency response plans — if officials take time to understand the reasons behind residents' decisions. "To be able to work with people, you have to understand their context," the U.S.-based Pellegrino said, highlighting the example of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when some people didn't evacuate because their pets weren't allowed in evacuation centres. "Because of that incident so many years ago now … we understand that the value that people put into their pets really, you know, impacts their judgment. "Those pets often bring a point of solace and a point of comfort for people, and so to be able to have them in a safe space, provide food, whatever areas pets need — we're trying to make that happen so that we are sensitive to what people need and value, and ultimately build that trust in us so that we can keep everybody safe." During an emergency like a wildfire, clear and widespread communication that's tailored to give groups the support and information they need in a way that will resonate with them — whether it's people with limited English proficiency or those with disabilities — is key to getting people on board with evacuation, Pellegrino said. But even better is engaging those communities before an emergency like a wildfire strikes — whether that means doing disaster drills, encouraging families to have an evacuation plan in their back pocket that accounts for things like medications and pets, or reminding people to fireproof their homes as much as they can ahead of time, so they feel ready to leave when the time comes. WATCH | This man evacuated his family from the Pimicikamak wildfire: "Emergency managers need to prepare these types of things before, in terms of building relationships and having the resources to put out those messages quickly," Pellegrino said. "That's ultimately going to build trust and more community engagement." Find the latest wildfire information at these sources: Are you an evacuee who needs assistance? Contact Manitoba 211 by calling 211 from anywhere in Manitoba or email 211mb@
Hamilton Spectator
4 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Fire safety gets big boost in Kahnawake
Experts sounded the alarm on fire safety at the Kahnawake Fire Brigade (KFB) on Wednesday, kicking off a campaign that will reach at least 16 Indigenous communities, ahead of a giveaway of hundreds of smoke alarms in town. 'Kahnawake by far is probably the tip of the sword when it comes to fire protection,' said interim KFB fire chief Wihse Stacey. 'Communities look up to us. It's not unusual to get calls from Cree communities, from communities out west. Generally, we tend to lead the way. Having Kidde on board when it comes to fire safety, it's huge.' Kidde, a century-old brand specializing in fire safety projects, has teamed up with the likes of the National Indigenous Fire Safety Council and Firefighters Without Borders for its Cause for Alarm campaign, which will see 6,000 fire alarms donated to First Nations. 'We can't underscore how important this initiative is for this community and to all First Nations communities who struggle to maintain fire departments across the country,' said Mohawk Council of Kahnawake chief David Diabo, who attended to show Council's support for the initiative. He implored Kahnawa'kehró:non to sign up to receive a smoke detector, which will be distributed by the fire brigade pending an announcement on how they will be given out. 'It's so important because fire safety is all about being prepared, and everyone's at risk for fires in their homes, but some communities have higher rates of house fires,' said Ivanette Bonilla, chief communications and government relations officer for Kidde, who noted Indigenous communities suffer around 20 percent of fire-related deaths despite making up about five percent of the country's population. 'It's critically important that we reach these communities, not only with the alarms, but also with the education on how to keep the alarm,' she said, noting the importance of testing it monthly, changing it every 10 years, and of households having an evacuation plan, which is crucial when seconds count. The alarms provided by Kidde have 25 percent faster detection, Bonilla said, and are designed to avoid nuisance alarms that often prompt people to disable the devices. 'If you're cooking a hamburger at home, it won't trigger the alarm,' Bonilla said. A total of 504 alarms were donated to Kahnawake. Stacey presented the donation as an opportunity for community members to ensure early fire detection without having to dig into their own pockets. 'As a fire inspector, it's hard for me to go into these houses and tell them what to do, to tell them they have to spend money on fire safety,' said Stacey. 'How do I justify them spending money? They might be struggling to put food on the table but here I am walking in saying you have to buy this, you have to buy that.' The donation changes that equation, which is crucial considering the role the devices can play in the security of the community. 'Early detection saves lives, plain and simple,' he said, noting that anyone who has seen a video of a house fire on YouTube will know how fast fires can consume homes. Like Bonilla, Stacey urged community members to ensure their smoke alarms are functioning, with the fire brigade often seeing alarms installed that should have been out of commission long ago. 'That's actually one of the biggest problems that we face,' he said. 'If I walk into a house, there's a good chance I'm going to find one that could be 20 or even 30 years old. They have that funny yellow colour that looks like somebody's been smoking in there for years, and it's obvious to me without even having to look at it that it's long since expired, and that's the problem.' The last time the fire brigade distributed smoke detectors, there was a line up down the road before the giveaway even opened, he said, showing the level of interest and need in the community. Kahnawake elder Otsitsaken:ra Charlie Patton opened the event at the fire brigade, during which he recalled the Kahnawake of his childhood. 'I remember they had an old pumper truck that maybe started one day and didn't start the next day, and maybe it only ran because people pushed it up a hill,' he said. Oftentimes, he said, wells would go dry before a fire had been extinguished, and despite community members coming together, homes would be lost. 'Now look at where we are, the beautiful equipment that we have,' he said. 'This didn't just happen because somebody flicked a switch. It happened because people had foresight, people had a dream, people did the legwork and rolled up their sleeves and found ways to make the community better.' This is the context in which he put the smoke alarm donation. 'I'm sure it will save a lot of lives,' he said. marcus@ Marcus Bankuti, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Hamilton Spectator
5 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Prince Rupert breaks ground for new childcare centre for Indigenous families
This May, the Kxeen Community Services Society officially broke ground to build a culturally-focused childcare facility for Rupert's Indigenous, Inuit, and Métis children. The new building will be situated in front of Roosevelt Park Elementary School and will provide 37 childcare spaces, including 12 for infants and toddlers and 25 for children aged three to five. The project is expected to be completed by 2026. The Kxeen Society is offering the initiative through the Aboriginal Head Start Association of British Columbia (AHSABC). AHSABC is a non-profit organization that provides programs in urban and northern British Columbia communities. They focus on promoting the development of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis children and their families during early years of learning. 'The childcare facility will be styled after our natural coastal environment. The Infant and Toddler side of the facility will be ocean-themed, while the 3-5 years side will be rainforest-themed,' said Miranda Kessler, executive director of the Kxeen Community Services Society. 'Play equipment and outside structures will be nature-themed.' The society will take special care in providing culturally appropriate programming to the attendees. 'Elders, Knowledge Keepers, and the staff of Early Childhood Educators at the facility will focus on immersing children in the local Ts'msyen culture and language, however, practices of other Indigenous, Inuit, and Métis cultures will also be taught and celebrated,' said Kessler. 'This new facility not only expands child care capacity in Prince Rupert, but also strengthens the cultural and social fabric of our city by honouring Indigenous traditions and supporting early childhood development in meaningful ways,' said Prince Rupert's mayor Herb Pond. Kessler says the centre will welcome families to participate in all cultural activities and events to encourage the practice of culture outside of the daycare. The program will also align with the society's already established Prince Rupert Aboriginal Head Start Preschool guidelines and will come at no cost to families. The current school provides a learning space for children aged between 2.5 to 5 years. The program enhances the children's Kindergarten Readiness skills while honouring their cultural knowledge and heritage. 'Aboriginal Head Start continues its legacy of empowering young learners and supporting families with holistic, community-based programming by creating a nurturing space that celebrates language, culture, and identity,' said the City of Prince Rupert in a recent press release. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
