Politicians delay debate on Manx Care mandate and operating plan
A bid to have a general debate on the mandate given to the Isle of Man's health service for the year ahead has been rejected by politicians.Members of Tynwald have instead opted to discuss the document and Manx Care's operating plan in April, when separate motion will allow for a vote on the issue. Chief Minister Alfred Cannan argued the general debate would have covered key challenges in ensuring care was given "in the right way for the money that is available".But former health minister Lawrie Hooper said the mandate represented "a sizable shift away from what we are used to seeing" and members should be allowed to vote on it.
Manx Care recently published its aims for the next financial year, in response to the annual document from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC).In its operating plan the health care provider outlined how it aimed to stay within its £361.8m budget, with a focus on reducing pressure at Noble's Hospital using measures such as reducing hospital bed capacity and increasing private collaboration.But concerns have been raised by the Isle of Man Medical Society and cancer charities about possible reductions in some services.
'Opportunity missed'
During the March sitting Tynwald a bid by Health Minister Claire Christian to have standing orders suspended to allow the general debate to take place was unsuccessful.A general debate allows politicians to discuss an issue without voting on any resolution at the end.Christian said it would have been an opportunity to a debate the issues ahead of the operational year, which begins on 1 April and to "hear the voice of your people" through members' contributions.Encouraging politicians to back the move, Cannan told members it would allow for a "calm, sensible debate on behalf of constituents" on the key challenges facing the island's health service.Not going ahead would be "huge opportunity missed", he said.But Hooper said the new mandate represented "a massive change to the way services are delivered", and he had already tabled a motion for the April sitting that would give members the chance to vote on the document.In it he argues that the mandate and operating plan were "inadequate" and represented an "unacceptable reduction in services" for residents.He has also called for the DHSC to produce updated versions of the documents.The suspension of standing orders required 16 votes in the House of Keys, but only 14 members supported the move so the general debate did not take place.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
43 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
I always lose my erection when I'm with my girlfriend because she reminds me of my late mother – it feels like incest
The thought that my interest in her is some sort of weird incest thing makes me feel sick DEAR DEIDRE I always lose my erection when I'm with my girlfriend because she reminds me of my late mother – it feels like incest DEAR DEIDRE: SEX with my girlfriend is a flop – and I'm worried it's because she reminds me of my late mother. She's not my normal type at all, but I love being around her. Advertisement It's just whenever we try to have sex, I lose my erection. I'm 57 and have been divorced for four years. A few months ago, I decided to try dating again. I quickly met my now girlfriend, 48, on a dating site. I generally like petite, dark women, and she's tall and curvy with blonde hair, just like my mother was. That did unsettle me a little, but I brushed the thought away. Advertisement Her personality instantly attracted me. She is so warm, kind and funny, and she has a successful career. We had lots of interests in common too. When we met up, I realised I had developed strong feelings for her. Being around her felt comfortable and easy. We had lots of kisses and cuddles, and held hands in the street. So, the first time we went to bed together, I wasn't worried. But, within a couple of minutes, I lost my erection — and whatever we tried, I couldn't get it back. Advertisement Dear Deidre: Understanding why your man's gone off sex This has never happened before. I've tried to reassure her that I do find her attractive, but it's starting to affect our relationship, and I'm now questioning whether the problem is her resemblance to my mother. The thought that my interest in her is some sort of weird incest thing makes me feel sick. Of course, I haven't mentioned this subject to her. Please help before she leaves me. Advertisement DEIDRE SAYS: Being attracted to someone who looks like your mother isn't uncommon, and doesn't mean you ever wanted an incestuous relationship. Perhaps you're so comfortable around this woman because she feels familiar. But now you've focused on this, it has understandably become a turn-off. And, like any psychological problem affecting sex, the more you worry, the more your erection problem happens. Then again, you're now 57, so it's possible there's a physical reason behind your inability to sustain arousal. See your GP to rule out any health problems. My support pack, Erection Issues, has more information about this. Advertisement Sometimes, taking sex off the table for a while helps arousal to come back naturally. And the better you get to know your girlfriend, the less like your mum she will seem. Get in touch with Deidre Every problem gets a personal reply, usually within 24 hours weekdays. Send an email to deardeidre@ You can also send a private message on the DearDeidreOfficial Facebook page. FAMILY LEFT ON THE BRINK OVER VIOLENT YOUNGER SIS DEAR DEIDRE: MY younger sister is spiralling out of control, it's destroying our family. She's become increasingly violent and, the other day, when we had a row, she punched me in the face, leaving me with a black eye. I'm scared she's going to seriously hurt someone – or herself. She's 26 and I'm her 29-year-old big brother. She's had behavioural problems since she was a teenager and has dabbled with drugs and alcohol too. Yesterday, our dad tried to talk to her, and she threatened to jump out of the window, just to get attention. Advertisement Our parents are at a loss as to how to deal with her. They are distraught and I can see it's taking a toll on their health. I know she needs professional help – maybe even to be sectioned – but I don't know where to start. DEIDRE SAYS: Few people realise how much someone's mental health struggles impact the whole family. You're right to be concerned and it does sound like your sister needs specialist help. You and your parents also need support. Advertisement Contact Rethink Mental Illness ( which helps people with mental health problems, and their loved ones. It has a Siblings Network. If she's in denial, you could also try talking to your sister's GP. Tell them you're worried she's a danger to herself and others. BLOKE'S PLAYING WITH MY FEELINGS DEAR DEIDRE: I KNOW I should leave my on-off boyfriend, but every time I break up with him, he love bombs me until I take him back. I don't feel like he's really there for me and whenever he lets me down, I end up turning to drink. We've been in a relationship for five years and are both in our mid-30s. When we first started seeing each other, he was the perfect boyfriend – making me feel I was special. Then he disappeared. I was just starting to get over him, when he came back and started up with the love bombing again. Since then, we've been in this constant pattern. Our relationship is always conducted on his terms. It's making me feel so confused and I have no idea how he really feels about me. But I still love him. DEIDRE SAYS: This relationship doesn't sound healthy for you. Love bombing someone isn't the same as loving them – it's manipulation. He seems incapable of committing to a proper relationship, and after five years, things are highly unlikely to change. You deserve better. Read my support pack, Addictive Love, for more advice on how to deal with this type of relationship. Counselling could help. Perhaps it's time to take control and walk away from him for good. FEEL GUILTY FOR JAILING VILE EX DEAR DEIDRE: WHEN my abusive ex was sent to jail for his violent behaviour, I thought I'd finally feel safe and happy. But instead, I just feel sorry for him and I'm scared that when he comes out he will convince me to take him back. Advertisement We were together for ten years and have a daughter together. I'm 30 and he's 42. He was physically abusive throughout our relationship and it got worse when I was pregnant. I often felt in danger for my life. For a long time, I was scared to leave. Then I became afraid he'd start on our little girl. I told him I wanted to break up. He said if I left, he'd break both my legs and put me in hospital for months, so I couldn't look after her. I went to the police and got a non-molestation order. But he broke it. As he had previous convictions, he ended up being sent down for three years. Advertisement I can't move on. I keep thinking about him, feeling guilty that he's in jail because of me. I still love him and worry he might manipulate me into giving him another chance. What can I do to stop feeling like this? DEIDRE SAYS: He's in prison because of his own actions. You protected yourself and your daughter which was the right thing to do and have no reason to feel guilty. But your conflicted feelings are natural. You have a child together, and presumably some happy memories. Try to remind yourself how much he hurt you emotionally and physically. Advertisement Talking to one of the organisations listed in my support pack, Abusive Partner, and having counselling, will help you to work through your feelings and to build your strength so that you're in a stronger place mentally when he comes out. You can also get legal advice from Rights of Women ( 020 7251 6577).
The Courier
5 hours ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: 'Large-scale' investigation launched into Blairgowrie care home after complaint over care of resident
A 'large-scale' investigation has been launched into a Blairgowrie care home after a complaint over the care of a resident. Perth and Kinross care chiefs are probing Muirton House Care Home, which supports elderly people and those with dementia and learning difficulties. It follows a complaint from the family of a resident at the home, 40-year-old Heather Sandilands, who claimed she was not being given the proper care or support. The Care Inspectorate upheld a complaint made about Muirton House, including that Heather – who has Down syndrome and type one diabetes – was given 'inadequate access to meaningful social and recreational activities'. She was eventually moved from the Essendy Road home after eight years. Heather's sister Kirsty Cambridge, who is her welfare guardian, told The Courier that Muirton House seemed a good fit for her when she moved in. Kirsty said: 'She had a fantastic life there, better than I felt I could've provided myself. 'They were always out doing things, non-stop activities. 'I saw on Facebook all the things they were up to – they went to great lengths to make it a family home. 'Then came Covid, and all the activities stopped, and Heather started to have some behavioural issues. 'When lockdown passed, life went back to normal, but there were some staff changes at the home with new management. 'Heather used to spend the money I'd send her for when they were out doing things. 'I noticed she wasn't spending any money, and I could see on the Facebook photos her hair was long – she hates long hair. 'I phoned up to ask, and they told me they didn't have enough staff to take her out to do these things, like going to the hairdresser.' Kirsty claims Heather was being kept occupied by activities like cleaning her room instead of going swimming and out to eat food. 'Her life became like lockdown, and then the behaviour started again,' Kirsty said. 'I felt I had no alternative but to go to the Care Inspectorate.' All four parts of Kirsty's complaint to the Care Inspectorate were upheld. The watchdog found that: The report said: 'Ms Sandilands did not experience care planning reflective of her needs, wishes, choices and stress and distress symptom management.' Kirsty says when she saw the report, she was 'horrified' and it was 'actually worse than I realised'. In April 2025, Heather was given 28 days to leave Muirton House on the grounds it was unable to meet her clinical care needs. She has since been moved into a new care home in Clackmannanshire, closer to her sister. Off the back of concerns raised about the home, Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership has launched a 'large-scale' investigation – a multi-agency probe that takes place when people may be at risk of harm in a care setting. The partnership is made up of representatives from Perth and Kinross Council, NHS Tayside and other agencies. A spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership is undertaking a large-scale inquiry into Muirton House. 'We are working with the provider, residents, other placing local authorities and families, as well as the Care Inspectorate, to ensure that any issues identified are resolved promptly and all residents receive the highest possible standards of care and support.' A spokesperson for Muirton House, which is run by Larchwood Care, said: 'It would not be right for us to discuss publicly any individual and their care needs. 'We are working with the Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership to ensure that the care and support provided is of the required standard. 'The informal feedback has been very positive, and where necessary, changes have been made. 'We are confident in the care and support provided.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
PPE from company linked to Mone did not meet required safety standards, court told
Personal protective equipment supplied by a company linked to the Conservative peer Michelle Mone did not meet required safety standards and 'could seriously harm or kill patients' if used, the UK government has argued in court. Opening a high court trial for the Department of Health and Social Care, Paul Stanley KC said that the company, PPE Medpro, had not complied with technical manufacturing processes to ensure that the 25m surgical gowns it provided were sterile. The DHSC is seeking repayment of the full £122m it paid for the gowns to PPE Medpro, which Mone first recommended to ministers during the Covid pandemic in May 2020. PPE Medpro is defending the claim, arguing that the gowns were manufactured in China to the necessary standard of sterility, and that the DHSC agreed to the process before it awarded the contract. In its claim, the DHSC says that the gowns were marked as sterile and with 'CE', which denotes fulfilment of European technical standards, but did not have the required number after it that shows which approved quality assurance organisation has certified them. Health officials saw this when they first inspected the gowns in the UK in September 2020, and refused to release them for use in the NHS. In his opening submission to the judge, Mrs Justice Cockerill, Stanley referred to a statement made for the case by a DHSC official responsible for quality control of medical products. 'His evidence is categorical; his team would not have considered using the gowns as sterile surgical gowns,' the submission says. 'Without the relevant assurances of conformity that the gowns met sterility requirements, the potential impact on safety was such that they could seriously harm or kill patients and so could not be released for use.' The DHSC awarded the gowns contract, and another contract worth £80.85m to supply face masks, after Mone first approached the then Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove, in May 2020. The contracts were processed via the then Conservative government's 'VIP lane', which gave high priority to companies recommended by people with political connections. Mone, who rose to prominence running her lingerie company, Ultimo, was appointed to the House of Lords by David Cameron in 2015. Mone and her husband, the Isle of Man-based businessman Doug Barrowman, had for years publicly distanced themselves from the company until in November 2023 the couple confirmed their involvementand said that Barrowman was an investor and chair of the PPE Medpro 'consortium'. Setting out how the gowns contract was awarded, the DHSC said in its submission that Mone had 'pressed Medpro's case' with officials. Mone did not attend the hearing, but Barrowman was in the courtroom, sitting with his lawyers. Neither they nor any PPE Medpro employees who were involved in securing the contract, or members of the consortium, are listed to give evidence. Charles Samek KC, representing PPE Medpro, said that the gowns did comply with the required standards for sterility, and that the DHSC had approved the process before they awarded the contract. 'The secretary of state [for health] knew everything there was to know about my client's offer, all cards were on the table face up, and they entered into this contract … with their eyes wide open,' Samek said. The high court action is separate to the investigation by the National Crime Agency into whether Mone and Barrowman committed any criminal offences during the process of procuring the contracts. The couple have denied any criminal wrongdoing. In his submission, Samek said there was a concern that the NCA investigation, which he described as 'long-running and seemingly never-ending', is being conducted at the same time as the DHSC's high court claim 'to exert pressure' on the company and people connected to it. The NCA investigation is 'hanging … like Damocles' sword over PPE Medpro, without ever seemingly being progressed', his submission said. The high court trial is scheduled to last five weeks.
