logo
Food allergies are soaring, and hundreds of moms are fed up with ‘dangerous' jokes about them

Food allergies are soaring, and hundreds of moms are fed up with ‘dangerous' jokes about them

Yahoo21-05-2025

Following a Saturday Night Live skit that mocked people with peanut allergies, suggesting they should just 'take a Benadryl' and shut up, moms of the severely allergic have been speaking out on social media. Such jokes, they say, gaslight people with allergies and contribute to bullying that can turn deadly.
'Satire is so powerful—it can highlight social flaws. But to us, there's blind spot about food allergies to begin with, and this type of joke just magnifies it,' Lianne Mandelbaum, mom to a 19-year-old son with a deadly peanut allergy and founder of the advocacy nonprofit the No Nut Traveler, tells Fortune.
Today, 33 million Americans are living with food allergies—representing one in 10 adults and one in 13 children, according to Food Allergy Research & Education. Of those adults, 51% have experienced a severe reaction, while 42% of the children have, with emergency room visits for such reactions more than doubling between 2008 and 2016. And its prevalence among children has been on the rise for decades—up by 100 percent between 1997 and 2021.
It's why SNL's Instagram post of the skit—featuring recurring character Miss Eggy on a tirade about airplane food, including a complaint about how peanuts are no longer served—has racked up over 2,200 comments, a great many of them sharing personal experiences with allergies and calling out the joke as 'unbelievable,' 'ridiculous,' 'ignorant,' and 'dangerous,' particularly in light of it being National Asthma and Allergy Awareness Month.
NBC did not respond to a request for comment.
Mandelbaum's posts on the joke, featuring a photo of her son holding a sign that says, 'My food allergy is NOT funny,' have racked up more than 300 comments across her social channels. In it, she writes, 'I've seen my child's life almost slip away after a peanut exposure. I've given epinephrine while my hands shook. I've begged strangers for compassion in places where help was far away. This isn't a joke. It never was.'
As one commenter on the SNL post points out, 'Allergies are not a choice, and the fear when you're at 35000 ft on a plane when you have an allergy is real! The more that anaphylaxis is made out to be humorous the more dangerous it is …More compassion is needed!'
A severe allergic reaction, called anaphylaxis, is a serious, rapid-onset reaction to an allergen—be it food, medicine, latex, insect bites, or something else—in which your body's immune system sees something as harmful and reacts, according to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America.
Symptoms may include itching, swelling of the lips or throat, shortness of breath, dizziness, or stomach pain, and can lead to death if not treated promptly with an injection of epinephrine (typically through an Epi-Pen). Further treatment may also be necessary.
Taking an antihistamine like Benadryl, as Miss Eggy suggested in her skit, is not considered a first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, and the idea that Benadryl will stop anaphylaxis is a myth, according to the Allergy & Asthma Network.
In fact, the first thought Mandelbaum had upon hearing the joke was about a 13-year-old girl who died of a peanut allergy reaction back in 2013; she was given Benadryl first, and then epinephrine, but it was too late. After the SNL skit aired, Mandelbaum heard from the girl's mother, who told her, 'I can't believe that myth is still being perpetuated 12 years after she died.'
At least one commenter on Mandelbaum's Facebook post—a mom of kids with serious allergies—could take the joke, and felt it was important to be able to laugh at the situation.
Comedian Judy Gold, author of the book Yes, I Can Say That: When They Come for the Comedians, We Are All in Trouble, agrees. 'We need to laugh now more than ever,' she tells Fortune. 'No comedian, when writing their jokes, is thinking about your personal issues or childhood traumas, they're trying to get a laugh. Do you really think she is saying, 'I want kids to be hurt or die from an allergic reaction'? No. It is a parody. She is doing a character. Ego Nwodim [the actress] has a degree in biology.'
But, notes Mandelbaum, 'This isn't about being simply offended. It's about speaking up when repeated jokes normalize ignorance that can cost lives. If your lived experience with allergies is different, that's valid—but it doesn't negate the very real danger others face every day.'
Such jokes, she says, lead to taunting and bullying in the real world, whether on airplanes or at workplaces or schools—as was the case in Texas last year, when a teen football player's locker was stuffed with peanuts by his teammates, who knew he was deathly allergic (the mom has sued the school district). Years before, teens were charged with purposely exposing a girl to pineapple, knowing she had a severe allergy to the fruit.
One in three kids with food allergies say they've faced bullying because of it, according to a recent study, including by having an allergen waved in their face, thrown at them, or intentionally put in their food.
For airline travelers, even adults, bullying is a constant threat, too. That's according to a 2024 study out of Northwestern's Center for Food Allergy and Asthma Research and published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, which found that 98% of allergic fliers have anxiety on planes because they don't know how they will be treated. And 31% chose to stay silent about their allergy because of fears it would be ill-received.
Jokes like SNL's, maintains Mandelbaum, do not help.
'People have been incredibly kind to my son and looked after him, but other people are just not as fortunate,' she says, 'and we have to stick up for everybody… This is a real-life disability.'
More on parenting:
Modern parenting is hurting kids and adults, 'Anxious Generation' author warns
The 4 basic parenting styles—and what science says about which is best
Clues into Gen Z parenting styles can be found in their approach to these two powerful elements
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze
Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Two top Democrats claimed the Republicans' budget reconciliation bill and its proposal to let enhanced Obamacare credits expire will cause the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced findings that an estimated 51,000 Americans could die each year due to Republican-led changes to the federal healthcare system and the broader reconciliation bill. The national debt — which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors — fell to $36,214,400,664,854.53 as of June 3rd, according to the latest numbers published by the Treasury Department. That is down about $1.4 billion from the figure reported the previous day. Wyden called the "stakes" of the 'big, beautiful bill' debate "truly life and death," as a statement from his office read that "a new analysis estimates that more than 51,000 people will die per year as a direct result of the Republican reconciliation bill, and their refusal to extend Affordable Care Act premium tax credits." "Taking away health insurance and benefits like home care and mental healthcare from seniors, people with disabilities, kids, and working families will be deadly," Wyden said. "This analysis shows the dire consequences of moving ahead with this morally bankrupt effort," he said, referring to a study he and Sanders asked the University of Pennsylvania and Yale to conduct. Read On The Fox News App Liberals Blame Big Beautiful Bill's Loss On Dying Dems The Democrats employed the Philadelphia college's Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, as well as the Yale School of Public Health's Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis. "Let's be clear," Sanders said in a statement, "The Republican reconciliation bill which makes massive cuts to Medicaid in order to pay for huge tax breaks for billionaires is not just bad public policy." "It is not just immoral. It is a death sentence for struggling Americans." "[N]ot only will some of the most vulnerable people throughout our country suffer, but tens of thousands will die. We cannot allow that to happen," Sanders added. Winners, Losers And Grab-bags From House Gop's Narrow Passage Of 'Big, Beautiful Bill' In a copy of the study posted on UPenn's website, economics and health-centric academics found 7.7 million people would be estimated to lose Medicaid or Obamacare coverage by 2034, and 1.38 million "dual-eligible beneficiaries" would find themselves "disenroll[ed]." In a statement, Wyden cited figures of 11,300 deaths from the loss of Medicaid or Obamacare coverage, 18,200 deaths from the loss of Medicaid coverage among low-income beneficiaries and 13,000 deaths of Medicaid enrollees in nursing homes due to the rollback of a "nursing home minimum staffing rule" from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Wyden attributed an additional projected 8,811 deaths per year to the "failure to extend the enhanced [Obamacare] premium tax credits," citing the academics' analysis. Fox News Digital reached out to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., -- who spearheaded the "big, beautiful bill" in the House -- for comment. A representative for UPenn told Fox News Digital the university sent the results of their analysis to Wyden and Sanders in response to a request on the matter. "The estimates of mortality that are contained in the letter were based on peer-review research that was done independently and well before their request," the UPenn representative said. "The senators' request was to take the research results and translate into the estimated number of deaths."Original article source: Top Dems claim 51K people will die annually from the 'big beautiful bill' and its Obamacare freeze

Texas on the verge of putting warning labels on junk food
Texas on the verge of putting warning labels on junk food

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas on the verge of putting warning labels on junk food

(NewsNation) — In Texas, a bill has reached Gov. Greg Abbott's desk requiring warning labels on packaged foods like Doritos, Mountain Dew and M&M's that contain certain additives. The bill, passed unanimously by the Texas state Senate, would mandate labels on products that include synthetic dyes, titanium dioxide, bleached flour, partially hydrogenated oils, melatonin and various food colorings. In April, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced plans to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes by the end of 2026. Texas investigating cereal giant Kellogg over food dye use Kennedy has advocated for the Texas legislation. 'Secretary Kennedy encourages states to promote healthy practices and enhance consumer transparency in food labeling,' an HHS official told NewsNation. 'Americans deserve to know what's in their food, so they can make informed choices for themselves and their families.' However, several companies and organizations, including the Texas Retailers Association, have criticized portions of the bill. Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried 'The food labeling provision in this bill casts an incredibly wide net, triggering warning labels on everyday grocery items based on assertions that foreign governments have banned such items, rather than on standards established by Texas regulators or the USDA,' the organization said in a statement. If the bill is approved, Texas would become one of the first states to require such disclosures, potentially reshaping national food industry standards. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

A plan to preserve U.S. science leadership
A plan to preserve U.S. science leadership

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

A plan to preserve U.S. science leadership

PROBLEM SOLVERS National Academy of Sciences President Marcia McNutt made a plea to the nation's science research community during her second annual State of the Science address in Washington on Tuesday: Course-correct or lose to China. We're in the midst of a 'radical new experiment,' McNutt explained, in which the U.S., by pursuing budget cuts, canceling grants and adopting restrictive research policies, serves as the treatment group, while China is the control. Unforced errors made during the pandemic eroded many Americans' trust in science. But there's still at least one point of agreement: 'Everyone, whether it's scientists or nonscientists alike, wants U.S. science to be the world leader.' To remain a world leader in science innovation, McNutt laid out a plan. Among her key suggestions: — Build on a culture of innovation. McNutt worries that budget cuts will fuel overly conservative project selection and lead to less funding for high-risk, high-reward research. To course-correct, the U.S. should do a data-informed analysis of various peer-review approaches to ensure 'truly innovative' proposals succeed. — Create a national research strategy. 'No sensible business person would attempt to run a multibillion-dollar enterprise without a strategy, and yet that is exactly what we are doing with our research enterprise,' she said. In McNutt's view, relying on Congress to tinker with budgets isn't a strategy. Countries like China, Germany, Japan and Norway maximize research and development investment through strategic planning, primarily with apolitical non-government organizations, McNutt added. — Improve science education. The U.S. is already failing to produce enough STEM students to fill available jobs in science. The Trump administration's clampdown on visas will make it even more difficult for immigrants to fill those jobs. Beyond filling jobs, having science-literate lawyers, politicians and workers in manufacturing and transportation strengthens the nation's scientific enterprise. — Don't retreat from international collaboration. Some cutting-edge research facilities require resources from more than one nation. And when international students return home, their U.S. connections drive further international collaboration. 'We squander opportunities by not taking advantage of the fact that international colleagues want to work with us, and we only disadvantage ourselves,' McNutt said. — Cut red tape. Regulations divert time and money away from science, McNutt argues. And since the Trump administration has prioritized reducing regulations, McNutt hopes that push extends to research regulations. Still, in the Department of Government Efficiency era, that's not a given. 'I worry that the emphasis right now on waste, fraud and abuse only leads to more regulations, as everyone is assumed guilty until proven innocent.' The elephant in the room: The National Academy of Sciences is 'preparing for a fairly radical downsizing' amid the Trump administration's science cuts, McNutt told Stat News last month. A budget shortfall of roughly $40 million resulting from terminated contracts means the organization might have to lay off 250 employees in addition to the 50 members of the 1,000-person staff who have already been let go. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Pope Leo XIV wants to stop artificial intelligence from playing God. Like his namesake, Pope Leo XIII, who promoted workers' rights during the industrial revolution, the new pope is positioning himself as a guardian in the face of unchecked modern technology, POLITICO's Hannah Roberts reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Danny Nguyen at dnguyen@ Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: Dannyn516.70, CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. WORLDVIEW England's National Health Service has launched an internal review into an artificial intelligence model being trained on data from 57 million patients in England, our POLITICO colleagues across the pond scooped. Called Foresight, the generative AI model was touted as a 'world-first pilot project' to pinpoint high-risk patient groups and facilitate early interventions. Foresight was trained on de-identified data from millions of people in England, including a large-scale dataset called the General Practice Extraction Service Data for Pandemic Planning and Research. But doctors have serious misgivings about the model being trained on their patient records without proper authorization. What the docs say: Last month, representatives from the British Medical Association and Royal College of General Practitioners wrote to Ming Tang, chief data and analytics officer at NHS England, expressing 'serious concerns about the lawfulness of the data use and the apparent absence of strict governance arrangements,' according to an email seen by POLITICO. The bone of contention is whether NHSE took patient data solely intended for Covid-19 research and incorporated it into an all-purpose AI model. NHSE's guidelines state that applications for accessing patient data must undergo additional review by its Professional Advisory Group. The advisory group approved the British Heart Foundation consortium's use of the primary care data specifically for Covid-related research during the pandemic but was never consulted about large language model training. The official line: An NHSE spokesperson said: 'Maintaining patient privacy is central to this project, and we are grateful to the Joint GP IT Committee for raising its concerns and meeting with us to discuss the strict governance and controls in place to ensure patients' data remains secure.' What's next: The Joint GP IT Committee, which advises on IT matters related to general practice medicine, plans to write to the Information Commissioner directly, a person familiar with the situation told POLITICO. In addition to demanding that the British Medical Association be called as a witness to the Information Commissioner, the joint commission wants 'explicit governance' over future uses of AI and an undertaking that any future emergency measures permitting the use of general practitioners' data contain a sunset clause if doctors haven't been consulted, the person said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store