Two states have now passed fluoride bans. These other ones introduced bills.
Two states have now passed fluoride bans. These other ones introduced bills.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Florida joins Utah in banning fluoride from public water systems
Florida is the second state to take steps toward ending fluoridation in public water systems. Utah became the first in March.
Scripps News
Following a push by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and another Republican-led state, Florida this week banned the long-standing practice of adding fluoride to public water systems.
Florida's Gov. Ron DeSantis, on May 15, signed the 2025 "Florida Farm Bill," which removes fluoride from the state's legal definition of acceptable "water quality additives."
Fluoride, a naturally occurring element, is found in water, soil, air and some foods, helps prevent dental cavities and tooth decay.
In a measure opposed by dentists and medical organizations but praised by Kennedy, the secretary of U.S. Health and Human Services, and others questioning it's safety, Utah became the first state to ban fluoride earlier this year.
The new legislation was signed into law by Republican Gov. Spencer Cox on March 29 after being approved by the Utah State Senate in late February.
Why are states banning fluoride in public water? How many states have nixed the mineral from drinking water? What other states could follow in their footsteps? Here's what to know.
Opinion: DeSantis bans fluoride in Florida water, following RFK Jr.'s pro-tooth decay lead
Which states have banned fluoride?
As of May 16, two states had banned fluoride from public drinking water.
Utah : Republican state lawmakers Rep. Stephanie Gricius and Sen. Kirk A. Cullimore sponsored the bill, which was signed by Cox and went into effect May 7.
: Republican state lawmakers Rep. Stephanie Gricius and Sen. Kirk A. Cullimore sponsored the bill, which was signed by Cox and went into effect May 7. Florida: The bill, introduced by Republican state Sen. Keith Truenow, was signed by DeSantis on May 15 and is set to go into effect on July 1.
Exclusive: As RFK Jr. targets fluoride, Texas is coming for kids toothpaste
Which states have anti-fluoride bills on the table?
Several other states have introduced bills that would curb the use of fluoride in water. They include:
Lawmakers in other states including North Dakota, Arkansas, Tennessee, Montana and New Hampshire saw anti-fluoride legislation effort but the bill either failed or was tabled and missed deadline for the year.
What is fluoride?
Fluoride is an inorganic, tooth health-boosting mineral that helps prevent cavities and strengthens teeth.
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has touted fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest public health achievements of the 20th century. The CDC maintains that fluoridated water is both safe and cost-effective.
The mineral has been added to public water supplies for decades in the U.S. and to dental products including toothpaste, as a dental cavities prevention measure.
Why are some states banning fluoride in water?
Kennedy, who was appointed by President Donald Trump as the nation's top health adviser despite having no medical training under his belt, has led a renewed charge against adding fluoride to water.
In November, Kennedy announced on X the Trump administration would "advise all U.S water systems to remove fluoride from public water," citing unconfirmed health concerns including arthritis, cancer and IQ loss.
Earlier this week, federal health officials said they are beginning to remove ingestible fluoride supplements for children from the market.
Dig deeper: FDA moves to take fluoride supplements for children off the market
How much fluoride is safe in public water?
The U.S. Public Health Service recommends public water systems contain a fluoride level of .7 milligrams per liter of water. The World Health Organization's recommended limit for fluoride in drinking water is 1.5 milligrams per liter.
Federal public health agencies recommend public water systems be calibrated to less than half the fluoride levels which this research links to lower IQ in children.
Contributing: Mary Walrath-Holdridge Ken Alltucker and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY
Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@usatoday.com and follow her on X @nataliealund.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Greta Thunberg appears to fake being handcuffed as she arrives in France after being deported from Israel
Greta Thunberg has been mocked for appearing to fake being handcuffed upon her arrival to France. The Swedish activist was deported from Israel following a brief spat with local authorities this week. She and 11 others attempted to sail to Gaza to make a statement against Israel's campaign, but were seized by Israeli authorities and quickly sent on their way. Of the 12 activists on board the Madleen, which was carrying food and supplies for Gaza, four, including Thunberg, agreed to be deported immediately, while 11 of them have been banned from Israel for 100 years, the rights group that legally represents some of them said in a statement. The remaining eight were taken into custody after they refused to leave Israel voluntarily, and brought before a detention review tribunal on Tuesday, rights group Adalah said. 5 Greta Thunberg appears to hold her hands back like she's been handcuffed in videos taken of her in France. @BerkoTzlil 5 Thunberg walks through security at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris. @BerkoTzlil 'The state asked the tribunal to keep the activists in custody until their deportation,' Adalah said, adding that under Israeli law, individuals under deportation orders can be held for 72 hours before forcible removal. Israeli forces intercepted the boat, operated by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, in international waters on Monday and towed it to the port of Ashdod. They then transferred them to Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv, the foreign ministry said, from where Thunberg flew to France ahead of a scheduled flight to Sweden. 5 Thunberg sits in a plane, in a location given as Tel Aviv, Israel, June 10, 2025. via REUTERS Taking to X, Meghan McCain – the daughter of the late Republican senator and presidential nominee, John McCain – shared footage of Thunberg aboard the plane. 'Putting her in the last seat in coach that doesn't recline next to the toilet is my favorite thing today,' she captioned the clip. On arrival at Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris, 22-year-old Thunberg accused Israel of 'kidnapping us in international waters and taking us against our will to Israel'. 5 Thunberg talks to journalists upon her arrival to Charles de Gaulle Airport, as she left Israel on a flight to Sweden via France, after she was detained along with other activists aboard a Gaza-bound aid boat, on June 10, 2025. AFP via Getty Images 'This is yet another intentional violation of rights that is added to the list of countless other violations that Israel is committing,' she said. Four French activists who were also aboard the Madleen were set to face an Israeli judge, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said. He had earlier posted on X that five would face court action and only one would depart voluntarily. 5 Thunberg talks to journalists as she arrives at Arlanda airport outside Stockholm, Sweden, on June 10, 2025. Anders Wiklund/TT/Shutterstock Barrot told reporters that French diplomats had met with the six French nationals in Israel, and that French-Palestinian European MP Rima Hassan was among those who refused to leave voluntarily. The activists, from France, Germany, Brazil, Turkey, Sweden, Spain and the Netherlands, aimed to deliver humanitarian aid and break the Israeli blockade on the Palestinian territory. In what organizers called a 'symbolic act', hundreds of participants in a land convoy crossed the border into Libya from Tunisia with the aim of reaching Gaza, whose entire population the UN has warned is at risk of famine.
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries
Arkansas families suing to block Ten Commandments in public classrooms, libraries Show Caption Hide Caption Texas lawmaker challenges Ten Commandments bill on the 'Sabbath' A Texas state bill that would require public schools to post donated placards of the Ten Commandments created an "ironic" moment in debate. Seven Arkansas families have filed a federal lawsuit to block a new law requiring the display of the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms in the state, arguing that the law will infringe on their constitutional rights. In the complaint, filed June 11 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, the families challenged an upcoming state law that requires the Ten Commandments to be "prominently" displayed in every public classroom and library. The law, which takes effect in August, was signed by Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in April. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a multifaith group of families by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for Separation of Church and State (AU), and the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF). The defendants include four school districts — Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville, and Siloam Springs — in northwest Arkansas. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, or non-religious, said the law "violates longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent and the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment." The attorneys are asking a federal judge to declare the state requirement unconstitutional. In addition to the complaint, the attorneys are planning to file a motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction to block the implementation of the law while the suit is pending. "By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement. The lawsuit was publicly released by the AU on June 11 and viewed by USA TODAY. The Arkansas Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond to USA TODAY's request for comment on June 11. Related: How the Supreme Court could still reshape religious liberty with decisions in two cases Lawsuit: Ten Commandments law interferes with religious freedom According to the complaint, the display of the Ten Commandments in public classrooms and libraries will interfere with parents' right to direct their children's religious education and upbringing. The lawsuit further argues that the state requirement will create a "religiously coercive" school environment for children. Under the state law, each classroom and library will be required to post the Ten Commandments 'in a conspicuous place," the lawsuit states. The display of the text must be at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall and be printed in a "typeface that is legible to a person with average vision from anywhere in the room," according to the complaint. The law also mandates that schools and libraries display a specific version of the Ten Commandments, which the suit states is associated with Protestant faiths and conflicts with the version followed by many Jews and Catholics. "Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library—rendering them unavoidable—unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture," the complaint states. "It also sends the harmful and religiously divisive message that students who do not subscribe to the Ten Commandments ... do not belong in their own school community and pressures them to refrain from expressing any faith practices or beliefs that are not aligned with the state's religious preferences," the complaint added. It's not the first time. GOP leaders are calling for religion in public schools. Republican-led states push for religion in public classrooms Authorities in Republican-led states across the country have been pushing to spread religious teachings into public school classrooms, including incorporating the Bible into lessons and requiring schools to post state-selected versions of the Ten Commandments. School administrators and civil rights advocates have expressed opposition to the mandates, saying they violate students' constitutional rights. "Our Constitution's guarantee of church-state separation means that families – not politicians – get to decide if, when and how public-school children engage with religion," Rachel Laser, president and CEO of the AU, said in a statement on June 11. "This law is part of the nationwide Christian Nationalist scheme to win favor for one set of religious views over all others and nonreligion — in a country that promises religious freedom. Not on our watch. We're proud to defend the religious freedom of Arkansas schoolchildren and their families," Laser continued. The Arkansas law is similar to a Louisiana requirement that was signed in June 2024 by Gov. Jeff Landry. The Louisiana law was later blocked by a federal judge who declared it unconstitutional. The case, which is currently on appeal, is also being represented by the same counsel as the Arkansas lawsuit, attorneys said. In November 2024, Texas officials proposed a curriculum that includes teachings from the Bible. The state legislature also recently passed a bill requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to sign the measure, which would take effect in September. In July 2024, Oklahoma's top education official ordered public schools to teach the Bible, which large state school districts have largely ignored. Despite the state's Republican-controlled legislature's rejection of his $3 million request to fund the effort, state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters has insisted classrooms would all have Bibles by fall 2025. Contributing: Murray Evans, The Oklahoman, part of the USA TODAY Network
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
Donald Trump responds to Elon Musk's late-night apology after ugly public feud
WASHINGTON — President Trump is feeling good about Elon Musk's apology after the former 'first buddy' admitted late Tuesday he had gone 'too far' in his personal attacks on the commander-in-chief. 'I thought it was very nice that he did that,' the president told The Post in a brief phone conversation Wednesday morning, but didn't say whether he was willing to let bygones be bygones with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO. 3 Musk, 53, went off on Trump in a series of social media messages this past Thursday, at one point claiming the Republican would not have won the 2024 election without his help and suggesting the president was responsible for preventing the release of files on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein due to his past association with the late financier. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote late Tuesday after previously deleting his post about the Epstein files. Efforts have been made by Trump's allies to ease tensions between the two men. On Friday, Vice President JD Vance and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles held a phone call with Musk to talk about his relationship with Trump, according to a source familiar with the conversation. The Post could not independently confirm other reports that Musk reached out to Trump personally on Monday. The president has expressed openness to potentially burying the hatchet with Musk — who he accused last week of having 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' and being bitter about both leaving his special government employee position and the House GOP removing electric vehicle tax incentives from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 3 Trump told CNN on Friday that Musk was 'crazy' — and threatened on Truth Social to look into revoking his company's federal government contracts. But the president also told The Post on Friday that 'nothing surprises him' — not even his onetime ally turning against him. Trump told Post columnist Miranda Devine Monday that he doesn't 'blame' Musk for the blow-up that started with the former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) figure's criticisms of the Big Beautiful Bill — but maintained that he's 'a little disappointed.' 'Look, I have no hard feelings,' Trump said. 'I was really surprised that that happened. He went after a bill that's phenomenal. …He just — I think he feels very badly that he said that, actually.' When asked whether he would ever go back to a regular relationship with Musk, Trump told Devine's 'Pod Force One' podcast: 'I guess I could, but we have to straighten out the country.' 'And my sole function now is getting this country back to a level higher than it's ever been. And I think we can do that.'
