Who should win Defensive Player of the Year? We asked NBA coaches
The deep vein thrombosis that ended Victor Wembanyama's second season at the All-Star break did more than scuttle the San Antonio Spurs' hopes of reaching the postseason and temporarily deprive the NBA of its most heralded young star.
It also upended the league's 2024-25 Defensive Player of the Year race.
Advertisement
Wembanyama, who had finished as the runner-up one year ago as a rookie, seemed like the clear frontrunner this time around. But because the league's collective bargaining agreement requires candidates for most major awards to play in at least 65 regular-season games (or a minimum of 62 games in a case of a season-ending injury), Wembanyama, who only played 46 regular-season games before being shut down, is ineligible for the award this year.
The games-played threshold also eliminated other defensive standouts from consideration, including the Oklahoma City Thunder's Alex Caruso (54 regular-season games played), the Dallas Mavericks' Anthony Davis (51 games), the Los Angeles Lakers' Dorian Finney-Smith (63), the Denver Nuggets' Aaron Gordon (51), the Boston Celtics' Jrue Holiday (62), the Orlando Magic's Jalen Suggs (35) and the Detroit Pistons' Ausar Thompson (59).
In addition, players like Orlando's Jonathan Isaac, who played enough games (71) to qualify, were tripped up by an additional criterion that requires players to play at least 20 minutes in at least 63 games (and two other games between 15-20 minutes).
Which got us to thinking: With the Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY) field as wide open as it's been in years, who should win when the official results are announced Thursday night on TNT?
The three finalists for the 2024-25 Kia NBA Defensive Player of the Year Award:
▪️ Dyson Daniels of @ATLHawks
▪️ Draymond Green of @warriors
▪️ Evan Mobley of @cavs pic.twitter.com/32gTy5KMXi
— NBA Communications (@NBAPR) April 20, 2025
To gain some insight, we spoke with 13 NBA head and assistant coaches and asked them how they would have voted for first, second and third place. We granted them anonymity to give them full freedom to vote their consciences, without fear of reprisals and because teams typically don't allow assistant coaches to speak with members of the media. The coaches we surveyed were asked not to vote for their own players and to pick only from the field of players eligible for the league's official awards.
Advertisement
A panel of 100 sports writers and broadcasters who regularly cover the NBA vote for league awards, but we chose to poll coaches because they're the ones who are most well-versed with how well defenders wreck teams' game plans and because of the complexities involved with defense. The coaches pore over video of every game and monitor players' tendencies.
The coaches' choice was clear: Atlanta Hawks guard Dyson Daniels finished first in The Athletic's polling, receiving 42 total points and six first-place votes. Daniels finished well ahead of the second-place choice, Oklahoma City's Luguentz Dort, who had 24 total points and four first-place votes. The Golden State Warriors' Draymond Green, with 18 total points and two first-place votes, finished third.
Acquired from New Orleans last July in the trade that sent Dejounte Murray to the Pelicans, Daniels led all qualified players in steals at 3.01 per game, the highest average since the 1990-91 season, when Alvin Robertson led the league with 3.04 steals per game. At 22, the Australian was a revelation with an impeccable nickname — 'The Great Barrier Thief.'
'Dyson Daniels has established himself as one of the elite perimeter defenders in the league, leading the league in steals and doing some things we haven't seen in a long time,' a coach who gave his first-place vote to Daniels said.
'He has good instincts, he's opportunistic and he operates within the team defensive scheme. He picks his spots, and as you operate offensively, you have to be cognizant of where he is and how you protect the ball.'
As another coach said of Daniels: 'That guy is a walking steal. He's so disruptive.'
Another coach who voted Daniels first said: 'We were always on high alert when he was on the ball. Certain things that he does, you just can't really teach. He just has these catlike instincts that make an incredible impact for his team.'
Dort, though, had some strong support, too, as the key man on Oklahoma City's top-rated defense (a 106.6 defensive rating this season).
'Draymond and Evan Mobley, their teams are very good defenses, a lot because of them,' said a coach who picked Dort first. 'I just think Lu Dort individually takes the challenge on the other team's best player, which I think from a coaching perspective is super important.'
The coach cited Dort's ability to guard any of the five positions on the floor.
Advertisement
'There's times he's guarding point guards. There's times when, due to injuries or guys out, they go small and he's guarding bigs,' the coach said. 'So, I think his versatility plays a huge role in that, and his ability to just guard so many positions, I think, is super unique and super impactful in the modern NBA. Because of five-out offenses, there's a lot of (defensive) efforts that have to be made, (and) I think him being on the perimeter helps in a lot of different ways.'
An assistant coach who picked Dort said, 'OKC has the best defense in the league, and he's a key piece to that. He's a great point-of-attack defender. He's so physical; he wears offensive players down.'
But Green, looking for a second DPOY award after winning it in 2016-17, also has supporters.
Said one assistant coach of the now 35-year-old Green: 'He's the heartbeat of their team, and he brings a level of physicality and toughness that is contagious for their group. I think his defensive versatility probably sets him apart, where we can literally guard one through five, and there are very few people in the NBA that are capable of doing that.'
Among the others who received votes, the 23-year-old Mobley got some love for his role in anchoring the Cavaliers' eighth-ranked defense.
'I like the impact that he makes for Cleveland,' an assistant coach said. 'There's a lot of things that he does that do not show up in the stat sheet. Let's take away steals on the defensive end. Let's take away blocks. Let's take away defensive rebounds. Let's take away all those stats and just watch him switch on a guard, guard the ball, be off the ball and be in protection spots and basically take up one side of the floor.'
Sign up to get The Bounce, the essential NBA newsletter from Zach Harper and The Athletic staff, delivered free to your inbox.
(Top photo of Dyson Daniels: Jeff Hanisch / Imagn Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Want More Excitement From the N.B.A.? Try the Korean Broadcast.
Game 1 of this year's N.B.A. finals had a spectacular finish, with the Indiana Pacers completing a 15-point comeback over the Oklahoma City Thunder to stun the crowd in Oklahoma City. The victory was punctuated by a near-miraculous buzzer beater by Tyrese Haliburton of the Pacers, who drained the winning shot with only 0.3 seconds left on the clock. It was a thrilling moment for any basketball fan. But few reacted with as much fervor as Myung-jung Kim and Se-woon Park. 'Amazing, Indiana, don't call a timeout!' Mr. Kim and Mr. Park, sportscasters and analysts for South Korea's SPOTV, had exclaimed in Korean just ahead of the shot as Indiana grabbed a rebound and began to move the ball upcourt. 'Indiana, an underdog, faces a familiar situation — WAAAAAAAA! HALIBURTON! WOW!' A post shared by NBA (@nba) Their over-the-top reaction the moment the shot went in, which culminated in full-blown screeching and wailing, was shared widely across social media in the hours after Indiana's win. American fans shared clips of the rhapsodic call, and the N.B.A. posted an excerpt on Instagram. Commenters were quick to cite the passion and emotion of the South Korean announcers, with several saying the clip gets better with repeated listens. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
For NBA coaches, every game is casual Friday. Will suits ever return to sidelines?
When the Los Angeles Lakers and Detroit Pistons faced each other in the 1988 and 1989 NBA Finals, the matchups featured some of the most iconic players in pro basketball. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Magic Johnson and James Worthy led the Lakers. Isiah Thomas, Joe Dumars and Bill Laimbeer headlined the Pistons' roster. Advertisement Those championship series also included another competition of sorts: a clash between the league's most stylish, fashion-forward head coaches. The Lakers' Pat Riley, who twice appeared on the cover of GQ magazine, preferred immaculate Armani suits. The Pistons' Chuck Daly, whose dapper attire earned him the nickname 'Daddy Rich,' owned at least 100 suits. Times sure have changed. For NBA coaches, this is a golden age of comfort and convenience, a decade dominated by quarter-zips, not bespoke suits. When the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder meet Wednesday night in Game 3 of the NBA Finals, the wardrobes of Rick Carlisle, Mark Daigneault and their assistant coaches almost certainly won't qualify for the cover of any fashion magazine or for any of fashion's most renowned runways. The Pacers' and Thunder's coaching staffs wore quarter-zips and pants during the series' first two games, continuing a fashion sea change within the league that started in the 2020 NBA bubble and shows no signs of abating. And if league officials ever revert to requiring more formal attire, more stringent regulations most likely would occur over the objection of the vast majority of league coaches and assistant coaches. 'We've had several votes over the last few years, and it's well over 80 percent to 20 percent that is in favor of what we're doing presently, and it's closer to 85 or 90,' said Carlisle, the longtime president of the National Basketball Coaches Association. 'The coaches' association, we listen to all members. It's not just head coaches. It's head coaches and assistant coaches. It's over 200 members, and we listen very carefully.' League officials spelled out the current NBA rules governing coaches' attire in a mid-October memo sent to teams, specifying that head coaches and assistants must wear 'business attire' during games. For male coaches, the league defines business attire as a sport coat or suit coat, a dress shirt or a quarter-zip top; slacks or designer jeans; and 'appropriate shoes' and dress socks. For male and female coaches, business attire does not include athletic shoes, sneakers, sandals, flip-flops or work boots. Advertisement Athleisure items — such as jogger pants, jumpsuits, sweatpants or leggings — are not permitted during games. The league's regulations include one exception. Coaches may wear NBA-licensed short- or long-sleeved polo shirts as long as the head coach and assistant coaches dress uniformly. Byron Spruell, the NBA's president of league operations, told The Athletic that the guidelines for coaches' attire are a 'modified dress code' stemming from the pandemic-necessitated bubble at Walt Disney World, outside Orlando, Fla., five years ago. Because of the withering heat and humidity of a Florida summer, it made sense at that time to relax the dress code because it made coaches more comfortable as they walked from their team buses to the arenas. In the years since, the league, in consultation with the coaches' association, has continued with the modified dress code because coaches have gotten accustomed to a more casual look, because it's easier for coaches to pack for road trips and because having everyone wear similar team-issued clothing adds an element of uniformity to coaching staffs. The more relaxed NBA coaches' dress code mirrors a broader overall trend nationwide since the pandemic. Workplace attire has tended to be more casual and more comfortable over the last five years. 'Long story short,' Spruell said, 'we feel good about it still. Never say 'never' in terms of could we actually go back to kind of a full dress and business attire look rather than a casual look. But by the way, they can actually do that on their own at this point because, again, this was a modified dress code that allowed for the more casual look. But it's still in there that you can still wear a sport coat or a collared shirt … if you chose to do so.' These days, coaches are choosing not to wear more formal attire. Advertisement Like many of their coaching brethren, the Pistons' J.B. Bickerstaff and the Atlanta Hawks' Quin Snyder have experienced both approaches. They were assistant coaches and head coaches before the pandemic, and now they, similar to many of their colleagues, enjoy having one fewer responsibility — in this case, choosing and coordinating outfits. 'It saves you a ton of time and just makes your day a little bit easier, because it's one less decision that you have to make on that day,' Bickerstaff said. 'I think people look professional,' Snyder said. 'It's just easier, the decisions. I'd rather think about what we're trying to run after a timeout than whether my shoes match my belt. To whatever extent, it makes it easier and more functional. I think it's great. … I would bet that most coaches would agree with me after having gone through it as well. You kind of appreciate the simplicity of it.' One of the few voices in the wilderness is Cleveland Cavaliers coach Kenny Atkinson. 'I would prefer us wearing suits,' Atkinson said in October. 'I think I'm in the minority. I just love (wearing suits). We're a profession. I think it looks great. I think it looks great on TV. My daughter keeps saying, she says it at least once a week. She's 14 years old and she says, 'Dad, I miss the suits.' I just think it gives a certain aesthetic. I enjoyed seeing what the other coaches wore. I don't know if that's old school. I don't know, but I miss that. I wish we'd bring it back.' On game nights, Atkinson and his Cavaliers assistant coaches nonetheless wore quarter-zips throughout the 2024-25 season. Atkinson isn't the only NBA coach to receive some constructive criticism from a family member. Milwaukee Bucks coach Doc Rivers said his son Austin Rivers, who played 11 seasons in the NBA, misses seeing coaches in more formal attire. Advertisement 'I don't know why he has an issue about it,' Doc Rivers said. The elder Rivers recalled Austin saying, 'You just look more important when you wear a suit. The game looks cleaner. … Look at the hockey guys. They all wear a suit. You know who the coach is.' 'So he may be right,' Doc Rivers added. 'I don't know. But I tell you what, when you pack for a two-week trip, man, these two pairs of pants and the quarter-zips are amazing. That's what I would say. For fashion's sake, please don't change.' (Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; photos of, from left, Rick Carlisle, Mark Daigneault, Pat Riley and Chuck Daly: Jonathan Daniel / Allsport/NBAE;; Gary A. Vasquez / Imagn Images)
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Thunder at Pacers Game 3 picks, odds, how to watch: NBA Finals shift to Indianapolis
After both teams won a game in Oklahoma City, the NBA Finals are off in earnest. The top-seeded Oklahoma City Thunder and impossibly-clutch Indiana Pacers are tied up at 1-1, with Game 3 going down Wednesday night. OKC is a favorite on the road, but Indy is a tough out, especially in its own gym. All systems go for these fast-paced Finals. Advertisement This game will also be available on ESPN+. Series odds: Thunder -600, Pacers +425 Through two games, the Thunder are decisively winning the factors they prioritize. Their turnover rate is half of the Pacers' (19 to 39). It's hard to lose a series with an advantage like that. Oklahoma City also has the superior free throw rate and a far better defensive rating. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is getting to the rim comfortably, while funneling down the Pacers' passing lanes. It has only been two games, but the regular-season MVP is averaging an absurd 36 points, 5.5 assists, 5 rebounds and 3.5 steals. Sunday's crowd showed the requisite love. To win away from home, Mark Daigneault's team will need more from Jalen Williams on the offensive end. He went 2-for-9 from behind the arc in Games 1 and 2. Lu Dort should continue seeing clean jump shot looks, and he'll be the primary defender on Tyrese Haliburton come Wednesday night. The Thunder played straight-up defense for most of 2025, but they have adapted to a 'talk it, touch it, switch it' scheme that can neutralize Indiana's elite spacing and off-ball movement. Dort, Alex Caruso and Cason Wallace need to set the perimeter wall early, because Haliburton and his backcourt can microwave offense at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Accordingly, Chet Holmgren and Isaiah Hartenstein should see fewer minutes, unless things go off the rails. Indiana has seldom been on the rails this postseason. What a thoroughly unbelievable run. First, the icy closeout of division rival Milwaukee. Then a breezy upset of 64-win Cleveland before a center-stage dispatching of New York. Haliburton's heroic effort in Game 1 was just the latest. All this is to remind folks that Indy cannot be counted out until the very last buzzer. Advertisement Rick Carlisle and his crew can hold their own against OKC's suffocating defense. The Pacers were just above 40 percent 3-point shooting in the first two games. Indiana has to get a more efficient showing from Pascal Siakam in Game 3, but the free-throw rate is strong and he's dominating offensive rebounds (eight so far, with Hartenstein second at five). We cannot sleep on fiery Indy, especially in Naptown, but Oklahoma City looked wire-to-wire dominant in Game 2. Music matchup: The Sooner State has produced all-time country sensations like Woody Guthrie, Reba McEntire, Gene Autry and a carousel of others. Indiana has a great heartland rocker of its own in John Mellencamp, but the state is strongest in rhythm, blues, soul and dance — Michael and Janet Jackson were born in Gary, and Babyface hails from Indianapolis. It's a matter of preference here. 1993 — Bulls 111, Suns 108. For the first time ever, opposing players each dropped 40-pieces in a Finals game. Michael Jordan and Charles Barkley both scored 42 points in a brisk Game 2. From the New York Times archive: Clifton Brown: 'This was the Jordan-Barkley showdown that the league envisioned when the series began. When the third quarter ended, Barkley already had 35 points and Jordan had 30. Both players were carrying their teams. Barkley was making power moves, forcing the Bulls to swarm around him and leaving other Suns wide open. Jordan was making midair moves, long-range jumpers and savvy defensive plays.' Betting/odds, ticketing and streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Chet Holmgren: Kyle Terada / Getty Images)
