Warning Of Impact Of AI This Workers' Memorial Day
As we mark Workers' Memorial Day (28 April), the national peak body for workplace health and safety is paying respects to workers who have lost their lives, while also warning of emerging trends taking a toll on Australian workers.
In 2024, 168 people were killed at work in Australia, and already this year, more than 30 workers have lost their lives. Transport, postal and warehousing; agriculture, forestry and fishing; and construction are the highest represented industries.
This year's Workers' Memorial Day theme is focused on the impacts of digitalisation and artificial intelligence on workers' health and safety. AI monitoring programs are in the spotlight, as an increasing number of workplaces turn to artificial intelligence for worker surveillance.
The Australian Institute of Health and Safety (AIHS) CEO, Julia Whitford, said increased monitoring is creating unprecedented mental health risks.
"What we're witnessing is the unfortunate dark side of workplace digitalisation – constant surveillance and algorithmic management that are creating toxic environments," Ms Whitford said.
"While AI has tremendous potential to reduce physical risks and improve efficiency, we're seeing alarming evidence of workers feeling dehumanised when their every movement and decision is monitored by algorithms or software.
"When workers know they're being continuously tracked and assessed by machines programmed to prioritise productivity above all else, it fundamentally changes their relationship with work – and understandably leads to fear they'll be replaced with technology."
Ms Whitford said there needs to be a proper framework to guide workplaces in using these systems while assessing their impact on workers.
"Occupational health and safety are indeed a fundamental right, and that means protecting workers from both physical and psychological harm in the workplace,' she said.
"The message is clear: AI systems must be designed with worker wellbeing at their core, not as an afterthought. Australian businesses implementing these technologies have both a legal and moral obligation to ensure they enhance, rather than compromise, workplace health and safety.
'And if you're feeling unduly stressed because of monitoring software in place at your work, speak up and raise your concerns with your manager, boss, or business owner. It's important for them to understand the mental health impact new technologies may be having on workers so they can assess risks and make changes where necessary.'
Mental illness is estimated to cost Australian businesses 39 billion dollars each year due to lost participation and productivity. Ms Whitford said there several ways managers can help.
'Create positive, supportive, and inclusive workplace cultures; intervene early when individuals and teams report distress; and support individuals experiencing a psychological injury in line with the advice of their medical professional. Everyone has the right to go to work and come home safely.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
8 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZONE scoping Kingston drop zone
Queenstown skydiving operator NZONE could move south to Kingston. Its parent company, Australian adventure tourism operator Experience Co, has been talking to the township's community for nearly a year about shifting from its Jack's Point airstrip to one on Kingston Station. Its current site, where it has operated since 1990, sits on land owned by Australia-based RCL Group. The Hanley's Farm developer is seeking consent for a 2800-home Homestead Bay subdivision, under fast-track legislation, that would eventually rub out the airstrip. Experience Co boss John O'Sullivan says it has a lease and resource consent to operate at Jack's Point until mid-2031, and intends to stay until then "at a minimum". He reckons with massive developments like Homestead Bay, "planning's one thing and delivery is another". Kingston's just one of "a number" of potential sites it's looking at in the Whakatipu Basin, O'Sullivan says. He's not divulging the others "out of respect for those communities we're talking to, and because of competitive pressures". The Wollongong-based company bought NZONE in 2015, before purchasing Skydive Wānaka the following year. It also operated from a drop zone near Glenorchy — for which it still has a lease and resource consent — until a Covid-induced shutdown in 2020. He says it's engaging closely with Kingston's residents because it's "critical to have a social licence" wherever it operates. Tandem skydiving has a low impact on communities, with aircraft take-offs and landings, and parachute drops, able to be done on a "small footprint", he says. "We're good for the communities in which we operate. "We have a positive economic impact, we create jobs, and we bring visitors to the region that otherwise might not have been there. "That supports other tourism operators in those communities." Kingston Community Association chairwoman Kimberley Marshall says Experience Co's skydiving operations boss, Ken Stone, made a presentation at its annual meeting last July. NZONE's since carried out twosimulated parachute flights, while an actual parachute drop's inthe works. A residents' survey after the second flight prompted 40 responses and generated a series of questions — most have focused on the aircraft's engine noise and flight path, as well as the volume of customers' shouts and screams as they parachuted down. Stone's answers have been informative, she says. "Everything we've requested, they've been happy to do and provided us with information. "Not everyone's going to be happy about it, but I think the general sense is people are OK with it."
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
RNZ's money correspondent answers your questions. Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. 'People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider,' said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. 'MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. 'To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount.' People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.
Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
Do I Have To Pay For My Partner's Care?
Send your questions to If one person in a de facto relationship needs permanent medical care, does the Government require the other partner to pay for the care once the unwell patient's funds run out? The basic answer to your question is that when your partner is being assessed for their ability to pay for their care, your income and assets will usually be taken into account. If you're referring to medical care in a rest home setting, your assets and personal income affect whether your partner will qualify for a residential care subsidy. "People who need residential care are required to pay for it themselves, if they can afford to do so. If they cannot afford it, they may be eligible for a residential care subsidy, which Health New Zealand pays directly to the care provider," said Ministry of Social Development group general manager for client service delivery Graham Allpress. "MSD's role is to check whether people qualify for this subsidy by performing a 'financial means assessment'. "To get the subsidy, a person's income and assets must be under a certain amount. If they are in a relationship, the combined income and assets of both parties must be under a certain amount." People can qualify for the subsidy if they are 50 to 64, single and without dependent children, or over 65 and meet the income and means test. That means, even if your partner's funds have run out, your assets could still be taken into account. If only one partner needs care, the couple combined need to have assets of no more than $155,873 not including the family home and car, or $284,636 if you do want the home and car in the assessment. If it's other types of care that you're thinking of, it could be a good idea to contact Health NZ for a needs assessment. There are options such as the supported living payment but eligibility for this is assessed on a household income basis, too. I'm currently a NZ tax resident living in NZ, but previously lived in Australia (over a decade ago) and purchased shares on the ASX that I continue to own and receive dividends for (which I declare as part of my income). If I sold these shares now, worth about $150,000, what taxes would they be subject to? Specifically, would I have to pay a capital gains tax on the increased share value (as I would if I were an Australian tax resident). This is probably a question for an accountant with expertise in Australian tax. Based on information available online, it seems that you potentially should have paid tax on the shares in Australia when you stopped being an Australian resident. Assuming that didn't happen, the Australian Tax Office is likely to be expecting capital gains tax to be paid on them when they are sold. You aren't likely to have any New Zealand tax obligations. Tax experts tell me that the authorities have access to a lot of data these days so it's possible that the Australian Tax Office will find out about any share sale and might get in touch with you. I am 78 years of age and still work part time and also still contribute to my KiwiSaver. Am I eligible for the government contribution? Sorry, no. While the government said it was going to start making contributions to 16 and 17-year-olds' accounts, it hasn't budged on the upper limit of 65.
