logo
Trump is slashing billions from Harvard. Here's a breakdown of the federal funding that's been lost.

Trump is slashing billions from Harvard. Here's a breakdown of the federal funding that's been lost.

Boston Globe28-05-2025

Trump officials have said they're cutting Harvard off from federal money because they allege the university has allowed antisemitism to flourish on campus amid
A student protester against the war in Gaza walks past tents and banners in an encampment in Harvard Yard, at Harvard University in Cambridge on April 25, 2024.
Ben Curtis/Associated Press
Advertisement
In a move to exert pressure over Harvard, Trump administration officials on April 11
Harvard
The university has
Advertisement
Harvard President Alan Garber has responded by saying the Trump administration is focusing on antisemitism and discrimination to try to justify an unlawful attack on academic freedom and day-to-day operations at a university that has few peers worldwide.
'These actions have stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world,' Garber said in a widely cited
Archon Fung, professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, addresses students, faculty, and members of the Harvard University community on Thursday, April 17, 2025, in Cambridge.
Charles Krupa/Associated Press
Harvard
Here's a refresher on how much money the Trump administration has slashed from Harvard, including when the cuts happened.
February: NIH 'indirect costs' cap
On Feb. 7, just a couple of weeks into Trump's second term, officials at the National Institutes of Health announced they would
For decades, NIH grant recipients could get reimbursed for a predetermined percentage of the so-called indirect costs tied to research, like administrative and facility expenses not directly tied to scientific goals.
Andrew G. Nixon, a spokesperson for the US Department of Health and Human Services, said the cuts to indirect reimbursement costs would
At Harvard, the NIH previously reimbursed
Advertisement
After the Feb. 7 announcement, NIH indirect cost reimbursements were capped at 15 percent, representing a loss of tens of millions of dollars across Harvard.
Here's a breakdown, according to an
$33.8 million at Harvard Medical School
$13.1 million at Harvard University
$12.7 million at Harvard School of Public Health
A demonstrator holds a sing in Harvard Square after a rally was held against President Donald Trump's attacks on Harvard University.
JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images
March: $9 billion under 'review'
On March 29, the Trump administration announced it would
hospitals, in an effort to 'root out antisemitism,' according to the government's antisemitism task force.
The announcement came 10 days after the task force secured
Local hospitals that could be affected by Harvard's funding review include
April: Billions in NIH cuts
By far the biggest blow to Harvard's federal funding came on April 14, when the NIH announced it was
The freeze came the same day that
'Harvard is committed to fighting antisemitism and other forms of bigotry in its community. Antisemitism and discrimination of any kind not only are abhorrent and antithetical to Harvard's values but also threaten its academic mission,' lawyers told the Trump administration in an
In its lawsuit over the funding, Harvard said they began receiving stop work orders in the immediate aftermath of the federal government's April 14 announcement. The university also said what the Trump administration characterized as a funding 'freeze' amounted to a termination of funds.
Advertisement
'The effect is the same. Under whatever name, the Government has ceased the flow of funds to Harvard as part of its pressure campaign to force Harvard to submit to the Government's control over its academic programs,' Harvard officials wrote in their
The combined $2.26 billion in lost NIH grants and contracts is roughly 80 percent of the more than $2.8 billion of federal money that's been announced axed by the Trump administration at Harvard, including the most recent cuts in May.
April 20: Plan to freeze 'additional $1 billion'
On April 20, the
Garber and other Harvard officials referenced the potential freeze of an additional $1 billion in funding in their
'A threat such as this to a university's academic freedom strikes an equal blow to the research conducted and resulting advancements made on its campus,' the lawsuit said.
May 5: Trump halts all new grants
On May 5, the Trump administration told Harvard that the university would receive
Education Secretary Linda McMahon notified Garber of the consequences in
The university 'should no longer seek GRANTS from the federal government, since none will be provided,' McMahon wrote.
Advertisement
Mid-May: More federal agencies cut grants
On May 13, Harvard updated its lawsuit to include another
Harvard said in its filing that the terminated grants had come from
May 27: Trump tells feds to cancel Harvard contracts
On Tuesday, the US General Services Administration, which oversees federal contracts, told all federal agencies to
The letter appears to be an attempt to sever any remaining business relationships between Harvard and the government.
The affected contracts include a Department of Defense contract for management training and a Health and Human Services contract for research on energy drinks, the Globe reported.
Claire Thornton can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Europe to give Iran message that US open to direct talks
Europe to give Iran message that US open to direct talks

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Europe to give Iran message that US open to direct talks

By Francois Murphy, John Irish and Parisa Hafezi GENEVA (Reuters) -European foreign ministers will tell their Iranian counterpart on Friday that the U.S. is open to direct talks even as it considers joining Israeli strikes intended to smash Tehran's nuclear capacity, diplomats said before a meeting in Geneva. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi will be told that Iran must send a "clear signal," two diplomats told Reuters, with pressure mounting on Tehran to agree tough curbs on its nuclear programme to prevent the potential development of an atomic weapon. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke to several Western counterparts prior to the Geneva meeting, the diplomats said, indicating readiness to engage directly with Tehran. Washington did not confirm that, though broadcaster CNN quoted a U.S. official saying President Donald Trump supported diplomacy from allies that could bring Iran closer to a deal. Tehran, however, has repeatedly said it will not talk to the Trump government until Israeli attacks end. The ministers from Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, plus the European Union's foreign policy chief, were meeting separately prior to planned face-to-face talks with Araqchi. "The Iranians can't sit down with the Americans whereas we can," said a European diplomat. "We will tell them to come back to the table to discuss the nuclear issue before the worst-case scenario, while raising our concerns over its ballistic missiles, support to Russia and detention of our citizens." The Trump administration is demanding Iran stop uranium enrichment altogether, whereas the E3 have in past talks left it some scope to enrich for civil ends in exchange for extremely strict international inspections of its nuclear activities. On Friday, French President Emmanuel Macron shifted closer to Trump's position, saying that any new deal with Tehran needed to go towards zero enrichment. A senior Iranian official told Reuters Iran is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment but said the prospect of zero enrichment would undoubtedly be rejected, especially while Israel was attacking Iran. IRAN DEMANDS END TO WAR The talks were due for mid-afternoon in Geneva, where an initial accord between Iran and world powers to curb its nuclear programme in return for sanctions lifting was struck in 2013 before a comprehensive deal in 2015. Separate talks between Iran and the U.S. collapsed when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12. "There is no room for negotiations with the U.S. until Israeli aggression stops," Araqchi was quoted as saying on Iranian state TV on Friday. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot spoke to Rubio on Thursday night, during which Rubio said Washington was ready for direct contact with the Iranians any time, according to a French diplomatic source. The main message Europeans will pass to Araqchi is that the U.S. has signalled readiness for direct talks, but that Iran must give a serious signal, the two European diplomats said, without defining what the signal should be. Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, has spoken to Araqchi several times since last week, sources say. While diplomats did not expect a breakthrough in Geneva, they said it was vital to engage with Iran because once the war stopped the nuclear issue would remain unresolved given that Tehran would still retain the scientific know-how. "Even now, if they have something to say, we will listen," Araqchi said of the Europeans. "We are not ashamed of defending our nation's rights and we are not avoiding anyone." German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said European powers had always been ready to talk provided Iran committed to not developing nuclear weapons. "Now it's Iran's move," he said. Trump has said he will decide within two weeks whether to join Israeli strikes.

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles
Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

Chicago Tribune

time8 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Appeals court lets President Donald Trump keep control of National Guard troops deployed to Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — An appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to keep control of National Guard troops he deployed to Los Angeles following protests over immigration raids. The decision halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. 'The undisputed facts demonstrate that before the deployment of the National Guard, protesters 'pinned down' several federal officers and threw 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects' at the officers. Protesters also damaged federal buildings and caused the closure of at least one federal building. And a federal van was attacked by protesters who smashed in the van's windows,' the court wrote. 'The federal government's interest in preventing incidents like these is significant.' It also found that even if the federal government failed to notify the governor of California before federalizing the National Guard as required by law, Newsom had no power to veto the president's order. Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social platform, calling it a 'BIG WIN.' He wrote that 'all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.' Newsom issued a statement that expressed disappointment that the court is allowing Trump to retain control of the Guard. But he also welcomed one aspect of the decision. 'The court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court,' Newsom said. 'The President is not a king and is not above the law. We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens.' The court case could have wider implications on the president's power to deploy soldiers within the United States after Trump directed immigration officials to prioritize deportations from other Democratic-run cities. Trump, a Republican, argued that the troops were necessary to restore order. Newsom, a Democrat, said the move inflamed tensions, usurped local authority and wasted resources. The protests have since appeared to be winding down. Two judges on the appeals panel were appointed by Trump during his first term. During oral arguments Tuesday, all three judges suggested that presidents have wide latitude under the federal law at issue and that courts should be reluctant to step in. The case started when Newsom sued to block Trump's command, and he won an early victory from U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco. Breyer found that Trump had overstepped his legal authority, which he said only allows presidents can take control during times of 'rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' 'The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'' wrote Breyer, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton and is brother to retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The Trump administration, though, argued that courts can't second guess the president's decisions and quickly secured a temporary halt from the appeals court. The ruling means control of the California National Guard will stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold.

On Juneteenth, Trump says the US has 'too many' holidays
On Juneteenth, Trump says the US has 'too many' holidays

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

On Juneteenth, Trump says the US has 'too many' holidays

Trump criticized the number of American holidays and claimed they cost billions in productivity. The post was made on Juneteenth, a federal holiday that Trump previously supported. Joe Biden later said making it a federal holiday was "one of the proudest moments of my presidency." Joe Biden has reiterated his support for Juneteenth as a federal holiday, after Donald Trump said America has "too many" of them. "Too many non-working holidays in America," Trump wrote on Truth Social late Thursday. "It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed." The president said that the frequency of holidays "must change" and that workers didn't want them, either. "The workers don't want it either!" he continued. "Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Juneteenth, held on June 19 every year, commemorates the end of slavery in the United States and has long been celebrated by Black Americans. It became the 11th federal holiday in 2021 with a law signed by then-President Joe Biden. The bill passed with broad bipartisan support, receiving unanimous approval in the Senate and all but 14 votes in the House of Representatives. Biden later posted on X that he had celebrated the day in Texas and that making Juneteenth a federal holiday was "one of the proudest moments of my presidency." "It's a day of liberation. It's a day of remembrance. And it's a day of celebration. Today, it was an honor to be in Galveston where freedom rang out 160 years ago," he said. The White House press office didn't immediately respond to Business a request for comment from Business Insider regarding Trump's Truth Social post. Most federal offices, such as the US Postal Service, are closed during Juneteenth. Markets like the Nasdaq and New York Stock Exchange don't trade during the holiday, either. But whether private companies and state governments remain open varies. Most major banks are closed for the holiday, but not all companies provide paid time off. Earlier on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing that the White House was open. When asked by a journalist about commemorating Juneteenth, she said she was "not tracking" Trump's signature on any proclamations for the holiday. "I know this is a federal holiday," she said. "I want to thank all of you for showing up to work. We are certainly here. We're working 24/7 right now." Trump himself supported making Juneteenth a federal holiday in the wake of widespread protests following the killing of George Floyd. "Make Juneteenth a National Holiday" was included among his "Promise to Black America over 4 years" policy proposals in his 2020 presidential campaign. During that campaign, Trump took credit for publicizing Juneteenth after moving one of his rallies from June 19 to June 20 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. "I did something good: I made Juneteenth very famous," Trump told The Wall Street Journal at the time. "It's actually an important event, an important time. But nobody had ever heard of it." In the same interview, Trump expressed surprise that his administration had commemorated Juneteenth every year. "Oh really? We put out a statement? The Trump White House put out a statement?" he said, according to the Journal. "OK, OK. Good." The White House did not publish a statement on its website commemorating Juneteenth this year. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store