‘I used to think Ireland was safe': American tourist (81) reveals vicious ordeal after street robbery
Sentencing adjourned of Tomas Starodubcevas, who is charged with robbery of the holidaymaker in Killarney
An American tourist, who came to Ireland on a long-planned trip to celebrate her 54th wedding anniversary, has revealed the extent of her injuries and the ordeal she suffered when she was thrown to the ground and robbed while in Kerry.
Andrea Bartlett (81) gave a lengthy victim impact statement via video link from the US this week during the sentencing hearing of Lithuanian man Tomas Starodubcevas (24) who is charged with robbery arising out of the incident at Port Road, Killarney, on April 22, 2024.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
It's quaint the things you find in some people's bathrooms...
Anna Percy's 12-year-old daughter had a friend round, and at one point this young girl visited the bathroom. On her return she mentioned to Anna that she was intrigued by the toothbrushes she spotted on the shelf. It transpired that in her home everyone uses the motorised versions, and she had never seen a non-buzzy brush before. 'I didn't know you could get one that wasn't electric,' she admitted, before asking: 'What do you call it… an acoustic toothbrush?' Dan's the man True confession time. Reader Neil Gregory is a respected pillar of society, often to be spotted in sensible shoes, sedate trousers and a shirt which is safely tucked beneath his belt. But in the good old, bad old days of the 1960s he was something of a Flower Child, with hair as lengthy as Wagner's Ring Cycle, bell-bottom jeans, and even a pair of sandals, which was a brave choice of footwear to be wearing on the puddle-spattered Glasgow pavements. Being a hippy meant befriending other hippies and forming a community of sorts, which Neil proceeded to do. He was even lucky enough to bond with a bona fide American drop-out from the rat race, who was named Daniel, and had previously loafed around the fabled hippy enclave of Haight-Ashbery, before he eventually tripped and traipsed his way to Scotland. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this chap came to be known by the nickname Dan Francisco. Anger (mis)management True confession, Part Deux. Reader Ryan Dawson says: 'I realised I have a road rage problem when my five-year-old daughter shouted "Pick a lane, eejit!" while sitting in my shopping trolley.' Andrew Smith from Troon spotted this shop in Irvine and concluded that they could have chosen a better name for it… (Image: Contributed) Trash talk When he was a student, Barry Rogers got a part-time job as a garbage collector. 'So you're working as a binman?' said one of his friends. 'I prefer to think of myself as a pick-up artist,' replied Barry. Kid's stuff We mentioned that a Scottish actor has bagged the role of Harry Potter in a TV version of the popular fantasy series. David Morrow wonders if this will lead to other classics of children's literature becoming Scottified, and he looks forward to reading… The Famous Fife. Bump and beyond 'I bought a book on how to survive falling down a staircase,' says reader Chris Jones. 'It was a step-by-step guide.'
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lawyer says she's no terrorist as DHS accuses Sen. Shaheen's husband
DHS accused Shaheen's lawyer husband, William "Billy" Shaheen, of having traveled with a "known or suspected terrorist" -- and said the senator had used her influence to have him removed from a TSA watchlist. Shaheen denied getting her husband removed from a watch list, as Atallah, a close family friend blasted DHS for trying to "score political points by smearing innocent people." "Let me be crystal clear: I am a U.S. citizen, a licensed attorney, a law-abiding American, and Billy Shaheen's legal co-counsel," Atallah told Seacoastonline, part of the USA TODAY Network, adding she had been pulled out of airport lines more than 40 times for invasive searches. Atallah came forward after DHS said Shaheen's husband had been accompanied on flights by a suspected terrorist. "New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen's Husband Traveled with a Known or Suspected Terrorist Three Times in a Single Year," a June 4 DHS4 press release alleged. "I am the individual DHS referred to in its recent public release, the so-called 'known or suspected terrorist' who traveled with Attorney William 'Billy' Shaheen," Atallah said in a statement. "I have no criminal record and have dedicated my career to fighting for immigrants' rights here at home, and to representing, pro bono, Americans who were wrongfully detained or held hostage abroad, out of a deep belief in justice and service," Atallah said. "In fact, I also worked closely with the Trump administration during its first term to help bring unlawfully detained U.S. citizens home." The DHS press release cites specific flights in which Bill Shaheen was a "Co-Traveler with a Known or Suspected Terrorist." Atallah said she was on those flights. Kristi Noem says Biden 'weaponized' watchlist DHS asserts that the TSA watch list program, "Silent Partners Quiet Skies," was politicized by the Biden administration, leading to the harassment of political opponents like Tulsi Gabbard, the former congresswoman and President Donald Trump's current director of National Intelligence - while letting political allies like the Shaheens off the hook. The Biden administration "weaponized" the program "against its political foes and to benefit their well-heeled friends," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said in the press release. DHS announced June 5 it was ending the Quiet Skies Program, saying it had "failed to stop a single terrorist attack while costing US taxpayers $200 million a year." Atallah doesn't disagree the Quiet Skies program was broken. "I had no idea I was ever on a TSA Quiet Skies watchlist until I read DHS's public statement," Atallah wrote. "I knew I was being subjected to humiliating searches -- frisked, pulled aside, questioned -- more than 40 times, and NOT ONCE did they find anything illegal, inappropriate or incriminating on me." Atallah said she asked Sen. Shaheen's office for help, "not to intervene but simply to understand why this was happening to me and who was behind it." "I have done nothing wrong and I am not worried - they can find anything on me if they try," she said. The Department of Homeland Security declined to say why Atallah was flagged as a possible terrorist. "We are confident in our law enforcement's intelligence, and we aren't going to share intelligence reports and undermine national security," DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, noting Atallah "chose to reveal herself of her own volition." Atallah filed a Freedom of Information Act request over the airport searches. In June 2023, DHS told Atallah it could "neither confirm nor deny any information about you which may be contained within federal watchlists or reveal any law enforcement sensitive information." DHS suggested, but didn't confirm, it may have made " may assist in avoiding incidents of misidentification." As a well-known immigration lawyer, Atallah said she has been working to arrange the return of Palestinian-Americans trapped in Gaza. "I have already helped individuals and families, including a prominent Massachusetts family," she said. "I have helped them get home; that's what I do and I am very passionate about it." Choir girl turned lawyer Atallah said she has known Jeanne and Bill Shaheen since she was 16, "when I was a choir girl at St. George Church in Dover, New Hampshire, a church that Billy's mother helped build." "It is both baffling and disgraceful to see this administration suggest that Bill Shaheen was 'traveling with a terrorist,'" Atallah wrote, "when, in fact, he was traveling with me: a fellow attorney and American citizen. This isn't just false, it's a deliberate and dangerous distortion, designed to score political points by smearing innocent people." Sen. Shaheen recently announced she will not seek re-election in 2026. U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H., is the Democratic frontrunner for her seat, and the Shaheens' daughter, Stefany Shaheen, of Portsmouth, recently announced her bid for Pappas' seat. "The whole situation is ludicrous," said Bill Shaheen. "I did not know I was on a list, or why I was on a list but I guess I know now. The first time I was searched, I was told it was 'random' when I asked why. After a few times, you get suspicious, and they will not tell you why you are on the list. That's un-American." Shaheen said the searches are invasive. "They take your belt; they feel up your crotch," he said. "They don't even bother to ask you on a date. Then they 'walk' you to the gate." Shaheen said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, his wife, never asked anyone to take him off any list. He only wanted to know why he was being searched and who was responsible. "If you are going to take away someone's rights, you better be ready to justify it, better be able to prove the facts," he said. Bill Shaheen said he has known Atallah since she was a little girl. "She has a very big heart and she wants to help people, wherever she can," he said. "She said, as a girl, she wanted to be a lawyer. I offered guidance to help her along the way. I cannot and will not ever believe she is a terrorist." 'Invasive and degrading' Shaheen's office said she contacted TSA "after her husband was subjected to several extensive, invasive and degrading searches at airport checkpoints." "Any suggestion that the Senator's husband was supposedly included on a Quiet Skies list is news to her and had never been raised before yesterday," the office said in a statement. "Nor was she aware of any action taken following her call to remove him from such a list." The senator's office noted Bill Shaheen had been stopped and searched at least five times, despite the fact that he is a former judge who also served as U.S. attorney for New Hampshire. Bill Shaheen is a respected Lebanese-American attorney, the senator's office said, who is active in the Arab-American community. What was TSA's Quiet Skies program? The Transportation Security Administration, which federalized airport security after the terrorist hijackings Sept. 11, 2001, created the "Quiet Skies" program in 2010 to provide additional screening for suspicious travelers. TSA has said individuals identified for additional screening aren't necessarily "known or suspected terrorists." Travelers are chosen for the list are based on aggregated travel data, intelligence and suspicious activity. TSA doesn't release how many people are on the list for security reasons. But press reports said 1.2 million people, including 4,600 U.S. citizens, were on the Terrorist Screening Database in 2017. Civil liberties groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, have filed lawsuits on behalf of people who disputed their inclusion on the "Quiet Skies" list. But TSA officials have defended the program as "very effective" at providing security and protecting the privacy of travelers. Atallah said she chose to speak out to clear her name and the names of the Shaheens. "They used my story not to bring about accountability or reform, but to wage a partisan smear campaign," she said. "They twisted facts, spread falsehoods, and used the official platform of DHS to paint me, a U.S. citizen and attorney, as a 'terrorist' for political gain." Contributing: Bart Jansen, Josh Meyer - USA TODAY
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence
"An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico's, it is founded on a third-party's criminal use of the company's product," Justice Elena Kagan wrote. The decision landed against a backdrop of strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. President Donald Trump wants Mexico to do more to stop illegal drugs from flowing into the United States and Mexico wants to stop illegal arms from flowing south. Mexico has maintained tighter regulations on firearms than its neighbor to the north. The case was also the first time the Supreme Court ruled on a 2005 law that shields gunmakers from liability for crimes committed by third parties. An exception in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act allows suits if a gunmaker is accused of knowingly violating a state or federal law. Attorneys representing Mexico argued that gun companies are "aiding and abetting" the trafficking of hundreds of thousands of high-powered firearms into Mexico through deliberate design, marketing and distribution choices. That includes doing business with dealers who repeatedly sell large quantities of guns to cartel traffickers, Mexico's counsel alleged. Firearms makers, led by Smith & Wesson Brands, said the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes after being sold, transported, and used to commit crime in Mexico involves too many steps to blame the industry. Guns made in the United States are sold to federally licensed distributors who sell them to federally licensed dealers - some of whom knowingly or negligently sell them to criminals who smuggle them into Mexico, where they end up in the hands of cartel members. Mexico's attorneys stressed that the suit was in its early stages and said Mexico should be allowed a chance to prove its allegations in court. A federal judge in Massachusetts dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms. But the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the challenge met an exception in the law and could move forward. Mexico, it said, had adequately alleged the gunmakers "aided and abetted the knowingly unlawful downstream trafficking of their guns into Mexico." Mexico was seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages, estimated in the range of $10 billion, and a court order requiring gun companies to change their practices. Lawyers for gun rights groups told the Supreme Court that Mexico's suit is an attempt to bankrupt the American firearms industry and undermine the Second Amendment. Gun violence prevention groups worried the case could make it harder to bring domestic lawsuits against the gun industry. The case is Smith & Wesson Brands Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
