
Government still has no plan to replace US HIV funding, Health organisations are demanding action
'We are determined not to let people die,' reads a letter from the Global HIV Treatment Coalition and civil society organisations sent to the presidency and health minister Aaron Motsoaledi. The letter demands that the government gets its act together on a fully costed emergency plan to deal with the loss of HIV funding.
This follows billions of rand for HIV and TB programmes being withdrawn after the Trump administration cut funding for USAID and the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in January. In 2024, PEPFAR provided about R7.5 billion to South Africa.
Vulnerable people, known as 'key populations ', such as sex workers have lost access to vital HIV programmes that delivered ARVs, USAID-funded clinics have closed down, and health workers have been retrenched.
HIV activists say the health department has 'not taken concerted action' to address these funding cuts, and that 'Parliament, the National and Provincial AIDS Councils, and everyone else in the country are in the dark regarding the emergency plan and action required'.
The letter is signed by Zackie Achmat and Anneke Meerkotter on behalf of the Global HIV Treatment Coalition. About 200 people, including leading activists, doctors and public health advocates, as well as over 70 organisations have endorsed it.
The country's HIV programmes are also facing a further blow to funding after The Global Fund announced that its allocations would be reduced.
The letter demands that the health minister provides information on the impact of US funding cuts and details of the national and provincial government's emergency plans. It calls for the government to meet with civil society and health sector leaders to review the plan.
A month ago, activists warned Parliament's health portfolio committee about the looming health crisis and that people were struggling to access antiretrovirals.
The letter refers to a study which estimates that from 2025 to 2028, the discontinuation of PEPFAR could result in a 29% to 56% increase in new HIV infections, and 56,000 to 65,000 additional AIDS-related deaths.
Neither the presidency nor national health department responded to a request for comment.
In his budget speech in May, the finance minister, Enoch Godongwana, stated that no new allocations are being made to deal with the withdrawal of US funding for HIV-related services. But he stated that such funding may be issued later in the year. We reported at the time:
Officials from the National Health Department have been in negotiations with Treasury over the last few months about securing emergency funding in order to cover the PEPFAR cuts.
The emergency funds could come from Treasury's contingency reserve, which exists partially in order to cover unexpected funding shortfalls. It may also be financed through borrowing.
The health department's proposal for emergency funding had apparently been insufficiently detailed. It needed to provide more information about how the money would actually be spent.
We understand that the health department has also put in a separate application to the National Treasury to cover the cuts to research funding by the US. This follows a decision by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to effectively cancel grants to researchers in South Africa (see a detailed explanation here). Two large private donors have offered to assist with this if the government puts up a certain amount.
To understand the effects of the US funding cuts, GroundUp and Spotlight made a request on 25 June to the National Health Laboratory Service under the Promotion of Access to Information Act for data going back to 2015, including the monthly number of HIV viral load, CD4, TB and syphilis tests.
This article first appeared on GroundUp. Read the original article here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
China confirms trade deal with US and lifting of ‘restrictive measures'
The announcement by the US and China follows initial talks in Geneva in early May, which led both sides to postpone massive tariff hikes. China has confirmed details of a trade deal with the United States, saying Washington would lift 'restrictive measures' while Beijing will 'review and approve' items under export controls. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump announced that the US and China had signed a trade agreement and that he expects to reach a deal with India soon. 'We just signed with China the other day,' Trump said. Rare earth minerals The announcement by the US and China follows initial talks in Geneva in early May, which led both sides to postpone massive tariff hikes that threatened to derail much of the trade between the two countries. A top priority for Washington in talks with Beijing had been ensuring the supply of the rare earth minerals for products including tech products, electric vehicles, hard drives and national defence equipment. ALSO READ: Hopes rise as US and China continue trade talks Restrictions China, which dominates global production of the elements, began requiring export licences in early April, a move widely viewed as a response to blistering tariffs imposed by Trump, according to AFP. Beijing confirmed on Friday that an agreement had been reached. 'It is hoped that the United States and China will meet each other halfway,' a spokesperson for the commerce deoartment said in a statement. Huawei ban There was no mention if there would be a lifting of the US ban on Huawei products. When the Trump administration blacklisted Huawei Technologies in 2019 over spying concerns, the move almost wiped out the Chinese company's global smartphone business. Yet it bounced back with the support of China's government and is now at the center of national efforts to achieve technological independence from the West. The remarkable comeback raises questions about whether US efforts to contain China's geopolitical ascent have been effective or adequate and which of the two superpowers will come to dominate in areas such as semiconductor design and artificial intelligence, according to Bloomberg. Some have equally wondered about whether the United States is truly concerned about raising any national security concerns against Huawei, or about safeguarding its dominance of the global technology ecosystem. ALSO READ: Trump says deal with Xi 'extremely hard' as steel tariffs double


The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
ActionSA wants deputy ministers axed, plans to save billions
Andrew Whitfield's dismissal as Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition has sparked major reactions. ActionSA has weighed in and called for President Cyril Ramaphosa to remove the remaining 42 deputy ministers from their posts. ActionSA's Athol Trollip says the executive must be freed from incompetence, underperformance, and impropriety. He says Ramaphosa should implement bold reforms that deliver real accountability. The party believes that Ramaphosa missed an opportunity to make decisive changes and steer the country in a new direction. He said the president failed to 'cut the dead wood' and remove those tainted by corruption and mismanagement. The political party says it has introduced a bill to slash cabinet perks and rein in executive excess. The Enhanced Cut Cabinet Perks Bill is part of ActionSA's Cabinet Reform Package. '[It] will soon see us table a Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament to abolish the position of Deputy Ministers altogether. Measures that together could conservatively save South Africans R1.5 billion a year,' said Trollip. Trollip said Minister Thembi Simelane, Minister Khumbudzo Ntshaveni and Minister Nobuhle Nkabane should have been removed, but instead they remain firmly in place. He said the ActionSA believes that South Africans deserve leadership that serves them, not themselves. 'Ramaphosa's cabinet is not only one of the largest in the world but also deeply ineffective, with worsening socio-economic indicators reflecting a failure rooted in absent reforms,' added Trollip. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Oversight committee for the Presidency stalled as Parliament waits on submissions
National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza says there was an agreement by the Rules Committee on the formation of the committee to play oversight on the president, but parties were requested to give the modalities of that committee. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Eight months after Parliament decided to establish a committee that will play oversight on the president, progress on this initiative seems to have stalled as some parties are yet to make a submission on the format the committee should take. This emerged when the long overdue committee was raised in the meeting of the National Assembly Programme Committee on Thursday. ActionSA MP Lerato Ngobeni enquired about the update on the proposed committee when MPs met to discuss the programme for Parliament. 'I think at some point, and I don't know where it lies in terms of being updated around the Vote 1 committee. We did vote that there must be oversight over Vote 1 in the Presidency. Maybe, if we can get an update as to when that committee will be established,' Ngobeni said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Secretary to Parliament Masibulele Xaso said the matter was currently before the Sub-Committee on the Review of Rules. 'Political parties were asked to make submissions. The initial deadline, I think, was the 30th of May, then extended to the 6th or 7th of June,' Xaso said. He also said only three parties have made submissions. 'So the matter is currently serving before that sub-committee. Once the sub-committee has concluded its processes on the issue, it will report to the Rules Committee, then the Rules Committee to the National Assembly,' Xaso added. National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza urged the parties to finalise their submissions. 'If they still are otherwise, the sub-committee will have to deal with only those presentations that they had received on the modalities,' she said. According to Didiza, there was an agreement by the Rules Committee on the formation of the committee, but parties were requested to actually give what the modalities of that committee should be. This was because some elements in the budget for the Presidency are dealt with by separate portfolio committees. 'So the essence was what then would this committee deal with. It was those issues that parties were asked to make representations on,' added Didiza. The formation of the committee to play oversight on the president dates back to the sixth Parliament when parties such as the DA, the EFF and IFP had written separately to former National Assembly speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula asking that the portfolio on the Presidency be established. In his report on state capture, Chief Justice Raymond Zondo recommended the establishment of a committee to oversee the president and the Presidency, among other things. After President Cyril Ramaphosa in response to the recommendations of the Zondo commission, Parliament said the proposal to establish a portfolio committee to oversee the Office of the President should be referred to the Rules Committee. In 2023, Parliament undertook a study tour to some countries to see how oversight of the Presidency was done.