‘Vodafone Idea's capex plan unlikely to help regain subs; faces ₹20,000 crore annual cash shortfall'
NEW DELHI:
Vodafone Idea
(Vi) planned capital expenditure (CapEx) of ₹50,000-55,000 crore over the next two to three years is unlikely to significantly help the ailing telecom carrier regain subscribers that have migrated to rival
Reliance Jio
and
Bharti Airtel
's networks, according to
Motilal Oswal
.
'Vi continues to lose market share to peers due to lower ARPU translation, given its inferior subscriber mix and elevated subscriber churn,' the brokerage firm said in a report, seen by ETTelecom.
'Despite the likely capex, we believe regaining subscribers would be a tall ask for Vi, given its peers' superior free cash flow generation and deeper pockets,' it added.
Motilal Oswal estimated that Vi's capex increased to ₹4,200 crore in Q4FY25, the highest since the merger of Vodafone and Idea Cellular, with the overall FY25 capex rising to ₹9,600 crore.
'Despite equity infusion and acceleration in capex, Vi continued to lose market share to peers. On our estimates, it lost ~130bp in subscriber market share (SMS) and ~155bp in revenue market share (RMS) in FY25, among the three private telcos,' the brokerage said.
In the fourth quarter (Q4) of fiscal year 2025, Vi's net loss widened sequentially to ₹7,166 crore, from ₹6,609 crore in Q3FY25. Last week, its board of directors approved raising around ₹20,000 crore more, which is seen as crucial to investing in the expansion of its 4G and 5G networks and arresting subscriber churn.
The telecom joint venture between India's
Aditya Birla Group
and the UK's Vodafone Group Plc has been unable to control subscriber declines despite launching commercial fifth-generation (5G) services in key markets in the January-March 2025 quarter, including Delhi and Mumbai.
In the December 2024 quarter, subscriber base had fallen below the 200 million mark for the first time since its merger in 2019. In the March 2025 quarter, it further declined to 198.2 million.
'We believe the company's network investments remain contingent on debt raise, which, in turn, is dependent on continued support/AGR relief from GoI (₹200 bn+ (₹20,000 crore) annual cash shortfall over FY26-31E),' the brokerage firm said.
According to the report, the stabilisation of Vi's subscriber base, along with further relief from the government of India, remains imperative for the telco's long-term survival.
'Further, with no relief so far on AGR dues (repayments commence March 2026) and no breakthrough on the debt raise, we believe Vi is likely to face an annual cash shortfall of ~₹200 bn (₹20,000 crore) and may be unable to meet its capex guidance of ₹500-550 bn (₹50,000-55,000 crore) over FY25-27E,' the brokerage said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Mukesh Ambani, Sunil Mittal teams up against Elon Musk, writes letter to…, says businesses will suffer if…
(File) A group representing Indian telecom giants Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel has raised concerns that their businesses can adversely affect if India sets satellite spectrum prices at 'unjustifiably low' rates and potentially favoring satellite internet providers like Elon Musk's Starlink. In May, India's telecom regulator proposed that satellite service providers pay 4% of their annual revenue to the government for offering services. Starlink has argued against auctioning spectrum, advocating for a licensing model similar to global practices. The company contends that spectrum is a natural resource that should be shared among service providers. The Cellular Operators Association of India in a May 29 letter to the telecoms ministry sought a review of those pricing proposals, saying traditional players pay higher upfront auction charges for telecoms spectrum which make their payments to the government for spectrum roughly 21% higher, when compared to what satellite players would pay. 'Price per MHz should be equivalent or at least comparable for both, especially when used to reach the same consumers for identical services,' said the letter as reported by Reuters. 'Satellite services can offer competitive and affordable alternatives to terrestrial broadband,' it added. Reliance and Airtel didn't comment on the matter yet. A senior Indian government source, as cited by Reuters on, said the telecoms ministry is still reviewing the pricing recommendations made by the regulator, adding such industry concerns have been raised in the past. Telecom players like Reliance Jio are concerned they will be offering similar wireless broadband services as satellite providers but paying much more, said an industry source with direct knowledge of the situation. Reliance and others have spent nearly $20 billion in recent years to get 5G spectrum via auctions to offer telecom, data and broadband services. The process of Starlink getting a license is 'nearly complete', telecoms minister Jyotiraditya Scindia told The Print news website on Tuesday. (With Inputs From Reuters)
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
No rollback of satcom recommendations, government to decide: Trai official
NEW DELHI: The telecom regulator's views were based on an extensive consultative process involving divergent views from multiple stakeholders, and could not be reconsidered, while it's for the government to take a final call, a senior regulatory official said. "We have duly followed the extensive and transparent consultative process with multiple stakeholders sharing divergent views. It is for the government to decide," a Trai official on the conditions of anonymity told ETTelecom, adding that "a level-playing field is out of question" in the current context. "Satellite communications or satcom is a complementary service to terrestrial network providers, with no question of a level playing field between the two. The ₹500 per subscription charge is aimed at enhancing coverage and encouraging space broadband providers to offer services across the country's rural landscape." Early this week, Delhi-based Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea, in a letter to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) said that the watchdog has "underestimated the potential capacities of satellite networks" while possibly overstating those of terrestrial networks. "Incorrect assumptions have led to unjustifiably low spectrum charges for satellite services relative to terrestrial networks," COAI director general SP Kochhar added in his letter to DoT secretary Neeraj Mittal. However, Trai, citing a huge capacity variation between the two sets of players, strongly defended its move. "In our recommendation, we have clearly brought out that there is no case of level-playing field between the satellite service providers and terrestrial service operators because of the huge difference of capacity between them," the senior official said. "So, the capacity of a typical satcom service provider in terms of the internet capacity, is of the order of maybe 0.5 to 1 or 2 percent of the capacity of a typical large terrestrial service provider. So there is no question of level-playing field. It is a complimentary service." The telco lobby group said that the planned capacity of Elon Musk-owned Starlink and Jeff Bezos led-Amazon Kuiper are expected to surpass the current capacity of Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea combined. The idea behind prescribing ₹500 additional charge for urban subscription, according to the official, was to "encourage and nudge satellite service providers" to offer services in the country's rural areas as well. "They can divert their capacity to urban areas to some extent, but we want to nudge them to focus on rural and remote regions. This is the background under which the recommendation was made," he added. Meanwhile, satcom players backed the regulator, and said Trai's views were aimed at bringing affordable space broadband services to bridge the existing digital divide. Telecom watchdog recommended administrative allocation of satcom spectrum with a fee pegged amounting to 4% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR), for a five-year term, and that can be extended by another 2 years. The 4% AGR fee applies to both geostationary and non-geostationary satellite operators. Trai's proposal to subsidise user terminals for satellite operators through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) fund further tilts the level playing field against the terrestrial operator, especially given that a majority of the DBN levy is contributed by telcos, Kochhar added in his letter. The regulatory official said that it has recommended facilitating a target set of users that the government might want to support in unserved or rural and remote areas. "The government can consider subsidising the cost of the terminal. It is for the government to make a decision based on a targeted group or category of users." Lately, the activity in India's nascent space-led communication services sector has intensified following the entry of spaceflight company SpaceX's satellite network Starlink, partnering with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Jio and Sunil Mittal-driven Bharti Airtel.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Neither largecaps, nor smallcaps! India Inc's Q4 result season belongs to the middle order
Even as investors debate whether to chase largecap safety or smallcap thrill, Q4 earnings have quietly handed the trophy to a third contender—India Inc's middle-order. Midcaps have emerged as the surprise winners of the March quarter, delivering relatively better numbers across revenue, EBITDA, profit before tax and net profit. Domestic brokerage firm Motilal Oswal said within its universe, midcaps posted a robust 19% YoY PAT growth, beating not just estimates (10% higher than expected) but also the performance of both largecaps (+10%) and smallcaps (a disappointing –16%). The earnings season, once again, proves that resilience and growth are often found in the mid-ranks. Motilal data shows this wasn't a narrow performance. Midcap Metals clocked an 84% YoY jump in PAT, accounting for over a third of incremental profits. Public sector banks in the midcap universe delivered a 39% surge, driving nearly 50% of total PAT growth. Electronics manufacturing services (EMS) continued their hot streak, rising 70% YoY. The quality of results was notable, with widespread distribution of strong growth across several midcap sectors – in several cases better than the largecap counterparts, Motilal's Gautam Duggad said. Also read | Sensex will hit 1.5 lakh by 2030 & 3 lakh by 2035! Raamdeo Agrawal makes big prediction Other sectors that posted strong growth included Capital Goods (+30%), Consumer Durables (72%), and NBFCs – both lending (23%) & non-lending (36%). 'Comparatively, the mid-cap technology sector was subdued, posting a 12% YoY growth (est. 19%), but better than the large-cap peers – which is in line with our long-standing thesis that mid-cap IT is poised to grow structurally above the large-cap IT names,' he said. 'While overall earnings have been ahead of estimates (a welcome departure from the past 3 quarters' outcome of broad earnings misses), the Mid-cap segment has been an unexpected standout surprise – underlining its critical role in throwing up growth leaders for future – thus broadening the market's investable set of companies,' Duggad said. Market experts also point out that as the market capitalisation of midcaps has grown in the last 2-3 years, FIIs are also showing greater interest due to the liquidity factor. Valuations, however, are getting stretched, warns Trideep Bhattacharya, CIO-Equities, Edelweiss Mutual Fund. 'Mid and smallcaps are now trading at a 17–25% premium to their 10-year averages. So, the earnings momentum must continue. If growth lags, these stocks will be in the penalty box.' That calls for stock-picking discipline. 'Where there is a valuation premium, it must be matched with an earnings growth premium. The market is currently unforgiving of any mismatch,' Bhattacharya added. Still, Bhattacharya believes that midcaps can remain in favour for the right investor profile. 'For conservative investors, flexicap funds work. For moderate risk-takers, multicap funds. And for those with higher risk appetite and a 5–10 year horizon, midcap funds are ideal.' Dr. Joseph Thomas, Head of Research at Emkay Wealth Management, says both mid and smallcaps offer better value to the portfolio on a longer-term basis. 'This is because of two reasons. After the corrective downward movements seen in the last three to four months, the valuations are now at reasonable levels. The segment offers better growth and therefore, better price performance,' he said. In short, the earnings strength, sectoral diversity, and growing institutional participation make midcaps too important to ignore. Also read | Rs 15 lakh crore in net profit! India Inc's top 500 cos break records in FY25 despite downgrades ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
