Voters, demand answers to critical questions from Tri-Cities candidates
2025 is a local election year. Dozens of races will appear on the Aug. 5 primary and the Nov. 4 general election ballots. The results will shape the future of the Tri-Cities for years to come.
As candidates campaign in the months ahead, voters should demand answers to critical questions.
Local races for city councils, county commissions, school boards and other governing bodies differ from big state and federal races. These are nonpartisan races, and the candidates are neighbors who want to serve their community.
At a minimum, they deserve thanks for stepping up to do a job that can deliver more heartburn than peaceful nights. Things can get bad. Local officials increasingly receive threats and harassment, leading to burnout, resignations and retirements.
Voters therefore should look for candidates who possess the emotional and mental fortitude, not to mention the personal support network, to excel under such challenging circumstances.
The unfortunate reality is that the general distaste for politics that pervades American culture dissuades people from running. Too many races — dozens of them — are uncontested.
No candidate — incumbent or otherwise — deserves a free pass.
Benton and Franklin Counties are among the fastest growing in the state, and could have 400,000 residents by 2040. Voters must ask candidates how they balance the need for growth and economic development with paying for services.
Should projects in Richland's Targeted Urban Area or at the Port of Kennewick receive millions in tax breaks now that will reduce future tax revenue?
Likewise, how will elected leaders ensure that growth enhances livability for all and that the Tri-Cities are prepared to house and employ those future residents?
Growth affects more than just city and county governments. School districts must adapt to changing demographics and funding – more or fewer students; more from low-income families or who speak English as a second language.
How will elected school board members ensure that all students receive the quality education they deserve while school finances are in flux?
State funding is unpredictable lately, and federal support that increased during the pandemic has returned to normal. Some school districts overextended spending on recurring costs with those one-time dollars and now face deficits that taxpayers are reluctant to cover.
Debates over curriculum, religion and culture war issues have flared up locally. Voters should consider which candidates will seek to inject more controversy and more politics into schools and which will tamp down those flames.
Remember, most local offices are nonpartisan. Voters should ask candidates if they will act like it. Deciding whether to fill a pothole should not rely on being a Democrat or Republican.
Every local governing body relies on support from Olympia, whether it be financial or policy. How will candidates work with state lawmakers to advance the needs of the Tri-Cities?
Can conservative local candidates temper their politics enough to find compromise with Democrats who control the state capital?
Internecine battles within Franklin County government illustrate how badly things can go when voters prioritize partisan agendas over temperament.
County commissioners, the sheriff and the auditor have let governance devolve into grudge matches, turf wars and legal investigations. Paying for lawyers and jail takeovers is a poor way to manage the public's tax dollars.
Unlike statewide and federal elections, in a local election, voters have opportunities to engage directly with candidates. The people who run for school board, city council, county commission or any other local office are neighbors.
Voters can run into them at the grocery store, a local meeting, a candidate forum or just walking the dog. Candidates might go door-to-door and be ready to chat for a few minutes.
Take advantage of those encounters. There are a host of local issues that need strong leadership from residents who want to do right by their community and put in the necessary work.
If the Tri-Cities want better governance, the people must demand it, not just passively accept it or, worse, be apathetic when they don't get it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
43 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Supreme Court will hear Alabama appeal in bid to execute man found to be intellectually disabled
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will consider making it harder for convicted murderers to show their lives should be spared because they are intellectually disabled, according an order released early on Friday after an apparent technological glitch. The justices' action comes in an appeal from Alabama, which is seeking to execute Joseph Clifton Smith. He was sentenced to death for killing a man in 1997. Lower federal courts found Smith is intellectually disabled and thus can't be executed. When it's argued in the fall, the case could be the first in which the Supreme Court cuts back on its 23-year-old landmark ruling that barred the death penalty for people who are intellectually disabled. At issue is what happens in borderline cases, when scores on IQ tests are slightly above 70, which is widely accepted as a marker of intellectual disability. In 2014 and 2017, the court somewhat eased the burden of showing intellectual disability in those cases. It's the second time in about a year that an online error resulted in an early release from the high court. An opinion in an abortion case was accidently posted on its website a day early in June 2024. The court's landmark opinion overturning abortion as a constitutional right also went out early, though those circumstances were different because the case was leaked. This time, the court released a set of orders set for Monday after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications.


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican appeal and left in place a Pennsylvania court decision allowing people to cast provisional ballots when their mail-in votes are rejected for not following technical procedures in state law. The court released the decision Friday, after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications about orders that had been slated to be released Monday. A technological error also resulted in an opinion being posted early last year.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
The Republican at the Center of the War Between Trump and Musk
Caught in the middle of President Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's spectacular fallout is a Republican operative with close ties to both men. Katie Miller, 33, is a former Trump White House staffer married to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. Over the last year, she became a top adviser to Musk and worked at his side as he slashed and reshaped the federal government from his position as the leader of the Department of Government Efficiency.