logo
Morocco: His Majesty (HM) the King Congratulates Portuguese President on National Day

Morocco: His Majesty (HM) the King Congratulates Portuguese President on National Day

Zawya2 days ago

His Majesty King Mohammed VI sent a message of congratulations to President of the Portuguese Republic Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, on the occasion of his country's national day.
In this message, the Sovereign extends His congratulations to Rebelo de Sousa and His best wishes for prosperity to the Portuguese people.
His Majesty the King also welcomed the historic ties of friendship between the two countries, "which over time have established a diversified partnership".
On the same occasion, the Sovereign assures the Portuguese President of His "determination to pursue our joint action to bolster our bilateral cooperation, in the service of our two peoples".
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Kingdom of Morocco - Ministry of Foreign Affairs, African Cooperation and Moroccan Expatriates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spending review is no immediate panacea for Britain's growth woes
Spending review is no immediate panacea for Britain's growth woes

The National

time36 minutes ago

  • The National

Spending review is no immediate panacea for Britain's growth woes

A key theme of the UK spending review is raising government budgets in some areas and using those increases to boost economic growth. Defence will receive a major injection with British contractors set to cash in, driving skills and jobs and revitalising some of the worst-hit post-industrial regions. It all sounds exciting and eminently doable on paper but, moving away from the drumbeating, the picture is not as clear-cut as the one Chancellor Rachel Reeves paints. Indeed, it is nowhere near the rosy, easily achievable image she creates. Britain is to increase its military expenditure to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027 and then to 3 per cent in the lifetime of the next parliament. Those numbers are tiny and fall a long way short of the 5 per cent sought by the US and Nato. Given it is not remotely clear how even the 2.5 per cent will be met, which represents a lift of only 0.2 percentage points from the current level, it is hard see how Prime Minister Keir Starmer's 'ambition' of 3 per cent, let alone 5 per cent, will be met. As the Institute for Fiscal Studies makes clear, there are few avenues: spending less on public services or raising borrowing and tax revenues. Some funding is to be derived from cutting international aid but after that, attention will focus on savings elsewhere or borrowing and taxing more. Details of what Reeves has in mind are scant – they will be revealed in her autumn budget – but tax rises look the most likely option. They will be justified on the grounds of need and the argument is already being rehearsed. Gone is the old rhetoric of maintaining a deterrent. Instead, the language is of 'readying for war'. It is presented as a national crisis, a conflict when the usual caveats and restraints are abandoned in favour of all hands to the pump or rather, the wallet. Except they are not. The day before Reeves' set piece, the Labour activists' news website LabourList published a poll finding that one in four party members backed defence savings not increases. 'The poll, conducted by Survation, found that 26 per cent of readers who identified as members would want to see money earmarked for defence to be spent elsewhere, despite the government pledging to boost investment in the military in the coming years,' LabourList said. One Nottingham councillor, Steve Battlemuch, seemed to voice the reasoning of many when he said: 'I will watch the Chancellor's spending review with my fingers crossed that councils start to get a better deal, but I suspect the multinational defence industry will be the ones popping the Champagne corks when she sits down. 'They have more lobbyists than children and councils have, and they have the fear factor. In a world where fear beats hope we have an uphill battle to get money allocated to making things better locally.' He may well be right. Despite the talk of 2.5 per cent, it is small compared to how Britain once was. In 1955, the military accounted for 7.63 per cent of national income. The subsequent long-lasting 'peace dividend' saw that proportion of GDP scaled back and the money directed to other services. With that decline, though, came a commensurate decrease in weapons manufacturing – armaments suppliers disappeared and the sector heavily retrenched. Rebuilding will not occur overnight. It will be a slow process necessitating the planning and construction of factories and their attendant infrastructures and the sourcing of parts and materials, not to mention the development of skills. Into that breach is bound to step established major producers from the US and similarly friendly countries. Those overseas behemoths will be rubbing their hands, or as Battlemuch put it, 'popping the Champagne corks', at the prospects ahead, despite Starmer and Reeves promising to 'buy British'. It was that downsizing that saw Britain slash domestic defence shipbuilding capability, so the sector fell, effectively to just one shipyard at Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria. It happens to be my hometown. Even there, the size of the workforce drastically diminished, as Ministry of Defence orders continued to slump. At one stage, with completion of the generation of Vanguard submarines, it was down to below 5,000, badly hitting the town's fortunes. More recently, the site, now part of BAE Systems, has been climbing and is back up to 12,000 workers with another 5,000 to be added in the years ahead. Under the Strategic Defence Review 2025 and proclaimed by Starmer, the plant will build 12 new attack nuclear submarines. Local Labour MP Michelle Scrogham said: 'This will safeguard jobs, provide huge opportunities for local people and be the driver for our local economy across south Cumbria.' BAE, however, has struggled to obtain the necessary approvals for expanding its production facility. On the employment front the situation is little better. A nuclear industries task force has been set up to help train the tens of thousands of workers needed across the upscaling of nuclear in defence as well as in civil energy programmes. On the defence side, the submarines will be built by BAE with their nuclear reactors hailing from Rolls-Royce. It too is doubling the size of its Raynesway site in Derby. Once launched, the vessels will be maintained by Babcock. John Howie, Babcock's chief corporate affairs officer, has said: 'The industry needs to recruit a lot just to stand still. We don't want to steal from each other.' Starmer and Reeves then, may be gung-ho and what they are promising will certainly be of economic advantage, not to mention security. But the great defence push will cost and it cannot be completed immediately. A healthy dose of realism is required before everyone gets too carried away.

No longer the big outlier, Italy sees bond renaissance: Mike Dolan
No longer the big outlier, Italy sees bond renaissance: Mike Dolan

Zawya

time2 hours ago

  • Zawya

No longer the big outlier, Italy sees bond renaissance: Mike Dolan

(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.) LONDON - As investors wring their hands about mounting public debt loads across the G7, Italy - a country traditionally seen as a poster child for profligacy and unsustainable debts - is enjoying a relative bond market rejuvenation. Italy's borrowing premium over Germany, which typically reflects relative credit risk, bond supply and political risks, has halved in just two years to less than 100 basis points. More remarkably, this spread - seen by many as the pivotal intra euro zone debt metric - is within a few basis points of post-pandemic lows reached in early 2021 and it's fast homing in on the smallest premium since before the euro debt crisis exploded in 2010. While some investors may wonder if there's any more juice left in this trade, Italy traded with a premium of just 20bps over Germany before the global banking crash of 2008. And yet after a decade and half of existential euro debt crises, domestic political upheaval, European Central Bank intervention, a pandemic and the invasion of Ukraine - the nearing milestones are remarkable. Helped by recent European Central Bank easing, nominal 10-year Italian government borrowing rates of 3.5% are back at the average of the entire 26-year euro zone period. IT'S ALL RELATIVE G7 debt markets are often a relative game. Italy's debt-to-GDP ratio - long in excess of 100% - is no longer such an extreme outlier. Even though its current 137% tally remains historically high, the figures for other advanced economies are fast catching up. Italy's debt burden is also one of the few in the G7 that's not projected to keep rising over the rest of the decade. Japan comfortably retains that mantle as the most indebted G7 nation relative to its economic size. But U.S. sovereign debt has zoomed through 100% of GDP, and U.S. President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' making its way through Congress is expected to make that worse. More obviously within Europe, once frugal Germany has also lifted its self-imposed 'debt brake' and committed to fiscal stimulus that will arguably buoy euro zone growth at large even as some see its debt-to-GDP ratio hitting at least 100% within 10 years. And what is just as notable for European investors is that France's deficit and debt struggles mean Italy's risk premia have all but converged with those in Paris. At just 20bps on 10-year debt, it's the lowest since 2008. And Unicredit strategists point out that the 3-year Italy-France spread briefly turned negative earlier this year for the first time in more than 20 years. Once Europe's largest debt pile, Italy's gross government debt outstanding was overtaken by France four years ago. At 3.3 trillion euros last year, according to Eurostat, France's debt pile was last year some 300 billion euros bigger than Italy's. Aided by a relatively stable government by Italy's fractious post-war standards, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's administration has been in power since 2022 and Italy's credit ratings are starting to turn up. In April, rating agency S&P Global raised its rating on Italy to "BBB+" from "BBB" in a surprise move and last month Moody's upgraded the outlook on its 'Baa3' rating to "positive". Moody's cited a "better-than-expected" fiscal performance last year and a "stable" political environment, providing a boost for Meloni's plan to keep a lid on annual budget deficits - projected at 3.3% of GDP this year and 2.8% in 2026. "The positive outlook is also supported by a robust labor market, sound household and corporate balance sheets and a healthy banking sector," Moody's said in its report. Goldman Sachs economists this month raised questions about whether the increasingly benign Italian government bond pricing had gone too far given still much-needed structural changes in the economy and a rising European defense spending. But it said there were three 'ameliorating factors' - ongoing fiscal space provided by European Union recovery funds through next year, higher 'real' rates due to disinflation, and continued stable government. What's more, they said higher defense spending may lift Italy's deficit and debt metrics along with other euro countries but joint EU bond sales to fund that meant Italian bond issuance would not increase and the average maturity of its debt could extend further. On top of that, Goldman pointed out, the Italian fiscal balance is improving at the fastest pace among the biggest four euro zone governments - bringing the gap with the euro zone average to its lowest in almost 10 years. Once again, it's all relative. Italy still has a debt problem - but increasingly so too do all its peers. Rome is getting rewarded for keeping it in check at least. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. (by Mike Dolan; editing by Deepa Babington)

Fears for UK's global influence as Foreign Office suffers cuts
Fears for UK's global influence as Foreign Office suffers cuts

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

Fears for UK's global influence as Foreign Office suffers cuts

The UK's Foreign Office has taken the brunt of cuts in the latest government spending review, prompting fears that Britain's 'soft power' capabilities will be heavily eroded. Staff face a cut to their overseas allowances and potentially being downgraded on pay scales as the department tries to save £78 million a year, a supplementary document revealed. If we aren't proactive in maintaining our global influence, we can expect our standing to diminish Emily Thornberry With a major reduction in overseas aid to fund an increase in defence spending already announced, there is growing concern that Britain's ability to use 'soft power' diplomacy tools will be severely curtailed. The cuts were condemned by senior Labour MP Emily Thornberry, chairwoman of the cross-party Foreign Affairs Committee, who said they were 'alarming and inconsistent' and could damage Britain's global influence. The reduction in Foreign Office spending was part of the review announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves, in which the military and security services, and the National Health Service receive significant increases in spending. Efficiency plans Morale at the Foreign Office is understood to have taken a blow after the small print of the review, labelled 'departmental efficiency plans', shows proposed cuts to pay and allowances. The government department, which has 156 embassies and 49 consulates worldwide, will 'tighten grading standards to ensure roles are … appropriately remunerated'. 'This will counter a pattern of grade inflation that has emerged over the past decade and more robustly support cost control,' the report warned. Those operating in overseas postings, where they are compensated to maintain a standard of living comparable to the UK, are fearful that they too face cuts. The overseas allowance would face 'reform' and 'streamlining' with the monetary value of specific allowances 'being reviewed and revised', the report said. 'This is an ambitious plan to transform the FCDO [Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office] into a smaller, technologically advanced department with planned investment in both workforce reform and digital transformation that will drive significant efficiencies,' it stated. Harshest cuts Ms Thornberry said that in the current international turmoil Britain had 'never been more needed as a force for good'. However it was, she added, 'very concerning that the FCDO appears to be suffering the harshest real-terms cuts'. With the overseas aid budget already cut from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of GDP to pay for defence, she was 'deeply concerned about the strain that this spending review will place on the entirety of the department'. She would scrutinise the report to ensure the department was 'not suffering major further cutbacks'. 'Real-term cuts to the Foreign Office budget are alarming and inconsistent with the government's objective to position the UK as a leader on the world stage,' she warned. BBC World Service worries Ms Thornberry also raised concern about the lack of 'clarity or concrete commitment' to finance the British Council and the BBC World Service, which both rely heavily on Foreign Office funding. The BBC has already scaled back the World Service, prompting concern about the UK's soft power overseas. BBC Arabic radio was among 10 foreign language services to stop broadcasting in 2023. Russian-backed news services have begun broadcasting in Lebanon on the former BBC Arabic frequency, leading to acknowledgement that closing the service may have been a mistake. It has also been reported that ministers have asked the British Council look at efficiencies that could make the influential overseas organisation close in 60 countries 'If we aren't proactive in maintaining our global influence, we can expect our standing to diminish, and for autocratic states to fill the vacuum we leave,' Mrs Thornberry concluded. The efficiency report also revealed that the Integrated Security Fund, which supports initiatives on national security risks domestically and overseas, would need to 'deliver efficiency gains' of £10 million within three years, mainly through 'automation, AI, and digital tools'. Lib Dem MP Rachel Gilmour warned on X that cutting the foreign aid budget by £6 billion a year could 'not only undermine our soft power, but also leave vital regions exposed to hostile powers and geopolitical rivals.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store