logo
Council ‘staffing crisis' threatens Rayner's housing target, builders warn

Council ‘staffing crisis' threatens Rayner's housing target, builders warn

Yahoo2 days ago

Council staff shortages are causing 'serious' delays and putting Angela Rayner's housebuilding target in jeopardy, builders have warned.
The Home Builders Federation (HBF) said a 'staffing crisis' at local authorities had led to mounting delays that are holding up projects across the country.
As part of the housebuilding process, developers and local authorities must negotiate agreements on funding for public infrastructure such as schools, roads or affordable homes. However, the time it takes to strike these deals has surged and agreements are now taking well over a year on average to finalise, according to the HBF.
Builders have been waiting for an average of 515 days – nearly a year and a half – for these so-called Section 106 agreements to be finalised. That waiting time has increased by a fifth over the past two years.
Researchers found 35pc of all Section 106 agreements took longer than a year to complete. In one case, a developer was left waiting for seven years.
The Housing Secretary has pledged to build 1.5m homes by the end of the current parliament, although she has conceded in recent weeks that this was a 'stretching' target.
The Government has proposed recruiting 300 extra planning officers to tackle the issue. However, the HBF said that this would be nowhere near enough extra staff to address backlogs and delays. The organisation has identified a national shortage of 2,200 planning officers across England and Wales.
Neil Jefferson, the chief executive of the HBF, said ministers had taken 'welcomed steps' to address planning delays, but needed to take 'meaningful action' by increasing funding for councils.
He said: 'Meeting the Government's ambitious housing targets will require ministers to remove the barriers that are currently causing housing supply to flatline.
'The Government needs to ensure that local authorities have the capacity to process planning applications within a reasonable timeframe such that construction can get under way.
'If ministers can speed up the planning process, alongside providing mortgage support for first-time home buyers, and funding for housing associations to purchase affordable homes, house builders can start to actually increase supply.'
The HBF warned that delays were particularly costly for smaller developers that lack the financial reserves to absorb rising costs.
It came as affordable housebuilder MJ Gleeson issued a profit warning citing planning delays, rising costs and a weak housing market. Its stocks plummeted by more than 20pc on Tuesday.
Delays stem from its business in the North, where developments have been largely held up by biodiversity rules rather than infrastructure agreements. However, the situation underlines the planning hurdles that housebuilders face.
Council planning offices are under-staffed as local authorities come under intense financial pressure. Research by the Local Government Association (LGA) in March found that councils face a funding shortfall of more than £8bn by 2028-29 without enough additional income. A quarter of councils in England have warned that they will need emergency bailouts from the Government.
An LGA spokesman said: 'There is a significant ongoing and historic challenge with resourcing planning teams and retaining staff with necessary specific skills across the country, with nearly two thirds of councils relying on agency staff to address capacity and skills gaps.
'Planning is a vital part of ensuring safe, well designed and appropriate house building takes place, and despite the challenges faced by local planning departments, nine in 10 planning applications are approved.
'Councils want to work with the Government to better help recruit and retain the planners and built environment professionals required to support an efficient locally-led planning system in order to build the homes we need.'
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been contacted for comment.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New car market returns to growth
New car market returns to growth

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

New car market returns to growth

The UK's new car market returned to growth in May with a 1.6% increase in registrations, figures show. Industry body the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said 150,070 new cars were registered last month, up from 147,678 in May 2024. This represented the best May performance since 2021 and was only the second month of 2025 with year-on-year growth. Registrations of pure battery electric new cars rose by 25.8% to take a market share of 21.8%, up from 17.6% a year earlier. The SMMT said this was partly a result of manufacturers offering discounts to boost sales. It noted that under the Government's zero emission vehicle (Zev) mandate, at least 28% of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year must be zero emission, which generally means pure electric. Across all manufacturers, the year-to-date figure is 20.9%. SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'A return to growth for new car registrations in May is welcome but manufacturer discounting on new products continues to underpin the market, notably for electric vehicles. 'This cannot be sustained indefinitely as it undermines the ability of companies to invest in new product development – investments which are integral to the decarbonisation of all road transport. 'Next week's spending review is the opportunity for Government to double down on its commitments to net zero by driving demand through fiscal measures that boost the market and shore up our competitiveness.'

Is Scottish care sector at risk from immigration shake-up?
Is Scottish care sector at risk from immigration shake-up?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Is Scottish care sector at risk from immigration shake-up?

New immigration rules risk deepening Scotland's care sector crisis amid workforce shortages, writes Carolyn Bowie The UK Government's changes to immigration rules for care workers marks a significant shift for Scotland's health and social care sector. Whilst aimed at improving oversight and reducing exploitation, these new rules, along with further proposed restrictions, could intensify recruitment and compliance pressures on care providers already struggling with chronic workforce shortages. In February 2022, the Skilled Worker visa route was expanded to include care workers, triggering a rapid rise in overseas recruitment; numbers jumped from 37,000 in 2022 to 108,000 in 2023. Alongside this, 120,000 dependants also entered the UK, an imbalance that has prompted government action. Throughout 2024, the Home Office cracked down on care sector sponsors, revoking 1,494 licences, which was a significant shift from 337 in 2023. This left around 40,000 migrant workers in the UK without valid sponsorship, many of whom remain ready to rejoin the workforce if given the opportunity. (Image: Carolyn Bowie is a Principal Associate and Business Immigration specialist) Which 2024/2025 key reforms is the care sector already grappling with? Dependents Banned: From 11 March 2024, care workers are no longer allowed to bring dependents to the UK. The government argues this helps control net migration, eventhough it makes the UK a less attractive destination for skilled overseas carers. Mandatory CQC Registration: Care providers hiring via the Skilled Worker route must be registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). This aims to prevent unethical employers from exploiting workers, ensuring greater oversight. Rising Costs: From 9 April 2025, the Certificate of Sponsorship fee increased from £239 to £525. This cost cannot be passed on to the worker, adding financial pressure on employers. Application fees across immigration routes, including Skilled Worker visas and settlement, are also rising. Domestic Recruitment Priority: Care providers must now demonstrate attempts to hire from within the UK, especially among displaced international workers, before sponsoring new recruits from overseas. While intended to reduce dependency on foreign labour, it may hinder providers in areas with limited local applicants and put burden onto councils and carers. Minimum Salary Increased: The minimum salary for a Health and Care Visa has risen to £25,000, up from £23,200, to align with labour market conditions. White Paper proposals: What are we expecting? Ending Overseas Recruitment: Perhaps the most controversial proposal is the phased removal of the care worker route for new overseas applicants. If implemented, this would prevent care providers from sponsoring new migrant workers altogether, raising alarm in a sector already grappling with staff shortages. Limited Transition Period: Current overseas care workers will be allowed to remain, change sponsors, and apply for settlement under a three-year transition period; however, this timeframe, and the policy itself, will remain under review. Settlement Delayed: The time required to qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain may double, from five to ten years, for many care workers, impacting long-term workforce planning and staff retention. What employers should do now ■ Review Sponsorship Systems: Ensure full compliance with record-keeping, reporting, and monitoring duties. ■ Train HR Teams: Equip recruitment staff with up-to-date knowledge of immigration rules and processes. ■ Plan for Domestic Recruitment: Begin developing local training and recruitment pathways to reduce reliance on overseas workers where possible. ■ Audit Pay Structures: Ensure staff salaries meet the updated minimum thresholds. ■ Engage Sponsored Staff: Hold discussions with current employees about their status and future options. The challenges ahead? These reforms underscore the government's commitment to reducing net migration and curbing visa misuse. However, the new restrictions carry significant risks for care providers; tighter eligibility criteria, higher costs and more administrative burdens, all at a time of high demand for care workers. Smaller providers may be disproportionately affected, lacking the resources to navigate complex compliance demands or absorb the additional costs; this could affect thousands in care. The UK's evolving immigration policy represents a turning point for health and social care. Whilst efforts to improve standards and support domestic recruitment are welcome, a blanket reduction in overseas recruitment risks destabilising a sector already under pressure; this could directly impact the quality (and quantity) of care received by reliant on care provision. A more balanced approach, supporting ethical international hiring alongside investment in local skills, will be essential to sustaining care services in Scotland and across the UK. Carolyn Bowie is a Principal Associate and Business Immigration specialist with leading national law firm, Weightmans

Holiday let owners face tax ‘triple whammy'
Holiday let owners face tax ‘triple whammy'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Holiday let owners face tax ‘triple whammy'

Airbnb owners are set to face a triple whammy of taxes as the Government increasingly treats them as 'walking ATMs,' a senior Tory MP has warned. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing minister, criticised ministers for hitting short-term let owners with little-known licensing fees when they are already paying double council tax. From April 1, all English councils were given the powers to charge a 100pc council tax premium on second home owners. More than 230 chose to implement the charge – which The Telegraph is campaigning to be cut or abolished. But the new legislation included scope for the Government to introduce a registration scheme to regulate holiday lets and ensure they are recorded with councils. This is expected to involve a licensing charge, which experts estimated would be around £100 per year. Labour has failed to provide a timeframe for when this will be introduced. The result could be that short-term let owners are saddled with paying double council tax bills, plus an annual licensing fee. Mr Hollinrake has argued that the double council tax bill should cover the cost of an owner registering a short-term let. In a written parliamentary question, he asked the Government whether it 'will ensure that homes subject to a second homes council tax premium by local authorities are not charged additional registration fees'. But Chris Bryant, the culture minister, refused to confirm the exemption in his response. He added that the 'scope of the scheme is still being determined'. A loophole in the business rates system means some households could avoid the double tax altogether. Mr Hollinrake told The Telegraph: 'Labour's thirst for tax cannot be quenched, and people may now be hit by a triple whammy of council charges – two lots of council tax, and a licensing fee on top if they ever want to rent it out. 'Such licensing charges are especially pointless, as councils already know the property is being used as a second home by virtue of the council tax surcharge. 'Local taxpayers deserve better than being treated like walking ATMs by this punishing Labour government.' Andy Fenner, head of the Short Term Accommodation Association (STAA), said: 'This appears to be purely a revenue-generating exercise rather than a genuine policy need. Short-term rental tourism provides vital investment and supports thousands of jobs and businesses throughout our communities. Alistair Handyside, of the Professional Association of Self-Caterers UK, said it was supportive of the scheme but concerned about 'the amount of other interventions such as the council tax premiums, the abolition of the furnished holiday lets tax regime and the new EPC standards, these are closing businesses at a very fast rate'. The second home council tax premium was originally brought in by the Tories. However, Labour has come under criticism for refusing to monitor the impact of the policy on housing, tourism and local economies. Ministers said it was up to individual councils to decide if the double tax is 'effective'. But The Telegraph revealed earlier this month that eight in 10 local authorities who charge the premium failed to carry out impact assessments before introducing it. If a property is let out for 70 nights a year, it qualifies for business rates and is therefore exempt from council tax. Many second home owners will qualify for small business rates relief, which offers up to 100pc relief, if the property is the only one they let. This loophole will cost local authorities £334m this year in missed revenue, a figure which politicians said proved the premium was backfiring. If a property is not let for 70 days, however, it will still be on the hook for all three charges. A government spokesman said: 'A registration scheme will help local authorities across England identify the short-term lets in their area so they can address any community impacts. We will set out more details on how the scheme will work in due course.' AirBnb was also approached for comment. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store