Scots ‘Voted for Change', Says Starmer After Labour's Surprise By-election Win
Sir Keir Starmer has said people in Scotland have 'voted for change' following Labour's shock win in the Hamilton by-election.
The prime minister congratulated Labour's new MSP Davy Russell and looked ahead to next year's Scottish Parliament election, saying it is a chance to 'turbo-charge delivery.'
Russell took the seat vacated by the death of Scottish Government minister and SNP MSP Christina McKelvie.
Posting on social media on Friday morning, Starmer said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change.
'Next year there is a chance to turbo-charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border.
'I look forward to working with you.'
Related Stories
2/3/2025
6/2/2025
Labour's candidate, who is the deputy lord lieutenant of Lanarkshire, beat the SNP's Katy Loudon, who fell to her third defeat since 2023.
The win comes against the backdrop of national polls which place Scottish Labour in third place behind the SNP and Reform UK, and will undoubtedly give a boost to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's bid to become first minister in next year's election.
Sarwar told BBC Radio Scotland's 'Good Morning Scotland' programme he is confident Labour can win that contest.
When asked if his party can defeat the SNP, which has been in power in Scotland since 2007, Sarwar declared: 'Absolutely.
'I believed it before this by-election and I continue to believe it now.
'Next year the choice is simple—a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister.
'That is the choice facing the people of Scotland, that is the campaign over the next year, and that is a campaign I am confident we can win.
'I think what the people of Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse did yesterday was lead the way to that change of government next year and a Scottish Labour government next year.'
He also said he will 'continue to challenge the poison of Reform,' making clear he is 'talking about the people who lead Reform' and not those who 'may be tempted' to vote for them.
Mach of the Hamilton campaign had been dominated by a Reform advert—branded 'racist' by Labour and others—which had alleged Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community.
A surge in support for Nigel Farage's party saw it come in third place in Hamilton, just 800 votes behind the SNP, although there had been speculation Reform could come second or possibly even win the seat.
Reform deputy leader Richard Tice insisted the party is 'delighted' with the result.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4's 'Today' programme, he said: 'It's truly remarkable.
'We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.'
At the election count earlier, Tice told the PA news agency he was 'thrilled to bits' with the result.
When the votes were counted, Russell polled 8,559, Loudon took 7,957 votes, and Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088.
Speaking to PA after the declaration, Sarwar said: 'I think people need to change the script, because we've proven the pollsters wrong.
'We've proven the commentators wrong, we've proven the bookies wrong.
'We've proven John Swinney wrong and so many others wrong too.'
In the final days of the campaign, the first minister had said it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform, and Sarwar asked what it says about a government that has been in power for 18 years when 'all it has to offer in a campaign is vote SNP to stop Farage.'
Swinney said Loudon had 'fought a superb SNP campaign' and that he was 'clearly disappointed' his party was unable to win.
'Labour won by an absolute landslide in this area less than a year ago—we came much closer tonight, but the people of Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do,' he added.
'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swinney 'deeply concerned' over bus firm job cuts
The first minister has said the Scottish government will do "everything it can" to support workers at bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis. John Swinney said he was "deeply concerned" the firm was planning to move its full operation to a site in Scarborough, North Yorkshire, putting 400 jobs at factories in Falkirk and Larbert at risk. However, he faced criticism from Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who claimed his government had ordered more buses from China than it had from the firm. Swinney said most bus ordering decisions in Scotland were made by private operators, and the government had to comply with state subsidy rules in the way it supported businesses. At First Minister's Questions Swinney said: "This issue has been occupying a great deal of the focus and the attention of the deputy first minister and I and the UK government ministers since we became aware of the situation over the last few weeks, and then ultimately to the decision that was announced yesterday." He quoted a joint letter from the UK and Scottish governments, which pledged to "work closely with Alexander Dennis at this challenging time". Up to 400 jobs at risk at Scottish bus maker Alexander Dennis Bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis warns of 160 jobs at risk Alexander Dennis (ADL) cited strong competition from the China, which has seen its market share grow from 10% to 35%, among its reasons for the move. The firm also criticised UK policy, and called for jobs and local economic benefit to be factored in when taxpayers money is invested. Earlier Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham pointed to an order of 160 ADL buses for the publicly-owned "Bee Network" in the city, and questioned why the Scottish government could not do the same. In a statement, Burnham - who has previously visited the Falkirk site - said: "Our iconic Bee Network buses are a bit of Scotland right here in Greater Manchester. "We have over 160 Alexander Dennis buses criss-crossing our city-region every day - connecting our communities to opportunity. "If Greater Manchester can invest in world-class Scottish bus manufacturing, then why can't the SNP Scottish government?" Sarwar claimed the Scottish government had secured just 44 buses from ADL as part of the Scottish Zero Emission Bus Challenge Fund (ScotZEB) scheme last year. The fund was initially established in 2022 to "disrupt the bus and coach market" and allow operators the chance to make the move to zero-emission vehicles. Sarwar said that number was "five times" less than the number of buses ordered by Greater Manchester. However, that figure only covered the second phase of the rollout. The first phase, in which 276 buses were procured at a cost of about £62m, saw 137 buses ordered from ADL. An additional 116 buses were ordered from Chinese manufacturer Yutong, while the rest were built in the UK, Ireland and Europe. ScotZEBs predecessor, known as the Scottish Ultra-Low Emission Bus Scheme, also saw 207 electric buses ordered from ADL by operators between September 2020 and March 2021. Swinney said state aid regulations - in the form of the UK-wide Subsidy Control Act - prevented the government from directly procuring from a single supplier. In Scotland, most public service buses are procured by private operators, who then run them on routes across the country. Swinney said: "What I am doing, what the deputy first minister is doing, is how can we find a way in which we can remain legally compliant with the Subsidy Control Act and enable these obstacles to be overcome? "We are going to do everything we can to find a way through the Subsidy Control Act provision, so the government can continue to work within the law, and so we can support manufacturing in Scotland."
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reeves's public sector obsession will crush the economy
Rachel Reeves has cemented 'historic changes' to enlarge the British state, according to one of the nation's leading economists, with the battered private sector now looking at permanently higher taxes to support it. Paul Johnson, the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, says it is hard to overstate the scale of the shift taking place in the economy this decade, as government spending mounts on public services, welfare and debt interest – and taxes rise to match. 'These are historic changes in the size of the state and the size of taxation in this country,' says Johnson. 'Over all of my lifetime up until 2020, taxes hovered around 33pc of national income. By the end of this decade they will be 38pc of national income. I cannot see them coming down. 'In economic history terms I think this decade will be seen as the decade in which the British state grew.' An older and sicker population suggests the state will only get bigger. Analysis by the Resolution Foundation, a think tank, shows that Reeves has put health spending on course to gobble up half of all the money spent on day-to-day services by the end of the decade. This is up from a third in 2010 and roughly a quarter in 1999. 'That is a huge increase. Everything else pales a bit in significance,' says James Smith, an economist at the Resolution Foundation. 'We are becoming ever more a health state.' The proportion may rise even more after Labour publishes its 10-year plan for the NHS later this year. Previous proposals outlined by the Tories suggested that making the health service fit for the future would require a 50pc rise in the number of staff to 2.4m by 2037. Such an increase would mean one in 11 workers in England would be employed by the NHS, compared with one in 17 in 2021, according to the IFS. Ruth Curtice, the Resolution Foundation chief executive, said the clear shift towards higher health spending constituted a 'major reshaping of the state'. Labour is using its gigantic parliamentary majority to push through such seismic change. Yet at the same time the economy is weakening, undermining Reeves's ability to pay for her grand spending plans. GDP dropped by 0.3pc between April and March, suggesting the strong growth seen during the first three months of the year was not the start of a sustained recovery. The Chancellor has blamed Donald Trump's trade war for knocking Britain off course, and it undoubtedly had an effect. However, there is no sense that Reeves has adapted her plans to cope with Trump's crusade, which has been known about for months. Furthermore, April's GDP numbers also show clear signs that it was Reeves, not Trump, who was to blame for the slowdown. The services sector performed particularly poorly, with retail struggling amid the sharp rise in employers' National Insurance contributions, the tax bosses pay on workers' wages, and the minimum wage. Unemployment is up and the number of people in work is down, another sign that this 'jobs tax' is weighing on hiring. Worryingly, Britain is relying more and more on public spending to keep the economy afloat. Recent analysis by the Bank of England shows that activity has essentially been driven by the public sector over the past two years. That's not a sustainable model for growth, particularly given the dire productivity in the public sector. Businesses are increasingly frustrated. Simony Emeny, the chief executive of pub group Fuller's, argues the private sector is being forced to work far harder than the public sector. 'Because of what the Chancellor announced last year, we have had to work really hard to make our businesses as efficient as possible and use technology well and to make sure that we are in a position where we can absorb some of these cost increases,' he says. 'If I look at the Government, I don't see that same drive to improve efficiency coming through.' He cited the rise in the number of civil servants, which has soared from below 420,000 in 2016 to 550,000 today. 'The [hospitality] sector is having to be forensic about costs just to navigate the challenges we face and I'm not seeing that same scrutiny from the Government. [They] need to be consistent about this,' says Emeny. 'They're putting a lot of pressure on business with extra costs. We're having to absorb that this year, and so is everybody else.' Fuller's and other businesses may have to absorb even more costs later this year. With pressure to spend yet more on healthcare and benefits, and amid scepticism that many of the plans set out in the spending review are realistic, economists believe more tax rises await in the autumn. Johnson, at the IFS, suspects the long freeze on income tax thresholds will be extended – a classic stealth tax, as workers end up paying more tax even if their pay only rises in line with inflation – meaning they become worse off over time. But that alone may not be enough. Andy King, a former senior official at the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's spending watchdog, says it is almost certain to slash its growth forecasts at the Budget in the autumn, in part because of Reeves's own policies. 'The immigration policy looks net negative for growth, employment rights need to be scored, the employer NICs and national living wage rises look to have done much more damage to employment than was allowed for,' he says. 'The writing seems to be on the wall for another fiscal hole in the autumn.' That points to yet another tax raid, despite the record-breaking £40bn of tax increases in the Budget last October, which was supposed to put the finances back on an even keel for the rest of this parliament. King suspects the Chancellor will have to ramp up the big taxes she has promised not to touch: VAT, National Insurance or income tax. 'Now that the spending plans have been inked in, it leaves fewer levers for restoring fiscal headroom. So it looks like a rock and a hard place for the autumn. Something important may have to give if there is a material fiscal hole to fill,' he says. 'That means either loosening the fiscal targets, which look very risky given the way the bond market is viewing the UK relative to its peers. Or it means breaking manifesto tax commitments which looks, as Sir Humphrey might say, brave, bordering on courageous.' Whatever form tax rises end up taking, it will extend what has become a well-established pattern under Labour: raid the private sector to pay for ever higher state spending. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories
Businesses need to 'get on the pitch' to speak up against policies they think are damaging their prospects, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Conservative leader also appealed to business leaders to support her party, suggesting there was no credible alternative which would represent their interests. Speaking at the FTSE 250+ conference in central London, Mrs Badenoch said: 'My message to business is: I'm on your side, but I need you to be on mine too.' The Tory leader's appearance at the gathering came as the latest gross domestic product (GDP) figures showed the UK economy shrank more than expected, the day after the Government unveiled spending plans prioritising health and defence over the next few years. Speaking to an audience of business and investment chiefs, Mrs Badenoch hit out at Labour's tax rises, including the inheritance tax on family farms and national insurance employer contributions. She added: 'You need to support policies that back enterprise, and you need to challenge those who want more state control. 'Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. 'You need to get on the pitch too.' The Tory leader claimed the UK has 'forgot that business is a good in and of itself, and it pays for everything. It is the source of our prosperity'. Mrs Badenoch added: 'The challenge all of us in this room have now is that many people don't believe this anymore.' People instead believe 'business hoards wealth' and is 'greedy and needs to be taxed more', she said. Mrs Badenoch continued: 'This is a crisis. 'And the question before us is simple: Who has credible solutions? 'And I know many of you will be asking, 'Why should we trust the Conservative Party?' 'And I say because no-one is making the argument for business … except me and my party.' Mrs Badenoch's rallying call to businesses comes after the most recent political donations data showed a boost to the Tory war chest. The Conservatives raised nearly £3.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, the Electoral Commission revealed this week, outstripping Labour's £2.4 million and Reform UK's £1.5 million. Labour offers only 'managed decline', Mrs Badenoch also told business chiefs, before taking aim at Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. Mrs Badenoch appealed to the audience, signalling voters cannot 'allow Farage, with no experience of legislating – he's never in Parliament, let alone government – to just come in'. She added: 'Can you imagine 360 random people suddenly taking over government saying they are going to fix everything? 'We were there for 14 years, sweating and labouring, it was unbelievably difficult. 'How many of you would allow your businesses to be run by people who have never been in that business and say 'Come on in, I'm sure you can fix it'? 'That's what he's offering, it's not real. 'It is a scam, and it's my job to expose that scam.' A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Kemi admits they had 14 years and yet all they achieved was sky high taxes, low growth and open borders. 'The only scam is her telling the British public that the Tories have changed. 'It's the same people and the same old failed ideas. 'Quite simply, the Tory party is irrelevant.' Sign in to access your portfolio
