Ukraine's EU entry would drag bloc into war
Admitting Ukraine into the EU would only prolong the hostilities between Moscow and Kiev and risk dragging the bloc into the conflict, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has warned.
Ukraine, which has made EU membership a national priority, formally applied to join the bloc in February 2022, days after the escalation of the conflict with Russia. Hungary has repeatedly pushed back against the EU's goal of admitting Ukraine by 2030 – a target recently reiterated by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
On Monday, Orban reiterated Budapest's opposition to accession, calling it a decision that could shape the bloc's future for the worse.
'As a country neighboring Ukraine, we believe that if Ukraine is admitted to the European Union, it will mean war,' Orban told the conference of EU parliamentary speakers in Budapest. The EU has never accepted a country at war – and for 'good reason,' he added.
The Hungarian leader also expressed regret over the commitment of some EU leaders to continued military aid for Kiev.
'We have a different view. We think the longer the war lasts, the more lives will be lost and the worse the situation will become on the battlefield,' Orban said.
Ukraine still faces major hurdles on its path to joining the bloc, with full membership requiring unanimous EU approval and sweeping reforms, including anti-corruption efforts, improved governance, and legal alignment with EU standards.
Orban has long opposed Ukraine's integration into Western institutions, including NATO, arguing that its accession could escalate tensions with Russia. He suggested that the country should instead remain a 'buffer' between Russia and the West.
While Russia has consistently rejected the idea of Ukraine joining NATO, its position on EU accession has been more restrained. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said Ukraine has the 'sovereign right' to join the bloc, provided that it remains a matter of economic integration and not military alignment.
However, Russian officials have warned that the line between civilian and military in the EU is becoming blurred. Peskov has accused the bloc of actively working to prolong the Ukraine conflict by repeatedly expressing its intention to support Kiev in its desire to 'continue the war.' He has also criticized Brussels for undermining peace efforts by portraying Russia as the bloc's primary adversary.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has stated that the EU is 'becoming militarized at a record pace,' adding that there is now 'very little difference' between the EU and NATO.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
17 minutes ago
- Russia Today
EU state blocks accession talks with Ukraine
Hungary has vetoed a joint EU statement on Ukraine at the bloc's Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels, effectively blocking Kiev's accession talks, according to a communique published on Thursday on the European Council's website. The statement, which urged the council to open membership negotiations with Ukraine, was 'firmly supported by 26 heads of state' out of 27 EU members, the document read. As unanimous approval is required, talks cannot begin until Hungary reverses its stance. The communique noted that the council will revisit the issue at its next meeting in October. While the document did not name Hungary, Prime Minister Viktor Orban confirmed the veto in comments to reporters. 'We stopped Ukraine's EU accession with the votes of Voks2025, and I needed it, because I was almost swept away by the public anger when I announced that Hungary would not agree to start negotiations with Ukraine,' Orban said, referencing the national referendum which concluded on June 20. More than 2 million Hungarians, or 95% of voters, rejected Ukraine's EU bid, according to the prime minister. 'I had to remind [the council] that the most important criterion [for accession] is that there is in fact a country,' he said. 'There must be a defined identity, borders, a population, a territory, and in the case of Ukraine, none of these apply.' Ukraine made EU accession a national priority in 2019, formally applying in 2022 shortly after the escalation of its conflict with Russia. The EU granted Kiev candidate status later that year and set a 2030 target for membership. While Brussels supports the move, critics argue that Ukraine's institutions and economy are unprepared, and the cost would strain the bloc. Budapest opposes EU membership for Ukraine, warning it could escalate tensions with Russia and burden EU taxpayers with decades of military aid. Alongside Hungary, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico and Polish officials have raised concerns. A recent IBRiS poll shows only 35% of Poles support Ukraine's EU bid, down from 85% in 2022. Moscow strongly opposes Ukraine joining NATO, but had previously taken a neutral stance on its EU ambitions, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov saying in March that Ukraine has the 'sovereign right' to join if the bloc remains focused on economics. However, with Brussels ramping up defense spending, Russian officials have recently grown critical. Peskov earlier this week called EU militarization 'rabid,' while former President Dmitry Medvedev said the bloc has become 'no less of a threat' to Russia than NATO. 'This is a politicized, globalist, and fiercely Russophobic organization,' Medvedev wrote on Telegram on Wednesday. 'Thus, the so-called 'Ukraine in the EU' is a danger to our country.'
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
The latest NATO summit was the priciest humiliation fetish ever produced
Fresh off dropping an 'F bomb' on both Iran and Israel for blowing up the only ceasefire in history ever announced exclusively on his social media feed , US President Donald Trump hopped on his jet and headed straight to the NATO summit. Everyone wondered what mood he'd land in after crossing the Atlantic. Apparently not feeling like rolling the dice, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte wrote him a love letter in advance, suggesting that the scariest weapon of mass destruction for NATO is the American president's mouth. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto five percent! Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world,' Rutte gushed. 'You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way – as they should – and it will be your win.' Hard to believe this guy was once the prime minister of the Netherlands. Oh, President Trump, way to really stick it to Europe! What a wonderful thing you've just done to make almost all of Europe subsidize the American military industrial complex to the tune of 5% of their GDP! Back when Trump first started hounding Europe to cough up 2.5% of their GDP for defense, European leaders rolled their eyes. But after nuking their own energy-driven economy with their anti-Russia, pro-Ukraine policies, they've decided to embrace the idea like they thought of it themselves. Nothing like selling European taxpayers on buying a ton more US and European hardware under the pretext of a hypothetical 2030 Russian invasion. Perfect cover for a spending spree that will become the problem of whoever's in office by then (ie. not them). Trump initially wanted them all on a 2.5% spending target. But heaven forbid American arms dealers hog all the action. Europe's military industrial complex needs a piece too. Hence, 5% for everyone and a double-dip dinner at the weapons buffet. Trump showed up straight from showcasing US bombs on Iranian soil – one giant demo reel for his European customers. When he landed, Rutte practically faceplanted directly into Trump's backside. And if you thought what he wrote to Trump was cringey, wait till you hear what Rutte said aloud in the wake of Trump bombing Iran for Israel – er, I mean, for peace: 'You are a man of strength but also a man of peace, and the fact that you also successfully got this ceasefire between Israel and Iran, I really want to commend you for that,' Rutte cooed. 'Without President Trump, this would not have happened. Absolutely not.' Way to thank an arsonist for putting out his own fire. What's next: nominating him for Fireman of the Year? Even the press did a double-take, basically asking Rutte, Bro, you sure you want him reading your fan mail on live TV? Answer: Absolutely. 'Not embarrassed,' Rutte replied. The NATO secretary general sounded so enamored with Trump that you had to wonder why the two of them didn't just get a room already. 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language,' Rutte told journalists, referring to Trump, as journalists may or may not have barfed into the nearest potted plant. Between remarks like that and all the gushing about how Trump was making Europe pay for the privilege of being extorted for a protection racket that Trump says isn't even sure that he would honor, it all sounded so sadomasochistic that I started to feel like maybe I should be paying for this kind of kinky TV content. Or I guess you could say that European taxpayers already are – to the tune of 5% of GDP. And as for Europe being taken to the cleaners, Rutte had this to say about those who might struggle to pay up, like Spain, which opted to stick to 2%: 'Countries have to find the money.' Easy to say as the former Dutch Prime Minister – and now, unelected NATO chief – safely off the electoral hook. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez isn't quite so glib, promising to hold the line at a much lower 2% spending target. How long before other NATO leaders realize that they can say no, too? Polish President Andrzej Duda already called the 5% pledge a mere 'gentleman's agreement,' insisting there'd be no penalties for ignoring it. Sounds like those school spirit rallies where the star quarterback expects everyone to cheer for the big game, then everyone just goes home and does their own thing afterwards. Speaking of which, Ukraine apparently isn't the center of the universe anymore. 'The fact that Zelensky will not participate in any official form at the NATO summit clearly indicates that the previous chapter is over,' Hungarian PM Viktor Orbán suggested. 'The Americans, Turks, Slovaks and we have made it clear we do not want to sit at the same table with him.' Zelensky even swapped the pizza delivery look for undertaker chic. Perhaps a better match for the current state of his country. Or maybe just his ego. As for the usual pre-summit group photo – it looked like the teachers made sure that Trump and Zelensky weren't together for it, hoping to avoid a reprise of their White House spat when Trump smacked him with the rhetorical equivalent of a stapler to the face. And forget any serious focus on countering China. The leaders of NATO's would-be Asia partners – South Korea and Japan – bailed to deal with the economic fallout of Trump bombing the Middle East and spiking their oil prices. And so NATO stumbles on, proving that when Trump cracks the whip, Europe says, 'Thank you, sir, may I have another?'
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
France warns of ‘worst-case scenario' on Iran
French President Emmanuel Macron has warned that the international community must act to prevent Iran from leaving the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which prohibits it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Some Iranian politicians have threatened to withdraw from the NPT in retaliation for recent US and Israeli strikes on the country's nuclear facilities. While Macron argued the strikes were 'genuinely effective,' he cautioned that the 'worst-case scenario' would be Iran quitting the landmark arms control treaty. 'The worst would be that the consequence of this is Iran's exit from the Non-Proliferation Treaty and therefore, ultimately, a drift and a collective weakening,' Macron told reporters after an EU summit in Brussels on Thursday. 'Our hope is for a genuine convergence of views, as the objective … is to prevent the resumption of [Iran's] proliferation activities,' he added. Macron said France plans to hold consultations with the other four permanent members of the UN Security Council – the US, UK, Russia, and China – in the coming days. He also noted that he had briefed US President Donald Trump on France's recent communications with Tehran, including 'in the last few hours.'Rafael Grossi, head of the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said it would be 'very regrettable' if Iran were to withdraw from the treaty. Abbas Golroo, chairman of the Iranian parliament's foreign relations committee, stated on June 22 – the day the US struck three nuclear facilities, including the uranium enrichment site at Fordow – that Iran has 'the legal right to withdraw from the treaty.' He later added that lawmakers would review the country's continued participation in the NPT. Earlier this week, the Iranian parliament voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei accused the agency of failing to properly condemn the strikes. Iran, which denies pursuing a military nuclear program, maintains that it has the right to enrich uranium for civilian purposes.
