Astronomers Name ‘Super Venus' Close To Solar System — What To Know
Artist's impression of GJ 1214 b passing in front of its host star. The 'transit method' allows ... More astronomers to study an exoplanet by seeing which wavelengths of light dim when the star's light passes through the exoplanet atmosphere.
Astronomers in Japan and Arizona, using data from the James Webb Space Telescope, have revealed a unique type of exoplanet unlike any in the solar system.
The exoplanet — defined as a planet orbiting a star other than the sun — is named Enaiposha and is just 48 light-years away, putting it in the solar system's immediate neighborhood.
That also makes it close enough for astronomers to see whether it has an atmosphere and what kind. That's exactly what astronomers at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan and the University of Arizona/Steward Observatory did—and they found something unexpected.
The latest data on Enaiposha, also called GJ 1214 b and Gliese 1214 b, suggests it has a carbon-dioxide-rich atmosphere, challenging previous notions about the composition of exoplanets of its size.
Though exoplanets tend to be classed as a 'super-Earth' or a 'mini Neptune,' Enaiposha's carbon dioxide-dominated atmosphere makes it more likely to be a 'super Venus.'
'The detected CO2 signal from the first study is tiny, and so it required careful statistical analysis to ensure that it is real,' said Kazumasa Ohno at the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, who co-led the study.
Artist's depiction of the size relationship between Earth and GJ 1214b, also known as Gliese 1214b.
Enaiposha has been studied closely since its discovery in 2009, but until JWST came along, astronomers couldn't see through its thick blanket of clouds. That allows it to reflect a lot of its parent star's light, making it cooler than anticipated.
By using its Mid-Infrared Instrument, JWST has been able to reveal major new insights into its atmosphere. In May 2023, scientists at the University of Oxford tracked Enaiposha, then described as a 'sub-Neptune,' through an entire orbit of its star, with its changing heat seen as it passed through phases, similar to how we see the moon, Venus and Mercury from Earth.
In addition to finding a big temperature difference between the planet's day and night sides, scientists discovered that Enaiposha's atmosphere is enriched with heavier molecules, such as methane and water.
The constellation Ophiuchus in the night sky.
Enaiposha is in the constellation Ophiuchus (pronounced 'Or-few-cuss), a vast summer constellation and one of 13 that the sun travels through each year. The other 12 are familiar to everyone as signs of the zodiac, so why isn't Ophiuchus one of them?
The ancient Babylonians divided the ecliptic—the apparent path of the sun through the sky—into twelve 30° sectors and assigned each one equally to one of the twelve constellations or 'signs' that intersected it. Since 13 is an unlucky number, one was dropped. Ophiuchus got booted out despite the sun spending a long time within it from Nov. 29–Dec. 17 (commonly thought of as Sagittarius despite the sun being in that constellation from Dec. 17–Jan. 20.
Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
7 Must-see Astro Events in the Night Sky You Won't Want to Miss This June
June 7: Mercury meets JupiterJune 11: Full strawberry moonJune 19: Moon nears SaturnJune 20: Summer SolsticeJune 22: Crescent moon swings by Venus June 26-27: Bootid meteor shower peaks June 29: Moon covers MarsCelestial meetups abound in the night sky this month, from eye-popping planet pairings to a crossing of the moon and Mars. Even better: you can view many of June's best sky sights from a city or the suburbs. Of course, traveling to a dark-sky destination, such as a national park, will elevate your stargazing experience, especially during late June's meteor shower. And dark skies are especially important when northern lights are in the forecast, which could happen at any time, given we're still in the heart of solar maximum—the roughly 11-year peak in aurora activity. The lights put on an unexpected contiguous U.S. show in late May 2025, and those ribbons could dance again at any moment; here's our guide to catching them. Now, it's time for June's night-sky highlights. Here's what to look for while stargazing this month. Don't miss sunset on June 7—particularly the roughly half hour after the orange orb sinks, when Mercury and Jupiter will travel toward the horizon in tandem. You can admire the pair in the same field of view in binoculars or a backyard telescope from June 7 through the evening of June 9. (For safety, wait until the sun has fully set before using viewing aids to watch the planets.) June's full moon earned the 'strawberry' nickname for the month's proliferation of the bright red berries. According to The Old Farmer's Almanac, the name originated with Indigenous communities like the Algonquian, Ojibwe, Dakota, and Lakota tribes. It will reach its peak illumination at 3:44 p.m. ET; catch it rising above the southeast horizon after sunset. And despite the fruity label, this month's moon won't actually look pink. Around 2 a.m. local time on June 19, the half-moon and vivid Saturn will tango together in the eastern sky. The duo will be close enough to share a view in your stargazing binoculars this morning. Scan down to spot Venus, which rises just after Saturn and the moon in the eastern sky. Friday, June 20, marks the beginning of summer in the northern hemisphere and the start of winter in the southern hemisphere. To celebrate the new season's kick-off, here are 23 summer vacation ideas for 2025—or, for powder chasers, a buzzy new hotel to bookmark for skiing in New Zealand this winter. Add another celestial meetup to your June stargazing bucket list with the close approach of Venus and the moon in the pre-dawn hours of June 22. This morning, the sliver of a moon will appear just above Venus along the eastern horizon. Saturn will glow in the sky to the right, and the sparkly Pleiades star cluster will be visible just to the pair's left. The June Bootid meteor shower is weak compared to the late-summer Perseids, but it has been known to produce unexpected flurries of 100 or more meteors per hour, according to You can try your luck with the Bootids during the peak overnight from June 26 to 27. The shower's radiant point, located in the constellation Bootes, will be visible high in the western sky after sunset and into the pre-dawn hours. Head out for sunset on June 29 to watch the crescent moon temporarily cover Mars. The objects appear to cross right as the sun sets, and they'll slowly separate from each other as they near the western horizon. Enjoy the show from sunset until around midnight local time, and keep an eye out for Mercury on the northwest horizon after sunset, too. Read the original article on Travel & Leisure
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life
The search for life beyond Earth is a key driver of modern astronomy and planetary science. The U.S. is building multiple major telescopes and planetary probes to advance this search. However, the signs of life – called biosignatures – that scientists may find will likely be difficult to interpret. Figuring out where exactly to look also remains challenging. I am an astrophysicist and astrobiologist with over 20 years of experience studying extrasolar planets – which are planets beyond our solar system. My colleagues and I have developed a new approach that will identify the most interesting planets or moons to search for life and help interpret potential biosignatures. We do this by modeling how different organisms may fare in different environments, informed by studies of limits of life on Earth. Astronomers are developing plans and technology for increasingly powerful space telescopes. For instance, NASA is working on its proposed Habitable Worlds Observatory, which would take ultrasharp images that directly show the planets orbiting nearby stars. My colleagues and I are developing another concept, the Nautilus space telescope constellation, which is designed to study hundreds of potentially Earthlike planets as they pass in front of their host stars. These and other future telescopes aim to provide more sensitive studies of more alien worlds. Their development prompts two important questions: 'Where to look?' and 'Are the environments where we think we see signs of life actually habitable?' The strongly disputed claims of potential signs of life in the exoplanet K2-18b, announced in April 2025, and previous similar claims in Venus, show how difficult it is to conclusively identify the presence of life from remote-sensing data. Oxford Languages defines 'habitable' as 'suitable or good enough to live in.' But how do scientists know what is 'good enough to live in' for extraterrestrial organisms? Could alien microbes frolic in lakes of boiling acid or frigid liquid methane, or float in water droplets in Venus' upper atmosphere? To keep it simple, NASA's mantra has been 'follow the water.' This makes sense – water is essential for all Earth life we know of. A planet with liquid water would also have a temperate environment. It wouldn't be so cold that it slows down chemical reactions, nor would it be so hot that it destroys the complex molecules necessary for life. However, with astronomers' rapidly growing capabilities for characterizing alien worlds, astrobiologists need an approach that is more quantitative and nuanced than the water or no-water classification. As part of the NASA-funded Alien Earths project that I lead, astrobiologist Rory Barnes and I worked on this problem with a group of experts – astrobiologists, planetary scientists, exoplanet experts, ecologists, biologists and chemists – drawn from the largest network of exoplanet and astrobiology researchers, NASA's Nexus for Exoplanet System Science, or NExSS. Over a hundred colleagues provided us with ideas, and two questions came up often: First, how do we know what life needs, if we do not understand the full range of extraterrestrial life? Scientists know a lot about life on Earth, but most astrobiologists agree that more exotic types of life – perhaps based on different combinations of chemical elements and solvents – are possible. How do we determine what conditions those other types of life may require? Second, the approach has to work with incomplete data. Potential sites for life beyond Earth – 'extrasolar habitats' – are very difficult to study directly, and often impossible to visit and sample. For example, the Martian subsurface remains mostly out of our reach. Places like Jupiter's moon Europa's and Saturn's Moon Enceladus' subsurface oceans and all extrasolar planets remain practically unreachable. Scientists study them indirectly, often only using remote observations. These measurements can't tell you as much as actual samples would. To make matters worse, measurements often have uncertainties. For example, we may be only 88% confident that water vapor is present in an exoplanet's atmosphere. Our framework has to be able to work with small amounts of data and handle uncertainties. And, we need to accept that the answers will often not be black or white. The new approach, called the quantitative habitability framework, has two distinguishing features: First, we moved away from trying to answer the vague 'habitable to life' question and narrowed it to a more specific and practically answerable question: Would the conditions in the habitat – as we know them – allow a specific (known or yet unknown) species or ecosystem to survive? Even on Earth, organisms require different conditions to survive – there are no camels in Antarctica. By talking about specific organisms, we made the question easier to answer. Second, the quantitative habitability framework does not insist on black-or-white answers. It compares computer models to calculate a probabilistic answer. Instead of assuming that liquid water is a key limiting factor, we compare our understanding of the conditions an organism requires (the 'organism model') with our understanding of the conditions present in the environment (the 'habitat model'). Both have uncertainties. Our understanding of each can be incomplete. Yet, we can handle the uncertainties mathematically. By comparing the two models, we can determine the probability that an organism and a habitat are compatible. As a simplistic example, our habitat model for Antarctica may state that temperatures are often below freezing. And our organism model for a camel may state that it does not survive long in cold temperatures. Unsurprisingly, we would correctly predict a near-zero probability that Antarctica is a good habitat for camels. We had a blast working on this project. To study the limits of life, we collected literature data on extreme organisms, from insects that live in the Himalayas at high altitudes and low temperatures to microorganisms that flourish in hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor and feed on chemical energy. We explored, via our models, whether they may survive in the Martian subsurface or in Europa's oceans. We also investigated if marine bacteria that produce oxygen in Earth's oceans could potentially survive on known extrasolar planets. Although comprehensive and detailed, this approach makes important simplifications. For example, it does not yet model how life may shape the planet, nor does it account for the full array of nutrients organisms may need. These simplifications are by design. In most of the environments we currently study, we know too little about the conditions to meaningfully attempt such models – except for some solar system bodies, such as Saturn's Enceladus. The quantitative habitability framework allows my team to answer questions like whether astrobiologists might be interested in a subsurface location on Mars, given the available data, or whether astronomers should turn their telescopes to planet A or planet B while searching for life. Our framework is available as an open-source computer model, which astrobiologists can now readily use and further develop to help with current and future projects. If scientists do detect a potential signature of life, this approach can help assess if the environment where it is detected can actually support the type of life that leads to the signature detected. Our next steps will be to build a database of terrestrial organisms that live in extreme environments and represent the limits of life. To this data, we can also add models for hypothetical alien life. By integrating those into the quantitative habitability framework, we will be able to work out scenarios, interpret new data coming from other worlds and guide the search for signatures of life beyond Earth – in our solar system and beyond. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Daniel Apai, University of Arizona Read more: Are we alone in the universe? 4 essential reads on potential contact with aliens 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence' − an astronomer explains how much evidence scientists need to claim discoveries like extraterrestrial life Extraterrestrial life may look nothing like life on Earth − so astrobiologists are coming up with a framework to study how complex systems evolve Daniel Apai receives funding from NASA, Heising-Simons Foundation, Department of Defense, Space Telescope Science Institute, and the University of Arizona, and leads the NASA-funded Alien Earths astrobiology research team that developed the framework described here. He is affiliated with the Steward Observatory and Lunar and Planetary Laboratory of The University of Arizona.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tiny Pebbles Created One of The Most Extreme Worlds in The Galaxy
The tiny pebbles left over from a star's formation fed the growth of one of the strangest, wildest worlds humanity has ever known. It's a famous one, Tylos, or WASP-121b, a gas giant exoplanet some 880 light-years away, so close to its host star that its atmosphere is filled with clouds of vaporized metal. Now, new observations show that this world – one of the most studied in the Milky Way – was constructed from the dust and rocks that circled the star, back when the system was still in its early formative years. The smoking gun? Silicon monoxide – clouds of vaporized rock. Using JWST, a team of astronomers identified the molecule in the exoplanet's atmosphere, in addition to water, carbon monoxide, and methane. "The relative abundances of carbon, oxygen, and silicon offer insights into how this planet formed and acquired its material," explains astronomer Thomas Evans-Soma of the University of Newcastle in Australia, who led the research. Tylos is around 1.75 times the radius but only 1.16 times the mass of Jupiter, orbiting a yellow-white star named Dilmun that's 1.5 times the radius of the Sun, on a breakneck orbit of just 30 hours. It's so close to the star that it's literally evaporating, its atmosphere puffed up by the intense heat. As it whips around Dilmun, Tylos passes between us and it, which means it's in the perfect configuration for study. Some of the star's light passes through the exoplanet's puffy atmosphere and becomes altered by the molecules therein as it goes. Astronomers can painstakingly study these tiny signals to figure out which molecules are responsible for the alterations. Tylos is what is known as a hot Jupiter – gas giant worlds in bogglingly close proximities to their host stars. They're something of an open question: they can't form in those close orbits, because the radiation and winds from the star would stop the gas from accumulating. The leading explanation is that they form farther away and migrate inwards. The first detection of silicon monoxide in an exoplanet's atmosphere was described in a paper published in 2022. It's a very difficult and rare molecule to detect. But it's the combination of molecules in the atmosphere of Tylos that helped Evans-Soma and his team figure out the exoplanet's birthplace. Stars are born from dense clouds of molecular gas. As they spin, material arranges itself in a disk that spools into and feeds the growing star. Once the star is powerful enough to push away the material with its winds, its growth is cut off, and the material that's left in the disk clumps in small pebbles of dust and ice that stick together and grow to form planets. At closer proximities to the host star, ice sublimates into gas. This is known as the ice line or the snow line, and different ices have different sublimation points. Studying the ratios of the molecules in the atmosphere of Tylos, the researchers concluded that the exoplanet formed at a distance from its star where methane was in its vapor form, but ice remained frozen. In the Solar System, that distance is out between the orbits of Jupiter and Uranus. Dilmun is hotter than our Sun, so the distance would be even greater for Tylos – suggesting that it had to migrate a long way to get to its current position. It's also some of the best evidence yet for how hot Jupiters form and evolve. But there's another mystery. The methane was detected on the exoplanet's nightside, which faces permanently away from Dilmun. Methane is unstable at high temperatures, and would be undetectable on the scorching dayside. As it moves around into the nightside, it's expected to remain undetectable at the same altitude. The plentiful abundance, therefore, of methane high in the nightside atmosphere of Tylos suggests some interesting atmospheric processes going on. The researchers think it's vertical mixing – strong updrafts carrying methane from deep in the atmosphere to the upper atmosphere, where it can be detected by JWST. "This challenges exoplanet dynamical models, which will likely need to be adapted to reproduce the strong vertical mixing we've uncovered on the nightside," Evans-Soma says. Although we've peered at Tylos more than most of the nearly 6,000 exoplanets confirmed to date, the strange, melting world still has a lot to teach us about planets in the Milky Way. The research has been published in Nature Astronomy. Haunting Image Shows The Moon Deimos From The Surface of Mars Stunning Images Reveal The Sun's Surface in Unprecedented Detail The Universe's Most Powerful Cosmic Rays May Finally Be Explained
