The awkward logic behind Nottingham Forest's next major decision
After Chelsea did what truly mattered on the final day of the Premier League season, winning and securing a place in next season's Champions League.
Now, Nottingham Forest are left to wonder about it all, settling for the Conference League to leave a mood of plaintive appreciation at the City Ground. There were a few shots of their scowling owner, Evangelos Marinakis.
The Greek businessman didn't come onto the pitch in the manner he has made so notorious of late, but Chelsea co-owner Todd Boehly did. The American hedge-fund manager ostentatiously celebrated Champions League qualification with the squad, the club returning to the competition for the first time in three years.
'Very proud,' Enzo Maresca said. 'We brought this club where this club has to be, the most important competition.'
The Italian also indulged in a bit of a victory lap, even saying 'eff off to all" of the team's critics.
He stopped himself from actually swearing when he remembered he had his young daughter sat in front of him for the press conference.
They have qualified for Europe for the first time since 1995-96, but that is only after a campaign where they spent a long period in the top three, and looked like getting back into the Champions League for the first time since they were European champions in 1980-81.
Nuno did make sure to add that they should also be 'proud'. They have significantly overperformed, even if it ended up underwhelming. A little like some of the manager's football and the season as a whole, there were no fireworks on this final day.
It says much that five clubs were going for the last three Champions League places, and only two of them won. One was Chelsea, who properly dug in after Levi Colwill's 49th-minute strike. Maresca actually lamented how so much of modern football discussion is results-based, but this was all about just getting over the line.
You could see it in their football on the day, and the focus. Maresca said the only time he was informed of results elsewhere was when Manchester United went 2-0 up against Aston Villa late on, which all but secured Chelsea's place in the Champions League.
In truth, they'd looked comfortable for most of the day.
Part of that was how they were playing, and a fairly compact performance. Pedro Neto was excellent for the goal to tee up Colwill. Marc Cucurella was solid as ever. Enzo Fernandez continues to evolve into a real leader.
In Maresca's press conference, where he came across at his most charismatic all season, the manager was quick to point out that Chelsea managed all of this with the Premier League's youngest-ever squad.
It was actually confirmed before the game that the average age of Chelsea's starting XI in the Premier League this season (24 years and 36 days) is the youngest-ever by a team in a single campaign in the competition. Two things can both be true: Maresca's line about 'where this club has to be' was correct in a few senses. Chelsea are so wealthy that they should still be a club that reach the Champions League, especially when we have the absurdity of allowing five in. In the same way that they won on the day, however, Chelsea also finished in the top four.
Maresca's grand riposte still might have been a touch far: 'The doubt was from outside. All the ones that have the answers or the ones that have the truth, they were saying that we are too young, we are not good enough, they were waiting for Aston Villa to drop points for us to achieve the Champions League. They were saying that we were not able to win on this pitch because we are too young, because we are not experienced. Unfortunately for them, they have all been wrong. All the ones that have the truth and have the answer to everything. So in English, how you say? Eff-off to all of them, because the players deserve that.'
The season will look even better if they win the Conference League on Wednesday, but there is another financial footnote there. A fair argument exists that clubs from the big five leagues shouldn't even be in the competition, and Chelsea also have an immense financial advantage over most of those - like their final opponents Real Betis.
It is about a par performance for the season given financial power, even if it obviously won't feel like that for the fans - or Maresca or Boehly.
This isn't to be churlish but it is the framing of modern football that ownerships like this have ensured. Chelsea's own PSR considerations have been significantly eased.
There was then the other part of the day. Forest just never looked like scoring. The pre-game table ensured they had to be the team to take the initiative here and they just couldn't really do it.
Even when Chris Wood was given a 94th-minute chance just yards out, you couldn't quite see it. You could see why Forest's season has gone as it has, mind, almost split into parts.
When they were on that streak in the first few months, such a chance would have been seized. It was the same with another Wood opportunity in the opening minutes.
His streak is over, though, and so is Forest's.
A European run is possible, which shouldn't be forgotten. Chelsea may have done too much in modern times for the Conference League but Forest can value it. They can also have a real go at winning it.
As to whether Nuno is the man for that, that is where there is now a bigger discussion, that he was directly asked about after the game.
The Portuguese clearly did well for the moment. He has overachieved.
That doesn't mean the moment hasn't passed, though.
The underlying numbers show Forest should have finished 14th. People might scoff at that and point to the table, but these figures are usually borne out over a longer period of time. That is probably what we have seen with Forest's slide from - a brief - second to seventh.
Nuno spoke afterwards as if he was expecting a difficult conversation, and even spoke of a 'bad day' like this. You wouldn't have quite guessed that from the supporters' hearty applause afterwards, but you would from Marinakis' facial expression in the final minutes.
And here's an awkward little thought experiment.
If Marinakis were to change manager, it would likely be presented as harsh, and typical of his type of owner.
But would there not be a logic? Could it not be akin to Bournemouth going for Andoni Iraola or similar. Nuno's football was revelatory for one moment, in terms of how it was an approach that many clubs had forgotten how to solve. It looks like it has since been rumbled.
He and some Forest fans would of course say the manager now deserves his chance.
Whatever happens, Chelsea deserve their Champions League place.
They, unlike most rivals, did what was required.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
Caoimhin Kelleher to Brentford
Caoimhin Kelleher has joined Brentford from Liverpool for an initial fee of £12.5m that could rise to £18million ($24.3m). The 26-year-old goalkeeper has signed a five-year deal with an option of a further year. As part of this summer's transfer coverage on The Athletic, in addition to breaking news, tactical analysis and in-depth reads, our Transfers TLDR series (you can read them all here) will bring you a quick guide to each of the key deals. Cork-born Kelleher was signed by Liverpool from local club Ringmahon Rangers and relocated from the Republic of Ireland to England at 16. He worked his way up through the age groups to become a goalkeeper Jurgen Klopp described as the best No 2 in the world. No goalkeeper in Liverpool history has won more penalty shootouts (four), and he even scored in the 11-10 shootout win against Chelsea in the Carabao Cup in 2022. Kelleher played 67 times for Liverpool and won one Premier League title (he failed to make an appearance in the successful 2019-20 Premier League season), one Champions League, one FA Cup, one Super Cup and two League Cups. Caoimhe O'Neill Kelleher was built in the image of Alisson by former Liverpool goalkeeping coach John Achterberg. Expect a similar goalkeeper to the Brazil No 1. The Irishman was a striker until he was 13 and may not look as imposing as bulkier goalkeepers, but his bendy frame will pull off saves that look out of reach. Advertisement There may be the occasional blooper, but with penalties, look out for his 'smooth criminal' penalty-saving, where he falls towards the taker. Caoimhe O'Neill Kelleher is a capable shot stopper, with a 71 per cent save rate last season, marginally behind Flekken's 74 per cent. His distribution was solid, too, and he often went short from open play, as Flekken did. The key difference is their long passing. Flekken attempted 21.3 Opta-defined long passes (covering 32+ meters or 35+ yards) and completed 41 per cent. In contrast, Kelleher attempted 12.5 and completed 26 per cent. This could be due to Brentford's tactical approach, which embraces directness in comparison to Liverpool. With more minutes, Kelleher's numbers across the board are likely to improve. Anantaajith Raghuraman Kelleher's most recent injury saw him receive stitches in his knee in October 2023, though this did not lead to a lengthy layoff. He suffered a groin injury in June 2022 that sidelined him for three months and an abdominal tear in February 2021 that ruled him out for a month. Anantaajith Raghuraman 'Caoimh is cool as ice,' Achterberg told The Athletic in March 2024. 'He can play left foot, right foot; his speed reactions are crazy and he reads the game so well.' 'He was unbelievable,' his former Ringmahon team-mate Keelyn Cotter told The Athletic in 2020. 'We had a few goalkeepers in our league who were getting trials in England. The competition was fierce, but within a couple of years, he'd flown past them all. It also helped that he understood what a good striker might do because he was one himself.' Caoimhe O'Neill Kelleher has signed a five-year contract with an option for a further 12 months. He has cost Brentford £12.5million initially, potentially rising to £18m. Through joining in early June, just under a month's worth of the fee will hit Brentford's 2024-25 financials, as will four weeks of Kelleher's wages. Liverpool's most recent financial year ended on May 31, so this deal has no impact on their 2024-25 accounts. Advertisement In terms of those wages, Kelleher's new deal is unknown, though as ever, the cost of the deal will go beyond just the transfer fee and any agent costs. For Liverpool, Kelleher's departure won't make a sizeable dent in their staff costs, with the backup goalkeeper one of the lower earners in a well-paid squad. Chris Weatherspoon After adding on agent fees, assumed at 10 per cent, Kelleher's signing adds £200,000 to Brentford's transfer fee amortisation charge in 2024-25, with a further £2.7m per year then charged until the end of the 2029-30 season. The sale of Mark Flekken to Bayer Leverkusen for £8.4m generated a profit on sale of around £2.8m immediately in the club's books, more than offsetting the £200,000 amortisation added by signing Kelleher. From Liverpool's perspective, there could be a situation where they would not enjoy the full £12.5m fee. Reports in Ireland suggest Ringmahon, the club Kelleher joined Liverpool from as a 16-year-old, may be due 20 per cent of Liverpool's profit on any sale, which would mean Ringmahon would bank around £2.5m of the £12.5m fee. The Athletic has not been able to verify those reports, but if that were the case, it would leave £10m in profit booked into Liverpool's 2025-26 accounts, with the possibility of a further £4.4m in add-ons. Chris Weatherspoon
New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
How could Bryan Mbeumo improve Manchester United?
Bryan Mbeumo is a good player and should fit whatever style of football Ruben Amorim wants to play next season at Manchester United. That's the short version. The 25-year-old Mbeumo, who will turn 26 in August, notched 20 goals and eight assists for Brentford last season, establishing himself as one of the better forwards in the Premier League. Advertisement While we are merely at the beginning of this transfer story — United are set to open talks with Brentford following news that Mbeumo's decision is that he would prefer to move to Old Trafford — this is a signing that has to work. For the player and his future club. Here's a cheat sheet as to why it probably will. Because he is versatile and a fan of maximal efficiency. Give him the ball and he'll look to get things done. Six years at Brentford have seen Mbeumo develop from a promising youngster in the Championship into a forward capable of taking on Champions League defences. The Cameroon international has been deployed in several roles at Brentford, impressing as a right winger in a 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 setup (playing off Ivan Toney), and thriving as a striker in a 3-5-2 alongside Yoane Wissa. Mbeumo is direct. Naturally left-footed, but not shy about using his right, he excels when driving into space. A look at his goals and assists from last season shows a player who has favoured areas in and around the penalty area, and knows how to get to them consistently. Look at that trio of shots to the right of the box in the graphic below. That's a little zone where he hustles to get a shot off. One difference between Mbeumo in 2024-25 compared to seasons past comes in his presence at the back post. The forward has furthered his talent and timing when attacking crosses and cutbacks. The campaign also saw him finesse and experiment with his crossing ability from the right half-space, hitting balls early and consistently against unprepared defences. Furthermore, he's got a massive backside. As Yaya Toure once pointed out, this is often used as a tool attacking players use when looking to gain separation from defenders. Mbeumo uses his posterior in a similar fashion to Eden Hazard during his Chelsea peak, opting for a well-timed hip-check to protect the ball before powering away while the defender is reeling. The pace at which Mbeumo moves with the ball, coupled with the skills he employs to protect it, makes him a quality footballer. His versatility is alluring, but Mbeumo's best fit would be as the right-sided No 10 in Amorim's 3-4-3. His possible arrival would change the complexion of United's striker search this summer window. A team containing him, Matheus Cunha and Bruno Fernandes would be best led by a centre-forward who prefers to stretch the play, rather than drop deep and receive the ball at their feet. (The Athletic will elaborate on this more in a future piece.) United's reasons for signing Mbeumo are best explained by a series of quotes Amorim gave towards the end of last season. Asked to elaborate on which characteristics his squad would benefit from, the head coach said: 'It is players that play more inside than outside, those small things, even the foot. It's really important in the position that Garna (Alejandro Garnacho) played today (against Athletic Club), as a right No 10, to have a left foot. It can change the way you play.' Advertisement A look at Mbeumo's progressive carries from 2024-25 shows a left-footed player equally capable of cutting inside or getting chalk on his boots on the outside. If he were to join Amorim's side, he would help provide additional angles of attack, making the team less one-dimensional in the final third. He's a straightforward defender when his team are out of possession, too, pressing to eliminate the more obvious passing lanes from opponents when they look to build from the back. This is a Premier League-proven attacking player who wouldn't require the same onboarding process that may come with alternative transfer targets. The eagle-eyed among you may have spotted a degree of xG overperformance from Mbeumo's non-penalty goal tally last season. The forward netted 14 times from an expected goal value of 7.3, suggesting he may have enjoyed a purple patch in front of goal that could be hard to replicate next season. Six of his league goals came via penalties in 2024-25 — a duty he'll likely have to delegate to his future captain Fernandes. Mbeumo is also a player who works best when given the ball in high volume. As is Cunha. And Fernandes, who will likely play in central midfield behind them. To get the best out of the trio, Amorim will have to recalibrate his build-up patterns to ensure they all get the attacking space and enough of the ball to better affect games. Amorim will also need reinforcements at centre-forward and wing-back to further these plans. There's a lot more to his game that we'll leave for a later date, but here's the hyperbolic statement for your footballing group chats and discussions in beer gardens: If Mbeumo arrives at Old Trafford, he'll provide the sort of attacking play many expected from Jadon Sancho in 2021. This is someone who can help solve a lot of issues on the right-hand side of United's attack.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
They tried to make him go to Riyadh… Here's why Bruno saying no should be celebrated
It's easy to get annoyed at Bruno Fernandes. As an on-pitch presence, he's not especially likeable. His face seems permanently set to 'complaint' mode. He nags at referees. There was that undignified episode when Manchester United lost 7-0 to Liverpool a couple of years ago and he essentially threw a tantrum on the pitch. Advertisement But, as much as anything, that just illustrates something we all know — that on-pitch manners do not necessarily maketh the man. You hear plenty of stories about Bruno being a good guy, which at the very least balances the apparent petulance, most notably his attempt to pay for United staff to attend the FA Cup final after their free travel and accommodation were nixed as part of Big Jim Ratcliffe's cost-cutting drive. He also tends to be the one who 'fronts up' to the media after United defeats, when most of the time he's the least of their problems. That might feel minor, but doing it means one of his younger, more junior, probably struggling team-mates doesn't have to. Fernandes currently plays for the worst type of football institution: one that's rich and high profile, and thus commands a lot of attention, but one that can't win games, seemingly makes the wrong decision at every turn and is run by people who seem intent on flushing any goodwill they might have down the toilet through redundancies, price rises, cutting charitable grants and whatever else they have planned in the name of austerity. This is a club that blunders at pretty much every turn, that has been carried on the pitch by their best player and captain for longer than he probably cares to remember, and one that you have little confidence is going to turn things around any time soon. In short, you wouldn't blame Fernandes for desperately grabbing at any plausible life raft that happens to float past. Which brings us to his decision to turn down Al Hilal this week. Fernandes was reportedly offered a contract that would have more than doubled his already significant wages to move to Saudi Arabia, with Al Hilal also apparently prepared to pay a £80million transfer fee to extract him from the sludge he's currently wading in. Advertisement Most United fans will naturally be delighted by his decision to reject the offer. Not only do they keep their best player, but they will be protected from the dispiriting prospect of their club probably frittering away a crucial windfall: of all the clubs you would trust to cash in on their star man and use the money to responsibly beef up their squad, United are at the bottom of the list. But the rest of us in Britain, Europe, the non-Saudi world, should be pleased too. It is, on the most basic level, refreshing to see someone have the conviction to turn down that amount of money. I can't confidently say that I would. If you can, then fair play to you. Fernandes' representatives met with Al Hilal, so we can assume that he didn't turn the offer down on moral grounds, otherwise he might not have even entertained it. But it's still pleasing that a player has not signed up to the Saudi project; someone of standing has rejected being a representative of the ultimate purpose of their move into sport, whether you call it sportswashing, soft power or something less charitable. The players that have agreed to move to the Saudi Pro League so far have generally fallen into three categories: ageing legends in decline, like Cristiano Ronaldo or Sadio Mane; excellent-but-not-quite-elite types in roughly their peak years, like Ruben Neves, Ivan Toney or Aleksandar Mitrovic; and relative journeymen, such as your Daniel Podences or Georges-Kevin N'Koudous. What they haven't really yet managed to snag is a genuinely elite player at the peak of his powers from one of the elite clubs; a player who could probably slot happily into most top European teams and who represents a legitimate loss to one of the 'legacy' leagues. You could argue Karim Benzema (who was the reigning Ballon d'Or holder when he joined Al Ittihad) or Riyad Mahrez (fresh from Manchester City's treble-winning season) fit into this category, but they were 35 and 32 respectively when they made their moves. Fernandes is 30, but still performing as if in his prime, so would probably have been the SPL's biggest coup from a purely football perspective, if not a PR one. Advertisement As it is, one of the Premier League's best players is staying in the Premier League, and will continue playing at a level of competition that befits his ability. Whether it's for that reason, or a sign that not everybody can be bought, or that not everyone can be persuaded to represent state project — take your pick — this should be celebrated. This is all said with the caveat that Fernandes is staying… for now. We have been in this position before, where someone turns down a move to Saudi Arabia initially, only to reconsider. Steven Gerrard, who rejected an offer to become manager Al Ettifaq in June 2023 then joined them the following month, springs to mind. This article might look pretty silly if Fernandes flip-flops. He also isn't necessarily staying at United: should a competent European team make him and United an attractive offer, he may still leave. We also shouldn't pretend he's a saint who is sticking around purely for altruistic reasons, for the history of a proud football club that he simply can't abandon. He has made this decision for essentially the same reason that all of those players who have moved to Saudi: because it is in the best interests of him and his family. If a better alternative presents itself, he will probably take it, and rightly so. But for now, Bruno Fernandes is not moving to Saudi Arabia, and we should welcome that fact.
