Joey Chestnut returning to Knoxville to defend bologna eating title
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (WATE) — World champion competitive eater Joey 'Jaws' Chestnut is returning to Knoxville to defend his title as the Bologna Eating Champion of the World in Knoxville next month.
At noon on Saturday, May 10, some of the world's top competitive eaters will be facing off in Knoxville at the 2025 Ultimate Bologna Showdown presented by Dead End BBQ and Elm Hill Bologna. It's a competition where Major League Eating says things can get 'seriously meaty.'
Rep. Harshbarger calls Black congressman 'boy' in interview
The contest is slated to take place at the RecSports Field Complex on Sutherland in Knoxville, and there will be a combined $10,000 in prizes and the title of the Bologna Eating Champion of the World on the line. First place will take home $5,000, followed by second earning $2,750, and stair-stepping down to fifth, which will take home $300.
Last year's contest was the first Ultimate Bologna Showdown. During the competition, competitors have eight minutes to eat as many slices of Elm Hill Bologna as possible.
During the May 18, 2024 competition, Chestnut, the #1-ranked competitive eater in the world from Indianapolis, Indiana, took home the title and set a world record by eating 14 pounds of Elm Hill Bologna. He defeated #4-ranked eater James Webb from Sydney Australia who ate 11 pounds for second, and Geoffery Esper who at 10.75 pounds for third.
At this year's competition, Chestnut will be facing Webb along with #2-ranked Patrick Bertoletti from Chicago, Illinois as well as #5-ranked Miki Sudo and #6-ranked eater Nick Wehry from Tampa, Florida. Last year, Knox County Mayor Glenn Jacobs competed in the event, but this year, he is expected to be a special guest.
Man killed, driver charged after crash on North Broadway
'This is the greatest field of talent ever assembled in the history of competitive bologna eating,' said Major League Eating Chair George Shea. 'The people of Knoxville will see history made as Chestnut defends his title against accomplished challengers.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape
This excerpt from Becoming Caitlin Clark: The Unknown Origin Story of a Modern Basketball Superstar by Howard Megdal is reprinted with the permission of Triumph Books. For more information and to order a copy, please Caitlin Clark broke women's basketball. In the best possible way here. But also, in ways that are deeply confounding to Clark and those around here. Because Sheila Johnson, co-owner of the WNBA's Washington Mystics, appeared on CNN and slammed Time Magazine for featuring Caitlin Clark as its athlete of the year. No, really. That happened. "We read Time Magazine where Caitlin Clark was named Athlete of the Year," Johnson said on Dec. 13. "Why couldn't they have put the whole WNBA on that cover and said the WNBA is the League of the Year because of all the talent that we have? Because when you just keep singling out one player, it creates hard feelings." Where to start? This is, of course, sports. There are winners and losers every year, every day, in individual awards, in team accolades. The concept of fairness dictating any man in sports history being honored as Athlete of the Year simply would not be a matter of even basic debate. But this is part of the calibration problem - there have been, as Johnson correctly noted, "so many talented players who have been unrecognized." There have been, as Risa Isard and Nicole Melton documented in their landmark September 2021 study of race in WNBA coverage by ESPN, CBS Sports, Sports Illustrated and as exhibited in WNBA team and league press releases, a disproportionate number of stories about white players compared to the majority Black makeup of the league during the 2020 season. That study did not, however, include Caitlin Clark, nor does it even study the time period in which Clark has been playing college basketball or in the WNBA. It speaks to a truth that is absolutely accepted by a broad base of experts on the subject - that the WNBA's best players have been undercovered historically, and that overwhelmingly the WNBA's best players, just as a majority of all its players, have been Black. Simple reasoning has been assigned in so many of the loudest, least-illuminating conversations about exactly why Caitlin Clark is so prominent in the larger American sports culture now, and what it means about both what came before her and the future of women's basketball. The more singular the explanation, the less useful it is. Even worse are the simple motivations assigned to those on both sides of this discussion - for reference, a significant number of people, particularly those with the most invested in the space, such as players, coaches and executives, don't even view this discussion as one with "opposing sides." But for many of the harshest critics of Clark, it was easy to hear the undercurrent of fear, that the full appreciation for the women's game had come too late for them, the money which follows such fandom simply not trickling down into the sport's remarkable and compelling past. The WNBA has existed as a safe space for marginalized people for nearly three decades because broader American culture so often ignored it. That tradeoff is felt in ways, large and small, that fill the league's players, coaches, executives and long-tenured fans with ambivalence. Everyone with a stake in the league's success is living in that gray area, and not only is the money too good to approach it any other way, with it the chance to finally see what a fully-vested WNBA looks like, but the momentum is so overwhelming the league and its stakeholders couldn't stop this train if they wished to do so. And for the countless, often anonymous newcomers to the women's basketball space who saw Clark being tested like all rookies but only clocked it through the race of the players in the majority Black league doing it, discounting all the incredible stories and women who created the scaffolding of possibility for Caitlin Clark engendered bitterness, fear and anger. And everyone involved in this oversimplification suffered from a failure not just of understanding the racial, gender, historical and competitive context, but so often a failure to understanding that when Caitlin Clark had opened these doors to the broader audience, it represented a chance for others to follow. Caitlin Clark did it first, but is doing it in a way that is precisely designed for the opposite of Clark existing as a one-off phenomenon. She is a beginning, not a culmination. And none of this means that Caitlin Clark is being overcovered now. If it is true that Sue Bird, for instance, received disparate media coverage relative to her greatness, or compared to, say, Sylvia Fowles - the former I'd argue is debatable, the latter is not, with the final seasons of the league's best-ever point guard in Bird and best-ever center in Fowles receiving deeply unequal treatment across television broadcasts and column inches alike - it did not lead to, in the case of Fowles or Bird, the kind of dramatic leaps in audience we have seen from Caitlin Clark in 2024. Clark is different. And there is no counterfactual in the current game: we cannot know what would have happened if Caitlin Clark, but Black, had built her fan base and audience at Iowa, then taken her precision passing and 30-footers to the WNBA. But we do have a historical comp. Frequently, the comparison is made between Clark and her rivalry with Angel Reese and the elevation of the NBA during Magic Johnson and Larry Bird's ascension from college basketball to the pros. After all, more than 35 million people watched the Michigan State-Indiana State national championship game in 1979 featuring the two stars, and the NBA reached a dramatic new level of popularity by the end of their careers. The problem is that, unlike with Clark, it didn't happen anything like right away. (There are other problems with this comparison, too: Magic and Bird were both immediate stars of contending teams, Bird's Celtics winning 61 games, Magic's Lakers winning it all, while Reese's stardom did not translate into a playoff appearance for the Chicago Sky.) The NBA Finals remained on tape-delay broadcast several seasons into both of their pro careers - the clinching win by Johnson's Lakers in the 1980 NBA Finals was preempted by many CBS Network affiliates in favor of The Incredible Hulk, The Dukes of Hazzard and Dallas. By 1984, CBS showed just ten NBA games, nationally, all regular season long. But the actual comp here for Clark also entered the league in 1984, coinciding with TBS purchasing the rights to a national TV cable package: Michael Jordan. Within two years, a dramatic expansion of games, even the slam dunk contest - biggest attraction, Michael Jordan - helped a rising tide of NBA ratings, Jordan's Bulls helping to lead the way, not quite by as much of a lead over the Celtics, Lakers and other teams as Clark just experienced, but notable just the same. To this day, the four most-watched NBA Finals of all time took place in the 1990s, and all featured Jordan's Chicago Bulls. Those ratings fell after Jordan retired, only starting to approach them once more when LeBron James reached the apex of his rivalry with Steph Curry in 2016 and 2017. James was honored with the Time 2020 Athlete of the Year. The apex of these viewership trends correlate not to a generic rising tide. It is when deeply compelling stars make games must-watch. That is the company Clark finds herself in after a single season. The audience tells us so. Time has only been naming an Athlete of the Year since 2019, but Sports Illustrated has honored someone in this way since 1954. In 1991? It was Michael Jordan. If there are any contemporaneous accounts of anyone suggesting the entire NBA should have received the award instead of Jordan in 1991 or James in 2020, I was unable to find them. I'd further note that when Sheila Johnson's Mystics won the WNBA title in 2019, playing home games in a sold-out but entirely-too-small 4,200-seat Entertainment and Sports Arena, she celebrated her team with, among other things, a massive championship ring. Only the Mystics, the team that won the title, received this ring. Not the entire WNBA. And in 2024, the Mystics moved four home games from ESA to Capital One Arena, where the NBA's Washington Wizards play. One of those games, with Angel Reese's Chicago Sky, drew 10,000 fans. Another, with Diana Taurasi and Brittney Griner's Phoenix Mercury, drew 12,586. The other two, against Caitlin Clark and the Fever, drew 20,333 and 20,711. Put another way: Clark's two visits to play the Mystics in 2024 drew 41,044 fans, almost half of what Washington's entire 2023 home slate drew: 87,813 fans. "There were so many times where it felt like if a call was made against the other team, people were cheering, which typically in an away environment, you're not getting positive feedback from the crowd," Clark's Fever teammate, Lexie Hull, told me. "But this year, that happened several places, so feel very fortunate about that." But how does one reconcile it all? It's complicated, and evaluating the ways in which race has held the league back and acting and appreciating the progress that has followed through that prism is not the same thing as pretending it isn't happening at all or that the league as a whole is not benefiting from Caitlin Clark's ability to maximize this moment made possible by pioneers in her home state and trailblazers in the WNBA alike. Knowing bad-faith actors have entered the WNBA space intent on using Caitlin Clark's presence to attack Black women of the league while at the same time embracing how many new fans have arrived to love and appreciate her and so many others in the WNBA. And the extra pressure on her opponents, who are forced to simultaneously answer a disproportionate amount of questions about a player who isn't even on their own team in most cases, who are competing at the demanding level asked of anyone in the WNBA, but if that effort leads to a foul deemed unnecessary by Clark's vociferous fan base - with the ugliest manifestations of that passion curdled by racism - players were subjected to cruel, inhuman taunts, even death threats. Every bit of that discordant mix is something Caitlin Clark is hyper-aware of, the calm in this sea of madness, able to hold two disparate ideas in her head at the same time in ways that so many who are paid to analyze failed at verbalizing all year long, each of these failures from someone with a megaphone only further complicating the degree of difficulty for Clark, her teammates and her opponents alike, ratcheting up the tension further. This article was originally published on as Becoming Caitlin Clark: How the Fever Star Shifted the WNBA Landscape . Copyright ABG-SI LLC. SPORTS ILLUSTRATED is a registered trademark of ABG-SI LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lewis Black Jokes AI Makes All College Kids Lazy, Even ‘Sasquatch in a Suit' Barron Trump
Veteran comic Lewis Black is worried artificial intelligence models like OpenAI's ChatGPT are 'making everyone lazy' in college, from professors to students alike — including Barron Trump. Black, during a Thursday night segment on 'The Daily Show,' railed against AI's rapid rise on campuses across the U.S. 'Come on, professors, if you replace your teaching assistant with AI, then who are you going to leave your wife for?' he joked. 'And if you're not using your brain as a professor, what is your job? You're basically a scarf model with a drinking problem.' Black added that it is 'extra insulting' that Harvard professors are now using AI more and more: 'You're the top school in the country. Why did your students even bother paying an Asian kid to take their SATs?' The 76-year-old comedian also said college is all about 'experimenting,' like seeing how much LSD you can do without forgetting your name. Black himself seemed to enjoy college quite a bit — he earned degrees from the University of North Carolina and Yale University back in the day. Nowadays, he is concerned college freshman, such as the president's son, Barron, who just started at New York University this year, will be turning to AI to answer questions they should figure out on their own. 'What are we going to do if a student like Barron Trump isn't using his full cognitive ability?' Black asked. 'The only thing AI should be telling that Sasquatch in a suit is 'Be shorter, you freak. You're blocking the goddamn sun.'' The post Lewis Black Jokes AI Makes All College Kids Lazy, Even 'Sasquatch in a Suit' Barron Trump | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tracy Moore, 50, says there was a 'little bit of denial' when she started experiencing menopause symptoms: 'Hold on, I'm at that age...'
Less than two months after she was let go from Citytv, Tracy Moore found herself doing yoga in Costa Rica with a group of strangers. What began as an excuse to leave a cold Toronto winter to process a major career change in solitude quickly turned into a bonding experience that celebrated sisterhood, menopause and the idea that mid-life could be the perfect time to start all over again. The 50-year-old television personality is set to appear in a panel talk at the first Women's Healthy Living Show in Toronto this weekend for an unfiltered discussion about women's health. Yahoo Canada spoke to Moore ahead of the event to discuss navigating change, menopause and much more. In February 2025, fans were surprised when Citytv announced it was foregoing plans to create a new hour of Breakfast Television with Moore and Cheryl Hickey at the helm. The decision ended a 20-year relationship between the network and Moore, who had previously served as host of Cityline for 16 years. She addressed the news in a video posted to Instagram that was gracious and measured; it wasn't what you'd expect from someone who had just received career-altering news. Moore said the writing was on the wall when the network decided to cancel Cityline, she just didn't know when that chapter of her career would end.'I had many, many months to wrap my head around a new way of defining myself — and my friends and family did not. The viewers did not...,' she said, adding that the public's reaction to the news was overwhelming. "I was drowning in inertia. It was being bombarded with everyone's reactions. I feel very deeply. I was taking on people's disappointment, people's congratulations, people's anger... I'm wearing it all. I just needed to sit on the couch and let it flow through me. Cry a little bit. Walk a little bit. Do all the things." I realized that there were a lot of people that were invested in my Moore A visit to her parents helped Moore understand the impact of her career; she was a trailblazing figure — the first Black woman to host a daytime talk show in Canada. "I realized that there were a lot of people that were invested in my career. There's aunts, uncles and cousins, and then there's visible minority communities," she said. "There's racialized people that were watching the show because they saw themselves reflected in a daytime show. They saw their people." Her father was the one who suggested she take a trip to get away and "gain some clarity." Moore remembered an invitation she received to Flip Flops and Hot Flashes, a menopause-focused yoga retreat in Costa Rica. She accepted the invitation on one condition: she did not want to have to be "on" for the group. Moore was on a mission to find her centre. She thought she was in need of solitude and peace. She was as the saying in reality TV goes, not here to make friends — even though that's exactly what happened. "I wanted to gaze at beauty — the sky, the trees the water,' she said. 'It turned int this incredibly bonding, beautiful, raw and authentic experience. It was a bonus, over and above anything I was expecting." Menopause and the realities of mid-life are topics Moore embraces discussing with her community of fans and followers. Her own journey with perimenopause began at 47, when she noticed her base temperature rising. "I used to be a cold girlie…I was always cold," she said. "Then all of a sudden I wasn't. It wasn't hot flashes, in general, I was hotter.' ...I thought to myself, 'Hold on, I'm at that age. This could be menopauseTracy Moore Initially, Moore said "there was a little bit of denial" about her symptoms. Although signs of perimenopause vary from person to person, there was one symptom that pushed her to visit her doctor. 'The biggest telltale sign for me was my inability to tamp down irritation," she said. "I'm the calm parent. I'm the patient one…. All of a sudden, I was the one arguing and so I thought to myself, 'Hold on, I'm at that age. This could be menopause.'" Moore began hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for progesterone and estradiol, which she said have helped manage hot flashes and other symptoms. The ability to talk candidly about women's health is something Moore said she had to fight for during her time on Cityline. There was an "unwritten rule" that menopause wasn't meant for daytime television, but a host in perimenopause meant the subject was unavoidable. "It's sort of a new generation and a new vibe," she said. "I think that people were willing to jump in and get into it." The push and pull behind the scenes was something Moore had been living with since she began working in television in 2001. Along the way, Moore said there were many times she had to make compromises and navigate micro-agressions over the way she styled her hair and what stories she wanted to feature. "I had to forgive myself constantly," she said. "I felt the burden of trying to make the show more accessible for more people and not just the Black community, but gay men and non-binary people. Everybody should be able to have a piece of the show and see themselves reflected in some way.... I felt the burden of trying to make the show more accessible for more peopleTracy Moore "Some days I thought to myself that I'm not supposed to be in media, because I think I'm too soft for this industry — and that was the wrong way for me to think. My sensitivity is the reason I was able to operate the way I was and reach the people I was meant to reach." The end of her time at Citytv presented an opportunity for Moore to take inventory of her hopes and goals for the future. She describes it as "divine" timing that she was let go from Citytv the same year she turned 50. In many ways, she's navigating her next steps with more than just her career in mind, it's something deeper. "There is a 'me' that exists outside of — I hate to call it this — but this 'circus' of being in a public-facing role. I have to refine and be 100 per cent sure of what and who I am," she said. "What do I really like? What do I really dislike? What do I actually want to do with my life?" I'm proud of myself, though, for walking myself through thisTracy Moore In addition to re-evaluating what she wants to create, she's also exploring how to participate in content creation without relying on social media for external validation. "I feel like that's always been my journey," she said. "You can't take all of those compliments that people are giving you to heart, because it means you also have to take all of the criticisms and all of the hate and all the vitriol to heart. "It's sometimes been a little bit sad, and it's sometimes been so happy," she said. "I'm proud of myself, though, for walking myself through this."
