
Americans tourists warned of increased threat in summer vacation hotspot
With summer travel approaching, officials are issuing a security alert to Americans who are using dating apps in certain areas of Mexico, warning travelers to use caution due to a rise in kidnappings linked to the apps.
On Monday, the U.S. Embassy and consulates in Mexico shared a security alert after confirming "several reports of U.S. citizens being kidnapped by individuals the victims met on dating apps in recent months."
"You've got to be careful, buyer beware. You've got to assume that something bad could happen to you in this process," Bobby McDonald, a retired supervisory Secret Service agent and a lecturer in criminal justice at the University of New Haven, shared with Fox News Digital about dating app dangers.
"If you choose to use it, be on extra-high alert. Be extra careful of where you're meeting this person or persons. Make sure that it's in a public area. Make sure it's an area where you're going to have cell phone service. Make sure that you're just watching out for yourself, situational awareness. Be careful and let people know where you are," McDonald urged.
McDonald added that these dating apps are the latest ruse criminals are using.
"Apps are the next level of places where criminals are going to be able to act on their nefarious activities. And you've just got to watch out," McDonald said.
"Again, there's not a whole lot we can do with respect to those apps or getting rid of them off the kids' phones or people's phones. People have just got to understand where they are, what they're doing and be ready to react to a bad situation and figure out how to get themselves out of it on the front end," he continued.
The alert was issued for Puerto Vallarta and Nuevo Nayarit areas.
The embassy said that "victims and their family members in the United States have at times been extorted for large sums of money to secure their release."
"Please be aware that this type of violence is not limited to one geographic area," the embassy said.
The embassy added that travelers should use caution when meeting strangers, encouraging meetings in public places and avoiding isolated locations, "such as residences or hotel rooms, where crimes are most likely to occur."
McDonald said that nothing about this alert surprised him.
"This is just kind of the next iteration of what we need to worry about when we're traveling, whether it's with our families, with our students going on spring break, all of those type of things. There just always seems to be a next level of something that we have to watch out about," McDonald said.
Embassy officials did not specifically name which dating apps were involved in the alert.
McDonald recommended that anyone traveling out of the country or even to a new place in the United States "do a little bit of research before you travel" and know what "the surrounding area of where you're staying is like."
"You need make sure that you are cautious of your surroundings. You need to have the phone number of the U.S. Embassy or consulate on your person. You need to make sure that you've made extra copies of your passport," McDonald said. "Not only leaving a copy at home, but having an extra copy with you."
McDonald added that travelers also need to make sure they are communicating with people back home and letting them know where they're going and what they're doing while on vacation on these trips.
"Just give people some information so that if, God forbid, something does happen to you, or you find yourself in a bad situation, there's somebody on the outside or back home that may be able to provide you some assistance," McDonald said.
What makes these situations even more troublesome is that McDonald said that there may be no access to Wi-Fi where travelers are vacationing, especially after being abducted.
"Depending upon your phone plan, there may not be any Wi-Fi in the area that you're taken to off of one of these areas or the resorts. So again, you want to try to minimize your ability to have something happen to you," McDonald reiterated.
While McDonald does not discourage traveling to areas outside the country, he said to just be mindful of your surroundings and over communicate with loved ones.
"Again, enjoy the area. Enjoy what's out there. Many places can be safe as long as you're keeping yourself in a safe area and watching what you're doing, providing information to loved ones and friends, and just making sure that you're enjoying yourself without putting yourself in harm's way," he said.
McDonald said what he has seen in his experience is kidnappings evolving into extortion.
"A lot of the issues are also moving towards extortion, taking pictures of you or having you on the phone, calling your parents or grandparents, asking them to wire money. There's a lot of different scams out there that you can easily find yourself involved with if you're not situationally aware of where you are and what's around," he explained.
The U.S. Consulate General said it is reminding U.S. citizens that in the State Department's travel advisory for Mexico, Jalisco is classified as "Level 3," which means "reconsider travel" due to crime and kidnapping. The agency added that while Jalisco is classified as a higher threat, Nayarit is classified as "Level 2," meaning, "exercise increased caution" due to crime.
Italy, France, Germany, Spain, Switzerland and the United Kingdom are other countries that also currently have Level 2 advisories from the State Department.
The State Department said it reviews travel advisories on a regular basis and would update alerts "any time conditions change substantially."
"The Department of State has no higher priority than the safety and security of U.S. citizens overseas," a State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital.
"We take seriously our commitment to provide U.S. citizens with clear and reliable information about every destination in the world so they can make informed travel decisions. We make this information available to U.S. citizens so they can be aware of their surroundings and take necessary precautions."
Level 1 and 2 advisories are reviewed every 12 months, while Levels 3 and 4 are reviewed at least every six months, the department added.
The department also said that the security alert issued by the embassy is a reminder for "U.S. citizens to use caution when using dating apps."
McDonald said that while he feels travelers don't need to put too much emphasis on the warning levels and the semantics, doing research prior to traveling and reading what the State Department is saying about the area is crucial in decision-making.
"If you're a little bit concerned, and you've done your research on the area, and you're checking out what the State Department is saying, and they say 'exercise increased caution,' that would say to me, 'Hey, maybe you want to postpone your trip to that area,'" McDonald said. "That means that that area is on the radar, things are happening there or the potential for more things to happen there are out there."
McDonald added that there are many safe places for travelers to escape to, and it's just a matter of being prepared.
"We need to be able to choose wisely when we're picking our vacation times, and when there are advisories out there like this, we need to be cognizant of the fact that you don't want to step yourself into an area that might be having increased trouble at the moment," McDonald said.
"It's situational awareness, knowledge of your area, a little bit of homework on the front end, and you can hopefully have a very safe and enjoyable vacation."
Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Historic House v. NCAA settlement gets final approval, allowing schools to pay college athletes
By Ralph D. Russo, Stewart Mandel and Justin Williams A federal judge Friday granted final approval of the House v. NCAA settlement, a watershed agreement in college sports that permits schools to directly pay college athletes for the first time. The settlement, which resolves a trio of antitrust cases against the NCAA and its most powerful conferences, establishes a new 10-year revenue sharing model in college sports, with athletic departments able to distribute roughly $20.5 million in name, image and likeness (NIL) revenue to athletes over the 2025-26 season. Previously, athletes could earn NIL compensation only with outside parties, including school-affiliated donor collectives that have become instrumental in teams' recruiting. Advertisement The NCAA and the power conferences (ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12 and SEC), as defendants in the settlement, also agree to pay nearly $2.8 billion in damages to Division I athletes who were not allowed to sign NIL deals, dating back to 2016. The damages will be paid out over 10 years, with most of the money expected to go to former power-conference football and men's basketball players. Universities can begin directly sharing revenue with college athletes starting July 1. Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, who previously ruled against the NCAA in the O'Bannon and Alston cases, granted approval roughly a year after parties agreed to settlement terms and nearly two months after a final approval hearing on April 7, where Wilken heard testimony from more than a dozen objectors. Lawyers for both the plaintiffs and defendants noted that the number of objections and opt-outs in the settlement represent a tiny fraction of the nearly 400,000 athletes in the certified class. However, some of those objectors delayed approval, largely citing the settlement's new roster limits. These limits, which replace sport-by-sport scholarship limits, cap the maximum roster size per team while allowing for every roster spot to receive a scholarship. Schools can offer scholarship funds — partial or full — as they see fit, which creates more potential opportunities. But as schools preemptively prepared to comply with those new limits, they removed roster spots for thousands of walk-ons, particularly in football, and partial scholarship athletes in non-revenue sports. In late April, Wilken offered an ultimatum, instructing the settlement parties to revise the terms in a way that mitigated any lost roster spots as a result of schools preparing for the new roster limits, or she would deny the whole agreement. Settlement lawyers responded with an amendment that allows for voluntary 'grandfathering' of any athletes who lost roster spots as a result of the roster limits, a status that will follow those athletes through the remainder of their eligibility, whether they return to their original school or transfer elsewhere. Advertisement The initial House v. NCAA case — brought by plaintiffs Grant House, a former Arizona State swimmer, and Sedona Prince, then an Oregon women's basketball player — was filed in June 2020. It challenged NCAA policy at the time that prohibited athletes from being compensated for the commercial use of their NIL rights or from sharing in the revenue generated from NCAA and conference television contracts. The case was later consolidated with two similar suits, Carter v. NCAA and Hubbard v. NCAA. The cases had not gone to trial. The NCAA and Power 5 conferences, fearful a verdict might result in much higher damages, agreed to a settlement in May 2024. Wilken granted preliminary approval in October 2024. The NCAA's traditional amateurism model, in which athletes could not receive any compensation beyond a scholarship, began to crumble in 2014 when Wilken ruled against the NCAA in a suit brought by former UCLA star Ed O'Bannon, who objected to his image being used in an EA Sports video game without his permission. Wilken ruled for the plaintiffs, but after an appeals court struck part of her decision, the only tangible effect was that schools began offering cost-of-attendance stipends. The next major case, Alston v. NCAA, made it to the Supreme Court, where the justices ruled 9-0 against the NCAA. Often mischaracterized as a case about NIL, Alston's main impact was that it allowed schools to provide athletes $5,980 a year in academic expenses. However, the lopsided decision left the NCAA vulnerable to additional legal challenges regarding rules that limited compensation, and it was delivered on June 21, 2021, nine days before numerous state laws allowing NIL payments were set to go into effect. The NCAA quickly scrapped most of its intended restrictions on NIL. In the years since, many athletes have entered into deals with local companies and struck lucrative endorsement deals with national brands like Gatorade and New Balance, as intended. But a far more common practice involves boosters using purported NIL deals to lure recruits or players from the transfer portal to their favorite school. The NCAA's enforcement division initially sought to punish schools that used NIL as a form of 'pay for play' or recruiting inducement, but when the University of Tennessee came under fire in early 2024, the state's attorney general sued, and a judge issued an injunction prohibiting the NCAA from enforcing those rules. Advertisement The amount of money being spent in the NIL arena has skyrocketed since 2021. Last year, Ohio State athletic director Ross Bjork said the Buckeyes football team — which later won the national championship — was earning $20 million in NIL. CBS Sports recently reported that a number of men's basketball rosters have already topped $10 million for next season. To this point, collectives supporting specific schools have ruled the market, but administrators are hoping the House settlement will curtail that influence. In addition to schools being allowed to make NIL deals themselves, the new model also requires all outside NIL deals of more than $600 to go through a clearinghouse that will determine whether the payments are for a valid business purpose and reflect fair market value. Meanwhile, the settlement establishes an enforcement arm that will penalize schools that go over the $20.5 million cap. All of this will be overseen by the newly established regulatory body, called the College Sports Commission, which is in the process of shifting considerable oversight and control of college sports away from the NCAA and to the power conferences. The NCAA's Division I Board of Directors recently approved a series of proposals, pending settlement approval, that will strike 153 rules from the association's handbook and clear the way for the settlement terms to be implemented. The settlement represents a significant shift in college sports, but it will not mark the end of the NCAA's legal challenges. Among numerous ongoing cases, Johnson v. NCAA was filed in 2019 in Pennsylvania and seeks to have athletes classified as employees who are entitled to minimum wage compensation. The NCAA's efforts to dismiss the case have thus far been denied. Revenue sharing and third-party NIL constraints could also invite additional lawsuits on the basis of Title IX, antitrust violations and conflicts with state laws. NCAA and power conference stakeholders continue to pursue antitrust exemptions in the form of Congressional intervention, in hopes of codifying the settlement and its effectiveness moving forward. President Donald Trump has explored a new commission focused on the issues facing college sports, led by former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and billionaire Texas Tech board chair Cody Campbell, though it is paused as members of Congress pursue legislation.


Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Discouraging International Students From Studying in US: Feldblum
Harvard University won a temporary reprieve from President Donald Trump's ban on its international students entering the US, a legal setback for the administration in its high-profile fight with the school. Presidents' Alliance on Higher Ed and Immigration President Miriam Feldblum has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
The Price of Pleasing Diddy: Recapping Week Four - Trial By Jury: Diddy - Podcast on CNN Audio
The Price of Pleasing Diddy: Recapping Week Four Trial By Jury: Diddy 28 mins If Cassie's turn on the stand was shocking, the marathon testimony we heard from the witness known only as "Jane" in week four of the trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs was jaw-dropping. Laura and CNN Entertainment Correspondent Elizabeth Wagmeister break down major moments and walk us through how the prosecution is mounting their racketeering and sex trafficking case, from accusations of drugs in checked luggage, a "love contract," and emotional and graphic text exchanges.