Teenager's school shooting plan 'extremely shocking'
A teenager's plan to carry out a school shooting after killing three members of his family was "extremely shocking, distressing and upsetting", a council leader said.
Nicholas Prosper shot dead his mother Juliana Falcon, 48, his brother Kyle, 16, and 13-year-old sister Giselle at their home in Luton in September.
The 19-year-old intended to carry out an attack at his former primary school - and a loaded shotgun with more than 30 cartridges was found in a bush after his arrest, police said.
Hazel Simmons, the Labour leader of Luton Council, said the authority "does not underestimate the emotional difficulty this news will have on children, staff, parents and carers across our school community".
Bedfordshire Police said it had learned Prosper had planned to commit a shooting at St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, in the town.
He was "apprehended before he could cause any further harm", it added.
Speaking on BBC Breakfast on Tuesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper described it as a "truly appalling, devastating case".
Prosper pleaded guilty to three counts of murder at Luton Crown Court on Monday.
As well as admitting the killings, he pleaded guilty to purchasing or acquiring a shotgun without a certificate, possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life and possessing an article with a blade or point.
He is due to be sentenced on 5 March.
Ms Simmons said: "The revelation that the perpetrator had plans to cause further harm in one of our schools is extremely shocking, distressing and upsetting.
"Our schools have robust systems in place to keep children safe and security is constantly reviewed and monitored."
She said the council had recently asked schools to conduct a security review following a fatal knife attack at a school in Sheffield - but said all of them would be asked to conduct a further review.
"We know this case will be unsettling for parents which is why the council is working with schools to put support in place in our schools to anyone who needs it," she added.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said action needed to be taken "on this growing obsession of violence among some of our teenagers".
She said an inquiry into the Southport knife attacks and measures being investigated by the UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall KC, would "look more widely at some the issues" and responses involving policing, children's and mental health services, the internet and early intervention.
She said the government was publishing legislation about Youth Diversion Orders, "which are about being able to take action early where young people seem to be being radicalised or being engaged in terrorism, to be able to take stronger measures".
Maureen Murphy, the headteacher of St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, said it was "devastated to learn of the tragic death of our former students Kyle and Giselle and their mother Julianna".
"We were very shocked to learn that St Joseph's was an intended target in this incident," she added.
"However we would like to reassure our parents and carers that there is no threat to the school."
She said there were robust systems in place to keep children safe which includes "having clear procedures in place such as lockdown and safety processes which are regularly practised at the school".
"We are proud to be a multi-cultural Catholic community where the safety of children will always be our number one priority and this will never be compromised," she added.
A range of support had been put in place for "any parent or pupil who needs it at this time."
Officers were called to the family flat in Leabank, off Wauluds Bank Drive, at about 05:30 BST on 13 September after a concerned neighbour said they heard a disturbance.
An inquest at Bedford Coroner's Court in October was told that all three of the victims died from gunshot wounds to the head.
Speaking previously Det Supt Rob Hall, from the region's major crime unit, said officers who arrived at the scene were "met with such awful circumstances".
Prosper was arrested shortly after and the firearm was found in the bushes during a search of the surrounding area.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Man who killed family also planned school shooting
Man in court accused of murdering mum and siblings
Triple murder suspect is son and brother of victims
Man, 18, charged with triple murder over Luton tower block deaths
The Luton teenager who planned a school shooting
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Luton Borough Council
Bedfordshire Police
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rough sleeping to be decriminalised in England and Wales
Rough sleeping will be decriminalised next year under government plans to scrap a 200-year-old law. Ministers are planning to scrap the Vagrancy Act, which outlaws rough sleeping in England and Wales. The law was introduced in 1824 to deal with rising homelessness, but Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has called it "cruel and outdated". The government's plan includes new legislation which will target crimes such as organised begging by gangs and trespassing, a statement said. Rayner, who is also housing secretary, said Labour was "drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society". "No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again," she said. The number of prosecutions and convictions under the 1824 act has declined over the past decade. According to government statistics, there were a total of 79 prosecutions and 59 convictions for offences related to rough sleeping in 2023 - down from a peak of 1,050 and 810 respectively in 2011. Repealing the Vagrancy Act was first announced in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. It had wanted to pass alternative legislation first, but this did not happen before the general election was called last year. The party's Criminal Justice Bill would have allowed police to move on "nuisance" rough sleepers and fine them if they did not comply. The Labour government said it plans to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that will "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe". These measures, which will be introduced through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, will include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime. Homeless charities have long called for the Vagrancy Act to be scrapped. Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: "This is a landmark moment that will change lives and prevent thousands of people from being pushed into the shadows, away from safety." He praised the government for having "shown such principled leadership in scrapping this pernicious Act". He said: "We hope this signals a completely different approach to helping people forced onto the streets and clears the way for a positive agenda that is about supporting people who desperately want to move on in life and fulfil their potential." People living on London's streets rises by 26% Pressure grows over rough sleeping clampdown
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The UK is about to pass Europe's most extreme abortion law
Britain may soon have one of the most extreme abortion regimes in the world. Next week, the Commons will vote on amendments, proposed by Labour MPs Stella Creasy and Tonia Antoniazzi, to the Crime and Policing Bill that seek to decriminalise abortion up to the moment of birth. In Britain, abortion is currently legal until 24 weeks of pregnancy. But for the pro-abortion lobby this isn't enough. A YouGov survey revealed that 70 per cent of MPs think women should not be liable for prison sentences if they have abortions outside current restrictions. Yet this is wildly out of step with public opinion. Just 1 per cent of British people support abortion up to birth. How is such a wildly unpopular opinion on the verge of becoming law? Let's rewind to 2020. The UK was in lockdown. Face-to-face appointments for abortions were suspended. Women were allowed to access over-the-phone appointments with clinicians and have abortion pills sent to them by post. These pills can only be used legally until 10 weeks' gestation. But without an in-person appointment, there is no way of knowing how far along a pregnancy has progressed. And there is no way of preventing women who are well past 10 weeks – and even past the 24-week limit – from claiming, or being coerced into claiming, that they are less than 10 weeks pregnant. Due to the risks, this arrangement was intended to be temporary. But in 2022, pro-abortion MPs hijacked an unrelated Bill to make pills-by-post permanent. Many people – including me – warned that this would lead to an increase in illegal abortions, dangerous late-stage terminations, coercion and undetected abuse. And we were right. In June 2023, Carla Foster was found guilty of aborting her baby eight months into pregnancy. She was given abortion pills after claiming she was only seven weeks pregnant. In December 2024, Stuart Worby was jailed after spiking a woman's drink with fraudulently-obtained abortion pills and ending the life of her unborn child. In just 18 months after pills-by-post was introduced, some estimates suggest that more than 10,000 women had to receive hospital treatment after taking abortion pills at home. These cases only exist because of pills-by-post, a scheme for which abortion providers enthusiastically campaigned. Before 2022, there were just three prosecutions for illegal abortions in 160 years. Yet instead of arguing for a return to face-to-face appointments, the abortion lobby is now capitalising on these prosecutions to convince MPs that women are being wrongly criminalised. The consequences of full decriminalisation will be grim, with inevitable increases in coercion and medical complications. The experience of Victoria, Australia suggests we will see more babies born alive after failed 'DIY' late-term abortions, and a rise in sex-selective abortions. Abortion is a sensitive issue and there is no public consensus on what the legal time limit should be. But in a society where human rights are respected and the vulnerable protected, it is unthinkable that there should be no consequences for ending the life of an unborn, fully-formed human child. Just moments after birth, such an action would incur life in prison. MPs must not allow the unpopular obsession of a handful of activists to change the law. Stand up to the extremists – the public are behind you. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Council 'inadequacies' found in handling of leader complaint
There were "inadequacies" in the way City of Edinburgh Council handled a complaint made against former leader Cammy Day, an independent investigation has concluded. Councillor Day became leader of the council in 2022 but stepped down in December 2024 after allegations he had sent inappropriate messages to Ukrainian refugees. In April, a police investigation concluded that there was "no evidence of criminality." An independent review found that the complaint was handled well but found "inadequacies" in the way a previous complaint was dealt with. Edinburgh council tasked the former Information Commissioner Kevin Dunion with reviewing how complaints made against Day were handled. His newly-published report found no evidence of a potential complaint made in 2006 - before Day was a councillor. But he concluded there were inadequacies with the way the then-council leader, Adam Nols-McVey, handled a complaint in 2018 when Day was the deputy leader of the council. The seriousness of an allegation that a "senior Labour councillor" had "groomed" a 15-year-old boy meant Nols-McVey should have shared it with other senior officials, the report said. Emails relating to the complaint were lost, with police later advising the fact the complaint was anonymous meant it couldn't be taken any further. Mr Dunion said the loss of related emails was an "unintended and unexpected consequence" of the information not being shared. More broadly, the report says the council still lacks sufficient safeguards to prevent this type alleged behaviour in future. 'No criminality' in Edinburgh council boss sex message probe Sex message complaint about council boss last year Labour council leader quits over alleged messages The report concluded that recent complaints about Councillor Day's alleged behaviour towards Ukrainian refugees in 2023 were handled properly and in line with the council's policies. He said, overall, complaints were for the most part handled properly and that the policies and procedures in place are broadly effective. Councillor Day denies all the claims that have been made against him, telling a newspaper he is the victim of a co-ordinated political attack. In April, Police Scotland said that no criminality had been established during its investigation into Cammy Day that focused on the 2023 allegations. Councillor Adam Nols-McVey said the report acknowledges that the 2018 complaint was dealt with in a "sensitive manner prioritising the protection of the complainant while raising it with the police, senior council officers and, most importantly, giving the individual concerned advice and directing them to support available". He added "unless alleged victims choose to make an official complaint and go through the process, there are restrictions on what action authorities can take". It raised concerns about "egregious" leaking of information for political motives and alcohol-fuelled behaviour at social functions in the City Chambers. Councillors will consider the report next Thursday.
