So, What Did I Miss?
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here.
'How much can possibly happen when I'm on parental leave?' I said five months ago, on January 10, 2025. 'I understand that Donald Trump will be the next president, and yes, he said he'd be a dictator 'on day one,' but our institutions have been 250 years in the making. Surely something that took 250 years to build would not run entirely on the honor system! I will be able to spend a few months keeping a baby alive, and when I get back, I will be able to walk to work without bumping into the president's birthday tank parade. If he tries to put an anti-vaccine crank in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services, a monstrous buffoon who thinks that it is acceptable for some children to die from measles, a disease we had eradicated until about eight minutes ago, Congress will surely stop him.
There won't be goons in face coverings yanking graduate students off the street and into unmarked vans after they write op-eds with which Marco Rubio disagrees. If Elon Musk, the world's richest man, expresses the desire to fire every federal employee for no reason, so that cancer research grinds to a halt, and foreign aid grinds to a halt, and the lifesaving medications that we have already stockpiled are instead just wantonly destroyed, someone will say, 'No, thanks! Do not do that!' Or, if this does happen, the team doing it won't include an individual nicknamed Big Balls.' (When I got that specific, I should perhaps have said to myself, Doesn't that sound exactly like something that would happen? But you know what they say about predicting what will happen: much harder since all the NOAA cuts!)
'Surely they won't close down FEMA on the grounds that we won't need it after the hurricane season is over. The National Guard won't be deployed to the streets of California against the wishes of its governor, to stop people from assembling to object to the goons in face coverings loading their neighbors into unmarked vans. Maybe the president will personally take over the Kennedy Center so he can bring back the musical Cats, but if so, that will consume the majority of his time, and he will not also try to ram through Congress a bill that will prevent judges from enforcing their rulings against him, push millions of people off Medicaid, and increase the deficit, just for fun! Also, if I want to work at a place that is excited to publish a wide range of opinions about things that aren't free speech and free markets, that won't involve getting a different job at a different publication owned by a different billionaire!' (Hi!)
Well, there is egg on my face. Which is still very expensive to have!
I have pulled a rare reverse Rip van Winkle. Rip took a brief, well-deserved nap and woke up decades later to discover that his country no longer had a king. I did the opposite of that. Anyway, I am scared to nap now. Which is bad because I very much need to nap. I have a five-month-old.
Five months is no time at all, if you are trying to grow something. As of this writing, my baby is still functionally helpless. You cannot even leave him on a flat surface, something you can safely do with plants or rocks. You have to put him in a special chair, or he will slowly tip over, like an ill-constructed cake.
He can do nothing for himself. He is still getting the hang of rolling over. Instead, he just lies there and yells at you for putting him in that position. Other than that, he smiles all the time, the confused but accommodating smile of someone who has not quite heard your last remark but knows it would kill the conversation if he were to ask you to repeat it. He has no idea what is going on. Lucky him.
Of course, none of this is news to anyone who has ever seen a baby, but it is a small miracle nonetheless. It is a wonder to me that everyone you see on the sidewalk underwent this process—was gently encouraged to roll over, had faces made at them and bubbles blown on their bellies until they laughed, was put in a hat and taken to the park.
I am not putting him in a hat and taking him to the park. I am walking to my new job. They are getting the city ready for the tank parade. Donald Trump is the president, and he has bought himself a tank parade with the money we saved by getting rid of all the people who know how to stop fires in the national parks. A decision I am sure will be worth it! National parks don't last, but a tank parade is something you will always have.
Every night, my son wakes up and cries. I get up and hold him until he stops. While I rock him, I stare into my phone, where they store the horrors. It has been three months since March 15, when our government shipped 238 men to a Gulag in El Salvador without due process. I sit there in the dark with his tiny fingers wrapped around my thumb and think about their mothers. I see now what my mistake was. Five months is no time at all to make something. But to destroy something—a minute is enough.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Israel and Iran trade strikes; Tehran energy facilities hit
Israel and Iran exchanged strikes into the early hours of Sunday. Iranian state media reported Israeli strikes on energy facilities, including the Shahran oil depot and natural gas installations. In Israel, missiles and projectiles launched from Iran killed at least seven people, according to Israeli authorities. The barrages — which represent the most sustained, direct attacks between the adversaries — have derailed nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran, with Iran accusing the United States of being complicit in Israel's attacks. In a social media statement, President Donald Trump said the U.S. 'had nothing to do with the attack on Iran, tonight.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously denied U.S. involvement in Israel's initial airstrikes against Iranian nuclear and military facilities. BAT YAM, Israel — A strike here Sunday killed at least four people and injured dozens more, according to the city's mayor and Magen David Adom, Israel's emergency services. Two women, a boy and a girl were among the dead, MDA said in a statement. At least 99 people were injured in the attack, it said, with four in serious condition. Despite the fighting between Israel and Iran, the United States remains committed to negotiations and hopes Iran 'will come to the table soon,' said one senior U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations. That sentiment was echoed in a White House statement calling on Iran to give up its nuclear weapons program.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A scrambled G7 agenda as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the Israel-Iran conflict
The return on Donald Trump to the G7 was always going to be unpredictable. That it is happening against the backdrop of an escalating conflict in the Middle East makes it even more so. Expectations had already been low, with the Canadian hosts cautioning against the normal joint communique at the end of the summit, mindful that this group of leaders would struggle to find consensus. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney carefully laid down an agenda that was uncontroversial in a bid to avoid any blow-ups between President Trump and allies, who of late have been divided like never before - be it over tariffs and trade, Russia and Ukraine, or, more recently Israel's conduct in Gaza. But discussions around critical minerals and global supply chains will undoubtedly drop down the agenda as leaders convene at a precarious moment. Keir Starmer, on his way over to Canada for a bi-lateral meeting in Ottawa with PM Carney before travelling onto the G7 summit in Kananaskis, underscored the gravity of the situation as he again spoke of de-escalation, while also confirmed that the UK was deploying more British fighter jets to the region amid threats from Tehran that it will attack UK bases if London helps defend Israel against airstrikes. Really this is a G7 agenda scrambled as world leaders scramble to de-escalate the worst fighting between Tel Aviv and Tehran in decades. President Trump has for months been urging Israel not to strike Iran as he worked towards a diplomatic deal to halt uranium enrichment. Further talks had been due on Sunday - but are now not expected to go ahead. All eyes will be on Trump in the coming days, to see if the US - Israel's closest ally - will call on Israel to rein in its assault. The US has so far not participated in any joint attacks with Tel Aviv, but is moving warships and other military assets to the Middle East. Sir Keir, who has managed to strike the first trade deal with Trump, will want to leverage his "good relationship" with the US leader at the G7 to press for de-escalation in the Middle East, while he also hopes to use the summit to further discuss the further the interests of Ukraine with Trump and raise again the prospects of Russian sanctions. "We've got President Zelenskyy coming so that provides a good opportunity for us to discuss again as a group," the PM told me on the flight over to Canada. "My long-standing view is, we need to get Russia to the table for an unconditional ceasefire. That's not been really straightforward. But we do need to be clear about what we need to get to the table and that if that doesn't happen, sanctions will undoubtedly be part of the discussion at the G7." But that the leaders are not planning for a joint communique - a document outlining what the leaders have agreed - tells you a lot. When they last gathered with Trump in Canada for the G7 back in 2018, the US president rather spectacularly fell out with Justin Trudeau when the former Canadian president threatened to retaliate against US tariffs and refused to sign the G7 agreement. Since then, Trump has spoken of his desire to turn Canada into the 51st state of the US, a suggestion that helped catapult the Liberal Party beyond their Conservative rivals and back into power in the recent Canadian elections, as Mark Carney stood on a ticket of confronting Trump's aggression. With so much disagreement between the US and allies, it is hard to see where progress might be made over the next couple of days. But what these leaders will agree on is the need to take down the temperature in the Middle East and for all the unpredictability around these relationships, what is certain is a sense of urgency around Iran and Israel that could find these increasingly disparate allies on common ground.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘gold card' visa scheme is pure gilded nonsense
President Donald Trump announced, back on February 25, that his administration would soon debut a 'gold card,' an immigration program that would allow wealthy foreigners, for the low, low price of $5 million, to become lawful permanent residents of the United States. At the time, Trump touted the program as a 'great' and 'fantastic' revenue generation strategy that would help reduce the national deficit, which approached $2 trillion during the most recent fiscal year. Shopify just killed UX design 'No Kings Day' map, speakers, cities: Everything to know about today's protests Ram Trucks fires up a near-perfect brand apology ad 'Wealthy people will be coming into our country by buying this card, they'll be wealthy and they'll be successful, and they'll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people,' Trump said. He told reporters that gold card buyers would not be required to pay tax on their income outside the United States; that the program was 'totally legal' and 'all worked out from the legal standpoint'—and that he expected it to go live within two weeks. 'Two weeks,' confirmed Department of Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, standing behind Trump in the Oval Office. When Trump estimated that the government could raise an easy $5 trillion by selling 'maybe a million' gold cards, Lutnick was unable to suppress a chuckle of delight. 'Wow!' he said. Today, though, anyone hoping to relocate to a budding police state where riot cops might shoot you point-blank for looking at them is still waiting for the chance to cut a check. In mid-March, Lutnick said during a podcast interview that gold cards would be available in 'about two weeks,' and claimed he'd presold 1,000 already. (I assume these sales, to the extent they exist, are handshake deals, since the alternative would involve the Secretary of Commerce personally collecting $5 billion and stashing it God knows where.) On April 3, Trump showed reporters a physical gold card bearing his scowling face and seismogram signature, and (again) said it would be out in 'less than two weeks.' But the delays kept coming. On April 11, Lutnick announced that gold cards would be available 'within a week and a half.' On May 21, he moved the goalposts even further, revealing that a website where 'people can start to register' for gold cards would be online in 'about a week.' On Thursday—three weeks after that update, for those keeping score— at last went live. Trump celebrated the launch on Truth Social as a way to 'ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere.' On Fox Business, Lutnick claimed to have logged 25,000 sign-ups in 15 hours. But he also acknowledged that these are waiting list spots, and that the administration is still 'getting everything set up.' The website itself most closely resembles an especially lazy phishing attempt; its only content is a contact submission form assuring prospective buyers that the gold card is 'coming,' and urging them to provide their email addresses to 'get notified the moment access opens.' The White House's struggles to get this initiative off the ground demonstrate just how unprepared Trump is for the basic work of governing, on the rare occasions that he expresses any interest in engaging in it. A key part of his pitch to voters has always been that, as an outsider to politics, only he has the Business Guy Mindset necessary to transform the federal government from a bureaucratic morass into a slickly branded, profitable enterprise. But fulfilling his more ambitious promises is always harder than he expects. As a result, an idea that Trump once suggested would single-handedly wipe out this country's $36 trillion national debt is, four months later, still taking the form of a bare-bones website that looks like it is soliciting interest in a new over-the-counter erectile dysfunction medication. At the announcement earlier this year, Trump explained that gold cards would replace the existing EB-5 visa program, which allows immigrants to obtain green cards if they invest at least $800,000 (and usually more) in a new business, and create at least 10 full-time jobs in the United States. In a Cabinet meeting, Lutnick clarified that the gold card program would technically 'modify' the EB-5 visa program, allowing buyers to obtain a 'license' from the Department of Commerce that would entitle them to make a 'proper' EB-5 investment. In response to a question from reporters, Trump asserted that the program does not require legislation because it allows buyers to obtain lawful permanent resident status and a 'very strong path to citizenship,' but does not directly confer U.S. citizenship. In news I am sure will astonish you, Trump and his handlers do not appear to have a firm grasp on the legal intricacies here. Congress, not the president, has the authority to create, modify, or end visa programs like EB-5. Federal law limits EB-5 visas to around 10,000 per year, which is of course nowhere near the million units Trump and Lutnick imagine selling in short order. The amount of the required capital investment, too, is set by statute, and nothing in the law would allow Trump to increase it to $5 million just because he feels like it. His distinction between programs that confer citizenship and programs that only confer lawful permanent resident status is nonsensical, as is Lutnick's reference to a 'license' from the Department of Commerce. Depending on what he has in mind, Trump's promise that gold card holders will enjoy some form of VIP treatment—'green card privileges plus,' he called it—probably also hinges on Congress's willingness and ability to pass a law to that effect. Absent congressional action, Trump's best bet for making this work might involve using his statutory authority to allow gold card buyers to enter the United States on the grounds that doing so entails a 'significant public benefit,' since a willingness to fork over $5 million to the Treasury Department arguably qualifies as such. But this status—the product of a legal process known as parole—is typically temporary, and is not even considered a form of 'admission' to the United States. It also would not make gold card buyers lawful permanent residents or give them a path to citizenship, which are things that people who pay that much would reasonably expect to get in return. Given that the Trump administration has spent the last several months gleefully repudiating the very concept of parole, I understand not wanting to pay seven figures for the right to be in the country for as long as Stephen Miller feels like allowing it. The lingering uncertainty around the program's specifics has resulted in a gold card market that is likely cooler than Trump might have imagined. Earlier this month, NPR interviewed several immigration attorneys who said they'd fielded inquiries from wealthy foreigners who are eager to pay up—which is, to be fair, exactly what I would say if I were an immigration lawyer contacted by a national publication for comment about a program aimed at potential clients who have at least $5 million in cash. Other experts, though, told NPR they anticipate sales in the low thousands; one explained that callers often lose interest once they find out that the $5 million is not an EB-5-style investment that they might recoup, but a de facto donation to the U.S. government. (As London School of Economics professor Kristin Surak points out, if you're a rich person looking to pick up another passport, why pay $5 million for a glorified green card when you can buy Maltese citizenship, and thus the right to live anywhere in the European Union, for about a fifth of the cost?) Nuri Katz, a Canada-based immigration consultant, told Bloomberg that he would expect a grand total of '50 to 200' applicants for Trump gold cards; more recently, in Forbes, he hypothesized that the White House is 'backpedaling' on the proposal because it realized it would 'have to expend a lot of political capital in order to get this done.' Perhaps there was a time when more than a handful of people might have been interested in ponying up for 'green card privileges plus,' whatever that may entail. But regardless of the legal form that Trump gold cards eventually take, the basic challenge of selling them will be that that they are branded with the face of an unabashed xenophobe whose administration is waging a global trade war, trying to bar foreign-born students and academics from entering the country, torpedoing international educational exchange programs, attempting to end birthright citizenship, and snatching noncitizens (and sometimes citizens) off the streets. Chances are that if you are privileged enough to be able to pay $5 million for the right to live in the United States, you are wise enough to decide that that money is better spent on something else. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data