Real Housewives star urges fans to buy Amazon heels that ‘look rich' & a great dupe for Louboutins costing £635 more
A POPULAR Real Housewives star has fans running to get a pair of Amazon heels.
Bethany Frankel, who was a fan favourite when she appeared on the Real Housewives of New York, has now become a social media star sharing her top buys.
3
And her most recent find has left fans rushing to Amazon.
Taking to TikTok, Bethany revealed she found the perfect pair of heels for summer and they look a lot like Louboutin's Me Dolly sandals.
She said: "Amazon shoe announcement. I want to gatekeep."
While the reality star wanted to keep the buy to herself, she decided to share it with her followers.
The peep toe shoes come with a super high, sleek heel and are from the brand TNYNFBEB.
The top leather has a smooth, low-cut style to elongate the legs and adds a retro touch.
The shoes come in multiple colours and the price starts at just £55.30.
Bethany added: "They're comfortable. They look rich. They're just it. These are Amazon shoes.
"You're not welcome because I don't want you to have them because my whole team copies everything I do and it's irritating, but I can't keep it from you.
"I'm going back on now and buying every color so you can't have them all. You can only get the ones you get. I get first dibs."
Primark drops 'stunning' £20 flower heels that are perfect for summer and dupe for £895 celeb-loved designer buy
The shoe looks super similar to Louboutin's Me Dolly heels which come in a patent calf leather and cost an eye-watering £690.
The dupe Bethany found from Amazon were a fraction of the price and could save you £635.
Fans of Bethany's were quick to thank her for sharing the designer dupe in the comments.
One person wrote: "Yes Beth, the actual Lord's work."
Why you should always buy a dupe over designer...
Fashion Editor Clemmie Fieldsend says it's time fashion snobs stopped looking down their noses at affordable versions of designer buys.
Bargain US supermarket Walmart became a social media sensation when its £60 dupe of Hermès' Birkin bag, dubbed the Wirkin, went viral.
Influencer @styledbykristi gushed: "Eighty dollars (£60), you can pretend that you got a Birkin. I mean, everyone will probably know it's not, because who the hell has the money to spend on the real Birkin? Not me.'
Me neither. And why bother? I would never spend that on a designer bag (although if someone wants to buy one for me, that's a different story).
Plus, if I splashed that much, I'd feel I was being ripped off...
We've all been told how the leading brands use the finest leather, thread, dyes and craftsmanship in the world.
But all that is inflated by fashion houses to create the desired illusion of exclusivity.
Just last year, Dior came under investigation for paying £44 to assemble a bag that sells for £2,000.
So while you might think you are paying for top-level craftsmanship carried out by a true artisan, chances are the poorly paid workers are not seeing any of your hard-earned cash.
Dupes — not to be mistaken for knock-offs that copy everything from the logo to the inside label — are a more practical and all-round sensible way to go.
I bought my first when I was 18. It lasted me four years and only broke after I wore it in the shower.
And these days, British high streets have plenty of dupes. In the past three years, Marks & Spencer, H&M and Mango have all seen huge spikes in sales thanks to their canny copies. They use the same viral, must-have marketing tactics that pricey brands have.
Fashion folk will tell you that you are making an investment and buying a 'heritage piece' and will turn their noses up at a high street equivalent. But we've been wearing looks inspired by catwalk designers for decades.
If we can buy a bag that's the spitting image of the pricier version, but doesn't mean you have to remortgage, why not?
Another commented: 'Thanks Bethany for sharing."
"I LOVE them! Gorg!" penned a third.
Meanwhile a fourth said: "I need them."
"I literally want them in EVERY color!! Ordered the light green and I can't wait,' claimed a fifth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Here is the real reason River City is being axed by BBC bosses
The letter's subject was BBC Scotland cancelling River City, an act I had previously described as cultural vandalism. My correspondent had a cooler disposition and a better way with words. Summing up how the soap had been brought low in recent years, she wrote: 'Its viewing figures were adversely affected by stop/start production runs, erratic scheduling and a general lack of promotion.' Spot on. And then came this: 'I began watching River City out of loyalty to my city, but came to the view that it makes an important contribution to the culture of central Scotland.' BBC Scotland HQ at Pacific Quay Watching out of loyalty to my city. How wonderful, how generous, how Scottish is that? Of the thousands of words written and spoken about River City, all the BBC statements, the petition to save the show, the debate in the Scottish Parliament, not one sentence hits home as hard as that contribution. Watching out of loyalty to my city. There writes someone who 'gets' what River City means, and why it is not just another programme that can be binned by BBC Scotland because its face no longer fits. But what do you know, no one is listening. Not to my correspondent, not to those who have signed the petition, not to MSPs, or ministers. It seems the main arguments in favour of keeping River City - that it provides jobs and training for working-class Scots who might otherwise never get a start in TV, as well as being a pretty decent drama beloved by its audience - are not enough for BBC Scotland to change its mind. We know this because the executive who made the decision appeared before Holyrood's culture committee at the end of May and said so. Hayley Valentine, director of BBC Scotland, told MSPs that River City, with its 200,000 viewers in Scotland compared to Shetland's 700,000 'did not pass the value for money test'. But the money saved by axing River City would help to fund three new short-run dramas, she confirmed. Though these will 'absolutely cost more to make', the BBC would 'expect' them to deliver much bigger audiences than River City and 'really hope' they will. Expectations and hope. In other words, BBC Scotland is taking a punt. Making all those people redundant on a gamble. Having said that axing River City was a creative decision, it really does come down to money. As for River City being a way into TV, Ms Valentine said opportunities would still be offered across a wide range of other programmes. So that's okay then. Nothing more to see here, folks. Except it is not okay. It is very far from okay. Cancelling River City has always been about more than the end of one programme. It's about BBC Scotland fighting Scotland's corner within the corporation, and making sure the BBC represents and is reflective of all those who pay for it. Read more On the former, was London asked for more money to fund the short-run dramas? Was there ever a chance of building on the UK-wide iPlayer audience for River City by running a promotion campaign? Where are the figures showing potential job and training opportunities lost versus those created? Was there any analysis or was this simply a case of executives thinking they knew best? I understand BBC Scotland's ambition. It wants another Baby Reindeer. It wants the next Adolescence. But it doesn't have the money of a Netflix or an Apple+, which makes it all the more important to ensure that it is making decisions for the right reasons. When it comes to River City, I'm not sure it is. Just as to govern is to choose, running the BBC is all about choice. Who is out and who is in, who gets the money and who doesn't. BBC Scotland decided, ultimately, that River City was expendable. It has made the arguments about viewing figures and opportunities offered elsewhere, but I think there is another factor at work here. For my money - £174.50 licence fee - River City was vulnerable because it was a Scottish working-class soap made by working-class casts and crews. No one thought there would be the backlash there has been. It wasn't like cancelling Question Time with its well-connected panellists and audiences (now there's an idea). The class ceiling exists in the media in general - heck, in society as a whole. It's not just BBC Scotland. Indeed, BBC Scotland has done more than most to widen access and should be commended for it. Now and then, a youngster will appear who doesn't sound like your typical BBC sort. They thrive on the attention and encouragement, but then at some point they hit that class ceiling. They don't get invited into the room where it happens, so they can't shape the corporation's future, and the story of inequality rumbles on. Representation matters. As the old saying goes, if you can see it, you can be it. For many working-class Scots, River City was 'their' soap, and therefore 'their' way into TV. Doors opened that had too often been closed, and if it could happen for the guy down the road, it could happen for you. You cannot put a price on that kind of positive PR. The same goes for viewer loyalty. Fans of River City have had their patience tested to a degree that would not have happened with any other show. Yet they've kept faith with the programme. Even now, they trust executives will repay that faith and cancel the cancellation, but will they? Back to you, BBC Scotland. Alison Rowat is a senior politics and features writer on The Herald. Contact
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Jessie J announces shock breast cancer diagnosis: 'Your girl needs a hug'
Jessie J left her fans shocked and heartbroken Tuesday by announcing that she has been diagnosed with breast cancer. The 37-year-old English songstress emphasized that the illness had been caught 'early,' saying: 'Cancer sucks in any form but I'm holding onto the word early.' In an Instagram video, she revealed that she discovered she was ill before the release of her hit new single No Secrets, which dropped on April 25. No Secrets was Jessie's comeback song after a roughly four-year hiatus, during which she welcomed her son Sky, two, with basketball star Chanan Colman. 'I have been in and out of tests throughout this whole period,' she explained, adding that she had not been adequately 'processing it 'cause I'm working so hard.' Although she was conflicted about going public with the news, she ultimately decided to do so because she is a 'sharer' and wanted to disclose the development to 'my fans and the people that care about me,' she explained. As she battles breast cancer, Jessie has continued to energetically promote No Secrets, the lead single for her upcoming sixth studio album. Last month she soldiered through an appearance at the BAFTA Television Awards in London, making her grand return to the stage to sing The Award Goes To.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
From the archive: Alan Yentob: the last impresario
We are raiding the Guardian long read archives to bring you some classic pieces from years past, with new introductions from the authors. This week, from 2016: For decades, Alan Yentob was the dominant creative force at the BBC – behind everything from Adam Curtis to Strictly Come Dancing. He was a towering figure in British culture – so why did many applaud his very public slide from power? Written and read by Sam Knight
